|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Saturday, December 10, 2011
Former National Vinny Castilla is one of 27 players on this year’s Hall of Fame ballot, but in a recent interview, the Mexican third baseman admitted it is unlikely he’ll earn a permanent spot in Cooperstown.
“It will be very difficult [for me] to get elected,” Castilla said in a Spanish-language interview earlier this month. “But it is an honor just to be noticed, to be on the ballot. I am very proud of being an option for those who vote, that is an accomplishment for me.”
But then CSNwashington follows up with…“Hall of an argument”.
No, we’re not going to argue that Vinny Castilla should be a Hall of Famer. But the previous post does bring to mind how baseball stats can be deceiving.
Castilla’s career batting numbers of .276 average, 320 homers and 1,105 RBIs aren’t that different from those of newly elected Hall of Famer Ron Santo: .277, 342, 1,331. And Santo achieved his totals in about 400 more games.
Again, we’re not arguing for Castilla to get into the Hall. Different eras, different kinds of players.
Just sayin’.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to phredbird for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (11 - 12:03am, May 26)Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamuraiNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (86 - 11:59pm, May 25)Last: cardsfanboyNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (4 - 11:26pm, May 25)Last: cardsfanboyNewsblog: CSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day (18 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielderHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot (28 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: lieiamSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (20 - 11:24pm, May 25)Last: DanNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (27 - 11:16pm, May 25)Last: baudibNewsblog: TBO: Nerdy Rays head north (17 - 10:07pm, May 25)Last: PreservedFishNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (6 - 9:57pm, May 25)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (6 - 9:42pm, May 25)Last: TR_SullivanNewsblog: Dodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic (22 - 9:38pm, May 25)Last: Cris ENewsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (117 - 9:36pm, May 25)Last:  Teufel's GraveyardNewsblog: Greenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal (817 - 9:08pm, May 25)Last:  The Yankee ClapperNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (55 - 8:48pm, May 25)Last: SquashHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (14 - 7:33pm, May 25)Last: Kiko Sakata
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. puck Posted: December 10, 2011 at 06:24 PM (#4012512)1105 RBIzzz are NOT "aren’t that different" than 1331.
And Santo and Castilla played in about as radically opposite environments that anyone can compare, at least in the last 90 years.
But they ARE both carbon-based life forms.
Just sayin'.
Santo 125, NL top 10s of 2 4 6 7
Castilla 95, no NL top 10s and best-ever were 127 and 115
just sayin'
Which is what makes him being a dick about it that much worse. Let me quote from the quoted above:
From the quote in the excerpt, it seems he does feel that way. I hope that's true. He had a great career, in the sense that I hope he feels happy about it. He wasn't a great player and didn't get a ring, but he had some strong seasons (great ones by traditional, unadjusted triple crown measures), made good dough, and he was and is loved by Rockies fans.
I think there's different kinds of "Just sayin'". In this case it's the "I'm not actually arguing this but I think this fact is interesting" technique.
I think it is most effective as a sarcastic end to a convincing (and usually stinging) rebuttal of someone else's claim. I had an English Lit prof who dropped that one all the time. It could be very entertaining at times (and sure motivated me to not be wrong around her).
Dante Bichette: .299/274/1141
Just sayin'.
Yes. A high percentage of blog posts that are linked here have some sort of disclaimer that basically invalidates the entire argument. It must be difficult to produce fresh material if you limit yourself to the world of ideas that are not nonsensical.
Greg's right that this isn't one of those cases. But it's also not a biting sarcastic technique. It's just an observation that is barely worth a BTF post, let alone its own blog entry.
I'm always much more interested in a retrospective of Danny Graves, Joe Randa, and Rick Helling than I am of...I guess Bernie Williams is the best new guy this year? I'd say Brad Radke too, but despite having quite a good career I think he's also fallen off the radar a little bit and would make for a memorable nostalgia target.
You're cruisin' for a bruisin' with that use of "asking for a beating".
I strongly recommend the annual membership. It's a very good deal even if you don't go back.
"Just sayin'" really only bothers me when it's not at all clear what the person is trying to "just say." IOW, about 95% of the time.
I'll always remember him. I was probably about 10 years old and got a Joe Randa "hot prospect" type card in a pack. For a long time I always felt a little cheated that he didn't become a big star. More recently I discovered he did have a nice little career.
What's the problem here?
I suspect the problem is a broken sarcasm detector.
Hey man, you're anglin' for a manglin' with that attitude.
For fun, can you guess the 14 third basemen (50% of their games at 3B, per BBRef) with 300 HR, 1000 RBI? (Hint - five began their career after 1990).
I liked him a lot when he was in Kansas City. For me, he was almost the definition of a quality player -- or maybe a step down, a "nice little" player. 12 years as a third baseman, .284/.339/.426, lifetime OPS+ of 96 with a high of 111 and a low of 77.
Schmidt
Mathews
Brett
Santo
Jones
Castilla
Williams
Nettles
Glaus
Ventura
Cey
Ramirez
Wallach
Rodriguez
And I don't believe Wallach had enough HR.
Ventura 294 HR 1182 RBI - He's out.
Glaus 320 HR 950 RBI - He's out.
Rolen 308 HR 1248 RBI - He's in.
Beltre 310 HR 1113 RBI - He's in.
Rolen - YES
Beltre - YES
Two more. One was a Rule 5 Draft pick, the other had a career OBA of .308.
Mathews
Santo
Castilla
Nettles
Chipper
Glaus
Aramis
Vinny
D Allen
Ventura
Rolen
Da Evans
Ma Williams
I'm sure my list isn't right, but I know that Darrell Evans is actually a correct answer.
I had no idea he was acquired that way.
Tony Batista didn't hit that many homeruns, did he?
Dick Allen played more games at 1B than 3B otherwise he'd be on the list too
Of course, the writers can't even get that right. They overlooked Edgardo Alfonzo, who was a better player than most of the new candidates. But they made sure to get The Immortal Tony Womack and his 1.2 career WAR total on the ballot.
2012 Potential Hall of Fame Ballot
Sigh. I don't get why they don't just put every first time eligible player on the ballot. There aren't that many guys who make it 10 years.
Always loved Vinny Castilla, a surprisingly skilled defender for a guy who hit like he did. If you just gave someone his batting line they'd probably assume he was a total butcher of the Soriano flavor.
55 guys retired in 2006 with 10 years or more.
60 in 2005, 55 in 2007, 54 in 2007. For some reason, BBREF has no data beyond 2007.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main