Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, July 31, 2008

Boston.com: Schilling: Keeping Manny could be a problem

Rehabbing Red Sox righthander Curt Schilling this morning said he thought the Manny Ramirez situation has affected the team and keeping him in Boston for the stretch run could present a problem.

“..I’ve always wondered how we came to be OK with ‘… he’s just not gonna play hard today,’ and that was OK. We’ve come a long way, especially in this city as devoted and as much as the Red Sox mean to people, the fact that you could have a Dustin Pedroia, a Jason Varitek, someone who would bleed and literally play his nine breaths to make an out or get a hit or win a game, and have somebody at the other end of the spectrum from a committed standpoint, you know these players love the uniform, love the fans, and believe in Red Sox and what it means to be a part of this and then you have guys who really don’t give a [expletive].”

“I enjoyed pitching with Pedro, but I watched Pedro for a year come and go as he pleased, and do whatever he pleased, from a schedule standpoint and to a point, All-Star break heading home and no one ever said a word… The things that Pedro said going out of town about Terry [Francona], that crushed me because of what I saw Tito do for him. Manny’s the same way…”

Guapo Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:25 PM | 100 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: red sox

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. JoeHova Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:30 PM (#2884090)
Schilling takes the high road again...
   2. Nasty Nate Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:33 PM (#2884098)
literally play his nine breaths


what does this mean?
   3. Infinite Yost (Voxter) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:34 PM (#2884100)
Boston.com: Everybody: Shut the #### up, Schilling
   4. SoSH U at work Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:35 PM (#2884103)
what does this mean?


He's actually a cat.
   5. Big Train Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:35 PM (#2884105)
Go away Curt Shilling.
   6. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:35 PM (#2884110)
There isn't some common thread between the players Schilling likes and those he doesn't, perhaps? Couldn't have anything to do with the relationships he's built through a shared language, or anything.
   7. Scatterbrain Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:37 PM (#2884112)
This supports my theory that Shilling is a nazi.
   8. RJ in TO Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:38 PM (#2884115)
Even though I can't stand Schilling, I will give him a lot of credit for putting his name on his quotes, rather than going the anonymous route. That being said, it'd be a lot smarter for him to go the anonymous route. I get the feeling that, with all his public statements about other players, he's not going to have too many friends in baseball once he retires.
   9. aleskel Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:39 PM (#2884120)
There isn't some common thread between the players Schilling likes and those he doesn't, perhaps? Couldn't have anything to do with the relationships he's built through a shared language, or anything.

that's not fair - everyone knows that Pedro and Manny both subscribe to Mother Jones and regularly donate to MoveOn.org
   10. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:41 PM (#2884121)
Even though I can't stand Schilling, I will give him a lot of credit for putting his name on his quotes, rather than going the anonymous route. That being said, it'd be a lot smarter for him to go the anonymous route. I get the feeling that, with all his public statements about other players, he's not going to have too many friends in baseball once he retires.
-if this came after a trade was completed, that'd be one thing. With the Red Sox still not having dealt Manny, this is stupid, and hurts his team. The more desperate the Sox are perceived, the weaker the return.
-I thought it was established that Schilling was the anonymous source ripping Scott Williamson for not manning up and pitching with a busted forearm.
   11. SoSH U at work Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:44 PM (#2884129)
-if this came after a trade was completed, that'd be one thing. With the Red Sox still not having dealt Manny, this is stupid, and hurts his team. The more desperate the Sox are perceived, the weaker the return.
-I thought it was established that Schilling was the anonymous source ripping Scott Williamson for not manning up and pitching with a busted forearm.


I agree with the first point. He could ask Millar about the potential embarrassment.

As to your second point, I don't think Schilling anonymously ripped Williamson. I think his name was attached (which is one reason why I always doubted he was the anonymous guy ripping Manny. Schilling don't do anonymous).
   12. Stevens Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:45 PM (#2884131)
Who gives a #### what Schilling thinks?
   13. RJ in TO Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:47 PM (#2884138)
-if this came after a trade was completed, that'd be one thing. With the Red Sox still not having dealt Manny, this is stupid, and hurts his team. The more desperate the Sox are perceived, the weaker the return.


