Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, June 29, 2009

BREAKING: Surgery for Carlos Beltran?

Colorado? Steadman? Is Beltran gonna be holed up at Ow Farm?

In a ominous-sounding move, Mets New York Mets center fielder Carlos Beltran flew to Vail, Colo., today for a second opinion on his ailing right knee from the inventor of microfracture surgery.

The Mets confirmed that Beltran was in Colorado to have the knee checked out by Dr. Richard Steadman, the surgeon who devised microfracture surgery in the 1990s to mimic missing cartilage.

Beltran has been on the disabled list since last Monday with what the Mets described as a bone bruise in his knee. If Beltran ends up having microfracture surgery, he would miss the rest of the season, at the least.

The surgery, which involves drilling holes in the knee so that blood and bone marrow clot to form new cartilage, has been done on numerous NFL and NBA players.

Repoz Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:26 PM | 98 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: mets

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Win one for Agrippa (haplo53) Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:33 PM (#3237085)
Oy.
   2. JJ1986 Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:35 PM (#3237087)
I guess Steve Phillips was right.
   3. Zeba Zeba Eata Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:36 PM (#3237089)
Everybody's broken.
   4. aleskel Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:37 PM (#3237090)
ruh roh
   5. Banta Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:40 PM (#3237094)
If he does have surgery, the question will have to be asked: could this have been avoided if the Mets would have DLed him when he first complained of the soreness?
   6. Lassus Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:47 PM (#3237098)
I thought that perhaps Beltran had said he was sore but that he could play, not that he complained and they said "suck it up".
   7. Banta Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:50 PM (#3237101)
Well, whichever way, Lassus. It's just that if one of my franchise players says that he doesn't feel right, I'd make damn sure he's not doing longterm damage, even if he thinks he can play.

The Mets have certainly lost the benefit of the doubt in these matters.
   8. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:54 PM (#3237105)
If Beltran goes down, do the Mets become sellers?
   9. Banta Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:55 PM (#3237106)
Sell what, OFF?
   10. twon8 Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:56 PM (#3237107)
I believe that this is a chronic condition and while playing surely aggravates it, it would have to be taken care of at some point. It probably would benefit Beltran to move to a corner, less wear and tear on his knees
   11. RJ in TO Posted: June 29, 2009 at 10:57 PM (#3237108)
If Beltran goes down, do the Mets become sellers?


What do they have worth selling that they'd want to sell? Delgado is hurt, Sheffield won't draw too much interest, Wright, Reyes, Beltran, K-Rod, and Santana aren't going anywhere, and no one wants the Castillo contract.

I suppose there might be someone out there who might want Hernandez, but that's about it. It's a stars & scrubs roster.
   12. Heinie Mantush (Krusty) Posted: June 29, 2009 at 11:05 PM (#3237118)
The surgery, which involves drilling holes in the knee so that blood and bone marrow clot to form new cartilage, has been done on numerous NFL and NBA players who were never the same after the surgery.


fxd
   13. Freeballin' (Tales of Met Power) Posted: June 29, 2009 at 11:10 PM (#3237133)
Sheff would draw some interest. Livan might too.
Both of those facts are too damn funny.

Maybe Church.
   14. Freeballin' (Tales of Met Power) Posted: June 29, 2009 at 11:11 PM (#3237140)
Would a contender take a flyer on Wagner, hoping he could step in in a pennant race?
   15. BringBackTimTeufel Posted: June 29, 2009 at 11:15 PM (#3237147)
Let's all pretend we did NOT see half a season of an Evans/Pagan-Reed-Sheffield/Church outfield coming.
   16. akrasian Posted: June 29, 2009 at 11:20 PM (#3237162)
#12, some players do come back just fine. Amar'e Stoudemire comes to mind, for instance. Early on the rates weren't good, but I don't remember the last player who had the surgery and didn't make it back okay. But it can take a while, of course.
   17. Tripon Posted: June 29, 2009 at 11:24 PM (#3237169)
Should have kept Endy Chavez!
   18. BringBackTimTeufel Posted: June 29, 2009 at 11:50 PM (#3237214)
Should have kept Endy Chavez!


Even HE was cursed.
   19. Mark S. Posted: June 30, 2009 at 12:06 AM (#3237239)
Should have kept Endy Chavez!



