Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

ESPN: Braves trade for Javier Vazquez

It was just reported on ESPN a few minutes ago. The article says it’s Vazquez and Boone Logan for Jo Jo Reyes, Brent Lillibridge, and “another top prospect.” Hopefully more details will emerge on the last player soon.

Kyle S Posted: December 03, 2008 at 12:34 AM | 156 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: braves, white sox

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
   1. jwb Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:39 AM (#3019442)
Rosenthal said the other prospect was Tyler Flowers, which would be great. He also said that Jo-Jo Reyes was not in the package, so who knows at this point. A few hours ago, Boone Logan was not involved, so maybe the ChiSox had to add something to get Reyes.
   2. CFBF Hates Hyphens Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:40 AM (#3019444)
Bill Shanks, who I loathe but who unsurprisingly has solid sources within the Braves organization, is reporting that Atlanta's giving up Lillibridge, Charlie Morton and Tyler Flowers for Logan and Vasquez. Mark Bowman over at MLB.com says a fourth prospect will also go Chicago's way.

I like this deal less than when Reyes was the headliner and Flowers wasn't in the deal. Flowers has hit the cover off the ball recently.
   3. A triple short of the cycle Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:40 AM (#3019445)
Swisher and Vasquez for prospects? Dye also on the block? So the Chisox are rebuilding?
   4. CWS Keith plans to boo your show at the Apollo Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:43 AM (#3019446)
I'm sure there will be a barrage of corrections, but according to the MLB.com article, it's a six player deal. Jo Jo Reyes is not part of the deal. The Braves are getting Vazquez and (probably) Boone Logan (LOOGY). The Sox are getting Lillibridge, Tyler Flowers and two others, one of those two perhaps being Charlie Morton.

I'm really digging this deal from the Sox' end. Getting Flowers makes the deal -- the Sox really need someone who can take the reigns from Pierzynski in the coming seasons. Morton also sounds like a good arm for the Sox to grab -- I'll be interested in any scouting reports from folks who have seen him before. And there's been no indication whatsoever who the fourth player coming to the Sox might be...
   5. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:47 AM (#3019448)
Weird that there are so many permutations being tossed around -- makes me wonder where this is in the negotiation stage. Reyes or not, Morton or not, Flowers or not, now I just read (in a comment on mlbtraderumors) that David O'Brien says that John Gilmore (3B prospect) is involved, but I can't find that on the ajc website.
   6. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:47 AM (#3019449)
Morton is a stuff goof. Solid FB, and good curve, but never translated that till half year in AAA this year, and end of last year.
Back issues supposedly contributed to his horrible showing in the ML this year.

I would be happy if this deal stopped at Flowers/Morton/Lillibridge. Its a bit of an overpay but yuo can live with that. Adding another good prospect just makes it a bad deal for the Braves.
But Braves' scouts have had a huge mancrush on Vazquez since time immemorial. And they are desperate for a cpl of good innings eaters.

PS : he reminds me of Gavin Floyd..so might work out well for the Sox
   7. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:48 AM (#3019450)
If no money is changing hands (or even if some is), I wonder what Kenny is planning to do with it (if anything). I have the White Sox at about $95M without Vazquez.
   8. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:51 AM (#3019453)
I think Javy wore out his welcome a bit, but I'll still be a little sad to see him go. Even when he's league average, he's a nice innings eater. He's been in the majors for 11 years, and has only made fewer than 32 starts ONCE (and that was in '99).
   9. Corn On Ty Cobb Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:57 AM (#3019455)
From O'Brien's blog:

I think I’ve got it nailed down now: Flowers, Lillibridge, Jon Gilmore and Santos Rodriguez, a Gulf Coast League lefty, for Vazquez and Logan.
   10. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:57 AM (#3019456)
If no money is changing hands (or even if some is), I wonder what Kenny is planning to do with it (if anything). I have the White Sox at about $95M without Vazquez.

Could be nothing. The Sox have been talking austerity this winter.
   11. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 03:00 AM (#3019459)
No Morton? Interesting.

Gilmore is a 3B, who the Braves drafted in the supp round cpl of years ago. Still hasn't show any power, though he hit a fair number of doubles and for a high average when demoted from low A to Appy League. Very young in baseball terms as he is from Iowa and didn't get many games in.
I have no clue who Santos Rodriguez is !
   12. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 03:02 AM (#3019460)
I have no clue who Santos Rodriguez is !

Interesting "K" ratio.

He looks like someone Kenny Williams would love - young, lefty, wild, and overpowering.
   13. Kyle S Posted: December 03, 2008 at 03:03 AM (#3019461)
I've never heard of Santos Rodriguez either. Flowers is a very talented hitter and I'm sad to see him go but I understand - you have to give up something to get a Javy Vazquez caliber player. Hopefully this is just the first of several moves to come.
   14. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 03:07 AM (#3019464)

Interesting "K" ratio.


