Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
C’mon now, cancelling the World Series is joyous compared to Arli$$.
Hey Bill, In what context do “one run” offensive strategies (in particular the sacrifice bunt, but also stolen bases) make sense in the early innings of a game? Said another way, how scarce do runs need to be in order to make the sacrifice bunt a favorable strategy in the early innings of a game?
I’m not sure I have a solid understanding of the issue. Billy Southworth bunted constantly in the early innings, believing that the most important thing was to grab the lead. Southworth’s teams were tremendously successful. It could be that if you have a GREAT team, one way to maximize that is to bunt in the early innings. I DOUBT that, but I don’t KNOW that it is untrue. And, as I have pointed out before. . .if the third baseman can’t field a bunt, why not bunt?
Re Southworth’s strategy: I’ve always heard that teams scoring the FIRST run in a game tend to win that game by some ludicrous %, but then I realized that every shutout of course is won by the team scoring the first run, probably equivalent (or close) to the % of wins claimed by the bunting/stealing crowd. Do you see this as blowing a significant hole in the small-ball argument? McCarver used to invoke it like it was heaven-sent wisdom, but I always found it spectacularly dumb.
Well. . .spectacularly dumb is harsh. It’s misleading. If you were to look, for example, at teams that score a run in the bottom of the fourth inning, you would find that those teams win about 70% of their games, just because a) EVERY run you score is highly significant in a contest in which it only takes a few runs to win a game, and b) when you score one run in the bottom of the 4th, very often you will score 2 or more, whereas when you score NO runs in the bottom of the fourth, then you never score 2 or more. It’s not that the first run is hugely significant; it is that every run is hugely significant.
Bill: I don’t expect you to keep printing my input on this. . .
In “Four Sluggers” you tossed in a very interesting generalization that fantasy GMs and possibly real GMs should all know - but I didn’t think was considered general knowledge: ” The usual rule is that a player is consistent when he is young; when he gets older, what he loses is not the ability to produce but the consistency of his production.” Can I take that as fact? Could you, please, elaborate on that? It would make a good subject for a serious study.
I can’t demonstrate that it’s true, no. It seems obvious to me, but then, Amy Adams didn’t win Best Actress for “American Hustle”, so I guess you never know.
Hey Bill, ESPN Magazine has published preseason predictions ( http://assets.espn.go.com/magazine/0331TEAMAL.pdf, http://assets.espn.go.com/magazine/0331TEAMNL.pdf ) based in part on a “chemistry score.” They worked with a couple of professors to build “a proprietary team-chemistry regression model” with three factors: “clubhouse demographics, trait isolation and stratification of performance to pay.” Basically, on each factor, more homogeneity is better: players with similar salaries, experience, race, nationality, etc. Each component gives a result in terms of wins; e.g., the Cubs lose 3.5 wins on “clubhouse demographics” because of “too much diversity”. A fuller summary of the method is here: http://blog.philbirnbaum.com/2014/03/espn-on-clubhouse-chemistry.html Any thoughts on this?
Ah. . .it’s happened at last. The happy marriage of sabermetrics and bullshit.
Bill, Selig will retire a the end of this year. Who are the leading candidaes to replace him?
George Will, Bob Costas, Mariano Rivera, Stephen Colbert, Pope Francis, Gwyneth Paltrow, Mitch McConnell, Dale Chihuly, Maui Mike, Rob Neyer, Robert Wuhl, Betty White and Steven Goldleaf. In that order.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
: MLB views Las Vegas as 'viable market,' Rob Manfred says
(72 - 11:16am, Feb 25)
Last: Misirlou doesn't live in the restaurantNewsblog
: OTP 20 Feb. 2017: Baseball in a Time of Politics
(1681 - 11:14am, Feb 25)Last:
: OT - December 2016 NBA thread
(2540 - 10:51am, Feb 25)Last:
: Posnanski | A Baseball Challenge!
(22 - 10:49am, Feb 25)
Last: Bug SeligNewsblog
: Inside Baseball with Jon Heyman: Final offseason grades
(17 - 9:51am, Feb 25)
Last: jacksone (AKA It's OK...)Newsblog
: In defense of Sammy Sosa
(11 - 9:50am, Feb 25)
Last: Pat Rapper's Delight (as quoted on MLB Network)Newsblog
: Don Mattingly thinks pace of play can be improved by changing views on strikeouts
(65 - 9:41am, Feb 25)
Last: SoSHially UnacceptableNewsblog
: How Buccaneers' Jameis Winston blew away Yankees prospects
(11 - 1:19am, Feb 25)
: Kate Upton: No sex with Justin Verlander before games
(40 - 12:39am, Feb 25)
Last: Gonfalon BubbleNewsblog
: Are statheads “pro ownership?”
(28 - 12:02am, Feb 25)
Last: Cargo CultistNewsblog
: Mike Piazza Learns How to Be an Owner. Of a Soccer Team. In Italy.
(180 - 11:36pm, Feb 24)Last:
: Baseball Reference has a New Look
(99 - 10:30pm, Feb 24)
Last: 6 - 4 - 3Newsblog
: For Jake Peavy, baseball must take a back seat
(13 - 10:18pm, Feb 24)
Last: the Hugh Jorgan returnsNewsblog
: Why Joe Maddon sees Kyle Schwarber as the leadoff guy in Cubs lineup | CSN Chicago
(14 - 6:59pm, Feb 24)
Last: 6 - 4 - 3Newsblog
: Pump The Brakes On Kyle Schwarber? Well, Actually...
(16 - 6:47pm, Feb 24)