The Mariners wish we kept Chavez as well.

Endy Chavez could miss part of 2010 as well with severe ACL and MCL damage.
   20. Banta Posted: June 30, 2009 at 12:12 AM (#3237255)
But that collision never would have happened if Chavez wasn't traded. Also, Michael Jackson would still be alive. And there'd be no such thing as H1N1.
   21. Heinie Mantush (Krusty) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 12:20 AM (#3237276)
16. To my eye, Amare isn't as athletic as he was prior to the surgery, and I've yet to see anybody come all the way back in that regard. Moreover, Beltran is a full decade older than Stoudemire was at the time of the surgery.

How athletic did Greg Oden look to you this season?
   22. Petuniaviles Posted: June 30, 2009 at 12:21 AM (#3237278)
But that collision never would have happened if Chavez wasn't traded. Also, Michael Jackson would still be alive. And there'd be no such thing as H1N1.

These are but very few of the long, long list of problems that can be blamed on Yuniesky Betancourt.
   23. Swoboda is freedom Posted: June 30, 2009 at 12:25 AM (#3237282)
To my eye, Amare isn't as athletic as he was prior to the surgery, and I've yet to see anybody come all the way back in that regard.

His 2007 season was just as good as before he was injured. It did take him a while to get back though.
   24. Matt Waters Posted: June 30, 2009 at 12:42 AM (#3237296)
If the Mets fall out of it, and that is nowhere near a certainty at this point, the Yankees should definitely inquire about Sheffield. He could adequately replace Nady.
   25. AROM Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:05 AM (#3237324)
The surgery, which involves drilling holes in the knee so that blood and bone marrow clot to form new cartilage, has been done on numerous NFL and NBA players who were never the same after the surgery.


Delgado's up at the end of the season, right? If Beltran's knee is never the same, maybe they can get his bat in the lineup at 1B. I've been impressed with Nando's defense in the few games I saw, I didn't think his reputation was much for D.
   26. AROM Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:06 AM (#3237327)
He could adequately replace Nady.


Doing what? Sitting on the bench? Yanks OF and DH spots are full even without considering getting some DH time for Posada.
   27. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:14 AM (#3237338)
I've been impressed with Nando's defense in the few games I saw, I didn't think his reputation was much for D.

Is he ready to hit in the majors?
   28. Srul Itza Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:22 AM (#3237346)
the Yankees should definitely inquire about Sheffield

Yeah, because this ended so well the last time.
   29. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:53 AM (#3237401)
the Yankees should definitely inquire about Sheffield. He could adequately replace Nady.

Why would the Yankees want another guy who can't field a position? They already have Matsui as 70% of the DH.

They need a RH bat that kills lefties (performance against RHP is basically irrelevent) and can play one or more of RF, LF, 3B, SS or C. OF will obviously be far easier to find. That would let them rotate some combination of Damon/Posada/ARod/Jeter through DH against lefties.

Mark DeRosa would have been pretty much perfect. I don't know why they weren't in on him. They have a ton of live arms to offer.
   30. Hugh Jorgan Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:57 AM (#3237407)
the Yankees should definitely inquire about Sheffield

As a Red Sox fan, I wholly support this...
   31. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:58 AM (#3237408)
They need a RH bat that kills lefties (performance against RHP is basically irrelevent) and can play one or more of RF, LF, 3B, SS or C. OF will obviously be far easier to find.

I'm not really a huge fan of the guy, but Shelley Duncan pretty much fits in that role. And he's hanging around Scranton, waiting for the call.
   32. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:04 AM (#3237414)
I'm not really a huge fan of the guy, but Shelley Duncan pretty much fits in that roll. And he's hanging around Scranton, waiting for the call.

I don't think he can field any position adequately. They can't carry 2 DH's.
   33. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:25 AM (#3237429)
I don't think he can field any position adequately. They can't carry 2 DH's.

I wouldn't want him starting on a regular basis, but Duncan could probably fake left or right for a game or two here or there.
   34. Poster Nutbag Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:32 AM (#3237431)
Had to be Steadman, Repoz, the Good Dr. is no longer in....
   35. Heinie Mantush (Krusty) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:45 AM (#3237436)
His 2007 season was just as good as before he was injured. It did take him a while to get back though.