Hey, I agree with you that it's stupid of him. I'm just pleased to see a player put his name to a controversial quote, rather than do the Mark Grace routine.
   14. ellsbury my heart at wounded knee Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:47 PM (#2884139)
Who gives a #### what Schilling thinks?

Not me, but then who gives a #### about what anyone on this board thinks? Who gives a #### what any blogger thinks? Yet we'll certainly share our comments anyway...
   15. RJ in TO Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:47 PM (#2884140)
Who gives a #### what Schilling thinks?


Schilling. That's why he's telling us exactly what he thinks.
   16. JC in DC Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:47 PM (#2884141)
I'm assuming Gammons planted this is Schilling's mouth.
   17. Dave Cyprian Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:49 PM (#2884147)
#6 (MCoA), I disagree with a ton, many, of the things that Schilling says, but I do think its a little unfair to dismiss his comments as racial or ethnically biased. Pedro and Manny are both very eccentric to say the least. Choosing two white players to compare them to may not be prudent, but it doesn't invalidate the criticism.
   18. Nasty Nate Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:50 PM (#2884151)
The more desperate the Sox are perceived, the weaker the return.


I guarantee that no potential trading partner's perception of the sox' desperation is affected at all by anything coming out of Curt Schilling's mouth.
   19. Fred C. Dobbs Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:58 PM (#2884166)
I'm assuming Gammons planted this is Schilling's mouth.


That's not the only these he's planted in his mouth. Yeah...just take a few seconds and picture that.
   20. tribefan Posted: July 31, 2008 at 04:59 PM (#2884169)
you know these players love the uniform, love the fans, and believe in Red Sox and what it means to be a part of this

Boy, he really knows how to act for the media and fans, doesn't he?
   21. Esoteric Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:01 PM (#2884176)
Am I the only person in the world who a.) has absolutely no problem with what Curt Schilling said here; b.) thinks that his point was well-put and very probably true? I'm sorry, I refuse to believe that everyone on BTF is really ripping him for the diplomatic aspect of this quote...it's just more "I hate Curt" stuff.
   22. phredbird Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:01 PM (#2884177)
i was waiting for people to bring up a racial/cultural component to schilling's comments, but does schilling have a history of clashing with latin teammates? it would be one thing if there was a history.
also: how much truth is there to his comments? i don't follow the sox closely, but i have read some stuff about manny and pedro; manny being manny, etc., and pedro looking a little like he needed to do some offseason conditioning instead of whatever he does. any consensus in red sox nation?
   23. zonk Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:02 PM (#2884179)
Hilarious.

I was hoping the Manny deal would get done if only because I'm sitting on a lot of FAAB dollars in my NL only roto league, but for this stretch run entertainment, now I'm leaning towards Manny staying put.
   24. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:03 PM (#2884181)
Schilling clashes with anyone who takes a significant chunk of the spotlight on the team.
I think he was barely on speaking terms with Randy Johnson.
   25. aleskel Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:05 PM (#2884184)
Am I the only person in the world who a.) has absolutely no problem with what Curt Schilling said here; b.) thinks that his point was well-put and very probably true?

that's as may be, but he is still talking about someone who is, as of this moment, his teammate. And whatever we think individually about Schilling, or Manny, or the Red Sox, or whatever, I think most of us will agree that ripping your teammate in public is not something a professional athlete should do.
   26. ellsbury my heart at wounded knee Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:05 PM (#2884187)
Loving the uniform sounds weird and sort of vaguely fascist. Does anybody really love the uniform? The Red Sox uniform is nice and classic, and I like the Tigers and A's uniforms as friends, but I don't love any of them.
   27. Famous Original Joe C Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:06 PM (#2884188)
Who gives a #### what Schilling thinks?

Well, you came here to comment on it, so...
   28. SoSH U at work Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:06 PM (#2884189)
also: how much truth is there to his comments? i don't follow the sox closely, but i have read some stuff about manny and pedro; manny being manny, etc., and pedro looking a little like he needed to do some offseason conditioning instead of whatever he does. any consensus in red sox nation?


