Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, February 21, 2018

Baseball’s Economics Aren’t As Skewed As They Seem - The Ringer

Don’t have time to read right now but it looks interesting.

What Explains Labor’s Declining Share of Revenue in Major League Baseball? by J.C. Bradbury.

Jim Furtado Posted: February 21, 2018 at 03:21 PM | 7 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: cba, economics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: February 21, 2018 at 06:39 PM (#5628344)
Seems like the revenue split is close to 50:50, and has been since at least 2010.
   2. -- Posted: February 21, 2018 at 07:52 PM (#5628364)
Don't care how much the actors get in feature films, don't care how much the players get in baseball.

Why on Earth would I?
   3. McCoy Posted: February 21, 2018 at 08:56 PM (#5628390)
What's that? The pay issue wasn't a big deal? No way.
   4. ptodd Posted: February 21, 2018 at 10:19 PM (#5628426)
First of all, benefits account for 10% of all MLBPA salaries . So 40% based on Cotts is 44% with benefits. Not 50%.

Second, the revenue figures used by MLB are 10% lower than revenue from other sources. MLB obviously deducting revenue from the calculations. Whether thats legitimate or not remains to be seen since we don't see the breakdown

Third, the 50% number is a red herring. Nobody has agreed to it. In the economy as a whole at the turn of the century labor has got 60%. This has declined in the 21st century due to the destruction of unions and labor arbitrage due to outsourcing and globalization. MLb has no such excuse for any decline.

The main issue is the declining share of revenues players have received since the turn of the century. There is no doubt there has been a significant decline since 2000. Even the article accepts that. Limiting the look back to 2010 when revenue growth rates took a hit due to the great recession masks that as much of the decline occured starting in 2002-2003 when MLBPA also alleged collusion and came away with a minor settlement. Subsequent CBA's all gave owners excuses for lower payroll growth rates

Also, the data obviously does not address FA players share of the pie, nor the 2018 crash. It takes awhile before depressed FA prices impact the totals noticeably

At the moment, with 30% of SPers and position players in the top 50 unsigned, those who have signed have seen prices drop 20% from Dave Camerons conservative predictions. RPers which account for 25%!of all spending have come in as predicted.

NL is outspending AL 2-1.

MLBPA has a lot of work to do. Getting players to FA earlier is essential. I say let anyone after their age 28 season be a free agent regardless of service time (players can still become eligible earlier). Teams will call players up earlier but thats not a bad thing.



   5. Walt Davis Posted: February 21, 2018 at 11:52 PM (#5628452)
The main issue is the declining share of revenues players have received since the turn of the century.

Yep. I think it was this article or another I just checked that said studies suggest it was over 60% in the early 2000s.

Also, by MLB's official numbers, revenues were $9 B in 2014, $9.5 in 2016 and a bit over $10 in 2017. That's not massive growth but about 2.5% for 14-15 and 15-16 then 5% last year. Payroll meanwhile, per a USA Today article, went up 3.3% 16-17 after rising only 0.35% the year before. Possibly there have been substantial increases in benefits, etc.

So first question is why does MLB have a press release saying revenues topped $10 B for the first time in 2017 and this table shows revenues of $9 B. Now the article says a Union guy looked at these and said they were close so ... there's $1 B in revenue that doesn't count. That's potentially fine if that was revenue from the sale of BAM Tech or other MLB revenue that isn't baseball-generated. But for too lazy to do the math, 50% of 9 is 45% of 10 so whether that billion counts matters a lot.

Then this table does have total player salary + benefit increase 4.3% for 2015-16 while the USA Today article puts (end of year) payroll increases at 0.35%. Similarly 4.2% vs 3.5% for 2016-17. One thing is that I don't think the USA Today includes postseason pay -- has that increased substantially? Other than that, was there a big boost in pension contributions? The latter difference is not such a big deal but 4.3% and 0.35% are very different numbers. Maybe USA Today was a typo for 3.5%?

USA Today article on player salaries
USA Today article on MLB revenues
   6. dlf Posted: February 22, 2018 at 10:26 AM (#5628587)
First of all, benefits account for 10% of all MLBPA salaries .


Where do you get this figure?
   7. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: February 22, 2018 at 10:31 AM (#5628596)
MLB obviously deducting revenue from the calculations. Whether thats legitimate or not remains to be seen since we don't see the breakdown

The estimates that showed the lowest player share were using gross MLBAM revenues, instead of the net income MLB teams receive from MLBAM. There is no reason to use total MLBAM revenues, since they have many lines of business that are not related to MLB content.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Dynasty League Baseball

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Eugene Freedman
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP 2018 July 16: Why Does President Trump Balk At Attending Baseball Games?
(368 - 1:17pm, Jul 17)
Last: Zonk did it for the children of Russia

NewsblogMax Scherzer doesn’t fear hitters or swimming with sharks
(15 - 1:17pm, Jul 17)
Last: Pat Rapper's Delight (as quoted on MLB Network)

NewsblogPhillies Reportedly Increase Offer For Manny Machado
(63 - 1:14pm, Jul 17)
Last: Tom Nawrocki

NewsblogASG All-Star Week Thread
(60 - 1:10pm, Jul 17)
Last: Pat Rapper's Delight (as quoted on MLB Network)

NewsblogOT - 2018 NBA Summer Potpourri (finals, draft, free agency, Colangelo dragging)
(3280 - 1:09pm, Jul 17)
Last: aberg

NewsblogOT: Soccer Thread (World Cup)
(3201 - 12:56pm, Jul 17)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogIs Chase Utley a Hall of Famer?
(34 - 12:42pm, Jul 17)
Last: Never Give an Inge (Dave)

NewsblogA rival’s struggles may make it even tougher for Mets fans
(9 - 12:30pm, Jul 17)
Last: The usual palaver and twaddle (Met Fan Charlie)

NewsblogProspect Carter Kieboom’s talent might force Nationals into some difficult decisions
(24 - 12:02pm, Jul 17)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogMike Trout joins MLB Tonight | 07/16/2018 | MLB.com
(4 - 11:37am, Jul 17)
Last: What did Billy Ripken have against ElRoy Face?

NewsblogTexas Rangers: 'When that happens, I’m going to be nasty again': Why Rangers' Joey Gallo says banning shifts would get him back on track | SportsDay
(12 - 11:12am, Jul 17)
Last: Fernigal McGunnigle

NewsblogOT - Catch-All Pop Culture Extravaganza (let's call it July 2018)
(540 - 11:02am, Jul 17)
Last: McCoy

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 7-17-2018
(3 - 10:53am, Jul 17)
Last: What did Billy Ripken have against ElRoy Face?

Sox TherapyHalfwayish Home
(7 - 10:23am, Jul 17)
Last: jmurph

Newsblog9 Pirates 7, Brewers 6 (10): Two late leads slip away
(18 - 10:02pm, Jul 16)
Last: Moses Taylor, aka Hambone Fakenameington

Page rendered in 0.2659 seconds
46 querie(s) executed