|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Friday, January 29, 2010
The latest from Uncle Ennuiggily in Connecticut.
It all goes back to Rabbit Maranville. He liked to have the more-than-occasional pop. So he was in the rye (and the bourbon and the brandy). I’ve written here before that I’ve seen old sports columns that said that he was the second biggest gate attraction after Ruth. The columns in question were written by in 1951 an old Hartford Times sportswriter named Arthur McGinley. McGinley grew up in New London, Conn. with future playwright Eugene O’Neill. In fact, O’Neill based his only comedy “Ah, Wilderness” on the McGinley family.
Now O’Neill had a daughter named Oona. Oona would go on to marry Charlie Chaplin. But before that she dated director Orson Welles and author J. D. Salinger. What dioes Salinger have to do with baseball? He was a character in W. P. Kinsella’s magic realism novel Shoeless Joe. This was later adapted onto film as Field Of Dreams and the character of Salinger was replaced. Another character in the book and movie was Moonlight Graham. Graham may be the most famous cup of coffee player ever, thanks to Kinsella.
Graham went on to become a small-town doctor, but not before making one appearance with the New York Giants in the summer of 1905. Art Devlin was on that team. Devlin was an alum of Georgetown University back when they were producing ballplayers who weren’t basketball players. He was a third-sacker; a fast one who led the NL in steals in ‘05 with 59. Later on, the Giants sold him to Boston. They were just named the Braves that year because their owner was a bigwig in Tammany Hall. Tammany’s symbol was a Native American. While in Boston, he shared the left side of the infield with ... Rabbit Maranville. It’s all connected, folks.
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to robneyer for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (56 - 1:15am, May 26)Last: The Keith Law Blog Blah Blah (battlekow)Newsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (8 - 12:40am, May 26)Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamuraiNewsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (12 - 12:25am, May 26)Last: TriponNewsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (118 - 12:15am, May 26)Last:  Paul D(uda)Hall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (15 - 12:13am, May 26)Last: DanGNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (86 - 11:59pm, May 25)Last: cardsfanboyNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (4 - 11:26pm, May 25)Last: cardsfanboyNewsblog: CSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day (18 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielderHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot (28 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: lieiamSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (20 - 11:24pm, May 25)Last: DanNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (27 - 11:16pm, May 25)Last: baudibNewsblog: TBO: Nerdy Rays head north (17 - 10:07pm, May 25)Last: PreservedFishNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (6 - 9:57pm, May 25)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: Dodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic (22 - 9:38pm, May 25)Last: Cris ENewsblog: Greenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal (817 - 9:08pm, May 25)Last:  The Yankee Clapper
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Slivers of Maranville (SdeB) Posted: January 29, 2010 at 02:54 PM (#3449581)I re-read The Catcher in the Rye last night--first time since I was 21. Read it at 15 and again at 21. My own little good-bye to Salinger.
Blanda played for George Halas. Halas was on the Yankees in the teens. Go from there.
My gf and I decided to reread it this year. (we're a superselect book club.) I'm up to Chapter 9 right now.
It's all connected
I had possibly the most awesomely stereotypical Catcher in the Rye moment ever when I, like many others, blasted through the book one night at 14 or so. It wasn't required reading in my high school, which completely blew in terms of anything intelligent or diverse being taught. In fact, the only decent English teacher we had was retiring that year, before I was going to be old enough to take senior English with her, so I had started talking to her to glean whatever I could out of class whenever I could. I ran into her outside of the school library the next morning, me all completely and utterly a-twitter and yammering about how amazing the book was, and how insightful, and this and that and got to the point where I said, "It really felt like I was reading about myself!" "Oh, that's the wonderful thing about Catcher," said Ms. Conway, "it's completely universal." And off she went.
Blank stare of utter deflation.
The book + that one sentence = formative life moment.
(I did always end up liking Raise High the Roof-Beam, Carpenters and Franny and Zooey more, personally.)
I'd been looking for the proper thread to put it in since I heard the news yesterday.
bingo
Agreed.
Kind of like a BTF political thread.
That is sort of what CITR sounds like, but there is a lot more there. It has lasted for a reason. Also, remember it was published in 1951. Different time, and it had a different impact than it would today.
And Luckman was a teammate of Communist theoretician (and fellow Columbia grad) Herbert Aptheker on a Brooklyn semi-pro team (The Bushwicks) that competed against Negro League teams with Josh Gibson. I only wish that some congressional committee would have grilled Ronald Reagan about that connection.
What those other guys said. I was about 16 when I read it, & while it didn't change my life in the slighest, I found it worthwhile. I can't ever imagine wanting to read it again or why anyone else would want to, either, but then that's probably true of somewhere around 99 percent of everything I've ever read.
EDIT: Oh, and my kids hated CitR.
Salinger is a lot about voice. Not much "happens" in Salinger's books--no one gets laid, no one goes to war, societies don't shift--people just talk and observe and think. If you like Holden's voice, and Buddy's, and Franny's, then it is easy to get into him. If you don't, then you tend to see his characters as pretentious twits. And, I also think how one feels about Catcher in particular ties into the type of person one was in high school. The opening of the book, when he contrasts Holden, Ackley, and Stradlater, sets that tone.
Another thing going on is that CITR is kind of the Derek Jeter of American classic literature--great on its own terms, but mythologized and hyped in ways such that it is "uncool" to like it in many ways. But in the 50s--different story.
Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man is similar in some ways, although Joyce is on a different level than Salinger. I had two profs in grad school who always said Portrait was "the worst book in history."
IIRC, my Literary Arts teacher Mr. Greer said that Holden was basically a Christ figure trying to save the children. FTR, this was at a Catholic HS.
I enjoyed Catcher in the Rye when I first read it, as a teenager. When I was in my late '20s, I read it again, and had your reaction.
Franny and Zooey holds up better to repeat readings, IMHO.
that's exactly what Brother Carl said at my (Catholic) high school
Maranville-McGinley-O'Neill-Salinger-Jackson-Southworth-Maranville
Regarding the Christ-figures, I think there was a character in a book I read in high school that I heard the same BS about - his initials were JC, so he must be a Christ figure. I think it may have been someone in The Grapes of Wrath - a book I liked a lot. I can't blame the book for some terrible bit of analysis by someone else.
I also seem to recall a character from a Willa Cather story was a Christ figure because they wore a red hat. Just like Jesus himself!
Too true.
Why don't you just quit while you still are giving the impression of seeming to fcck yourself in the ass--an optimum condition for you, I suspect.
"...People who need a punch in the face affect the lives of many. There is still no known cure for someone who deserves a punch in the face, except a punch in the face, but we can raise awareness..."
well first in line is holden caulfield
i can't even make it past the first chapter - what a waste of 1 hour of my life - because he is such a whiny little ########. if i knew he was supposed to be the bad guy and he be gettin some shtt later, i might could manage to keep reading - not sure how
i would not have felt like holden had anything to say if i could have read it when i as a teenager neither.
he isn't no christ figure - he wouldn't know the meaning of sacrifice iffn he had to copy the definition 100 times on the blackboard. that has got to be like one of the stupidest things i ever heard
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main