41/12 in 26 ip and no HRs! but he was repeating GCL too. Meh, not too worried. Thats the strength of the Braves system at the moment. Bunch of hard throwers at the low level.

Poor McCann is going to catch 140 games and then play in the other 22 games in some capacity again. I hope all his yoga is paying off!
   15. Tripon Posted: December 03, 2008 at 03:12 AM (#3019469)
7:42pm: O'Brien believes Chicago's return to be Flowers, Lillibridge, third baseman Jon Gilmore, and pitcher Santos Rodriguez.


Wow, the White Sox just cleaned up on the Braves.

http://www.ajc.com/blogs/content/shared-blogs/ajc/braves/entries/2008/12/02/hampton_is_gone.html#comment-211735903
   16. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 03:17 AM (#3019473)
Wow, the White Sox just cleaned up on the Braves.

Is my sarcasm detector broken?
   17. Frisco Cali Posted: December 03, 2008 at 03:17 AM (#3019474)
Lillibridge is decent also. Didn't hit in the majors last year, but that should change.
   18. flournoy Posted: December 03, 2008 at 03:29 AM (#3019480)
I assume this means that Escobar won't be traded, which is good news. Last year I wanted the Braves to trade Renteria to the White Sox for Vazquez, but I like what the Braves ended up getting for Renteria even better.

Unlike everyone else here (I think), I like both Reyes and Morton and am glad that the Braves are apparently hanging on to them. Tyler Flowers showed some huge power this fall, he's a big loss. Lillibridge is expendable, and I don't care about Gilmore or Rodriguez.

Optimistic so far...
   19. Crispix Attacks Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:04 AM (#3019487)
This is great news. Soon we could see Lance Broadway pitching to Tyler Flowers, which would surely be the gayest-sounding battery in baseball history.
   20. Chris Dial Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:12 AM (#3019491)
Great. Now Mets fans get to hear how awesome the Braves rotation is all spring.
   21. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:19 AM (#3019494)
Great. Now Mets fans get to hear how awesome the Braves rotation is all spring.


Which would be a welcome change from hearing 24/7 how Oliver Perez is the non-kosher Sandy Koufax, and how Maine is the next great thing and how Pelfrey is the next Brandon Webb.
   22. Sam Hutcheson is the Rickey Henderson of... Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:19 AM (#3019496)
Great. Now Mets fans get to hear how awesome the Braves rotation is all spring.

Vasquez (whom I like quite a bit), Jurrjens, Campillo, Reyes, Morton doesn't exactly scream dominance. Now, throw AJ Burnett in and bump Morton out and you've got something to start wagging about, maybe. Fold Tommy Hanson and Tim Hudson in come 2009 and you've got real sh*t talk on your hands again.

Flowers is a big prospect to let loose but he's blocked by McCann and he's not on the Heyward/Schafer/Hanson do-not-touch list. Lillibridge had a big upside two years ago but he's struggled mightily since and hasn't shown much promise at the ML level. Haven't heard of the other guys at all.

s/
   23. The Answer to the TWolves (GMoney) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:21 AM (#3019497)
Hudson is done for all of 2009 isn't he?
   24. Sam Hutcheson is the Rickey Henderson of... Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:24 AM (#3019499)
That should have read 2010. Some people say Hudson might come back in August or September of next year but he's really a 2010 resource. I mistyped.
   25. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:26 AM (#3019501)
Seems like a really good deal for the Braves. KW is really dumping salary for anything he can get huh?
   26. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:27 AM (#3019502)
Hudson is done for all of 2009 isn't he?


Due back in August , I think.

I would like to poll other Braves' fans here, but a rotation of
Vazquez
JJ/Campillo
Morton/Jo Jo Reyes
Smoltz/Glavine
with Hanson/Medlen in the wings.
And a bullpen of
Soriano/Gonzalez/Acosta/Moylan/Boyer/Carlyle/Logan/Ridgeway with bunch of AAA arms doesn't sound too bad to me.
Not the greatest, but should be above average. I really really think the Braves need a power bat in the OF, and that should be the aim now. Not Peavy or Burnett or Lowe. If we get them and the power bat, its dandy. But really, we have probably one of the top infields in the majors. We need to fix that outfield ASAP, esp in LF. I wouldn't be opposed to a top heavy deal for Burrell, something like lots of $ for the first 2-3 yrs and then options.
   27. CWS Keith plans to boo your show at the Apollo Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:28 AM (#3019503)
KW is really dumping salary for anything he can get huh?

Tyler Flowers = "anything he can get"? Really?
   28. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:30 AM (#3019504)
KW is really dumping salary for anything he can get huh?

