User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.2543 seconds
54 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. DL from MN Posted: November 11, 2011 at 08:57 PM (#3991311)He certainly was, frequently filling in at center field, as well as winning a Gold Glove as a right fielder in 1966. To consider Oliva comparable as a defender to the likes of Carty/Colavito/Powell etc. is hilariously wrong.
Now that all these various and irrelevant talking points are out of the way, he's still only in the HoVG, and that's where he's going to stay.
That said I don't think Oliva is a god awful choice, roughly the same as Rice. Better than a selection like Cepeda (who again is in because of a mis-valuing of walks).
OK, I know it's probably just empty platitudes, but Chance faced Yaz, Kaline, Mantle, Killebrew, Frank Robinson, Reggie Jackson, and Rod Carew. He also faced over the hill Eddie Mathews and Yogi Berra.
OK, it's probably because Oliva hit really, really well against him (.429/.500/.857), but it still sounds ridiculous, just like it would be ridiculous for Greg Maddux to say the toughest hitter he ever faced was Shawn Green.
P.S. I'll always have good thoughts of Oliva for coming to the SABR Hall of Fame meeting back in the late 1990s. One of the SABR guys asked him earlier that day if he would show up. He said he would, and he did.
Based on many such statements over the years, it seems what pitchers remember most are hits. I'm sure they remember the guy they gave up 10 HR to but mainly they measure "hitter" by BA.
From 1964 to 71, Oliva was top 3 in the AL 7 times (#8 the other year) and led the AL in hits 5 times.
Now, from 64 to 71 (well 66 to 71), Robinson was the genuine terror of the AL -- 300/401/543, 169 OPS+. Killebrew and Howard were a distant 2/3 at 156/155 but both were relatively low average hitters. By BA, Oliva was the class of the AL with his 313 (Robinson the only other to average 300). Oliva had a 140 OPS+ which is behind Boog, Kaline and Yaz but his BA was 40, 25 and 20 points ahead of those guys which also meant he had the highest SLG (but lowest ISO).
Especially for a RHP like Chance I can see how Oliva would seem (and might have been) the best ... next to Robinson.
Based on many such statements over the years, it seems what pitchers remember most are hits. I'm sure they remember the guy they gave up 10 HR to but mainly they measure "hitter" by BA.
From 1964 to 71, Oliva was top 3 in the AL 7 times (#8 the other year) and led the AL in hits 5 times.
That's exactly right. When we (meaning most of us on BTF) think of "best hitters", we're mentally calculating the whole package, which includes walks and extra base hits, key components of OPS and OPS+. But oftentimes when pitchers think of "best hitters", they call to mind those batters who put the ball in play safely a higher percentage of the time than anyone else, and also the ones who are the toughest to strike out. They'll equate "best" with "toughest to get out", or "fewest holes in their swings", not "who produces the most runs". Of course by any objective standard they're wrong, but in a way it's simply because they're using a different dictionary, or even speaking a different language.
and if 'talent-wise' was the determining factor, it would be the Hall of the Very Enormous Size
I think generally, when a pitcher gives up a walk they think "my fault". When they give up a hit it's "his fault". I didn't pitch in the major leagues, but that's certainly the way I felt.
Poor comp. Oliva was a certain HoF talent whose career trajectory was derailed by knee injuries. If you're really, really into peak, he'd be an OK candidate.
I don't know. If talent were the sole consideration, you could throw out a lot of guys too. It would all depend on how big or small you wanted the hall to be.
Even then, I don't quite see it. He had 4 really good seasons, 64-66 and 71. WAR's of 7.4, 6.6, 6.0, 5.9. Some similar players:
Dave Parker - 7.1, 6.9, 6.7, 5.6
Dale Murphy - 7.5, 7.2, 7.1, 6.3
Reggie Smith - 6.3, 6.0, 5.6, 5.5
Keith Hernandez - 7.2, 6.8, 6.5, 5.6
Ken Boyer- 7.8, 6.2, 6.2, 5.8
Cesar Cedeno - 8.2, 7.6, 6.0, 5.6
Lance Berkman - 6.7, 6.4, 6.2, 6.1
Rocky Colavito - 7.9, 6.7, 5.8, 5.4
Buddy Bell - 6.9, 6.2, 6.1, 6.0
And that's not counting clearly superior players who are unlikely to make the Hall (players with higher and/or longer peaks) like Jim Edmonds, Larry Walker, Scott Rolen, Carlos Beltran, Todd Helton, Sal Bando, Dick Allen, Jim Wynn, Bobby Grich,
If you want a guy with a good peak only case, how about Jason Giambi? Peak WARs of 10.3, 8.7, 7.3, 6.0.
Oliva's peak is just too ordinary for it to be a compelling, or even OK argument for him to be singled out for the honor.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main