I hate to belabor my point, but athleticism =/= statistical output. What I see when I see Amare Stoudemire is a far more mature player than the player who put up monster stats in 2005. Still very athletic, mind you, but not quite what he once was. I'm very impressed that he has come as far as he has.

I'm amazed that Amare turns 27 next season. I thought he was much, much younger since he'd gone from HS to the pros, but I do vaguely recall hearing that he'd been old for a rookie.
   36. AJM Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:55 AM (#3237439)
I think I'm going to jump off a bridge.
   37. Rough Carrigan Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:01 AM (#3237440)
Speaking of Steadman, look at a picture of the guy and then a picture of Attorney General Eric Holder(at least, that's what they're telling us his name is to not be too overt about Oprah's influence in the administration)
   38. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:03 AM (#3237441)
I think I'm going to jump off a bridge.

You'll probably land on John Maine.
   39. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:11 AM (#3237446)
You'll probably land on John Maine.
He's already hurt. It'd be Wright or Castillo.
   40. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:13 AM (#3237448)
He's already hurt. It'd be Wright or Castillo.

If the Mets aren't transporting Wright in a Popemobile by now, I don't know what they're thinking.
   41. Teufel's Graveyard Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:15 AM (#3237451)
They need a RH bat that kills lefties (performance against RHP is basically irrelevent) and can play one or more of RF, LF, 3B, SS or C.


Bill Hall would have fit that description before this year. The Yankees can have him if they want him.

As far as the lefty killer thing, there was a nice thread years back that said that there is pretty much a league wide platoon split, and that any lefty killer will eventually regress there. It's still a small sample size this year for Hall, but he certainly has regressed.
   42. Swoboda is freedom Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:35 AM (#3237457)
I hate to belabor my point, but athleticism =/= statistical output. What I see when I see Amare Stoudemire is a far more mature player than the player who put up monster stats in 2005. Still very athletic, mind you, but not quite what he once was. I'm very impressed that he has come as far as he has.

I haven't seen him enough to judge, but it could also be getting older. A lot of players can't jump as well when they are 27, compared to when they are 22. (Actually they can, but the landing is harder and they don't want to)

Again, you are probably right, it might have taken something away.
   43. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:39 AM (#3237460)
Early on the rates weren't good, but I don't remember the last player who had the surgery and didn't make it back okay. But it can take a while, of course.
Chad Tracy has been pretty awful since the surgery.
   44. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:41 AM (#3237461)
Given the nature of the surgery, Beltran will probably need a full year to return to baseball, and about 18 months to make it back to normal - if he does. That really knocks him out until the start of the 2011 season. And it probably means his days as a premier defensive centerfielder are over
   45. AJM Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:41 AM (#3237462)
It'd be Wright or Castillo.

If you can promise it's Castillo I'll do it.
   46. Swoboda is freedom Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:44 AM (#3237464)
If you can promise it's Castillo I'll do it.

Wait till he's standing next to Murphy.
   47. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:46 AM (#3237467)

Wait till he's standing next to Murphy.
Don't you be hating on Daniel. .875 OPS guys like him don't grow on trees.
   48. Banta Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:54 AM (#3237470)
levski, don't make me get the hose.
   49. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:56 AM (#3237471)
Don't you be hating on Daniel. .875 OPS guys like him don't grow on trees.
Poor Sam M. He may never live that down. I bet MHS and Joe C. are picking their players already.
   50. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:00 AM (#3237473)
Maybe the Mets can trade Murphy for Chris Burke.
   51. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:05 AM (#3237475)
This year is cursed for the Mets.
   52. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:08 AM (#3237477)
Poor Chris Burke. He got dumped twice this year by the Padres alone. And once by the Dbacks and Mariners.
At least Juan Guttierez is working out as the other "throw-in guy" in the Valverde trade.
I'd still have liked to have Callaspo back, however, and his 108 OPS+
   53. RollingWave Posted: June 30, 2009 at 06:47 AM (#3237508)
Don't you be hating on Daniel. .875 OPS guys like him don't grow on trees.
Yes, and apparently he isn't in the house so far this year either. as Murphy's only OPSing .200 points below that right now.
   54. Matt Waters Posted: June 30, 2009 at 10:26 AM (#3237524)
Doing what? Sitting on the bench?


