Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Boston Red Sox’s contract talks with David Ortiz to begin ‘next week’, source says - ESPN Boston

One year at $14 million sounds about right. Any more and they should let him walk.

A year ago, Ortiz accepted arbitration from the Red Sox but contract negotiations dragged on through the winter until, finally, he signed a one-year deal worth $14.58 million on the day he was scheduled for an arbitration hearing.

Under the new collective bargaining agreement, the process for a player like Ortiz is different this offseason. Instead of arbitration, teams have the option of making a qualifying offer (based on the average salary of the top 125 players in the league) to their free agents. In Ortiz’s case, that would mean a pay cut because the salary is believed to be in the neighborhood of $13 million.

Jim Furtado Posted: October 10, 2012 at 10:34 AM | 8 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: free agents, red sox

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Jose Is The Most Absurd Thing on the Site Posted: October 10, 2012 at 10:57 AM (#4261610)
I won't be bothered if they go 2/28 or something like that. They've got sooooo much freed up money right now that I don't think that second year creates a problem for team construction for 2014 and they can always release him if he's a complete disaster in 2013. Part of that is I expect the Sox to not be very good in 2013 and I'd rather see a David Ortiz farewell tour than bring in a Mark Reynolds or someone to fill his shoes on a 76 win team.
   2. I Am Not a Number Posted: October 10, 2012 at 12:35 PM (#4261743)
and they can always release him if he's a complete disaster in 2013

Or trade him to the Dodgers.
   3. villageidiom Posted: October 10, 2012 at 01:16 PM (#4261787)
Under the new collective bargaining agreement, the process for a player like Ortiz is different this offseason. Instead of arbitration, teams have the option of making a qualifying offer (based on the average salary of the top 125 players in the league) to their free agents. In Ortiz’s case, that would mean a pay cut because the salary is believed to be in the neighborhood of $13 million.
Is that threshold in terms of AAV? Would a 2-year contract offer have to be $26 million ($13 million AAV) or would $14 million contract be considered a "qualifying" offer because it's > $13 million? What if it were structured as $13 million in 2013 and $1 million in 2014, which would be "more" than a qualifying 1-year $13 million deal?

I was thinking 2 years / $24 million, but I don't have a sense whether that would be considered qualifying or not, nor whether a yearly structure of $13/$11 would be qualifying because it has the first year at $13 million.
   4. The Yankee Clapper Posted: October 10, 2012 at 03:02 PM (#4261987)
Ortiz missed some games due to injury, but he didn't have the type of season that normally gets a pay cut. I wouldn't think it to be worth poisoning the well just to save a few hundred thousand. The Red Sox should willingly offer $14.5M, or perhaps a bit more, just to get a quick & harmonious deal.
   5. Danny Posted: October 10, 2012 at 03:19 PM (#4262031)
I was thinking 2 years / $24 million, but I don't have a sense whether that would be considered qualifying or not, nor whether a yearly structure of $13/$11 would be qualifying because it has the first year at $13 million.

A qualifying offer is a one year contract--just like offering arbitration under the old system, except the offer is for a set salary.

That shouldn't prevent a team from also negotiating a multiyear contract either during the Quiet Period or after the qualifying offer has been accepted/declined--but they have to formally issue the one year offer for $13M+ to qualify for compensation.
   6. Steve Balboni's Personal Trainer Posted: October 10, 2012 at 06:08 PM (#4262328)
No other team is going to offer Ortiz anything close to this amount of money, certainly not for two years. The Red Sox should offer him $14 million for 2013, with a vesting option for 2014 that is based on games played in 2013, rather than performance measures. Honestly, he has proven over the last few years that he can still rake. What we don't know is whether or not he can stay on the field.
   7. the Hugh Jorgan returns Posted: October 10, 2012 at 07:09 PM (#4262431)
One year at $14 million sounds about right.

Seems cheap for our new 1B!
   8. Spivey Posted: October 10, 2012 at 07:36 PM (#4262454)
I don't understand why other teams keep letting David Ortiz sign 1 year deals with the Red Sox. He's been really damn good 3 years in a row, especially the last 2 years. I would be *happy* for the Rangers to sign him to a 2/32 type deal. Unless he wants to stay there.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Mike Emeigh
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Newsblog2014 WORLD SERIES GAME 3 OMNICHATTER
(438 - 11:14pm, Oct 24)
Last: Jeltzandini

NewsblogHow top World Series players ranked as prospects. | SportsonEarth.com : Jim Callis Article
(19 - 11:08pm, Oct 24)
Last: Chip

NewsblogBuster Olney on Twitter: "Sources: Manager Joe Maddon has exercised an opt-out clause in his contract and is leaving the Tampa Bay Rays immediately."
(77 - 11:07pm, Oct 24)
Last: HMS Moses Taylor

NewsblogJohn McGrath: The Giants have become the Yankees — obnoxious | The News Tribune
(6 - 11:04pm, Oct 24)
Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)

NewsblogOT: Politics, October 2014: Sunshine, Baseball, and Etch A Sketch: How Politicians Use Analogies
(3732 - 10:54pm, Oct 24)
Last: snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster)

NewsblogDid Adam Dunn Ruin Baseball? – The Hardball Times
(72 - 10:08pm, Oct 24)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT: Monthly NBA Thread - October 2014
(381 - 9:55pm, Oct 24)
Last: RollingWave

NewsblogCurt Schilling not hiding his scars - ESPN Boston
(17 - 8:40pm, Oct 24)
Last: DJS and the Infinite Sadness

NewsblogRoyals get four AL Gold Glove finalists, but not Lorenzo Cain | The Kansas City Star
(13 - 8:11pm, Oct 24)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogBeaneball | Gold Gloves and Coco Crisp's Terrible 2014 Defense
(2 - 7:47pm, Oct 24)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT: The Soccer Thread, September 2014
(915 - 7:37pm, Oct 24)
Last: CWS Keith plans to boo your show at the Apollo

NewsblogOT: NBC.news: Valve isn’t making one gaming console, but multiple ‘Steam machines’
(871 - 7:22pm, Oct 24)
Last: Jim Wisinski

NewsblogDealing or dueling – what’s a manager to do? | MGL on Baseball
(67 - 6:38pm, Oct 24)
Last: villageidiom

NewsblogThe ‘Little Things’ – The Hardball Times
(2 - 6:34pm, Oct 24)
Last: RMc is a fine piece of cheese

Newsblog9 reasons Hunter Pence is the most interesting man in the World (Series) | For The Win
(15 - 5:31pm, Oct 24)
Last: zonk

Page rendered in 0.2336 seconds
52 querie(s) executed