Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Friday, October 29, 2010

Cubs bullpen catcher cited for marijuana possession

This wouldn’t have happened under Ryno’s watch!! (rolls anudder)

A bullpen catcher for the Chicago Cubs has been cited for possession of marijuana after a traffic stop on Interstate 80 near Lincoln.

Lincoln County Court records obtained by Lincoln Journal Star show that when 34-year-old Corey Miller was stopped last Saturday for speeding, a small amount of marijuana and drug paraphernalia were found in bag of baby formula and 8.4 pounds of the drug were found in a suitcase.

Miller was cited and released to care for an infant in his vehicle. No number was listed for him.

The court records show a woman with Miller, 26-year-old Maria Myaskovsky, of Madera, Calif., was charged Monday with possession with intent to deliver. She’s pleaded not guilty. Cubs’ spokesman Peter Chase says the team is looking into the incident.

Repoz Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:03 PM | 55 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: cubs, special topics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. A triple short of the cycle Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:25 PM (#3679663)
So his baby smokes marijuana. What's the big deal?
   2. My Grate Friend, Peason's pants are rankled Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:27 PM (#3679664)
He's just trying to show his support for the NL World Series representative.
   3. Robert in Manhattan Beach Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:29 PM (#3679665)
How did they get from 'stopped for speeding' to 'going through his bags looking for drugs'?
   4. frannyzoo Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:32 PM (#3679668)
I'm far from an expert here, but:

1. 8.4 lbs...that's quite a bit isn't it. Wouldn't that about "be" a typical suitcase?
2. Why is only the woman charged with intent if they're both in the car with the suitcase?
3. Why did we start using "pleaded" instead of "pled" for past tense? I like "pled" so much more. I notice the BBTF spelling nanny doesn't even recognize "pled". Did I dream "pled"? Am I such a English Teacher Weenie (ETW) that I would dream about verbs?
   5. i'm not STEAGLES and you shouldn't be either Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:38 PM (#3679669)
so, does this explain carlos zambrano's more mellow attitude following his demotion to the bullpen?
   6. Willie Mayspedes Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:41 PM (#3679672)
#3 If he had 8.4 pounds they would have been able to smell it a mile away.
   7. Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:49 PM (#3679677)
#3 If he had 8.4 pounds they would have been able to smell it a mile away.

Cops have a super-awesome sense of smell, sure.
But if this went as it usually does, it went like this:

COP: So, I notice you and your car smell like weed.
GUY WITH POT AND A PIPE IN HIS BABY BAG, AND 8.4 POUNDS OF POT IN THE TRUNK: Really? I don't smell anything.
COP: Well, I do. Mind if I search your car for drugs?
GUY WITH POT AND A PIPE IN HIS BABY BAG, AND 8.4 POUNDS OF POT IN THE TRUNK: Um, okay. No problem.
   8. isaacc7 Posted: October 29, 2010 at 11:56 PM (#3679682)
How did they get from 'stopped for speeding' to 'going through his bags looking for drugs'?

You'd be amazed at how often cops will ask to search a vehicle they have stopped. You eill be even more amazed at the number of people that say "OK" even if they have 8 pounds of pot in it. Folks don't seem to understand that they can say no to a search if there is no warrant. Of course, if the cop noticed the joint behind the ear of the driver, then all bets are off...
   9. Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes Posted: October 30, 2010 at 12:06 AM (#3679685)
Folks don't seem to understand that they can say no to a search if there is no warrant.


Yup.
Remember, kids, just because it's a uniformed cop with a gun, you don't HAVE to do everything he says.
So, you tell the cop "No." What could possibly go wrong?
   10. Jonk Posted: October 30, 2010 at 12:07 AM (#3679687)
Geovany Soto?
   11. Athletic Supporter leads the nation in drifters Posted: October 30, 2010 at 12:13 AM (#3679689)
I'm going to go out on a limb and say that 26-year-old Maria Myaskovsky of Madera, Calif is taking the fall for Mr. Miller.