Tyler Flowers has his issues, but he has a legit case for being the best catching prospect behind Wieters. As some White Sox fans mentioned upthread, that itself should be a big return for Vazquez, given how empty their system is.

EDIT : what Keith said. And think of it this way. Flowers is at this point probably better than the much-hyped Hank Conger.
   29. Sam Hutcheson is the Rickey Henderson of... Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:36 AM (#3019509)
I really really think the Braves need a power bat in the OF, and that should be the aim now. Not Peavy or Burnett or Lowe.

First off, this deal pretty much takes Peavy out of the picture. Trading Lillibridge means Escobar and Kelly Johnson are starting infielders. They could still trade for Peavy but then they'd have to pay for Furcal or Renteria. I don't see that happening.

I do see them continuing their pursuit of Burnett and/or Lowe. Vasquez isn't the ace that they were looking for. He's the "solid, capable innings eater" that they are bringing in to replace Mike Hampton.

Vasquez makes 11.75m per for the next two years. Subtract that from the 45m the Braves had for free agents and you still have 33m per year to bring in Burnett and Adam Dunn at an average of 16m per year. Probably won't spend all of the kitty on just two players, but there's wiggle room in the budget and enough to drop and incentives laden offer to Glavine (no) or Smoltz (maybe.)
   30. DKDC Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:38 AM (#3019513)
Tyler Flowers has his issues, but he has a legit case for being the best catching prospect behind Wieters.


Flowers is a nice prospect, but he's barely a catching prospect.
   31. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:40 AM (#3019514)
They could still trade for Peavy but then they'd have to pay for Furcal or Renteria. I don't see that happening.

I am not ruling it out yet. Both of them have professed special affinity for playing in Atlanta under Cox. And this trade just de-leverages the Braves' position in the Peavy deal. And frankly, hype aside, just Escobar would be better for the Padres than any of the other rumoured packages.
Peavy, Burrell and Furcal for the remaining $33 mil. sign me up for that utopian scenario.
   32. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:42 AM (#3019516)
Flowers is a nice prospect, but he's barely a catching prospect.

And what makes you say that? Someone who caught all year in the minors and the AFL counts as a C in my book.
   33. CWS Keith plans to boo your show at the Apollo Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:44 AM (#3019518)
Has there been any mention of money going to the Braves? Vazquez is due $23 million over the next two seasons and I'd guess that if the Sox aren't paying (a majority of) Vazquez's way to Atlanta, they'll use that $11.5 million on a free agent (as they've now cleared a good chunk of change from their payroll in Uribe, Crede, Cabrera, Swisher and now Vazquez, with another $10 million gone if Dye is dealt).

I'm a little disappointed that the Sox aren't getting Morton, but overall it seems like a pretty fair deal.
   34. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:45 AM (#3019519)
On June 5, 1989, we were one inning away from having Terry Fennell Blocker pitch to Bruce Edwin Benedict. So close!
   35. Corn On Ty Cobb Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:46 AM (#3019520)
I don't think this affects a Peavy deal at all. The Braves were never going to hand the SS reigns over to Lillibridge. Burnett is likely priority #1 now, but Peavy is still on the radar. Escobar's name has been floating around too much to believe the Braves haven't soured on him and are actively looking to replace him.
   36. DKDC Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:51 AM (#3019523)
And what makes you say that? Someone who caught all year in the minors and the AFL counts as a C in my book.


What if he was also a fat juicer with a bum knee that allowed over 100 SBs last year?
   37. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:51 AM (#3019524)
It shouldn't necessarily work this way, but when Javy blew up on the penultimate day of the season and in the playoffs, he was gone for sure.
   38. Sam Hutcheson is the Rickey Henderson of... Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:52 AM (#3019525)
And frankly, hype aside, just Escobar would be better for the Padres than any of the other rumoured packages.
Peavy, Burrell and Furcal for the remaining $33 mil. sign me up for that utopian scenario.


It's still an option, I'm just guessing the momentum is toward Burnett now, more than Peavy. I'm not sure I have a preference either way. Peavy would be cheaper but require back-filling with Furcal - I don't have a problem with that. Burnett only costs money but means a long deal for a pitcher. In my perfect scenario they sign Burnett to a reasonable deal, bring in Burrell AND Raul Ibanez and tell Smoltz he can close if he's willing to work for incentives and fight his way back onto the roster.
   39. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:52 AM (#3019526)
This is a really nice move for the Braves. Even "bad" Vazquez is good for 200 or so league average innings and he could always be much better than that. Lillibridge looks like a bench player to me and the two pitchers are still pretty far away. The catching prospect looks like the only guy the Braves will miss.

The Mets should have trumped this offer.
   40. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:56 AM (#3019527)
Yea, I'm underselling Flowers, but from what I have read he probably won't stick at catcher which reduces his value quite a bit. We'll see.

