|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Monday, August 20, 2012
Hey, they’re both in the freakin’ rearviewmirror…so what’s the diff, Biff?
“I used to follow the Red Sox in the American League,” Vedder told MLB.com. “But now Theo is with the Cubs—so I like the Twins.”
These days, he makes the trek to watch Minnesota. With an invite from ex-Twins player Ron Coomer, Vedder traveled to Safeco Field on Saturday—where he Felixed—to hang out in the Twins clubhouse.
“Usually my favorite place to go to a game is Wrigley Field, but Ron invited me down and we’ve been wanting to go to a game,” Vedder said. “He was friends with a couple of other old-time Cubs that I knew, Jose Cardenal and all those guys. Really good guy. All these players seem really, really incredibly great.”
Apparently, he hit it off with Minnesota skipper Ron Gardenhire as well.
Repoz
Posted: August 20, 2012 at 01:38 PM | 132 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
poser,
twins
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to Mike Emeigh for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (3321 - 2:32pm, May 19)Last:  David Nieporent (now, with children)Newsblog: Hal Steinbrenner calls tickets 'affordable' (13 - 2:30pm, May 19)Last: BhaakonNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for May 19, 2013 (11 - 2:27pm, May 19)Last: cardsfanboyNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013 (866 - 2:27pm, May 19)Last:  Shooty is in the Trust TreeNewsblog: Cafardo: Dustin Pedroia the best second baseman in MLB? (81 - 2:26pm, May 19)Last: Ray (RDP)Newsblog: Draft Features Rarest of Prospects: Redheads (60 - 2:15pm, May 19)Last: jdennisNewsblog: Murray Chass: ARE RED SOX REELING ALREADY? (7 - 2:10pm, May 19)Last: MontyNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (943 - 2:06pm, May 19)Last:  FancyPantsHandle glistening with foreign substanceNewsblog: SoE (Megdal): It's Time to Finally Believe in the Orioles (21 - 1:53pm, May 19)Last: DanNewsblog: Weiner: The Supreme Court Judge and the Curt Flood Case reenactment (2 - 1:17pm, May 19)Last: bobmNewsblog: BtBS: Kevin Gregg Re-emerges in Chicago (3 - 1:00pm, May 19)Last: rlcNewsblog: MLB hoping for large replay expansion in 2014 (49 - 12:59pm, May 19)Last: David Nieporent (now, with children)Newsblog: Hochman: Dallas Green still tells it like it is (8 - 12:20pm, May 19)Last: bobmNewsblog: Holmes: Where does Miguel Cabrera rank among Tiger greats? (30 - 12:09pm, May 19)Last: David Nieporent (now, with children)Newsblog: Hold tight on that Moreland Express | Dallas-Fort Worth Sports News - Sports News on the Dall... (3 - 12:06pm, May 19)Last: SG
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
Now, I like Pearl Jam well enough. I'm not a super-fan, and I haven't listened to a lot of their recent stuff, but they wrote a lot of good rock and roll songs. This would be a loss.
However, what if Scott Stapp and Chad Nickelback Uglyface and the rest of them had never heard Eddie Vedder do his Vedder vocal thing? I think Vedder pulls it off, somehow, but he inaugurated a style of rock singing which has been a blight on our culture. If millions people hadn't come to appreciate Vedder, would they have accepted Stapp and Uglyface and the sludgy dirges over which they brayed?
I propose that despite the good music Vedder and company have made, we might be living in a better world if they'd gotten real jobs instead.
Is Vedder's vocal style really all that different from whats-his-dead-name from Alice in Chains or Cobain or whomever from the grunge era?
"I um...gurble, Minnesala Tbans. Go Tbans!"
But otherwise I can get behind the`theory.
But then who would have backed Matt Dillon in Singles???!?!?
Oh yes, at least different from Cobain (I've managed to forget what Alice in Chains sounded like, which is at least one benefit of impending dementia). Vedder does this thing that you can imitate by sort of narrowing your mouth and pushing the base of your tongue forward and singing from low in your throat in a voice lower than you naturally would, preferably the word "well" or "yeah". Cobain was far more natural.
Stone Temple Pilots, Bush, and Creed were the first bands I remember with singers who exactly aped Vedder. In the late 90s & early aughts I got dragged to see a lot of metalish bands in the Tampa area, and they all had a Vedder clone fronting them. The thing is that you can ape him even if you have relatively limited pipes, while someone like Cobain is a lot harder to pull off.
I just learned that zonk is not between the ages of 33-40. I'm guessing older.
Actually, I'm 38!
But seriously - explain to me the distinctions... OK - Layne Staley tended to moan more, but when I hear Jeremy or whatnot, I hear the same vocal stylings I hear in say... most of Nirvana's stuff - just with a different voice doing the yelping.