Yeah, they're generally true. Pedro kind of operated on his own schedule a lot of times, and the club looked the other way. Then again, I'm sure some bench guys might have been actively discouraged from being so open and forthright about teammates and the clubhouse as the old blogger has, so it's not like special treatment is only the province of the Latins on the club.
   29. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:07 PM (#2884191)
Am I the only person in the world who a.) has absolutely no problem with what Curt Schilling said here; b.) thinks that his point was well-put and very probably true?
I think a lot--if not most--people here would agree with at least the truthfulness of what Schilling said about Manny. But what exactly does he gain by calling out someone who is--at least in theory--his teammate why that guy is still on his team? Why would the Sox benefit from this?
   30. Jimmy P Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:07 PM (#2884194)
i was waiting for people to bring up a racial/cultural component to schilling's comments

How about when African-Americans or other minority players speak out they're disruptive (Terrell Owens, Manny, Chad Johnson), but when guys like Brett Favre and Schilling put themselves in places where they don't belong (telling team what to do, other players contract squabbles), it's good for the team and being a stand up guy?
   31. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:09 PM (#2884203)
#6 (MCoA), I disagree with a ton, many, of the things that Schilling says, but I do think its a little unfair to dismiss his comments as racial or ethnically biased. Pedro and Manny are both very eccentric to say the least. Choosing two white players to compare them to may not be prudent, but it doesn't invalidate the criticism.
I was trying to be careful and not call bigotry.

My point was that Schilling's friends are mostly English-speaking, and likewise Manny's and Pedro's friends. That's what language gaps do. A little bit of critical thought might suggest to Schilling that he's been biased by this divide.
   32. Esoteric Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:10 PM (#2884205)
I think most of us will agree that ripping your teammate in public is not something a professional athlete should do.
And I think most of us would agree that such a prohibition only goes so far. Once your teammate has gone utterly beyond the pale, as Manny has over the last two months, all bets are off. I don't care if he's a hitting machine, this level of selfish behavior - behavior that has harmed the team - has in turn obviated his teammates' requirement to sit in silent tolerance. If he won't consider their interests, then why the hell should they consider his? At the very least they can unite around their disdain for him.
   33. Swedish Chef Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:13 PM (#2884210)
Schilling is just practising for his Senate run, in politics he will have ample opportunity to stab his teammates in the back.
   34. phredbird Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:14 PM (#2884211)
i didn't say i thought it was a good idea or that schilling did anything appropriate. i'm probably thinking it's more the opposite. i'm thinking the sox don't benefit from this at all, and that it shows schilling has his own agenda, which is something i believe most of us will agree with. seems like he's decided he doesn't like manny so much and wants to force the issue, but doing it in a dumb way.
   35. aleskel Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:15 PM (#2884215)
And I think most of us would agree that such a prohibition only goes so far. Once your teammate has gone utterly beyond the pale, as Manny has over the last two months, all bets are off. I don't care if he's a hitting machine, this level of selfish behavior - behavior that has harmed the team - has in turn obviated his teammates' requirement to sit in silent tolerance. If he won't consider their interests, then why the hell should they consider his? At the very least they can unite around their disdain for him.

yes, but what does opening this up to the press have to do with uniting in disdain? By all accounts, Manny has lost his teammates' support already, but there's no guarantee that he's not going to still be on the team come Friday. I'm all for players being open with the press/fans, but sometimes, for the sake of just a modicum of team cohesion, you need to keep things in-house.
   36. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:15 PM (#2884218)
If he won't consider their interests, then why the hell should they consider his? At the very least they can unite around their disdain for him.
It's not Manny's interests, it's the ballclub's interests.

Problems need to be dealt with internally. The front office needs as much as possible to be able to claim plausibly they don't need to make the trade. The team needs as few conflicts as possible if they aren't able to make the trade. This is Schilling putting Schilling ahead of the team.

Manny's done bad things, which are obviously worse than what Schilling's doing here. But being a professional is about recognizing that the team comes first and that means keeping your mouth shut. (At least before hte trade is complete.)
   37. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:19 PM (#2884224)
Am I the only person in the world who a.) has absolutely no problem with what Curt Schilling said here; b.) thinks that his point was well-put and very probably true? I'm sorry, I refuse to believe that everyone on BTF is really ripping him for the diplomatic aspect of this quote...it's just more "I hate Curt" stuff.