It also took me about ten reads to realize that this was in fact not Corky Miller, another 34-year-old journeyman catcher.
   12. phredbird Posted: October 30, 2010 at 12:14 AM (#3679691)
You'd be amazed at how often cops will ask to search a vehicle they have stopped. You eill be even more amazed at the number of people that say "OK" even if they have 8 pounds of pot in it.


see, this happened to me once. this was when my son was all of about 4 and still riding the baby seat. i was stopped for speeding. this was in jefferson parish, if anybody here is from new orleans then you know right away how high on the d1ckhead meter these guys are cruising. the highway was almost deserted on a sunday morning, i was on the way to my parents house and i was barely over the speed limit. the cop asks for my registration etc. and then starts asking me where i'm going and so on, then wants to know if he can search my trunk. my first response was utter bewilderment. i'm driving with a toddler. i'm gonna be carrying? are you an idiot? then my next thought was what the hell, all i've got in the trunk is an old trenchcoat and a spare tire and maybe some old books or something. if this guy thinks he's about to bust pablo escobar he's in for a disappointment, so i let him. also, i started to worry that if i said no, there was no telling what was going to happen and i was more worried for my son than anything else. the more i thought about it later, the angrier i got ... but i felt kind of helpless at the time.
   13. Infinite Yost (Voxter) Posted: October 30, 2010 at 12:45 AM (#3679698)
In my life, I have smoked marijuana one million times. I have been to the houses of people who make fairly good livings selling it. I have thrown entire paycheques down the drain on it.

Never, in my many years of handling marijuana, have I seen anything like 8.4 pounds of it. By my calculations, that's tens of times more of it than I've ever even been in the same building with.
   14. michaelplank Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:13 AM (#3679703)
How did they get from 'stopped for speeding' to 'going through his bags looking for drugs'?


Mr. Z ponders this subject, here (second verse): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WwoM5fLITfk

...although he's not exactly up to speed (heh!) on the Belton Rule: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_York_v._Belton
   15. Swedish Chef Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:31 AM (#3679708)
Never, in my many years of handling marijuana, have I seen anything like 8.4 pounds of it.

Which proves you are neither Cheech nor Chong.
   16. Andere Richtingen Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:37 AM (#3679714)
I really doubt it was 8.4 pounds. Guys caught by the police in possession of 8.4 pounds of marijuana are not sent off with a Monty Python-esque, "Right! Off you go!"

I'm guessing 8.4 pounds should have been 8.4 grams. Even 8.4 ounces would be a huge quantity and evidence of intent to distribute.
   17. michaelplank Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:47 AM (#3679718)
Even 8.4 ounces would be a huge quantity and evidence of intent to distribute.


That's about how much Paul McCartney had when he got busted in Japan and famously claimed it was for personal use.
   18. An Athletic in Powderhorn Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:52 AM (#3679719)
a small amount of marijuana and drug paraphernalia were found in bag of baby formula and 8.4 pounds of the drug"


Yeah, one of these descriptions is wrong.
   19. A triple short of the cycle Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:05 AM (#3679723)
That's about $40K in weed

8.4 lb * 16 oz/lb * 300 $/oz = $40,000
   20. Srul Itza Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:32 AM (#3679731)
1. 8.4 lbs...that's quite a bit isn't it. Wouldn't that about "be" a typical suitcase?


If it was lose or in baggies, yes. But if you're up in that kind of weight, you're probably talking about a packaged brick, possibly 4 keys (which would be 8.8 pounds, unless they opened one). That would not take as much space as you would think -- less than four large books.

And if it was properly wrapped, it should not give off that much aroma -- unless, again they opened one for consumption.

But that gets back to the first point. Letting some drive off with a few joints, or a baggie with an ounce or so, yeah, I can see that happening.

With 4 keys in the car, though? That does not scan.
   21. Srul Itza Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:34 AM (#3679732)
8.4 lb * 16 oz/lb * 300 $/oz = $40,000


Is that what it's going for these days? Damn.
   22. Unintentionally_Ignorant Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:38 AM (#3679734)
$40,000?!? I thought bags were only a dime!
   23. Enrico Pallazzo Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:39 AM (#3679735)
300 $/oz

In southern Ontario we can get it for $10/gram on average, with about 28.5 grams per ounce.