Well, yeah, being a bat off the bench. Had Nady been able to return, that was pretty much going to be his job description, barring a collapse by Swisher.
   55. jacksone (AKA It's OK...) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 12:35 PM (#3237552)
Given the nature of the surgery, Beltran will probably need a full year to return to baseball, and about 18 months to make it back to normal - if he does. That really knocks him out until the start of the 2011 season. And it probably means his days as a premier defensive centerfielder are over


I believe the generally accepted timetable for NBA players is 75-85% after one year, 100% two years after the surgery. And a sizable increase in the risk to the other knee if play is resumed too early. Too much stress on the non-injured knee from having to carry >50% of the load.

No clue how that holds up for a MLB player.
   56. bunyon Posted: June 30, 2009 at 12:57 PM (#3237568)
If you can promise it's Castillo I'll do it.

You'll die when he drops you.
   57. Freeballin' (Tales of Met Power) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:36 PM (#3237595)
"Given the nature of the surgery, Beltran will probably need a full year to return to baseball, and about 18 months to make it back to normal - if he does. That really knocks him out until the start of the 2011 season. And it probably means his days as a premier defensive centerfielder are over "


He still won't suck quite as much as Chris Young. How's Brandon Webb doing, by the way?
   58. Obi One Kenobi Nil Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:54 PM (#3237610)
I think we can safely say that Chris Young is a bust.
   59. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 01:57 PM (#3237613)
Given the nature of the surgery, Beltran will probably need a full year to return to baseball, and about 18 months to make it back to normal - if he does. That really knocks him out until the start of the 2011 season. And it probably means his days as a premier defensive centerfielder are over


Keep wishing, levski...
   60. There are no words... (Met Fan Charlie) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:01 PM (#3237618)
Lordy Lord, what's next?

Are we to find out that Citifield is actually built on the site of an ancient Native American burial ground? Which also happens to be radioactive?

Whom did we piss off? And how?
   61. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:02 PM (#3237619)
Whom did we piss off? And how?

Gary Carter.

You didn't name the stadium after him.
   62. aleskel Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:07 PM (#3237622)
Are we to find out that Citifield is actually built on the site of an ancient Native American burial ground? Which also happens to be radioactive?

Worse. It's in Queens.
   63. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:21 PM (#3237635)
Keep wishing, levski...
Levski can be obnoxious, and obviously we're a long way from Beltran actually having the surgery. But that's hardly an unrealistic assessment, and I don't think anyone can argue that a 33 year-old Beltran might not be a premium defensive CF much longer anyway, and if he's coming the knee surgery, he almost certainly won't be.
   64. Obama Bomaye Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:22 PM (#3237639)
It was built on the ashes of the ashes!!!
   65. The District Attorney Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:38 PM (#3237648)
The very concept of Carlos Beltran having to move to 1B makes me weep. Can we not talk about this??

I certainly am not willing to write off Daniel Murphy yet. Dunno what the timeframe was on Sam's bet.
   66. OCD SS Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:42 PM (#3237654)
Are we to find out that Citifield is actually built on the site of an ancient Native American burial ground? Which also happens to be radioactive?


Every parking lot in Queens is cursed.
   67. bunyon Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:49 PM (#3237658)
Simple: move Murphy to CF.
   68. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 02:57 PM (#3237666)
I certainly am not willing to write off Daniel Murphy yet. Dunno what the timeframe was on Sam's bet.
400 PA, I believe. Murphy may not hit this badly all year, but he'd have to hit like a demon to get his OPS over .800 at this point
   69. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:02 PM (#3237668)
He's not. Murphy's OPS will probably go down from now on. He sucks.
   70. formerly dp Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:13 PM (#3237679)
He sucks.

Well, he probably needed another year in the minors. Remember the first week of the season, when Sam said it was a mistake to give Sheff any ABs over Murphy? I actually bought that for half a minute. Man, that first week of April was awesome, so full of hope and joy, when we thought 40% of the rotation sucking would be the team's biggest hurdle in 2009...
   71. Conor Posted: June 30, 2009 at 03:49 PM (#3237716)
Remember the first week of the season, when Sam said it was a mistake to give Sheff any ABs over Murphy? I actually bought that for half a minute.


Those were the days. I never really bought it, but at least you could make the argument.

Man, Sam really will never live Murphy down, will he?