No, I agree with you. Manny deserves every bit of this calling out.
   38. The Yankee Clapper Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:19 PM (#2884225)
Schilling's speculation on some of the motivation for the current controversy strikes me as probable:

Scott Boras stands to make zero dollars if the Red Sox pick up Manny’s options the next two years. Manny’s not 1- years from retirement, he’s maybe four obviously, that’s where he’s at. So does Scott Boras want to get a two year-deal for Manny or a four-year deal for Manny? At the end of the day it falls on the player because Manny’s an adult…
   39. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:21 PM (#2884231)
It's not Manny's interests, it's the ballclub's interests.

Why does anyone think Schilling gives two shits about the Red Sox ownership and whether they have to give up an extra prospect to get rid of Manny?

Schilling almost certainly gone after this season, and is probably still pissed they convinced him to delay surgery.

He certainly is working off his own agenda, and I don't really blame him.
   40. bunyon Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:23 PM (#2884235)
No, I agree with you. Manny deserves every bit of this calling out.

Unfortunately he was called out in English, which, apparently, he doesn't understand.
   41. SoSH U at work Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:23 PM (#2884236)
He certainly is working off his own agenda, and I don't really blame him.


So then his point is: It's bad for Manny to have his own agenda, but I can.
   42. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:29 PM (#2884243)
So then his point is: It's bad for Manny to have his own agenda, but I can.

No, I don't think anyone, most certainly not others players, begrudges a player the right to look after his own interests.
But, when you stop trying, or refuse to play, you've just crossed the line.

You can try and manipulate management all you want through the press, etc., but what Manny is doing is quitting on his teammates. That won't be tolerated by many people.
   43. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:30 PM (#2884245)
Why does anyone think Schilling gives two shits about the Red Sox ownership and whether they have to give up an extra prospect to get rid of Manny?

Schilling almost certainly gone after this season, and is probably still pissed they convinced him to delay surgery.

He certainly is working off his own agenda, and I don't really blame him.
The ironing is delicious.

This is precisely the Manny Ramirez situation - angry at his ballclub, lashing out, hurting the team to serve his own interests. While what Manny's doing is way, way worse, this is still is very bizarre defense of Schilling.
   44. Danny Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:35 PM (#2884255)
Am I the only person in the world who a.) has absolutely no problem with what Curt Schilling said here; b.) thinks that his point was well-put and very probably true? I'm sorry, I refuse to believe that everyone on BTF is really ripping him for the diplomatic aspect of this quote...it's just more "I hate Curt" stuff.

Do you believe all conservatives are persecuted, or just poor, innocent Curt?
   45. Blackadder Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:38 PM (#2884261)
The effort meme has always rubbed me the wrong way. We know, for instance, that while Manny doesn't often run out ground balls or make much effort to catch fly balls, he works obsessively to perfect his hitting. As for Pedro, I don't know much about how he prepares, but I'm pretty sure you don't become the most dominant pitcher ever without putting some time in. It annoys me when people take outward demeanor as a perfect proxy for overall commitment.
   46. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:38 PM (#2884262)
This is precisely the Manny Ramirez situation - angry at his ballclub, lashing out, hurting the team to serve his own interests. While what Manny's doing is way, way worse, this is still is very bizarre defense of Schilling.

I'm not saying what Schilling is doing is right, it's just well within the realm of acceptable self-serving behavior.

Manny is WAY out in the pale.
   47. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:41 PM (#2884271)
The effort meme has always rubbed me the wrong way. We know, for instance, that while Manny doesn't often run out ground balls or make much effort to catch fly balls, he works obsessively to perfect his hitting. As for Pedro, I don't know much about how he prepares, but I'm pretty sure you don't become the most dominant pitcher ever without putting some time in. It annoys me when people take outward demeanor as a perfect proxy for overall commitment.

But life doesn't work this way. I can put together some brilliant analysis for my boss, but if I constantly refuse to check my work, so that there are careless errors, or random don't show up or refuse to work on certain days, I'm still going to get canned.

Doing part of your job really well doesn't excuse you from doing the rest of your job.
   48. gay guy in cut-offs smoking the objective pipe Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:48 PM (#2884302)
Do you believe all conservatives are persecuted, or just poor, innocent Curt?

