(Richard) Griffin is the Toronto chapter president of the BBWAA. In that role he chooses the eight local baseball writers who will vote on this year’s awards. He was on the road with the Jays this week and I wasn’t able to talk to him.
I did discuss this with sports editor Jon Filson and columnist Cathal Kelly. Both defended the tradition, making the strong case that the voting process is transparent — players, other journalists and readers can learn who each journalist voted for following the vote.
“There is no one who doesn’t take this seriously. Your professional reputation is on the line. If you gave your MVP vote to someone who didn’t deserve it, you would be considered a buffoon,” said Kelly, who is not voting this year.
Both made clear their view that having a vote doesn’t change a journalist’s relationship to players or sports clubs. Nor, stressed Filson, does the process have any impact on the Star’s coverage.
“It doesn’t change what we do journalistically,” he said. “We would do the story on who is the most valuable player whether we have a vote or not.”
In this debate, I’m with those who believe it is the journalist’s job to cover the game from the sidelines, not be part of the game’s glorious traditions. I can’t think of any other area of coverage where such a practice would be okay.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Weekly Journalist_ Posted: September 17, 2011 at 12:54 PM (#3927915)I understand that American journalists are still allowed to vote in that country's elections.
Though perhaps that's not quite as important as allowing baseball writers to vote for the MVP.
DB
Yes, there is no way tech journalists would bother to vote if there were no free schwag to be had.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main