Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, March 26, 2014
C’mon now, cancelling the World Series is joyous compared to Arli$$.
Hey Bill, In what context do “one run” offensive strategies (in particular the sacrifice bunt, but also stolen bases) make sense in the early innings of a game? Said another way, how scarce do runs need to be in order to make the sacrifice bunt a favorable strategy in the early innings of a game?
I’m not sure I have a solid understanding of the issue. Billy Southworth bunted constantly in the early innings, believing that the most important thing was to grab the lead. Southworth’s teams were tremendously successful. It could be that if you have a GREAT team, one way to maximize that is to bunt in the early innings. I DOUBT that, but I don’t KNOW that it is untrue. And, as I have pointed out before. . .if the third baseman can’t field a bunt, why not bunt?
Re Southworth’s strategy: I’ve always heard that teams scoring the FIRST run in a game tend to win that game by some ludicrous %, but then I realized that every shutout of course is won by the team scoring the first run, probably equivalent (or close) to the % of wins claimed by the bunting/stealing crowd. Do you see this as blowing a significant hole in the small-ball argument? McCarver used to invoke it like it was heaven-sent wisdom, but I always found it spectacularly dumb.
Well. . .spectacularly dumb is harsh. It’s misleading. If you were to look, for example, at teams that score a run in the bottom of the fourth inning, you would find that those teams win about 70% of their games, just because a) EVERY run you score is highly significant in a contest in which it only takes a few runs to win a game, and b) when you score one run in the bottom of the 4th, very often you will score 2 or more, whereas when you score NO runs in the bottom of the fourth, then you never score 2 or more. It’s not that the first run is hugely significant; it is that every run is hugely significant.
Bill: I don’t expect you to keep printing my input on this. . .
In “Four Sluggers” you tossed in a very interesting generalization that fantasy GMs and possibly real GMs should all know - but I didn’t think was considered general knowledge: ” The usual rule is that a player is consistent when he is young; when he gets older, what he loses is not the ability to produce but the consistency of his production.” Can I take that as fact? Could you, please, elaborate on that? It would make a good subject for a serious study.
I can’t demonstrate that it’s true, no. It seems obvious to me, but then, Amy Adams didn’t win Best Actress for “American Hustle”, so I guess you never know.
Hey Bill, ESPN Magazine has published preseason predictions ( http://assets.espn.go.com/magazine/0331TEAMAL.pdf, http://assets.espn.go.com/magazine/0331TEAMNL.pdf ) based in part on a “chemistry score.” They worked with a couple of professors to build “a proprietary team-chemistry regression model” with three factors: “clubhouse demographics, trait isolation and stratification of performance to pay.” Basically, on each factor, more homogeneity is better: players with similar salaries, experience, race, nationality, etc. Each component gives a result in terms of wins; e.g., the Cubs lose 3.5 wins on “clubhouse demographics” because of “too much diversity”. A fuller summary of the method is here: http://blog.philbirnbaum.com/2014/03/espn-on-clubhouse-chemistry.html Any thoughts on this?
Ah. . .it’s happened at last. The happy marriage of sabermetrics and bullshit.
Bill, Selig will retire a the end of this year. Who are the leading candidaes to replace him?
George Will, Bob Costas, Mariano Rivera, Stephen Colbert, Pope Francis, Gwyneth Paltrow, Mitch McConnell, Dale Chihuly, Maui Mike, Rob Neyer, Robert Wuhl, Betty White and Steven Goldleaf. In that order.
for his generous support.
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
: SABR 46 Convention in Miami
(20 - 2:04pm, Jun 29)
Last: Dag Nabbit at ExactlyAsOld.comNewsblog
: OTP 2016 June 27: Republican comeback after eight years? Yeah, on the baseball diamond
(939 - 2:03pm, Jun 29)Last:
The Good FaceNewsblog
: OMNICHATTER 6-29-16
(24 - 2:03pm, Jun 29)
Last: Hank WhiteNewsblog
: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 6-29-2016
(16 - 2:03pm, Jun 29)
Last: Hank G.Newsblog
: Report: Red Sox, Jason Groome Far Apart In Contract Negotiations « CBS Boston
(31 - 2:03pm, Jun 29)
Last: Benji Gil Gamesh VII - The Opt-Out AwakensNewsblog
: Top prospect Aaron Judge making case to be on the New York Yankees - Yankees Blog- ESPN
(5 - 1:55pm, Jun 29)
Last: Lance Reddick! Lance him!Newsblog
: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 6-28-2016
(16 - 1:54pm, Jun 29)
Last: Hank G.Newsblog
: OT: NBA Playoffs Thread 2016
(6222 - 1:43pm, Jun 29)Last:
: Jose Reyes must demonstrate sincere remorse in return to Mets - NY Daily News
(162 - 1:32pm, Jun 29)Last:
snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)Newsblog
: Cubs use 3 different pitchers as OFs en route to 15-inning win
(8 - 1:24pm, Jun 29)
Last: There's a bustle in Misirlou's hedgerowNewsblog
: OT: 2016 Summer Soccer Thread
(1178 - 1:23pm, Jun 29)Last:
: The Francisco Lindor Effect Is Ridiculous | FanGraphs Baseball
(9 - 12:09pm, Jun 29)
Last: Sonny Gray's Got a Yakker for Your CuloGonfalon Cubs
: Slumping and Busting
(27 - 12:04pm, Jun 29)
Last: Dag Nabbit at ExactlyAsOld.comSox Therapy
: Is It Time To Panic?
(2 - 11:51am, Jun 29)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. NickNewsblog
: Colabello wants to clear his name
(8 - 11:44am, Jun 29)