First off, this deal pretty much takes Peavy out of the picture. Trading Lillibridge means Escobar and Kelly Johnson are starting infielders. They could still trade for Peavy but then they'd have to pay for Furcal or Renteria. I don't see that happening.

I had read reports earlier this offseason that the Braves felt Martin Prado was capable of starting, opening up a possible trade for KJ or Yunel.
   41. Sam Hutcheson is the Rickey Henderson of... Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:59 AM (#3019531)
They feel comfortable with Prado at 2B. I'd be shocked - seriously shocked - if they thought Prado could play SS every day. If the Peavy deal was built around KJ then Prado would be more of a fall back but I personally have a hard time seeing either Johnson or Prado shifting to SS to backfill for Escobar. Everything I've seen this winter suggests the post-Escobar plan hinges on Rafeal Furcal.
   42. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:59 AM (#3019532)
What if he was also a fat juicer with a bum knee that allowed over 100 SBs last year?

And that the bum knee and all allowed him to play 1B and kill low A. And then be a full time catcher when it healed. Should catching prospects ahve no injuries??
and 100SBs? he caught them at 27% which is kinda low in the minors. But apparently, he spent all fall trying to fix his throwing, and yet managed to be the best hitter in the AFL. And SB totals stop someone from being a catcher?
   43. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:01 AM (#3019533)
I had read reports earlier this offseason that the Braves felt Martin Prado was capable of starting, opening up a possible trade for KJ or Yunel.

Just the Braves' hype machine. Prado at best is a super sub with a good line drive bat. I think he will be terribly exposed as a full timer. And he is not in the class of Escobar/KJ.
   44. Sam Hutcheson is the Rickey Henderson of... Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:03 AM (#3019535)
And that the bum knee and all allowed him to play 1B and kill low A.

Flowers has known defensive issues behind the plate. He might work through them, or he might have to shift to 1B or DH. That he caught last year and is attempting to work through his shortcomings in the low minors in no way lessens the impact of his defensive weaknesses on his prospective value.
   45. Corn On Ty Cobb Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:05 AM (#3019536)
Prado is a butcher in the field. He'd be a catastrophe as an everydayer.
   46. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:07 AM (#3019537)
What if he was also a fat juicer with a bum knee that allowed over 100 SBs last year?

He's not fat. I haven't heard anything about a bad knee, nor about steroids.

The stolen bases thing is a bit misleading, as he also threw out 43 would-be basestealers. 27.7% isn't anything to write home about, but it's not unacceptable. It's better than what AJ Pierzynski can do.

Even if he doesn't stick at catcher, Flowers probably becomes the best pure hitting prospect in the Sox minor leagues. It's a fine return for Javier Vazquez.

The other three guys are nothing special, but neither is Boone Logan.
   47. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:12 AM (#3019539)
That he caught last year and is attempting to work through his shortcomings in the low minors in no way lessens the impact of his defensive weaknesses on his prospective value.

How is that less relevant than the fact that he was a juicer in JuCo and had to have a knee surgery 2 years ago? He caught half the year in low A, full year in High A and AFL. And when did SB% come in way of a good hitter sticking at catcher? Lets not even go to the Piazza/Posada level. Kendall,AJ et al have had long careers as catchers while being mediocre hitters. You think Flowers on a team with DH option has diminished value?
   48. CWS Keith plans to boo your show at the Apollo Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:13 AM (#3019542)
I highly doubt the Sox would've made Flowers the centerpiece of the deal if they didn't have a relatively high amount of confidence that Flowers will be able to stick it at catcher.
   49. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:16 AM (#3019544)
I highly doubt the Sox would've made Flowers the centerpiece of the deal if they didn't have a relatively high amount of confidence that Flowers will be able to stick it at catcher.

If he has Paul Konerko's career, I don't think the Sox would be too downhearted.
   50. regfairfield Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:24 AM (#3019546)
When Kornerko was 23 he hit .294/.352/.511 in the bigs. I don't see Flowers doing that next year.
   51. Walt Davis Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:55 AM (#3019573)
bring in Burrell AND Raul Ibanez

Are you giving up on Kotchmann or are you suggesting a LF/RF combo of Burrell and Ibanez? If the latter, I hope you guys have the reincarnation of Gary Pettis in CF. :-)
   52. Jeff K. Posted: December 03, 2008 at 07:05 AM (#3019577)
I couldn't figure out why I knew so many of the guys mentioned in all these permutations, as I'm nobody's idea of a prospect hound. There are plenty of people here that know ten times as much about the Rangers' system than I do, much less another team's. But Flowers, Morton, Gilmore, these were all ringing loud bells, and I knew things about them. And then I realized that though I'm in 2015 now and long ago traded all but Morton, Mogul '09 was to blame for it. Funny how that works with games; I knew over half of the Senators roster into the 2000s from NHL '98.
   53. Roy Hobbs of WIFFLE Ball Posted: December 03, 2008 at 09:00 AM (#3019583)
I've said this before, but this is as good a time to say it again as any: Javier Vazquez will be the first 3,000 K pitcher with a losing record.
   54. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: December 03, 2008 at 09:15 AM (#3019585)
This is great news. Soon we could see Lance Broadway pitching to Tyler Flowers, which would surely be the gayest-sounding battery in baseball history.

