User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.1929 seconds
54 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Leroy Kincaid Posted: February 15, 2012 at 08:18 AM (#4061335)Are Ted's share of IBM worth more than the market quote?
Provenance is always part of a collectible's value. I mean, a lucid person might think that's insane, but that's the market.
Barron Hilton was insane.
Anyone know what items besides coins are on sale?
Some answers here...
http://www.myfoxhouston.com/dpps/sports/mlb/ted-williams-auction-to-feature-mvp-award-al-ring-20110914_15016774
But isn't that usually about determining authenticity?
That's a good question. It's true when it comes to items like paintings, that are unique and can be forged. With items that exist in copies, like books, provenance can make a huge difference. Though one might argue that somebody's signature or bookplate creates a new unique item, I guess. And it's also the case that a provenance can be forged. The "Billionaire's Vinegar" case involved somebody selling old bottles of wine with the claim that they'd belonged to Thomas Jefferson; they were worth a lot more than mere old bottles of wine. (In that case, the objects were probably forged, too.)
With coins, granted, they look alike and people usually don't write their names on them. But I have to reckon that such items, say, stamps from Franklin D. Roosevelt's collection, if ever on the market, would be worth a whole lot more than stamps from my grandfather's – which, like coins, would be indistinguishable intrinsically.
With coins, granted, they look alike and people usually don't write their names on them. But I have to reckon that such items, say, stamps from Franklin D. Roosevelt's collection, if ever on the market, would be worth a whole lot more than stamps from my grandfather's – which, like coins, would be indistinguishable intrinsically.
That seems irrational, unless, somebody did something with the item in whatever field make them famous.
e.g. if you had Ted Williams bat, obviously valuable. Madame Curie's Geiger counter. Alfred Nobel's Bunson burner. A Pope's Bible.
But a random item belonging to a famous person doesn't make any sense.
On the great and infinite list of all the things in the world that don't make sense, this item is among the least confusing.
It is, indeed, irrational. People are irrational.
How much did a pair of John Lennon glasses go for?
Why do people want autographs?
Why did that woman dip her handkerchief in John Dillinger's blood?
Why are there groupies?
Please don't give Topps any more brilliant ideas.
Snapper, you get to choose between two copies of War and Peace. One of them was owned by Ernest Hemingway. The other was owned by a library in Ohio. Which do you want?
This seems like a good point.
I remember when I was a kid, going to the local coin 'n' collectible shop to pick out a few weird foreign coins for a couple dollars. I thought it would be fun to do that again, but then found out that the baseball card boom and bust was also a boom and bust for the very existence of coin 'n' collectible shops. There must be one somewhere around here.
To clone him, once medical science had advanced far enough?
Hypothetically, which would have the most value: Ted Williams's Bunsen burner, Madam Curie's Bible, Alfred Nobel's baseball bat, or the Pope's Geiger counter?
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main