|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
As a result, the Rays won’t be able to sign anyone next year for more than $250,000 and probably won’t make any major international splashes until July 2 either because of the tax. Going well beyond the bonus pool is a curious move, but the Rays did pull in a considerable amount of talent, including arguably the two best 16-year-old pitchers on the market. Given that their 90-win season last year will give them one of the lower bonus pools for the 2013-14 signing period, which many scouts believe is shaping up to be a down year for international talent, perhaps it will be a worthwhile gambit.
This is interesting, I had no idea the Rays had been blowing past the international spending cap like this. I believe a primate recently asked why a team wouldn’t spend excessively one year on international free agents to load up on top-end talent and then accept that the next year they would be very limited in what they could do. The Rays haven’t gone massively over budget but it appears they are making use of that suggested strategy.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Kiko Sakata for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Mariners sending Jesus Montero to Triple-A (47 - 4:27pm, May 23)Last: Harveys WallbangersNewsblog: ESPN: Forging bond with Pete Rose has helped fuel Joey Votto's desire to be great (102 - 4:24pm, May 23)Last:  MontyNewsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (4214 - 4:24pm, May 23)Last:  Bitter Mouse is a genre addictNewsblog: FanGraphs: Cameron: The 2013 Cubs: Better Than We Think (6 - 4:18pm, May 23)Last: DA Baracus is gritty and hits with RISPNewsblog: Don Mattingly rips into players and makeup of Dodgers (30 - 4:16pm, May 23)Last: SoSH U at workNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for MAY 23, 2013 (40 - 4:03pm, May 23)Last: Mike EmeighNewsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 5-23-2013 (9 - 4:02pm, May 23)Last: Crispix Attacks 2: Swag AirlinesNewsblog: Yanks, Manchester City awarded MLS expansion team (34 - 4:02pm, May 23)Last: ZachNewsblog: USA Today: This college baseball team is the best at postgame interviews (5 - 3:53pm, May 23)Last: villageidiomNewsblog: Leyland breaks his own rule, lets Verlander get win after delay (21 - 3:50pm, May 23)Last: zenbitzNewsblog: Demystifying Red Sox Ownership - What Do They Do? (WEEI) (21 - 3:50pm, May 23)Last: villageidiomNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (1108 - 3:44pm, May 23)Last:  Shooty is in the Trust TreeNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (1206 - 3:37pm, May 23)Last:  Der_KNewsblog: Astros vendor brings snow cones into bathroom stall, gets fired (14 - 3:24pm, May 23)Last: Don Geovany Soto (chris h.)Newsblog: Mets’ Ike Davis On Struggles: ‘I Can’t Do Any Worse’ (8 - 2:51pm, May 23)Last: thetailor
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John Northey Posted: February 12, 2013 at 11:40 AM (#4367733)I did, for one.
For what it's worth, Tampa hasn't gone _that_ nuts with spending. If we accept BA's pre-signing period rankings as gospel, they landed the #3, #6, and #14 guys (of the top 20). That's impressive, but they haven't exactly tried to buy up the market (which would be expensive from both a supply v. demand aspect, as well as the tax). Their share of top players will be less than what we've recently seen with Toronto, Texas, and Seattle (to name three) in the pre-pool era. Also, the timing is notable - this year, all teams had the same pool, that's changing to one that varies by success (which would hurt Tampa with the top dudes). Even with the penalty, they'd still be able to sign all the other guys they've tabbed since July (bonus < 250K), so it's not going to cripple their Caribbean operations or anything.
I think this is a better strategy with the int'l market than with the domestic draft - where I think I'd try to stick within the league's parameters (after you account for the buffer).
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main