This was from May 11.

I was right about Daniel Murphy, except I was wrong in thinking he'd be OK defensively. I still think he will be eventually, but he ain't yet, that's for sure. But he is and will continue to be a hitter. Every PA that Manuel gives to Sheffield over him is dumb with a capital Harrelson.


Now, at the time Sheff was hitting 186/364/349 compared to Murphy at 298/364/457, but probably the bigger problem was declaring victory on Murphy so early in the season.

Edit- Sam clearly put the jinx the two guys. Murphy has hit 205/275/291 in 133 PA since then. Sheff 325/414/579 in 145 PA since then. Luckily for Sam, Jerry has done plenty of other dumb things.
   72. Raskolnikov Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:16 PM (#3237749)
I also was and remain a big advocate of Daniel Murphy. I just don't know what's happened to him, he appears like a completely different hitter. I would still be patient with him - at least until a big bopper can be acquired or Ike Davis forces the issue. But at this point, I don't see how his bat can carry 1B. At best he appears to offer Mientkciwecz like skills.

As for Beltran, I'm hoping for the best. To not see him in his graceful form would devastate me. He was/is an absolute pleasure to watch patrolling CF for the Mets these last few years.
   73. bunyon Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:22 PM (#3237761)
Plenty of young guys struggle when they first come up. The jump to MLB is huge and young guys struggle physically and mentally. It's way too early to give up on Murphy. Now, that isn't to say he's obviously going to make it or that Sam's specific bet for this season looks good. It's just that I would not be too down about his future (or FMart's for that matter). These are guys that are likely being pressed to service a year early for various reasons. Hopefully it doesn't have a lasting negative effect.
   74. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:25 PM (#3237765)
I also was and remain a big advocate of Daniel Murphy. I just don't know what's happened to him, he appears like a completely different hitter.

Are you basing that off the 151 PAs in 2008? Because, he has a .796 OPS in 1078 minor-league PAs, and he wasn't young at any level.

I mean, that doesn't say he couldn't develop into a decent or even good MLB hitter (depending on his position). But it's a pretty good indication he didn't have the bat to carry 1B.
   75. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:29 PM (#3237770)
At best he appears to offer Mientkciwecz like skills.

On offense, right? Because he's nowhere near Doug on defense. Murphy is a great bench player. That's it.

I'm not down on FMart at all. He could go hitless for the rest of the year, and I'd still think he's a great prospect.
   76. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:37 PM (#3237781)
Sheffield has three clear advantages over Murphy at this point:

1. He's hitting
2. His track provides Jerry sufficient cover should anyone question Gary playing regularly when and if Gary cools off. "He's been in this game 20 years and blah, blah, blah"
3. Being a veteran player he is FAR better equipped to cope. Gary may not LOOK like he copes with the world around him. But clearly he has learned to make some accomodations as context changes

Daniel isn't hitting. He has no real track record. He's playing regularly and then it's several games with 1 plate appearance. That type of approach is difficult for a younger player working to really establish himself.

And since the defense is a wash, which is a pretty d*mning indictment of Murphy's defense I must say, Jerry has no CHOICE but to play Gary. Sheffield is arguably the team's best offensive player at this point on a per PA basis. He leads in the team in homers in 200 plate appearances.

And based on last night if you throw him a cheesy 88 mph fastball up around his shoulders he will it 440 feet.

Daniel won't EVER be able to do that.
   77. Banta Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:47 PM (#3237797)
And since the defense is a wash

Murphy's defense is worse than Sheff's. Manuel stated that he'll never play Murphy out there again. Which makes Daniel a first baseman who won't ever hit enough for the position.
   78. The District Attorney Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:52 PM (#3237801)
Either that, or they need to re-consider him as a LF once he's actually gotten to practice it a bit. I mean, seriously.
   79. bunyon Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:57 PM (#3237807)
DA, I agree. I know they're pinched, but if they decide the season is lost, they should send Murphy down to get started working on being a LFer. He didn't look like he'd ever be great out there, but from what I've read, he hasn't had much of a chance to learn the position. You can't just hang the kid out to dry. Even if all he'll ever be is a bench guy, you'd like him to be a good bench guy. Good bench guys are very important. At least the Mets should be learning this.
   80. formerly dp Posted: June 30, 2009 at 04:57 PM (#3237808)
Daniel isn't hitting. He has no real track record. He's playing regularly and then it's several games with 1 plate appearance. That type of approach is difficult for a younger player working to really establish himself.