STP and Creed I can see. Bush? Not so much.
I also have vague memories of something called Silverchair & something else called Candlebox, but I have no idea where they fit on the spectrum; luckily, they're really vague memories.
EDIT:
Silverchair was the Australian kid band that didn't contain Ben Lee. That much I'm clear on.
That's how Trent Reznor saw it:
It shocks me to see Bush go to No. 1. Not to single them out, but I just can't respect them. Do they write good songs? Yeah, they've written some good songs. But I cannot respect or tolerate the lack of innovation.
Music is my life. I know everything I can know about it. I know that it's not background. It's not stuff you put on in the car to drive home from your job at IBM. It means something to me. And that's why I hate when something so uninteresting can be so successful. But I'm going into it with this purist attitude. I can see that Bush song as exactly this Nirvana song. I can tell. #### them for doing that, you know? But it's also well-written enough that a guy who comes home from work can say, "Yeah, that's a good song. These guys rock."
Cobain and Vedder sound(ed) absolutely nothing alike. Compare two live performances:
Nirvana, Breed
Pearl Jam, Black
(And, to be clear, I think "Black" is a pretty great rock song. But Vedder and Cobain sound nothing alike, and you can hear so many of the offenses against sound committed in the last two decades lurking even in Pearl Jam's best singles, and that simply isn't true at all of Nirvana.)
I actually was at a Pearl Jam concert once, though I'm not sure I ever remembered them playing. I was at the 1992 Lollapalooza at Alpine Valley to see Ministry.
This.
The NW sound/grunge just never caught on with me -- which is strange (geographically, at least) because I love the stuff coming out of Vancouver (New Pornographers and the member's solo stuff... much to, I'm sure, Shredder's dismay - haven't been able to get into Destroyer yet).
Also strange - I do/did enjoy much of the stuff that might be that sound's primary influence - Sabbath, Zeppelin, Hendrix, etc. I just truly loathed Alice in Chains, found Nirvana lacking on a personal level (even if I can appreciate the occasional artistry). Pearl Jam, I just found to be the least offensive of the lot. I wasn't a glam metal guy hanging onto lost glory - it was time for that genre to go, I just felt like GnR was doing perfectly fine ridding the world of mascara and spandex.
I likewise enjoyed a lot of the British stuff that was basically an answer to the Seattle sound -- Pulp, Blur, even Oasis.
I like to think I have relatively eclectic tastes - queued up on my ipod right now is a Cheap Trick song off their debut (He's a Whore), which looks to be followed by Los Campesinos, then Marty Stuart... but grunge just never really did it for me. A few things here and there - I could handle Soundgarden in small doses and if what's his other name hadn't died, it's possible I'd have gotten into Mother Love Bone (and we wouldn't have Pearl Jam!)... but I think I'd have really hated living in Seattle in the early 90s.
Edit: also, Vedder was always primarily a basketball fan. Which is a far greater offense than inspiring lackluster copycat vocalists.
I am two years older than zonk and from an indie background. When I started getting into indie music at 15 or 16 grunge was very much an indie form. Pretty much everyone my age with my background has a Mudhoney EP or two stashed away somewhere, next to the My Dad is Dead and Bastro LPs. It's interesting what a vast difference a couple of years can make.
Also, I assume most people here despise Live's Throwing Copper, which went like 7 times platinum, and which would never have sounded like it did if not for Nirvana's success.
Silverchair took a radical departure with the Diorama album in 2002, its more pop than grunge. It didn't sell well, but I've always liked it.
Same here ... except in my case it was Dallas. Only thing of consequence they did was a cover of "Sonic Reducer" -- Pearl Jam, that is, not Ministry.
Sources report that nobody is interested and nobody cares.
Offhand, I can think of 2 songs of theirs I like -- "Glycerine" & "The Chemicals Between Us." Of course, that's 2 more than about 50,000 other bands have come up with.
The story on the ground was that STP actually admitted out loud somewhere that they were the most popular Redd Kross cover band in existence.
"I um...gurble, Minnesala Tbans. Go Tbans!"
Hrbek hrbek hrbek, hrbek hrbek hrbek. Hrbek. Mientkiewicz hrbek.
FWIW, I REALLY liked 16 Stone. Almost every song on the album seemed to be good in a different way.
I don't generally like Grunge. More of a hair-band guy myself because I grew up in the 80s.
This is the best song from the last hairband before Nirvana made Grunge cooler than hair:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5IfiLehLFJw
So it's not like I am fanboying for Grunge.
Did they wring the life right out of that song?