What about Piazza and Mlicki?
   55. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: December 03, 2008 at 10:17 AM (#3019588)
Piazza's not gay-sounding, just gay.
   56. Jeff K. Posted: December 03, 2008 at 10:20 AM (#3019589)
What about Aase to Lickert?

Rambert/Sasser? (Say it out loud)

An Italian stereotype might say "When I go out to the bars, Iannetta/Woodcock"

This isn't a battery but pitcher/batter: A weary, dismissive man might say "Sincock/Adcock"

-----
I didn't notice GB used Mlicki. Damn.

(EDIT) Sean, if you look through what people search on bbref, yeah, that was me.
   57. Sam Hutcheson is the Rickey Henderson of... Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:02 PM (#3019607)
Are you giving up on Kotchmann or are you suggesting a LF/RF combo of Burrell and Ibanez? If the latter, I hope you guys have the reincarnation of Gary Pettis in CF.

What's worse, Ibanez/Burrell with Blanco having to run down a gazillion doubles in the gaps, or Jeff Francoeur?
   58. flournoy Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:17 PM (#3019615)
He's not fat. I haven't heard anything about a bad knee, nor about steroids.


I don't know anything about him being fat or his knee problems, but he was suspended for PEDs a few years ago.
   59. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: December 03, 2008 at 02:53 PM (#3019621)
I don't think Flowers can stick behind the plate - throwing isn't his only issue back there.
   60. Kyle S at work Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:17 PM (#3019682)
Flowers is definitely "husky" if not fat - he's listed at 6'4" 245. I don't think he'll stick at catcher long-term, but he just may have the bat for first. He certainly tore the cover off the ball in AFL.

A shame that we're losing Gilmore too - he had a nice season at Danville last year. Of course, lots of folks have torn up that league and never done much since, so it's hard to say how much stock to put in such a performance.

All that said, Vazquez is worth it IMHO.
   61. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:22 PM (#3019689)
The Birmingham Barons should be an interesting team to watch next year - they could potentially have Brandon Allen at first, Gordon Beckham at short, Dayan Viciedo at third, Tyler Flowers catching, Jordan Danks in the outfield, and Aaron Poreda pitching all at the same time.
   62. AROM Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:55 PM (#3019730)
I hadn't heard of Flowers before, but those are some nice hitting stats in an environment that isn't that great for hitters.

This is a time to be thankful for Sean Foreman. Now we can go to B-Ref and see the defensive stats for minor league catchers. Before, the only way you'd ever know how a catcher did against the running game was if Baseball America felt like mentioning his CS%.

Next step: Can minor league catching stats predict major league performance? What's more important in the minors, CS% or SBA/9 inn, in predicting how he'll do at the major league level?

I suspect the later, as a catcher who has trouble throwing will encourage more runners to try on him, and he'll get a few CS off the slow ones so that his percentage won't be terrible. But a catcher with very low SBA against is more indicative of a guy who can throw.
   63. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: December 03, 2008 at 04:55 PM (#3019731)
All that said, Vazquez is worth it IMHO.


As a White Sox fan, this seems like one of those rare trades where both teams got what they want. I'm very happy about what Chicago acquired:

-the four prospects
-$11.5M in savings in each of '09 and '10
-getting rid of Logan (addition by subtraction)

That being said, I have no idea what Kenny is doing. The team entered the off-season with some very specific holes to fill: 2B (assuming Alexei moves to SS), 3B, CF, fifth starter. This trade opens up another rotation spot, and Kenny appears to be stockpiling players at infield positions:

2B: Getz/Nix

SS: Alexei/Lillibridge

3B: Fields/Viciedo

Plus Betemit, who can play all three of these positions. (EDIT: And Beckham, a year or two away.) Is Kenny:

-stockpiling prospects for a trade? OR

-planning to employ the "throw 'em all out there and see which ones stick" approach to prospects?

And what is the plan for CF and the last two spots in the rotation?
   64. MM1f Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:11 PM (#3019748)
Lillibridge is decent also. Didn't hit in the majors last year, but that should change.

Doubtful.
   65. Pops Freshenmeyer Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:13 PM (#3019750)
It's being reported that Atlanta is going to offer Burnett a 5 year deal. If the Braves make it happen then I assume they're not interested in Peavey.

The Cubs also seem to have abandoned that option when they committed to Dempster.