Assuming economies of scale, an ounce would cost us about $250 on average. Though I hear (mostly anecdotally) that American street prices are usually a bit higher than ours.
   24. McCoy Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:42 AM (#3679736)
I'll take foie gras and black truffles instead.
   25. CrosbyBird Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:59 AM (#3679741)
In southern Ontario we can get it for $10/gram on average, with about 28.5 grams per ounce

The main reason to consider marijuana your drug of choice is not to deal with that silly metric system. I suspected that you Canadians were uncivilized, but not buying in simple 2-dram units like regular folk?
   26. McCoy Posted: October 30, 2010 at 03:09 AM (#3679745)
When I saw that he was stopped for 8.4 pounds and then released I thought two things. One, the guy must be white and two, it was 1960's.
   27. Andere Richtingen Posted: October 30, 2010 at 03:34 AM (#3679752)
That's about how much Paul McCartney had when he got busted in Japan and famously claimed it was for personal use.

It seems ridiculous, until you try to decipher the lyrics from Band on the Run.

"I thought the major was a lady suffer-a-gette?" WTF?
   28. Alan S Posted: October 30, 2010 at 03:45 AM (#3679757)
This story reminds me of when Nate Newton got caught with 200 LBS of pot. It seems like it'd be difficult to even fit that much in a truck.

It also is like 125 years worth of pot for even the heaviest smoker. So kind of hard to argue he wasn't planning to sell.
   29. Walt Davis Posted: October 30, 2010 at 04:34 AM (#3679769)
I'm guessing that it was the young lady's suitcase ... this is why you don't pick up hitchhikers no matter how hot they are!

Though I hear (mostly anecdotally) that American street prices are usually a bit higher than ours.

f'ing socialism.

This story reminds me of when Nate Newton got caught with 200 LBS of pot. ... It also is like 125 years worth of pot for even the heaviest smoker.

Did you even see Nate Newton? My guess is he ate it.

Say, is it low carb?
   30. MM1f Posted: October 30, 2010 at 05:21 AM (#3679781)
"That's about how much Paul McCartney had when he got busted in Japan and famously claimed it was for personal use."

Why would freaking Paul McCartney carry weed for any reason other than his own personal use? Why would he ever need to sell weed?
   31. rickey steals third person Posted: October 30, 2010 at 05:40 AM (#3679785)
i totally read that as wayne newton
   32. larkin4HoF Posted: October 30, 2010 at 07:57 AM (#3679805)
I would assumed that part of the job of the bullpen catcher to supply the weed.
   33. SDforkballer Posted: October 30, 2010 at 12:46 PM (#3679822)
My college roommate is a U.S. Marshall and he was up here visting and this douche bag town cop pulled me over for going 2mph over the speed limit. Of course my roommate carries a gun or two at all times because of his job. Well, the pig sees my roommate seating in the passanger seat with a holstered gun and draws his weapon ordering us out of the car. My roomate tells the clown that he is a U.S. Marshall and has a Federal Firearms license. So the guy is screaming for us to get out of the car and we get out and my roommate draws two 9mm Beretta's on this guy and orders him to stand down while he gets his badge out. Needless to say, the town cop crapped his pants and my roommate told him he would not have had a problem blowing his stupid head right off of his body. The moral of the story is that small town cops are dummies and people that are carrying government issue guns in a holster usually are government agents.
   34. Downtown Bookie Posted: October 30, 2010 at 12:47 PM (#3679824)
#21 - i thought the same thing. I be old.

DB
   35. McCoy Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:36 PM (#3679834)
Actually the moral of the story is that law enforcement personnel are dummies. Your roommate is lucky he wasn't shot dead when he went for his guns. Your clown of a roommate should have had his badge out and ready to go before the cop ever got to the car. What the hell did your roommate think was going to happen in that situation? And why draw two guns on the cop? How in the world are you going to pull out your badge with a gun in both hands?
   36. Lassus Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:44 PM (#3679837)
Seriously. I call shenanigans on that story.
   37. michaelplank Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:49 PM (#3679838)
It seems ridiculous, until you try to decipher the lyrics from Band on the Run.