Agreed. If the Mets had more depth the best thing for Murphy would be some more time at AAA, call him back up when he gets hot. But that's not 2009 for the Mets or for Murphy.

Is it wrong to say that despite his numbers, I don't consider Martinez's stint a failure? There's a lot to like about the ways he has carried himself. And I don't think this is killing him mentally b/c the organization is giving him a pass on how he performs in the majors this year. There's just a lot of ways to get out a 20 year-old hitter- he's facing lefty specialists and seeing carefully crafted and honed pitch sequences. Some people were ready to give up on Justin Upton in mid-April (when he was at .167/.222/.250), even advocating playing Byrnes ahead of him, and now he's hitting .318/.399/.580...
   81. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:06 PM (#3237821)
Is it wrong to say that despite his numbers, I don't consider Martinez's stint a failure?
I think the only real takeaway from Martinez's time in the Majors thus far is that he's not, at age 20, ready to be a Major League player. Which is fine, if that's the worst thing you can say about a guy (and it might not be the worst thing you can say about Martinez, but that's a different point) it's not exactly a huge black mark.

David Wright spend his age 20 season in High A, same for Manny Ramirez (who came up at age 21, and put up numbers like F-Mart). So long as this isn't affecting Martinez mentally, or screwing his swing/approach/what have you, it's fine to call it not a failure.
   82. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:07 PM (#3237824)
Banta:

It's such a small viewing I was erring on the side of being nice.

Didn't know he buried the needle on the Reimer Scale
   83. Mark S. Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:09 PM (#3237827)
Good news:

Steadman examined Beltran's knee and agreed with the Mets' medical staff that the injury is a bone bruise, a source told the Daily News. Steadman, whose specialty is microfracture surgery, likely will advocate Beltran rest through the All-Star break, the newspaper reported.
   84. Win one for Agrippa (haplo53) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:11 PM (#3237829)
Is it wrong to say that despite his numbers, I don't consider Martinez's stint a failure?


Not at all; I totally agree with you. I like that he hasn't struck out a ton (a la Alex Escobar in 2001) and seems to have a kernel of a clue.
   85. Mark S. Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:14 PM (#3237834)
I think the only real takeaway from Martinez's time in the Majors thus far is that he's not, at age 20, ready to be a Major League player. Which is fine, if that's the worst thing you can say about a guy (and it might not be the worst thing you can say about Martinez, but that's a different point) it's not exactly a huge black mark.


The thing is, Martinez isn't really struggling. In 91 PA he has 13 Ks and 5 BB. The walks are on the low side, but the strikeouts aren't excessive. On the down side, his BABIP is .217 and his ISO is .073. I think he needs more ML time to get acclimated to the setting, since he seems to be hitting the ball weakly when he makes contact. Although his opposite field double Sunday night would have probably been out of the park in many stadiums.
   86. JPWF13 Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:16 PM (#3237840)
I just don't know what's happened to him, he appears like a completely different hitter. I would still be patient with him


he has a 24/23 k/bb ratio in 240 PAs
that's actually quite good.
IF he had a league average BABIP he'd be at .300/.360/.420 and Sam would hold a 5 point lead on his bet with MHS...

unfortunately he does not have a league average BABIP and his on contact numbers suck.

BTW Carp is up in Seattle

personally I think that Carp/Murphy and Evans should have been relatively easy to project as amongst each other (as hitters)

1: Carp
2: Evans
3: Murphy

Basically, Murphy had an unsustainable BABIP spike in his first 200 or so PAs...
My guess is that he's better than his YTD numbers- his CAREER to date is probably fairly accurate insofar as his ability
so basically a 95-100 OPS+ guy with no defensive position
   87. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:28 PM (#3237850)
My guess is that he's better than his YTD numbers- his CAREER to date is probably fairly accurate insofar as his ability
so basically a 95-100 OPS+ guy with no defensive position


That sounds about right to me.
   88. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:36 PM (#3237859)
Steadman examined Beltran's knee and agreed with the Mets' medical staff that the injury is a bone bruise, a source told the Daily News. Steadman, whose specialty is microfracture surgery, likely will advocate Beltran rest through the All-Star break, the newspaper reported.