The Padres are in serious trouble right now if they really have to shed his salary.
   66. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:17 PM (#3019752)
Doubtful.


This trade is sort of like the irresistible force meeting the immovable object. The Braves have a track record of trading promising prospects who wind up amounting to nothing. Kenny Williams has a track record (recently, at least) of acquiring young guys who can pretty immediately step in and contribute.
   67. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:17 PM (#3019753)
If I had to predict, Lillibridge competes with Nix to platoon with Getz at 2B, and more than likely is the starting shortstop for the Charlotte Knights. I think they're committing to Ramirez at short. Fields is the 3B, Viciedo is at least a year away. Betemit is a utility guy, taking over the job that Juan Uribe had last year.

Maybe the Sox bring back Jon Garland. It would be weird to trade Vazquez for prospects and then trade prospects for another starting pitcher, and I don't see them in the hunt for Burnett or Sabathia. Maybe Sheets.

As for center field, there's not a whole lot out there that's both worth having and won't cost a lot in trade.

Maybe the Sox just go with the kids for a year.
   68. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:17 PM (#3019754)
It's being reported that Atlanta is going to offer Burnett a 5 year deal. If the Braves make it happen then I assume they're not interested in Peavey.

I think this is leverage to get the Pads to back off on their demands. Towers is in a tough position where everyone knows he has to deal Peavy, but he basically has only 2-3 teams he can deal with. I wouldn't be surprised if the Braves were floating this rumor to gain some more leverage on Towers.
   69. jmurph Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:19 PM (#3019758)
It's being reported that Atlanta is going to offer Burnett a 5 year deal. If the Braves make it happen then I assume they're not interested in Peavey.


National media or local? Just curious.

I would not want my team to give Burnett 5 years. As Neyer pointed out in his chat yesterday, besides being fragile, he's just not that great. Lowe's career era+ is 122. Burnett's single-season career high era+ is 122. And I can't imagine giving Lowe 5 years either.
   70. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:20 PM (#3019761)
Kenny Williams has a track record (recently, at least) of acquiring young guys who can pretty immediately step in and contribute.

There's a disturbing downward trend in Lillibridge's offensive production over the last couple of years. I think in a best-case scenario, he's Jason Bartlett or Juan Uribe.
   71. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:23 PM (#3019764)
Rambert/Sasser? (Say it out loud)

What about Darling/Sasser?

Queen/Dickey?

Dickman/Peacock?
   72. MM1f Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:29 PM (#3019771)
There's a disturbing downward trend in Lillibridge's offensive production over the last couple of years. I think in a best-case scenario, he's Jason Bartlett or Juan Uribe.

I don't like Lilli as an MLB starter but he plays good D at SS, 2b and CF and he can run the bases and pop the occasional double. He could be a really nice supersub

It still kills me how many internet expert wannabes kept insisting he was a better player than Yunel.
   73. Cris E Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:31 PM (#3019772)
This trade opens up another rotation spot, and Kenny appears to be stockpiling players at infield positions

My guess is Kenny is loading up on kids to go get Peavy. They didn't get rid of Vasquez because they had too many starters, but because they didn't like him. Now they've got salary and roster space to make a run at Towers at the Meetings.

EDIT: Also, Battey-Kaat
   74. MM1f Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:31 PM (#3019774)
This trade opens up another rotation spot, and Kenny appears to be stockpiling players at infield positions:

2B: Getz/Nix

SS: Alexei/Lillibridge

3B: Fields/Viciedo

Plus Betemit, who can play all three of these positions.


I don't think most of that can qualify as stock-piling. I love Betemit but he hasn't shown himself to be more than a utility guy the last few years, Nix and Getz are fringy as hell and Lilli is a utility man himself.
I don't think anyone that qualifies as stock piling. I think KW just happens to have some useful utility men hanging around.
   75. Kyle S at work Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:32 PM (#3019776)
I've been predicting Burnett in ATL for a while; he always pitches very well against the Braves, and that seems to matter to our front office. He was dominating in the game he pitched for TOR against ATL this year.
   76. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:36 PM (#3019781)
My guess is Kenny is loading up on kids to go get Peavy. They didn't get rid of Vasquez because they had too many starters, but because they didn't like him. Now they've got salary and roster space to make a run at Towers at the Meetings.