"I thought the major was a lady suffer-a-gette?" WTF?


Actually that's Jet, but the point still stands.

Why would freaking Paul McCartney carry weed for any reason other than his own personal use? Why would he ever need to sell weed?


Agreed. It's not like he needed the cash. What made it funny was the quantity, which begged the question, "Geez, how much is this guy smoking?"
   38. Andere Richtingen Posted: October 30, 2010 at 01:58 PM (#3679841)
Actually that's Jet, but the point still stands.

Which is on an album (italicized) called...
   39. Swedish Chef Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:17 PM (#3679857)
And why draw two guns on the cop? How in the world are you going to pull out your badge with a gun in both hands?

No problem if you're that awesome, you just use your huge ##### to retrieve the badge.

Agreed. It's not like he needed the cash. What made it funny was the quantity, which begged the question, "Geez, how much is this guy smoking?"

It's weird anyway, don't stars have roadies or flunkies for carrying that kind of thing?
   40. Mo Vaughn Down The Road Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:26 PM (#3679862)
Why did we start using "pleaded" instead of "pled" for past tense

Because the spelling sucks. It should be spelled "p-l-e-a-d, just like the present tense.

I realize that's confusing to students of English as a foreign language but, their parents were at fault there for allowing them to learn another language first.
   41. Mo Vaughn Down The Road Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:35 PM (#3679866)
Is that what it's going for these days? Damn.

No kidding! When I was in college, you could buy an ounce for as little as $15. And not the crappy stuff either.

No wonder the California grow-your-own law is so popular.

If it's $300/ounce, then to this unstudied mind, the DEA does a pretty good job at interdiction. But the traffickers just keep jacking up the price, to stay magnificently profitable and finding clever ways of adapting like moving it in in submarines or growing it in remote areas of national parks.
   42. Greg (U)K Posted: October 30, 2010 at 02:54 PM (#3679879)
In that case legalization makes all kinds of sense.

Say the current costs are 500% of what they would be compared to a legitimate producer.
Then you just tax it at 475% or something.
The customer gets a slightly cheaper product, and the government gets some money

win-win!
   43. Mo Vaughn Down The Road Posted: October 30, 2010 at 03:03 PM (#3679884)
The drug nazis will never go for that, Greg. It makes too much sense.

If you talk to any DEA agent, they know they are fighting a losing battle, and would prefer to have marijuana legalized so they can focus on coke, heroin and methamphetamine. But it's a religious issue, and whenever religion enters the picture, objectivity and common sense leave it.
   44. Mo Vaughn Down The Road Posted: October 30, 2010 at 03:05 PM (#3679886)
I have some dutch friends, and they are on the fence as to how effective their government's policy of legalization is. They don't like the drug tourism but admit the alternative of prohibition would be even worse. If pot became legal here, other countries would probably shortly follow suit and I think the drug tourism angle would disappear.
   45. Greg (U)K Posted: October 30, 2010 at 03:18 PM (#3679890)
My (limited) experience with the Netherlands was pretty similar. They don't appear to relish being a drug tourist spot, but it's something they live with.
The Dutch authorities do appear to be VERY diligent in cracking down on harder drugs. Or at least they claim to, I was told over and over again in Amsterdam not to assume that because pot was ok cocaine or heroin was. As I am not too interested in either of those things I didn't experience firsthand how serious the authorities are about it.

My experience in Amsterdam was kind of a let down. There were gaggles of Americans scouring the streets for drugs, and gaggles of older folks scouring the streets for Van Gogh galleries. Unfortunately for me Heineken Duff Gardens-esque Experience was closed down while I was there so I just scoured the streets for Dutch cuisine (which I was advised against...one Dutch guy said "Dutch people don't even eat Dutch food"). It was like Belgium, but more crowded and with less interesting beer.
   46. PreservedFish Posted: October 30, 2010 at 03:39 PM (#3679896)
I love Amsterdam. Beautiful city outside of the red light district and train station areas, which have an outrageous number of begging junkies shifting in your direction. Still remember how amusing it was to have a "coffee shop" cashier explain to me the different pot varieties. He described the different highs the same way a wine snob talks about bouquets.