One of the things about early punk is that most (but not all) of songs were pretty uninteresting until infused with the manic glee they were performed with. Take that away and something definitely lacks.
John Waite made craploads of money and had a legitimate career that spanned decades. Jimmy Pursey probably made 5% as much and his big hit could have been written on the bus on the way to the studio and he needed a co-writer for it. But one of them never has to buy a pint at a football pub ever again and it ain't Waite.
In my case, it was a buddy who got Bush tickets shortly after their debut album and could never quite wrap his head around the fact that no one was particularly interested in seeing them. I'm fairly sure he still has 3 unused Bush concert tix somewhere...
Holy crap, I swear to God this opens with the riff from Billy Bragg's "Love Gets Dangerous". Can't listen, cognitive dissonance killing brain!
Alice in Chains, Soundgarden and Pearl Jam all sound pretty similar. Nirvana sounds like the last of the Our Band Could Be Your Life 80s indie bands.
(Apologies for the delay in getting to the relevant part).
Rob Paravonian's Pachelbel Rant
Axis of Awesome, "Four Chords"
Can't say I was expecting a My Dad is Dead reference on BBTF.
I like "Machine Head". It's a good driving song.
I was never a big Soundgraden fan at all, liked but didn't relaly love any Nirvana album until their last one, loved the Screaming Trees, liked some Alice in Chains here and there. I was more of a hard glam-rock and pop type. Redd Kross, Jellyfish, Degeneration, Smashing Pumpkins, Weezer, Nerf Herder, etc. I think my older brother's punk collection of scary bands made most of the grungers seems just like they weren't angry enough.
Russel Crowe's band?
Now when I revisit those earlier albums, it's very easy to hear the differences, both in the music and in the vocals. STP was awesome and sounded almost nothing like Pearl Jam. Same with Soundgarden, Nirvana. Even Alice in Chains, who I never liked, had their own sound. But a lot of the crappy groups that came after them do sound the same, and they sound more like Pearl Jam/Vedder than anyone else.
they were OK - Interstate Love Song is a fine driving tune.
One grunge song I loved - that Temple of the Dog tune "Hungry".
Huh, I've found the opposite. I still like most of STP's stuff, not just their hits. Whereas with Pearl Jam, Nirvana, Soundgarden, Alice in Chains, etc, only a few songs have maintained their allure.
They definitely have the most staying power for me. Soundgarden was probably my favorite at the time, and I still listen to Alice in Chains' "Unplugged" if I'm feeling blue. But I still listen to "Purple" and "Tiny Music".
EDIT: I also love Pearl Jam "Vs"
Interstate Love Song is one of the best songs of that era/genre, but the rest of their stuff never did much for me. I think Pearl Jam's Vs was probably the best "grunge" record.
Which uses a Jim Croce riff! From "I've Got a Name". I hated STP from the start, but that's one of the better riff thefts you'll find.
Wow... I was always struck by the familiarity of the riff from the first time I heard the STP song, but I never made the connection. My dad liked to fool around on the guitar quite a bit, and Croce was one of his favorites - so I'm a bit embarrassed I never made the connection.
Aha -- YouTube just told me which one that one is. For some reason, I'd never connected with Bush or with that song title; pretty good track. And of course I hear the opening chords multiple times a week; that's the intro to Paul Finebaum's talk radio show.
I was more into Metal at that time so was listening to Fear Factory, Deftones, Metallica, Tool, Sepultura, Pantera etc.
They absolutely do.
What PreservedFish said.
Also, I suppose the Buzzcocks are in the same boat with regard to all sorts of vapid pop punk acts from the past couple of decades.
Which leads to the strange fact that I loved grunge as a kid but would have agreed at the time that the bands kind of sounded alike, but today I'm less of a fan* but the differences are plain as day.
*Still some of my favorite music, but everyone's favorite music is heavily influenced by their teenage years; if Ten came out today, would I think it's one of the ten best albums of all time? Not likely.
This demonstrates how the term "grunge" drifted over the years. Nirvana sounded generally like the other bands from the late-1980s that were first called grunge. The more metalish Soundgarden et al sound came later.
This sort of semantic drift happens all of the time with musical subgenres. A great example is emo, which you can really hear if you go to the Wikipedia entry on it and listen to the various samples, in order. There is certainly a chain of descent there, marked mostly by the continued survival of the loud-quiet thing and the Mr. Earnest Boy vocal style. But if you just listened to Rites of Spring, then Jawbreaker, then Dashboard Confessional, you'd have a really hard time concluding that they're all the same sort of music, except that they are all broadly American rock music existing in a post- (and in the example of Dashboard Confessional, extremely post-) hardcore world.