This makes sense, actually. Rotoworld is reporting that the Cubs are out of the mix for Peavy and the Braves seem to be out, as well. I'm not sure the Mets or Yankees have the prospects the Pads want or the stomach to part with the prospects the Pads would want. Depending on how desperate the Pads are to shed his salary, this could be a nice arbitrage possibility for KW. Dump Swish and Vazquez for prospects and package them together for Peavy so that at the end of the day you have Betemit/Peavy for Swisher/Vazquez and a prospect. That looks good for the Sox, to me.
   77. ellsbury my heart at wounded knee Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:39 PM (#3019783)
Seems like teams are expecting FA salaries to be down this year. I imagine that's what's happening with so many teams not offering arbitration to players. Maybe Williams is planning on loading up with some FA deals?
   78. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:39 PM (#3019784)
Would Peavy accept a trade to the White Sox? That seems to be a major sticking point with these trade negotiations - Peavy only wants to go to a very small list of teams, and many of those don't have the pieces to trade for him.
   79. Dan Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:40 PM (#3019787)
I suspect the later, as a catcher who has trouble throwing will encourage more runners to try on him, and he'll get a few CS off the slow ones so that his percentage won't be terrible. But a catcher with very low SBA against is more indicative of a guy who can throw.

I would honestly say CS% is more meaningful in the minors, because frequently players are just running to get practice at baserunning regardless of how good the catcher is, unlike in the majors where teams are more selective since they're actually playing to win as the #1 priority.
   80. Stately, Plump Buck Mulligan Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:40 PM (#3019790)
Maybe the Sox just go with the kids for a year.


I can't imagine that, but if this article is to be believed, you might be right. The end of the article:

This winter, rival GMs have reported the White Sox are shopping nearly every big salary on their roster. To that end, first baseman/outfielder Nick Swisher (another in Guillen’s doghouse) was dealt to the Yankees and Jermaine Dye is being shopped to, among others, the Reds. Teams also are being told the White Sox will take offers on first baseman Paul Konerko and DH Jim Thome.


Looks like Christmas may come early for you, Jerry!
   81. Jimmy P Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:41 PM (#3019791)
All that said, Vazquez is worth it IMHO.

Wait until August, your opinion will change.
   82. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:41 PM (#3019792)
Would Peavy accept a trade to the White Sox? That seems to be a major sticking point with these trade negotiations - Peavy only wants to go to a very small list of teams, and many of those don't have the pieces to trade for him.

This is the million dollar question. Maybe KW will get Obama to call Peavy with a sales pitch on the glories of Chicago.
   83. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:43 PM (#3019799)
Myrtle appears to have been decent for hitters in '08 (R=102). Don't know if that's a real effect or not - I *think* there was minor work done on the park (building a restaurant or something) that may have change the air currents, would have to check (haven't been there, don't know what I'm talking about).

Lillibridge is decent also. Didn't hit in the majors last year, but that should change.

I think his bat will come around, but that might be my heart talking, as opposed to my head - I love that guy.
   84. Kyle S at work Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:46 PM (#3019801)
I don't think CWS have the bullets in the gun to go after Peavy even now (and think that Peavy wouldn't go there if asked). As much as I like Flowers, he was only the Braves' 8th best prospect according to Kevin Goldstein less than a month ago (Gilmore was the second most valuable guy, and he was out of the top 11). The Braves can still offer Yunel + Gorkys and be way, way ahead of any Tyler Flowers-based deal.
   85. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:46 PM (#3019802)
Dump Swish and Vazquez for prospects and package them together for Peavy so that at the end of the day you have Betemit/Peavy for Swisher/Vazquez and a prospect. That looks good for the Sox, to me.

I don't see that happening. If those prospects would have been enough to make a Peavy trade happen, the Braves would have traded for Peavy instead of for Vazquez.

I know lots of people think that this is just step 1 in a two-step process to bring a big name to the South Side, and I suppose that's possible - Ken Williams is nothing if not surprising. But I'm thinking that Ken Williams is serious when he talks about trimming payroll and improving the team over the long haul.
   86. David Concepcion de la Desviacion Estandar (Dan R) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:47 PM (#3019803)
Where was Minaya??????
   87. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:48 PM (#3019804)
Nobody's using first names now? I think Gaylord Perry pitching to Fran Healy for San Francisco in 1971 is a pretty strong contender.

The 1872 Middletown Mansfields sometimes featured a battery of Buttery and Clapp.
   88. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: December 03, 2008 at 05:57 PM (#3019819)
I know lots of people think that this is just step 1 in a two-step process to bring a big name to the South Side, and I suppose that's possible - Ken Williams is nothing if not surprising. But I'm thinking that Ken Williams is serious when he talks about trimming payroll and improving the team over the long haul.

Bah. Kenny will pull of something crazy. I know it in my bones. I look forward to it every offseason.
   89. billyshears Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:00 PM (#3019822)
For a supposedly good pitcher, a lot of organizations seem rather anxious to get rid of Vazquez.
   90. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:05 PM (#3019827)
He is the Reggie Sanders of pitching.
   91. flournoy Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:07 PM (#3019829)
Meaning he will suck balls with the Braves but be decent elsewhere? I hope not.
   92. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:12 PM (#3019836)
Bah. Kenny will pull of something crazy. I know it in my bones. I look forward to it every offseason.

