Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, March 27, 2013

BtBS: The Rise of the Called Strike

Using the retrosheet files dating back to 1988 (when pitch count data first becomes prevelent [sic]), I found that the amount of Balls per plate appearance has remained relatively stable since 1988, but the amount of strikes per PA has risen considerably.

This shouldn’t come as too much of a surprise—walk rates in the majors have returned to normal, while strikeout rates continue to inflate exponentially.

But what I did find surprising is that despite all the flame-throwing 7’ tall relievers with 100 mph four-seamers and untouchable, ‘filthy’ breaking pitches, it’s not the Swing-and-Miss Strike that has become more popular over the last two decades. It’s actually the Called Strike that has become more frequent in the modern day pitcher-batter face off

bobm Posted: March 27, 2013 at 08:22 AM | 4 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: umpiring

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. TomH Posted: March 27, 2013 at 09:55 AM (#4397496)
a fine article!

I suspect breaking up the "called strikes per PA" trend line into groupings like
a) players who hit home runs in >4% of PA
b) players who hit home runs in <1.5% of PA
c) the middle group in between
....... such that the 3 groups are about equal

and see what corrleation there is, as well as how the increase in HR/PA over time work swith this, might show if batter selectivity in pitches to emphasize power is an important variable.

   2. Walt Davis Posted: March 27, 2013 at 04:41 PM (#4397882)
It's probably my crappy connection but the article won't load for me. This is probably addressed in the article but in case not ...

(Not having seen the actual numbers) this is surprising to me. If balls/PA is remaining the same while strikes/PA is going up, then it's not strike zone expansion, it's an even greater reliance on rake and take. Which is consistent with more called strikes.
   3. dr. scott Posted: March 27, 2013 at 06:53 PM (#4397971)
One theory I read about the rise of strikeouts was the analytics available now on every batter. (for instance I have an app on my iphone that tells me every hole in hittters swing given counts, pitcher handedness etc). the theory is its easier for the pitchers, whose job is to be able to throw the ball at any location, to exploit this data than it is for the batter to correct the hole in the swing. I guess this would jibe with this data if one assumes the hitters also know the holes in thier swings and just dont swing at those balls... seems more likely that all strike outs would be up though.. too bad. I liked that theory.
   4. Walt Davis Posted: March 27, 2013 at 10:58 PM (#4398105)
I possibly take it back a bit. Obviously pitches per PA is going up (if the number of balls are the same and the number of strikes are up) which means the denominator is bigger so the rate of ball/pitch is lower which is consistent with an expanded zone. Per PA rather than per pitch seems a somewhat odd way to measure it to me.

Or is he not counting BIP as "strikes"?

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
danielj
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP 16 Jan. 2017: The ‘honor’ Trumps politics in scheduling Cubs’ White House visit
(1918 - 2:42am, Jan 22)
Last: You Know Nothing JT Snow (YR)

Sox TherapyThe Kids Are or Are Not Alright
(18 - 1:56am, Jan 22)
Last: Nasty Nate

NewsblogEx-Astro Luis Valbuena reportedly agrees to deal with Angels - Houston Chronicle
(19 - 1:51am, Jan 22)
Last: JAHV

NewsblogChris Russo thinks the latest selections have ruined Hall of Fame
(77 - 1:36am, Jan 22)
Last: David Nieporent (now, with children)

NewsblogJayson Stark: Casting my 2018 Hall of Fame ballot ... today
(82 - 12:51am, Jan 22)
Last: cardsfanboy

Hall of Merit2018 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion
(113 - 12:41am, Jan 22)
Last: Michael J. Binkley's anxiety closet

NewsblogOT - December 2016 NBA thread
(1215 - 12:07am, Jan 22)
Last: maccoach57

NewsblogMets' Jay Bruce problem: Ex-GMs weigh in on what team should do - NY Daily News
(1 - 12:02am, Jan 22)
Last: JJ1986

NewsblogHall of Fame's Rule of 10 should be changed | MLB.com
(75 - 11:25pm, Jan 21)
Last: cardsfanboy

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2000 Discussion
(26 - 11:09pm, Jan 21)
Last: DL from MN

NewsblogMLB Tonight: Jorge Posada | MLB.com
(30 - 11:03pm, Jan 21)
Last: Jose is El Absurd Pollo

Newsblog2017 Baseball Hall of Fame election results | MLB.com
(201 - 10:28pm, Jan 21)
Last: Ziggy: The Platonic Form of Russell Branyan

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2000 Ballot
(2 - 8:52pm, Jan 21)
Last: OCF

NewsblogOT - NFL stretch drive/playoffs (December 2016 - February 2017)
(622 - 4:12pm, Jan 21)
Last: Greg K

NewsblogThe Trumbo agreement, the ripple effect and what's next - School of Roch
(3 - 12:52pm, Jan 21)
Last: RMc's Yelling Mob of Hackmen

Page rendered in 0.1407 seconds
47 querie(s) executed