EDIT: OTOH, following veer bender, if you've never been into this sort of music then they'll probably all sound the same.
EDIT EDIT:
Well, it'd be such and obvious Creed ripoff...
I used to really like grunge back in the day but only Nirvana still exists on my Ipod. I just moved away from it--I guess I got bored with it. The stuff I still listen to from that time period is Pavement, Fugazi, New Order, the Pixies, Cracker, The Beastie Boys and the Spent Poets. (Just off the top of my head).
There's one sense in which Bush (and to a lesser extent Creed) were filling in the blanks of what would have been recorded if the original big names hadn't changed styles so much, but had gradually grown more polished but tired/jaded.
In another sense, Creed (and to a lesser extent Bush) were directly copying a grunge band that never existed, a perfect amalgam of simple song structures that sound good and "rock"(like Machinehead) but don't go anywhere (unlike say, Would?), along with Vedder vox that give you that angsty feeling, and allow serious lyrics about alienation, etc. to not sound ridiculous to a teenager (not saying Creed's lyrics are any good, but they are serious compared to Motley Crue, and could you imaging them being sung by a hair band singer?). Creed further perfected the product by adding a touch of metal sonics -- heavy, but crisp distortion, with palm-muting, that chugga-chugga sound (if you don't play guitar, turn on Metallica's black album - that sound). It's brilliant, and I thought Creed was kind of great if unoriginal, until I realized I'd been had.
To me grunge was more of a fashion trend than music trend. They seemed were more grouped together by their image than their actual music. Their main musical similarly was mostly that they weren't Warrant or Motley Crue.
My Bloody Valentine and Sonic Youth were said to be related to grunge. Spacemen 3, Galaxie 500.
Foo Fighters prove that Dave Grohl>>>>>>>>Kurt Cobain.
MBV and Galaxie 500 are the only band from that era that I spend a lot of time with these days. Galaxie 500 are my weight lifting music.
I don't really see a MBV-grunge link, other than the meaningless one that they both liked feedback.
I'd say this - and also add KISS.
Too many '>'s? How about Grohl >> Cobain?
Like I said above, I can appreciate Cobain's talents even if I didn't care for his music all that much, but for pure craftsmanship, I think I'll still take Grohl.
I hate to be a dinosaur by saying I'd call it an insult to Lennon/McCartney -- but I sort of feel like Grohl/Cobain fit in that paradigm. Lennon/Cobain were the better 'artists', in that they had a way of capturing the spirit of a specific age and putting it to music, but I think McCartney/Grohl are just better musical craftsmen.
It weirdly works out to a peak vs. career thing and I honestly think that would have been true even if not for the untimely demises.
Might be closer than you think: Do you believe that Grohl's drumming was a big part of Nirvana's greatness? I do. And "he didn't do anything any other drummer couldn't do" isn't a compelling argument when the comparison is to Cobain.
It's really mostly about the songs, right? I count the intro drum fill in Teen Spirit under songwriting. You can not cover that song without nailing that part, because the audience will know it - it's not an interchangeable part with other drum fills. Yeah, it's short and simple, but it's as awesome as anything Cobain contributed.
There's also the inherent interplay in rock bands during songwriting. Natural selection happens a lot as bands play out new ideas in practice/songwriting sessions, especially for loud rock of any type. You can try to write kick-ass riffs in your bedroom, and it does work sometimes, but the band almost always serves to approve/veto/modify everything, even unknowingly. I'm guessing that Grohl was at least as important as the average drummer in shaping Nirvana's songs, given what we know about his later career.
Also speaking of bands from the 90's, I always thought Dream Theater was a grunge band because of "Pull me Under" but turns out they are progressive metal whatever the hell that is.
Your mom is wrong.
A gleeful factoid I have heard in music histories more than 50 times: Nirvana knocked Michael Jackson off the top of the Billboard album chart. This is significant because the new is destroying the old, and the genuine is replacing the artificial, and ha ha ha.
A factoid I have heard in music histories 0 times: Nirvana was then knocked off the top of the Billboard album chart, after 1 week, by Garth Brooks.
In my book, Foo Fighters = replacement level seasons.
The only real question to me is whether you consider Dylan too folkish/not rockish enough to be judged with the other standard bearers in rock.
If I had to pick my favorite still active artist (I don't want to debate Dylan's last good work), I think I'd take the New Pornographers. If I can't pick a supergroup and you force me to identify individual writers, I'd probably fall back on (and I can hear the boos now) I might take Green Day maybe?
edited twice. How embarrassing.
This reminded me of two different Grandpa Simpson flashback bits, one, where he praises Johnny Unitas' "haircut you can set your watch to," and two, when he boos at Woodstock and chants "Bring on Shanana!"
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main