Best advice I got about choosing a coffee shop - just go anywhere that doesn't have a Bob Marley poster.
   47. Greg (U)K Posted: October 30, 2010 at 03:42 PM (#3679898)
I feel like I'm giving Amsterdam a bit of a raw deal. It's not like I had a bad time there, I liked walking the city. It just has the misfortune of being right beside, and therefore always compred to in my mind, the glory that is Belgium.
   48. PreservedFish Posted: October 30, 2010 at 04:10 PM (#3679907)
Best to just lump them together. The low countries, that magical land where monks brew the world's finest beer, hippies sell the finest weed, and your fries come with a choice of 25 different mayonnaise flavors!
   49. Morty Causa Posted: October 30, 2010 at 04:15 PM (#3679908)
Alcohol, drugs, and a 100% fat. Can it get any better? Rock and/or Roll forever!
   50. Mo Vaughn Down The Road Posted: October 30, 2010 at 04:58 PM (#3679916)
I was in Amsterdam last year and didn't see one vagrant or pot shop. But I was there on business and wasn't looking for either so I suppose that doesn't mean much.

I liked it quite a bit but I was there with a Dutch friend who is a terrific host and that makes a big difference.
   51. The Republic of Dresses Posted: October 30, 2010 at 05:02 PM (#3679918)
Still remember how amusing it was to have a "coffee shop" cashier explain to me the different pot varieties.

Did you pick the White Widow from Afghanistan?
   52. Flynn Posted: October 30, 2010 at 06:22 PM (#3679947)
Amsterdam is great, just get out of the touristy bits, which stink. I liked the Jordaan and de Pijp quite a bit.
   53. CrosbyBird Posted: October 30, 2010 at 06:58 PM (#3679964)
If you talk to any DEA agent, they know they are fighting a losing battle, and would prefer to have marijuana legalized so they can focus on coke, heroin and methamphetamine. But it's a religious issue, and whenever religion enters the picture, objectivity and common sense leave it.

You might be surprised to learn how many of the worker bees buy completely into the "marijuana is evil" propaganda. There are plenty of people who really believe that they are making this a safer country by cracking down on this horrible gateway drug.
   54. Greg (U)K Posted: October 30, 2010 at 07:03 PM (#3679967)
You might be surprised to learn how many of the worker bees buy completely into the "marijuana is evil" propaganda. There are plenty of people who really believe that they are making this a safer country by cracking down on this horrible gateway drug.

If the insane US Marshal waving his two guns around is any indication of Federal US law enforcement agents, I can easily believe that.
   55. Andere Richtingen Posted: October 31, 2010 at 12:26 AM (#3680146)
I love Amsterdam, but it has become a bit of a mess. It used to be that the red light district and the coffee shops took up a manageably small part of the city center, but it's a bit ridiculous now. It seems that the people who live there are fairly annoyed with it now, and the trend is reversing, which is both sad and probably a good thing. I sure wouldn't want to live in a center for vice tourism.

Best advice I got about choosing a coffee shop - just go anywhere that doesn't have a Bob Marley poster.

Go to the Jordaan. The bars and coffee shops there are quiet, pleasant places with friendly patrons. There aren't many of them, but that's a good thing.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
phredbird
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(11 - 12:03am, May 26)
Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamurai

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(86 - 11:59pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(4 - 11:26pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(18 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielder

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(20 - 11:24pm, May 25)
Last: Dan

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(27 - 11:16pm, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogTBO: Nerdy Rays head north
(17 - 10:07pm, May 25)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(6 - 9:57pm, May 25)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(6 - 9:42pm, May 25)
Last: TR_Sullivan

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(22 - 9:38pm, May 25)
Last: Cris E

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(117 - 9:36pm, May 25)
Last: Teufel's Graveyard

NewsblogGreenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal
(817 - 9:08pm, May 25)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(55 - 8:48pm, May 25)
Last: Squash

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.3300 seconds
54 querie(s) executed