That's a weird tack to take; Esoteric didn't say jack about conservatives. You might as well ask if he believes all spotlight-hogging loudmouthed publicity hounds are persecuted.
   49. Swedish Chef Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:56 PM (#2884326)
I can put together some brilliant analysis for my boss, but if I constantly refuse to check my work, so that there are careless errors, or random don't show up or refuse to work on certain days, I'm still going to get canned.

Well, if you work in software, technical brilliance can buy you an exemption from just about everything else.
   50. Jimmy P Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:56 PM (#2884327)
Doing part of your job really well doesn't excuse you from doing the rest of your job.

Not for us regular Joes. But, for people that are in very high demand (like athletes) it most certainly does.
   51. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:57 PM (#2884332)
And in doing so you inadvertently revealed a bit of your own bigotry.

...

That's just Danny. he can't make a substantive point so he throws an ad hominem out there instead.
Indeed.
   52. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 05:59 PM (#2884340)
Not for us regular Joes. But, for people that are in very high demand (like athletes) it most certainly does.

For a while, yes it does. But as soon as your talent slips, or an alternative appears, the knives come out, and everyone who you've pissed on and pissed off comes after you. That's what Manny's seeing now.
   53. zonk Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:01 PM (#2884349)

Well, if you work in software, technical brilliance can buy you an exemption from just about everything else.


And as well it should -

I'll take one technically brilliant, creative developer in place of 10 well-schooled dolts who write pristine UML, labor eternally over copious release notes, and spend their time poring over every last word in technical requirements.
   54. Jimmy P Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:02 PM (#2884354)
For a while, yes it does. But as soon as your talent slips, or an alternative appears, the knives come out, and everyone who you've pissed on and pissed off comes after you. That's what Manny's seeing now.

Yes and no. First, his talent has slipped, but even in this "down" year he's still damn good. So good that the Red Sox aren't giving him away. In that way, they are still excusing him for his behavior. And, he's getting paid this year, and it's almost guaranteed that he's going to get paid next year, the following, and probably one or two after that. So, besides some carping in the media, he's excused.
   55. Mirabelli Dictu (Chris McClinch) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:02 PM (#2884355)
literally play his nine breaths


what does this mean?


It almost certainly means that the reporter has a crappy tape recorder. My guess is that Schilling actually said, "Literally play his dying breath."
   56. Esoteric Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:03 PM (#2884357)
So it's come to this.

I 100% agree with what kevin is saying in defense of Schilling.

Time for me to pack it in I guess.
   57. Designated Sitter (GGC) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:08 PM (#2884361)
Will you guys quit fighting? Jesus. The Red Sox are my favorite team, but I can't even read the threads anymore.
   58. Danny Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:13 PM (#2884373)
That's a weird tack to take; Esoteric didn't say jack about conservatives. You might as well ask if he believes all spotlight-hogging loudmouthed publicity hounds are persecuted.


Sure, if Esoteric hadn't openly expressed his belief that Schilling is only disliked because he's conservative on other threads.
   59. Designated Sitter (GGC) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:17 PM (#2884382)
I always considered Schilling a conservative version of Bill Lee. I may be the only Primate who likes both outspoken hurlers.
   60. Ozzie's gay friend Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:20 PM (#2884389)
Get rid of Manny realize Thomas Yawkey (and many Boston fan's) dream of a lily-white Red Sox starting lineup (once and injured Ortiz is replaced by Pat Burrell next year).

Seriously, with Manny gone there isn't a single likable player on the Red Sox, besides maybe Elsbury (who gets blown so much on ESPN he's soon going to join Vartiek, Pedroia, Youk, Lester and Papelbaun in the ranks of the insufferable).
   61. AROM Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:27 PM (#2884411)
Get rid of Manny realize Thomas Yawkey (and many Boston fan's) dream of a lily-white Red Sox starting lineup (once and injured Ortiz is replaced by Pat Burrell next year).


It will be interesting to see how the front office and media treat Ortiz in a few years when he's in the last year of his contract.

I'm glad Ramirez isn't going anywhere. It really does appear he's become a distraction to the whole ballclub (or maybe the Angels are just playing on a whole other level), and it's in the best interests of every other team that might go to the world series that the Red Sox do not make a big trade to rejuvenate the team.
   62. Mayor Blomberg Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:27 PM (#2884415)
But life doesn't work this way. I can put together some brilliant analysis for my boss, but if I constantly refuse to check my work, so that there are careless errors, or random don't show up or refuse to work on certain days, I'm still going to get canned.


