User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.2751 seconds
50 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Never Give an Inge (Dave) Posted: March 26, 2012 at 10:36 PM (#4089821)Good for him, even though this news makes me feel old. He had a HOVG career.
You know, we should do a HoVG. We talk about it enough and it would give those of not smart enough to make good HoM voters something to do.
If such a thing existed, I'd consider the inner circle HOVG to be guys who were legitimately borderline HOFers -- Willie Randolph, David Cone, etc. I know those guys are in the HOM but (not to start a flame war--I chose them because they were two of my favorite players) they really shouldn't be in the HOF -- they just reflect the fact that the HOF is too big. Ordonez is comfortably in the HOVG but I don't think he is inner circle.
O-E-O forever
Just looked at his minor league stats. They're...pretty lousy. These days I'd be surprised if a guy with those stats even got a real chance.
He hit .329 at age 23 in AAA...but yeah, before that he did not have an impressive track record. I do remember his rookie season that he was a fantasy steal in one of my leagues despite not putting up all that great numbers, just because of how unexpected it was.
Unlike the HOF, the "inner circle" of the HOVG is not composed of the hall's best players but rather of its most representative players. Being on the HOF borderline - like Trammel, for example - necessarily means that you are not a quintessential HOVG player, and thus not inner circle HOVG. So while Mark Grace is inner circle HOVG, Fred McGriff, his superior, is doomed to the borderlands between Halls.
Also, my impulse is to say that players without HOF-quality peaks are more comfortably placed in the HOVG. Moises Alou (38 WAR) fits more naturally than Albert Belle (37 WAR).
And I'd agree that Alou is more quintessential HoVG than Belle. An HoF peak might disqualify you from the HoVG. I think there's a tough call on Cesar Cedeno and Eric Davis in particular but I will for the moment exclude them. Is Willie Davis in the HoM? (Reggie Smith is right?)
So ... off the top of my head
C Munson
1B Grace? Cooper? Watson?
2B Durham (I know, not yet eligible) Frank White?
SS Fregosi (HoF peak?), Campy, Concepcion
3B Buddy Bell, Toby Harrah
LF Moises
CF Monday, White, North
RF Clark
Let's see what PI suggests (min 70% games played, 1961 or later...)
Porter, Sundberg and maybe Parrish are other good C choices
Cash is obvious additional choice at 1B, Cooper, Watson not so great but solid
Durham is a pretty solid choice but Knoblauch and Lopes are better
Wow, Lansford and DeCinces hava a lot more WAR than I realized. Bell is the candidate but should probably be borderline HoM. Harrah is a good choice but split time between SS and 3B.
Concepcion is a bit further down the list than I'd have guessed and perhaps Fernandez should take his place.
Duh, Roy White (Moises plenty of time elsewhere)
Sure, Chet Lemon, Fred Lynn, blah, blah, blah
I'm gonna rule out Straw and Parker (HoF peaks?) so we could go Salmon and Barfield and Maggs right there too. Clark probably has too many WAR.
Mostly agree with #14.
#14 isn't all that controversial.
I would think the HOVG would be shaped like a donut, and thus would have an inner annulus rather than an inner circle (with McGriff on the inner edge and Jim Abbott or whoever on the outer edge).
Rice, Brock, and Puckett aren't eligible as they are in the HOF. No matter how much we whine about it, it is so, and therefore I'd say they aren't even eligible for discussion on the HOVG.
Well, I didn't say I agreed with that rule...and it's not like our tenets are carved in stone yet.
You shouldn't, because A-Rod was clearly the best player in the league that year.
Also, lineup protection is meaningless, doesn't affect value.
Jimmy Key, too.
I can't argue with that, which is why I said that it's because I'm a Tiger fan.
Tell that to Delmon Young last year.
This is a SABR truth that has always seemed fishy to me. And frankly, it is: http://mlbresearch.blogspot.com/ and http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/pitching-around-batters say there is *something* to lineup protection.
From your second link:
Unlike the HOF, the "inner circle" of the HOVG is not composed of the hall's best players but rather of its most representative players. Being on the HOF borderline - like Trammel, for example - necessarily means that you are not a quintessential HOVG player, and thus not inner circle HOVG. So while Mark Grace is inner circle HOVG, Fred McGriff, his superior, is doomed to the borderlands between Halls.