I'm worried that he'll overpay for Brian Roberts, or worse, Orlando Hudson.
   93. Cod Guy Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:14 PM (#3019838)
I don't see what Vazquez brings to the table that makes him worth acquiring for a guy who hits as well as Flowers does. He pitches a lot of innings, yeah, and that will help to protect Jurrjens and any other young guys whom the Braves put in their roation. Surely, though, there are other innings-eaters out there who would have commanded less in a trade than Vazquez did.

I'm worried that Frank Wren is actually going to try to win it all in 2009 and that he thinks that Vazquez is an important part of reaching that goal. Since leaving Montreal in 2003, Vazquez has had one season with an ERA+ over 100. His WHIP has been better than his ERA indicated in his tough years, but that's been a consistent presence in almost every year of his career, even when he's done well. Even if the Braves stood a chance of toppling the Mets and Phillies in 2009 (I don't see how they can do it), I don't think that it would be worth it to give up Flowers for someone like Vazquez. Even if Flowers doesn't pan out, it makes more sense to at least see if he will than to trade him for a middling starting pitcher.
   94. Pops Freshenmeyer Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:16 PM (#3019839)
I'm not sure the Mets or Yankees have the prospects the Pads want or the stomach to part with the prospects the Pads would want.

What they really don't have are baseball teams that Jake Peavy will play for.

Somehow I think the Cardinals will get him in the end. It will be a very low price and I'll curse the Cubs for giving Dempster that contract instead of getting a trade done.

As much as I like Flowers, he was only the Braves' 8th best prospect according to Kevin Goldstein

That's too low, IMO. Even if we assume he's a 1B from here on out he's still a solid prospect. Sickels rated him 5th and gives him a B.
   95. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:17 PM (#3019841)
Bah. Kenny will pull of something crazy. I know it in my bones. I look forward to it every offseason.

I'm worried that he'll overpay for Brian Roberts, or worse, Orlando Hudson.


Don't worry. His crazy sh!t usually ends up making sense. He's my second favorite gm to follow.

Beane
KW
big gap
??? Haven't really thought this far down, honestly. Ed Wade is fun because of the middle reliever obsession. I think I've given myself something to ponder during my next bathroom run.
   96. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:18 PM (#3019845)
That's too low, IMO. Even if we assume he's a 1B from here on out he's still a solid prospect. Sickels rated him 5th and gives him a B.

Also, FWIW, in some of the Atl-SD rimors, SD supposedly really wanted Flowers included in the package.
   97. MM1f Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:23 PM (#3019852)
I'm worried that Frank Wren is actually going to try to win it all in 2009 and that he thinks that Vazquez is an important part of reaching that goal. Since leaving Montreal in 2003, Vazquez has had one season with an ERA+ over 100.

Wow, talk about an intentionally misleading sentence.
On the flip side you could say, "Since leaving NY Vasquez has pitched between 202 and 216 IPs of 98 to 127 ERA+ ball every year."

Here is a much more honest, and accurate way to sum up Vasquez's pitching..
Javy Vasquez has had just 3 seasons in his career that were not average or better... 1998, 1999 and 2004.
   98. flournoy Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:25 PM (#3019854)
I don't see what Vazquez brings to the table that makes him worth acquiring for a guy who hits as well as Flowers does. He pitches a lot of innings, yeah, and that will help to protect Jurrjens and any other young guys whom the Braves put in their roation.


You answered your own question. The Braves were absolutely desperate for innings in 2008; that cannot happen again in 2009.

Surely, though, there are other innings-eaters out there who would have commanded less in a trade than Vazquez did.


Who? Give me names. League average innings eaters are very desirable commodities.
   99. ellsbury my heart at wounded knee Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:29 PM (#3019858)
This trade happened too soon. Flowers should have been acquired on Valentine's Day.
   100. Pops Freshenmeyer Posted: December 03, 2008 at 06:29 PM (#3019859)
Who? Give me names. League average innings eaters are very desirable commodities.

Jason Marquis!
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Downtown Bookie
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012
(1832 - 1:32am, May 26)
Last: baudib

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(119 - 1:28am, May 26)
Last: Swedish Chef

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(56 - 1:15am, May 26)
Last: The Keith Law Blog Blah Blah (battlekow)

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(8 - 12:40am, May 26)
Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamurai

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(12 - 12:25am, May 26)
Last: Tripon

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(86 - 11:59pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(4 - 11:26pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(18 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielder

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(20 - 11:24pm, May 25)
Last: Dan

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(27 - 11:16pm, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogTBO: Nerdy Rays head north
(17 - 10:07pm, May 25)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(6 - 9:57pm, May 25)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(22 - 9:38pm, May 25)
Last: Cris E

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.8377 seconds
57 querie(s) executed