If baseball actually was the absolute science that some haughty new-age hardball intelligentsia believe it is, then surely someone would have already created another Albert Pujols by now. For even baseball’s new brigade of pseudo-intellectual sabermetricians seem to understand that there are no highfalutin’ formulas that would deny the painfully obvious truth that the Cardinals slugger has become a near-perfect standard of baseball excellence.
The sabermetric clan just love them some Albert. If they could shove all of their ultimate exotic measures like VORP, WHIP, RAR, DIPS, SNW, OPS and WAR into a statistical blender, out would pop Virtual Pujols, a spectacular hitting machine even Keith Law could unconditionally love.
And I say thank goodness for Pujols, because he is the perfect baseball creation who, at least for the moment, has allowed the game’s stubborn old-school traditionalists, new-school deep thinkers and baseball’s statistical moderates, too, to meet on some common ground.
I woke up Tuesday morning with a slight case of uncomfortable dread bubbling in my stomach, wondering who and how someone armed with a Baseball Writers Association of America National League MVP ballot in one hand and a sabermetric crib sheet in another was going to use the rigid language of science to explain why Pujols didn’t deserve to win his third NL MVP.
...Numbers are not an absolute tool like the sabermetric worshipers would have you believe. You do not calculate the baseball genius of any great player solely with a spreadsheet any more than you would judge the musical genius of Chuck Berry or Miles Davis by an elaborate math formula.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. OCF Posted: November 25, 2009 at 07:44 AM (#3396356)And Repoz is so filled with love that he wants to give this man more exposure than he deserves by posting his articles here.
*sniffle*
Not until you clone Albert Pujols, you good for nothin' pseudo-intellectual.
There is nothing metaphoric going on here. He thinks the failure of the baseball scientists is that they have yet to clone Albert Pujols. He gives little credit to those of us who worked years to clone Mike Pagliarulo. Now that I think about it, maybe we aimed low, but he was solid at third for a little while and plus he has those scouting chops.
We hold multitudes.
Nope. Just Burwell being Burwell. Monumental stupidity with just a touch of undeserved egotism.
It would have been more than valid. It would have been super-valid!
well--we've solved it for a sphere
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main