Sorry, snapper, but your analysis isn't brilliant enough, or your boss would hire someone just out of school to clean up after you. I've seen that often enough.

Wow, 3-4 other replies in the time it took to post mine, or maybe I shoulda refreshed sooner.
   63. Guapo Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:29 PM (#2884422)
38pitches.com, June 9, 2008:

Manny hits 500, wow. 500 of anything means you’re good. Be it walks, hits, runs, anything, but 500 home runs, while it can be argued is not the milestone it once was, is still an incredible feat. The thing about Manny is this. Those 500 homers come with other even more impressive numbers that make his 1st ballot HOF selection a lock. His consistency year in and year out are astounding and in some cases unprecedented. I’ve said before, when you do something in a game that is more than a century old, for the first time, or only time, you’ve truly done something. Congrats to Manny and here’s to him hitting 600 here at Fenway.
   64. Ozzie's gay friend Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:30 PM (#2884425)
I'm like the biggest MAnny fan, and yet kind of agree that it would be best if he was traded (I mean Manny's pretty clearly at fault THIS time, as opposed to the past, though the Red Sox FO's Nixonian tactics are sickening even when justified).... but I pretty much only like the Red Sox anymore because of Manny soooooo...
   65. SoSH U at work Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:30 PM (#2884426)
Get rid of Manny realize Thomas Yawkey (and many Boston fan's) dream of a lily-white Red Sox starting lineup (once and injured Ortiz is replaced by Pat Burrell next year).


So true. We Red Sox fans hate Papi.
   66. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:31 PM (#2884431)
Sorry, snapper, but your analysis isn't brilliant enough, or your boss would hire someone just out of school to clean up after you. I've seen that often enough.

Wow! I'm glad I've never worked at the places you guys have.

I've worked at some pretty high powered places (and some not so much ;-)), but I've never seen laziness, sloppiness or refusal to do work tolerated.

Edit: stupidity and poor judgement are often tolerated, on the other hand.
   67. Srul Itza Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:32 PM (#2884432)
Am I the only person in the world who a.) has absolutely no problem with what Curt Schilling said here

You mean, other than Curt and "snapper"?

Yes.

HTH.

Next question.
   68. Ozzie's gay friend Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:33 PM (#2884439)
Guapo, that's what drives me crazy, Schilling Gammo, Bob Ryan and the rest need to be consistant. They shower Manny with chuckles and love when he's good, but when it's time to throw him under the bus they "reveal" all sorts of gripes from the past about how horrible he is.
They either have no memory, or get too caught up in the CW of the moment, or are FO schills.
   69. Big Train Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:33 PM (#2884442)
Remember that series in 06, when the Yanks won 5 games in 4 days to bury the Sox?

Manny was the only Red Sox who didn't quit. The Yanks just ended their season right there, and Manny got on base about 15 times in those 4 games (I think he got hurt in the last game). Thats why I find it amazing people think Manny isn't competitive or is dogging it now. That was never the impression I got from him.
   70. rfloh Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:35 PM (#2884447)
But life doesn't work this way. I can put together some brilliant analysis for my boss, but if I constantly refuse to check my work, so that there are careless errors, or random don't show up or refuse to work on certain days, I'm still going to get canned.

Doing part of your job really well doesn't excuse you from doing the rest of your job.


Sure. This applies to Schilling too. He came into spring training fat. He was lazy and stuffed his face.
   71. AROM Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:35 PM (#2884448)
I've worked at some pretty high powered places (and some not so much ;-)), but I've never seen laziness, sloppiness or refusal to do work tolerated.


Yet they tolerate you posting on BTF all day...

Not that you're the only one.
   72. Big Train Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:38 PM (#2884460)
what are you talking about?
   73. SoSH U at work Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:42 PM (#2884478)
Manny was the only Red Sox who didn't quit. The Yanks just ended their season right there, and Manny got on base about 15 times in those 4 games (I think he got hurt in the last game). Thats why I find it amazing people think Manny isn't competitive or is dogging it now. That was never the impression I got from him.