That's good news, even as a Yankee fan. It's bad for baseball to lose top flight talent like Beltran.
   89. Lassus Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:39 PM (#3237865)
Mon, Jun 29

1B Carlos Delgado should be cleared within days to begin "dry swings" without making contact with a baseball, assistant GM John Ricco said. Delgado, who is recovering from right hip surgery to repair a torn labrum and remove a bone spur, is projected to return in early August. (Yahoo Sports)


That could be good news.
   90. bunyon Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:42 PM (#3237869)
1B Carlos Delgado should be cleared within days to begin "dry swings" without making contact with a baseball,

He could now play RF for the Braves!
   91. RB in NYC (Now with New iPhone!) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:50 PM (#3237878)
That sounds about right to me.
If that's really the case, it's a brutal, brutal job by the Mets. That would mean in less than a year they managed to turn a possibly league average hitter who could maybe be a second baseman into basically a non-asset. That might have happened anyway, but it seems like they sure managed to destroy Murphy's career in a quick while.
   92. adamadkins Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:54 PM (#3237885)
Well, when you're run by Omar Minaya and your manager is Jerry Manuel...
   93. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 05:58 PM (#3237893)
If that's really the case, it's a brutal, brutal job by the Mets. That would mean in less than a year they managed to turn a possibly league average hitter who could maybe be a second baseman into basically a non-asset. That might have happened anyway, but it seems like they sure managed to destroy Murphy's career in a quick while.

Yup. They should really give him a full off-season and year at AAA to try and learn 2B, along with personal tutoring from whomever they think is the best 2B-defense guru around.

Just looking at stats, Murphy does profile as a "tweener". Good bat if he can play a premium-D position or add significant defensive value in the OF or at 1B. If he brings negative positional/defensive value, the bat just won't play.
   94. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: June 30, 2009 at 06:02 PM (#3237903)
Just looking at stats, Murphy does profile as a "tweener". Good bat if he can play a premium-D position or add significant defensive value in the OF or at 1B. If he brings negative positional/defensive value, the bat just won't play.

Seems like they could have tried to develop him as a Mark DeRosa type of player. Ah well. The solid showing Murphy gave last year might prove to be his undoing. I hope not. He seems like a guy that's easy to root for.
   95. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: June 30, 2009 at 06:08 PM (#3237911)
Seems like they could have tried to develop him as a Mark DeRosa type of player. Ah well. The solid showing Murphy gave last year might prove to be his undoing. I hope not. He seems like a guy that's easy to root for.

I think it's hard to make than transition going up the defensive spectrum at the MLB level. I like him too, although Sam's ridiculous touting did sour me a little.

Is it really too late to give him an offseason and 2 months in AAA to try and learn 2B?
   96. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: June 30, 2009 at 06:11 PM (#3237913)
I think it's hard to make than transition going up the defensive spectrum at the MLB level.

I meant in the minors.
   97. JPWF13 Posted: June 30, 2009 at 06:20 PM (#3237928)
I like him too, although Sam's ridiculous touting did sour me a little.


Well being a Met fan I was rooting for Sam to be right....
now, WRT Ellsbury and the late great Kevin's ridiculous touting, I was praying he'd bust.
   98. Raskolnikov Posted: June 30, 2009 at 10:01 PM (#3238220)
Hallelujah.

I'll take ten more agonizing heartbreak losses if it means that Beltran can recover fully.

The news made my day.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Adam M
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(12 - 12:25am, May 26)
Last: Tripon

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(118 - 12:15am, May 26)
Last: Paul D(uda)

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(86 - 11:59pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(4 - 11:26pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(18 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielder

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(20 - 11:24pm, May 25)
Last: Dan

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(27 - 11:16pm, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogTBO: Nerdy Rays head north
(17 - 10:07pm, May 25)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(6 - 9:57pm, May 25)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(6 - 9:42pm, May 25)
Last: TR_Sullivan

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(22 - 9:38pm, May 25)
Last: Cris E

NewsblogGreenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal
(817 - 9:08pm, May 25)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(55 - 8:48pm, May 25)
Last: Squash

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.6850 seconds
54 querie(s) executed