I am down with your first sentence, but I think Trammell isn't a borderline HOF player, he's a no-doubt HOFer who the voters have made a mistake with. I also think Cone is an almost certain non-HOFer who the voters made the right call with, and I feel comfortable with him as an "inner-circle" HOVGer.
I also don't think a low peak is necessary to be a HOVGer. High-peak guys who flamed out early are just as "representative" of the HOVG as low-peak compilers. There's room for both Albert Belle and Johnny Damon, for both Doc Gooden and Andy Pettitte, etc.
Yeah, having Cabby behind him allowed him to almost manage a .300 OBP with the Tigers!
Nah, they're in the Hall of Coulda Beens or the Hall of If Onlys or something.
As you can tell, I'm a big Hall of Hall of Fames guy.
EDIT: Here's an even more controversial criterion for the HoVG -- no MVPs or CYAs. RoYs are allowed.
This project will identify and prioritize the eligible players who should be elected to the Hall of Fame.
One thing I want to do here is make a distinction between players in Purgatory and those in the Hall of Very Good (HOVG). Players in Purgatory do not belong in any HOVG; they belong in the HOF! You often see “small Hall” advocates describing top candidates like Tim Raines, Bert Blyleven and Ron Santo as HOVG players; they’re on the outside of the HOF and deserve to be there, so they say. Contrary to this sort of contrivance, my idea is that HOVG players are of lesser quality than players generally enshrined in Cooperstown. The three mentioned players are clearly in the Hall of Fame class, perhaps the three most egregious oversights. Our aim will be to identify who all these players are and put them in their own place: The Hall of Purgatory (HOP: hope). (We’ll save for another project our elections to the HOVG.)
The voting format combines a ranked order with an up/down vote. I have devised a queue of candidates for the Hall, based on many different rankings and projects, on this website and others. We’ll start with the top 30 candidates. Each voter will be asked to do three things:
1. Rank the top 15 in order.
2. For each of these 15, mark Yes (Y) or No (N) in answer to this question: Should this player be in the Hall of Fame?
3. From the second 15, rank your top 6 in order. This identifies players the group thinks most deserve to be on the next ballot.
To be elected to the HOP a player must finish in the top 10 in voting and a majority of voters must say Yes, this player belongs in the HOF. We’ll elect a maximum of ten per election. If at least half the voters say No, the candidate is identified as a potential member of the HOVG. We’ll use a “three strikes, you’re out” rule: a player will be removed from the ballot after his third election being rejected by our electorate (if we get that far).
The project will end after the second time we elect no players to the HOP. We’ll end up with a nice prioritized list for the Hall of Fame to elect. Also, we’ll have identified some of the better players in the HOVG.
We’re ranking players based on Hall of Fame criteria, so character counts. Negro league and minor league play counts, but we’re not considering players who played primarily in foreign leagues. We’ll consider players retired in 2004 or earlier, everyone eligible for the 2010 BBWAA election.
In that project we identified 58 players that belong in the HOF. That's about the same number that the Hall of Merit has identified, although Purgatory chose a few non-HoMers (McGriff, Murphy, Leach, Belle, Walters, Van Haltren, Quisenberry and Redding). Five of those 58 have since been elected: Dawson (finished #26), Alomar (#4), Blyleven (#2), Larkin (#5), Santo (#1).
Eleven players were eliminated by the “three strikes, you’re out” rule. These could be seen as the top players in the HOVG:
Carl Mays
Dave Parker
Larry Doyle
Willie Randolph
Charley Jones
Bobby Bonds
Billy Pierce
Bob Elliott
Wilbur Cooper
Luis Tiant
Bob Johnson
We never did go back and complete the HOVG. At the end of that project these were the next 15 also-rans:
Wally Berger
Urban Shocker
Tommy Bridges
Dave Concepcion
Gavvy Cravath
Don Newcombe
Dave Stieb
Bret Saberhagen
Thurman Munson
Robin Ventura
Jim Kaat
Jimmy Ryan
Cesar Cedeno
Rusty Staub
Reggie Smith
I envisioned three primary levels in the Universe of Honors:
Level 1. The Hall of Fame
Level 2. Purgatory (players that belong in the HOF)
Level 3. HOVG (equal in size to the HOF)
The number of players to include at present:
1. 236
2. 58
3. 236
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main