First, I think you're confusing didn't quit with didn't suck. I really doubt Mirabelli or Crisp or Alex Gonzalez quit. That they weren't as good as Manny in the series has more to do with them not being as talented, not their respective work ethic.

And I don't think anyone's ever said it's a permanent condition with Manny. But 5.6 seconds home to first on a play you could beat out doesn't exactly scream balls out.
   74. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:42 PM (#2884480)
Yet they tolerate you posting on BTF all day...

Not that you're the only one.


Did you notice the past tense? Worked not work in high powered places ;-)

God, I hated those places. Of course, if I'd stayed I'd be making three times as much. Oh well, I'd rather get home for dinner. My current boss, if there's no work to do, wouldn't care if you went to the movies. As long as the work gets done.
   75. Ozzie's gay friend Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:42 PM (#2884482)
Kevin, having every baseball writer in america, and the population of Bristol drooling over you and heaping you withpraise can sure make a guy seem tedious and unlikable pretty quick.

I admire Lester, but just overcoming cancer (and having a great story) doesn't make me like him more. Jose Contraras's families struggle toe leave Cuba was inspiring and heart-wrenching, but i still loved it when the Red Sox would shell the guy. Joba Chamberlain's (equally over-played) story is a great one, but I still hope Ortiz takes him deep when they face each other.
Patrick Swazye has cancer, and I hope he can overcome it like Lester, but I won't be renting Roadhouse because of it.
   76. Big Train Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:44 PM (#2884487)
You're talking through your ass, that's what I'm talking about. The whole team except Manny quit. That's completely ridiculous.

Are the game chatters still accessible? Go check them out.
   77. Big Train Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:46 PM (#2884498)
Manny Delcarmen is a good story, and he is pretty likeable.
   78. Srul Itza Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:46 PM (#2884500)
I'm not saying what Schilling is doing is right

Okay, now I'm confused. I thought you agreed with Esoteric you had no problem at all with what he said or how he said it.

The ironing is delicious.

Jeez, I haven't cooked that way since I made grilled cheese sandwiches in college. Invest in a microwave, dude.

But as soon as your talent slips, or an alternative appears, the knives come out, and everyone who you've pissed on and pissed off comes after you.

As the old saying goes, be kind to people on the way up -- you'll pass them again on the way down.


As to the article itself: The very last thing Boston needs right now is somebody stirring the pot more. Sometimes it does make sense to call out a teammate, even publicly. But is there any reason to believe that this, especially coming from Schilling, would have a positive effect on Manny?

It sometimes seems like Schilling never has an unexpressed thought. There is a great deal to be said for honesty. But too much of anything can be a problem, even honesty. If you don't believe me, try answering your wife honestly the next time she asks you whether those pants make her butt look big.
   79. Srul Itza Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:48 PM (#2884508)
But 5.6 seconds home to first on a play you could beat out doesn't exactly scream balls out.

Unless, of course, his knees really were hurting him.

Nah, couldn't be. The MRI was clean.
   80. Ozzie's gay friend Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:48 PM (#2884511)
I'm not excusing Manny's childish behavior of late, though this is a Red Sox team that has a terrible history of dealing with players they want to leave (either by trade of FA). Also, they should know more than anyone about Manny's childish behaviour and perhaps should have seen something like this coming, or avoided it by talking to MAnny, or not getting offended by Manny's comments the same way you'd get offened by a fully-functioning person saying the same thing.
   81. rconn23 Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:49 PM (#2884514)
"I'm assuming Gammons planted this is Schilling's mouth."

I think they take turns. Gammo is just a caricature of himself now. Sad.

I think Schilling and Goose Gossage should host a show about how real ballplayers should act. It would be solid programming if the new Sirius/XM ever decides to put together a "Who gives a sh#t channel?'' channel.
   82. Ozzie's gay friend Posted: July 31, 2008 at 06:50 PM (#2884517)
IO actually like Delcarmen a lot too, but he's not a very good player (and I still love Wakefield and Jacoby)
   83. phredbird Posted: July 31, 2008 at 07:04 PM (#2884585)
If most of us agree with that then most of us are idiots.

Did it ever occur to you clowns that Schilling might be saying out loud what the rest of Manny's teammates have been saying amongst themselves in private?

