|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
The idea for FDP was to quantify the remaining aspects of run prevention that are not measured by walks, strikeouts, and home runs. With a FIP-based WAR, we have a metric that tells us how many wins a pitcher added through success in those three key areas. What we did not have was a metric that gave us the wins added through either hit prevention or runner stranding. With FDP, we wanted to be able to break down the remaining aspects into those two categories, so that we could identify exactly where a team’s run prevention — with a specific pitcher on the mound — was coming from.
To do that, we simply worked backwards. First, we calculated the total WAR that a pitcher would receive credit for if he was only evaluated by his runs allowed, and we assumed that he had 100 percent responsibility for every variable that influenced run scoring. That stat is now on the site, and is called “RA9-Wins”. If you do not want to consider any impact of fielding on run prevention, and solely want to evaluate a pitcher by what actually happened when he was pitching (accounting for park and league adjustments, at least), then this is the metric for you.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Chicago Joe for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (4460 - 6:09pm, May 25)Last:  Jolly Old St. Nick Done Jumped The ShipNewsblog: SB Nation: The Rotation: The worst baseball conversations (12 - 6:09pm, May 25)Last: Steve Balboni's Personal TrainerNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (1233 - 6:04pm, May 25)Last:  Swedish ChefNewsblog: Raissman: Could 2013 be last year for John Sterling and Suzyn Waldman on Yankees radio broadcast? (1 - 6:02pm, May 25)Last: TriponNewsblog: McCoy: Brandon Phillips playing to Joe Morgan's level? (11 - 5:58pm, May 25)Last: Steve TrederNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for MAY 25, 2013 (23 - 5:45pm, May 25)Last: Harveys WallbangersNewsblog: Flip Flop Fly Ball: George Brett - Jeans, Black Bucks, No Socks (2 - 5:40pm, May 25)Last: I Am Not a NumberNewsblog: Miguel Cabrera thrown six pitches at once, hits them all out of the park (9 - 5:40pm, May 25)Last: escabecheNewsblog: Who Are the Top Baserunners in Baseball? | Articles | Bill James Online (24 - 5:32pm, May 25)Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants toNewsblog: Curtis Granderson has fractured left pinky finger (15 - 5:25pm, May 25)Last: RMc and His Roster of RubbishNewsblog: SI: Alex Sanabia : I didn't know spitter was against rules (11 - 5:12pm, May 25)Last: zenbitzHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1982 Ballot (4 - 5:09pm, May 25)Last: Mr. CNewsblog: Perry: Hawk Harrelson reacts to blown call by Angel Hernandez (22 - 4:56pm, May 25)Last: GamingboyNewsblog: Flip Flop Fly Ball: Diamonds Aren’t Forever – Five Base Baseball? (5 - 4:37pm, May 25)Last: Jarrod HypnerotomachiaPoliphili(Teddy F. Ballgame)Newsblog: Manny Machado equals Ty Cobb in win over Jays (7 - 2:41pm, May 25)Last: Sunday silence
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. boteman Posted: August 30, 2012 at 12:07 AM (#4221963)Leads to Hiroshima
That was my first reaction when I read the headline. But, after reading the article, and looking at the new stats on the value page for pitchers, it looks like an interesting idea. The purpose of the FDP is so that the components of the "fielding dependent" part of the stat can be deconstructed.
The FDP starts with a RA/9 based WAR. The new components are "balls in play" wins and "left on base" wins. Cameron shows this formula:
RA9= FIP+BIP+LOB
If you are interested in understanding why a pitcher's actual results depart from FIP, this provides more detailed information.
I've read the full article now and it is more interesting than the excerpt would lead you to believe. I still don't like the idea of all-encompassing super stats so the increased granularity of this is welcome particularly if you combine it with measures of team defense and GB/FB tendencies.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main