Schilling has his own agenda? How about him ruining the rest of his career by leaving it all out on the field in the 2004 playoffs? You have selective memory or something? Really, I've seen some idiotic comments but that one just about takes the cake.


c'mon, kevin. of course he has an agenda. everybody has an agenda. and him saying out loud what his teammates are thinking is part of that. others have pointed out that speaking his mind at just this time isn't necessarily in the club's interest in reference to getting value for manny if he's traded. that doesn't mean he's wrong about manny, it's his timing that is off, and it demonstrates some of what schilling is about. he's a bumptious blowhard when he's not on the mound winning games. i salute his pitching and his 2004 heroics.
my comment is idiotic? whatever. throwing around the word 'clown' is pretty hot coming from you. if this board is so full of idiots, then why are you here? you don't add much to discussions from what i've seen.
   84. Slinger Francisco Barrios (Dr. Memory) Posted: July 31, 2008 at 07:17 PM (#2884638)
I've never seen laziness, sloppiness or refusal to do work tolerated.

I'll call out the Illinois Department of Employment Security as one place where I saw all those on a daily basis, along with the other more generally tolerated faults you mentioned. The very embodiment of "we don't want nobody nobody sent."
   85. Guapo Posted: July 31, 2008 at 07:22 PM (#2884663)
Schilling also said would give Jason Bay his No. 38 (and Bay's number with the Pirates) if Bay ends up joining the Red Sox in exchange for someone to give a five-figure donation to his charity, Curt's Pitch.

Requiring someone to give $10,000 to the charity you named after yourself as a condition of doing them a favor isn't the greatest example of selflessness.
   86. phredbird Posted: July 31, 2008 at 07:28 PM (#2884681)
Yes. At least this time it was. You are at once saying Schilling is right but his timing is bad. WTF? His timing is bad? When do you expect him to say something, 6 months from now after it's all blown over? And he's a bumptious blowhard but he's right on the money this time? Right. He's right but he's wrong. Up is down. Left is right. in is out.


you are letting your emotions rule your responses. i wonder if you can see how silly you sound sometimes. your method of heaping scorn on people with little to go on makes you a very unattractive person to converse with.
think about it. it's perfectly possible that schilling is hurting his club's chances for getting good value for ramirez if that is what they want to do. and it makes it look as if curt schilling has decided what the red sox should do about ramirez, instead of leaving it to his betters. so even if he's 'right', he is hurting the club. and his timing is bad. period. part of what he puffs himself up about is being a good teammate, etc. ... how is this good for the red sox? fine, your take may be its time for manny to go and you don't care how. that's not strategic thinking at a time when it's needed.
   87. Big Train Posted: July 31, 2008 at 07:42 PM (#2884734)
Requiring someone to give $10,000 to the charity you named after yourself as a condition of doing them a favor isn't the greatest example of selflessness.

I think, charity of his choice would have been a little better.
   88. phredbird Posted: July 31, 2008 at 07:43 PM (#2884738)
oh brother. kev, i don't really know what one has to do with the other. you've called me an idiot. how am i supposed to react to that? and your habit of avoiding responding to a person's points in favor of changing the parameters of the debate or moving over to insults is, again, unattractive. don't you want to get along with anybody? sorry, i forgot, i'm ... well, you know.
   89. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: July 31, 2008 at 07:46 PM (#2884757)
Pedro may have operated on his own schedule and come to spring training late but he never came to spring training sporting a spare tire.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Adam M
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(12 - 12:25am, May 26)
Last: Tripon

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(118 - 12:15am, May 26)
Last: Paul D(uda)

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(86 - 11:59pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(4 - 11:26pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(18 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielder

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(20 - 11:24pm, May 25)
Last: Dan

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(27 - 11:16pm, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogTBO: Nerdy Rays head north
(17 - 10:07pm, May 25)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(6 - 9:57pm, May 25)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(6 - 9:42pm, May 25)
Last: TR_Sullivan

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(22 - 9:38pm, May 25)
Last: Cris E

NewsblogGreenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal
(817 - 9:08pm, May 25)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(55 - 8:48pm, May 25)
Last: Squash

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.5440 seconds
55 querie(s) executed