Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

ESPN: Szymborski: Resetting Division Projections (INSIDER)

When you do a lot of work with projections, one of the things that takes some getting used to is the inevitability that your soothsaying will miss the mark on several occasions. Baseball teams have a lot of moving parts, and over half a year there's great potential for assumptions to go awry, askew or afoul. With a quarter of the season already behind us, we have a great deal of new information on teams -- some good, some bad -- and unless Bud Selig comes up with some crazy new idea to make the All-Star Game "count" even more, there are a lot of wins and losses in the books that nobody can go back and erase. Missing the mark here and there really isn't so bad -- if we could predict the future perfectly, things would be rather boring. So, which teams have changed their potential position in the standings at the end of the year by the greatest degree? To answer this question, I used updated ZiPS projections and a set of Monte Carlo simulations to estimate wins during the rest of the season, adding them to this morning's standings. The good news is that most teams still project in the same neighborhood, with 25 of 30 teams coming within six wins of the preseason projection edition. But if you have a tendency to see your glasses as half full, as I do, that leaves five teams that ZiPS is likely, at season's end, to have missed by more than six games.
Bonus to those that catch the Mr. Show reference.
Dan Szymborski Posted: May 22, 2012 at 03:28 PM | 26 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Bitter Calculus Instructor Posted: May 22, 2012 at 04:18 PM (#4137937)
The Dodgers and Orioles look substantially better in ZiPS' new standings


Glad to hear it!

Also, here are Baseball Prospectus' playoff odds for comparison: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/odds/index.php?dispgroup=div&standings_sort=divpct
   2. PepTech Posted: May 22, 2012 at 05:08 PM (#4137991)
There is no possible scenario by which the Rangers miss the playoffs? It's May.
   3. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: May 22, 2012 at 05:15 PM (#4138000)
The Royals still suck. That's good to know.
   4. Guapo Posted: May 22, 2012 at 05:15 PM (#4138001)
There is no possible scenario by which the Rangers miss the playoffs? It's May.


It would be awesome if they had a massive pigpile on the mound after tonight's game, sprayed champagne, etc.
   5. My guest will be Jermaine Allensworth Posted: May 22, 2012 at 05:22 PM (#4138012)
Baseball teams have a lot of moving parts, and over half a year there's great potential for assumptions to go awry, askew or afoul.

... and one time, all three!

   6. Dan Szymborski Posted: May 22, 2012 at 05:25 PM (#4138016)
Good man!
   7. Willie Mayspedes Posted: May 22, 2012 at 05:47 PM (#4138039)
I would have guessed the A's had a better shot at the division than the WC.

It would take a lot of injuries to the Rangers but they would only have to beat one team. I guess beating the best team in the league is harder than sneaking past the field.
   8. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: May 22, 2012 at 06:10 PM (#4138061)
I would have guessed the A's had a better shot at the division than the WC.

Don't forget there are two wild cards now, and the A's share a division with the best team in baseball.
   9. eastmostbias Posted: May 23, 2012 at 06:41 AM (#4138393)
How can they reset predictions? Isn't that called "reporting?"
   10. Joey B. has ignited his October #Natitude Posted: May 23, 2012 at 07:23 AM (#4138400)
Also, here are Baseball Prospectus' playoff odds for comparison: http://www.baseballprospectus.com/odds/index.php?dispgroup=div&standings_sort=divpct

Only 18.5% percent for the Nationals playoff odds, huh? Yep, the BP machine is still a ridiculous Garbage In, Garbage Out broken piece of trash.

That's fine though, we'll just keep on beating people's asses, and eventually people will come to realize that this is a good team now, whether they like it or not.
   11. ShoeGrit Posted: May 23, 2012 at 07:30 AM (#4138402)
Well Joey, maybe you'll like Cool Standings better.

If it makes you feel any better, it took an awful long time for the actual results to overcome the D Backs bad projections last year.
   12. Joey B. has ignited his October #Natitude Posted: May 23, 2012 at 08:17 AM (#4138407)
I'm really not bothered by it all that much. The simple fact is that the B.P. prediction software is a broken, worthless pile of crap. It always has been, and I guess it probably always will be. Personally though, I'd be a little embarrassed myself to have something of such poor quality out there for everyone to see.
   13. SoSH U at work Posted: May 23, 2012 at 10:36 AM (#4138457)
I'm really not bothered by it all that much. The simple fact is that the B.P. prediction software is a broken, worthless pile of crap.


Maybe they fixed it overnight. The Nats playoff odds have skyrocketed since yesterday.

   14. Joey B. has ignited his October #Natitude Posted: May 23, 2012 at 11:54 AM (#4138529)
Maybe they fixed it overnight. The Nats playoff odds have skyrocketed since yesterday.

I just looked, and you aren't kidding! An almost eleven percent increase sure seems like a pretty darn big jump after a three-run win in May, doesn't it?

I would sure love to be able to get a look at that software to see just what the heck is really going on in there.
   15. Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad) Posted: May 23, 2012 at 11:55 AM (#4138530)
Personally though, I'd be a little embarrassed myself to have something of such poor quality out there for everyone to see.


And yet you keep posting...
   16. Lassus Posted: May 24, 2012 at 09:09 AM (#4139175)
That's fine though, we'll just keep on beating people's asses, and eventually people will come to realize that this is a good team now, whether they like it or not.

Being 2 games up on the 4th-place Mets really screams "playoff lock".
   17. Joey B. has ignited his October #Natitude Posted: May 24, 2012 at 09:27 AM (#4139182)
Being 2 games ahead of the 4th-place Mets really screams "playoff lock".

No, we're not a "playoff lock"; that would be a ridiculous thing to say. I merely said that the 18.5% they had us at a couple of days ago is absurdly low.

Even though they moved us up a little, I think they still have us too low. Although it's still early, I sincerely believe that the Nationals are one of the top four or five teams in the National League now based on talent, though a lot of it has to do with the league being so weak.

I will readily concede without argument that the Braves, Cardinals, and Dodgers are clearly better teams than we are. As for the rest of the Central and West outside St. Louis and L.A., they're basically crap and I don't concede any of the rest of those teams are better than we are. The Phillies are an injury-prone, decrepit old team that is clearly headed downward and at the end of its run of greatness, and your Mets are a total collapse just waiting to happen. Enjoy their record while you can bro, because it's not going to last too much longer.

The Marlins actually scare me a little, because there is a lot of talent on that team. If people want to put them ahead of us I wouldn't argue it too strenuously. But if I'm right and we're in the top five, plain old common sense tells you 18.5% is obviously way too low, now that there are five teams who make the playoffs.
   18. Gern Blanston Posted: May 24, 2012 at 09:45 AM (#4139188)
Vlad beat me to it...
   19. Jose Can Still Seabiscuit Posted: May 24, 2012 at 10:08 AM (#4139201)
My general sense is that these projection systems create swings that are too large, too early in the season. I don't dispute that the Dodgers are both very talented and in a very good situation from a wins/losses standpoint but 90% seems awfully high to me, Baltimore at 47% seems incredibly optimistic and the Angels at 16% seems too low (all Cool Standings).
   20. Lassus Posted: May 24, 2012 at 11:21 AM (#4139265)
No, we're not a "playoff lock"; that would be a ridiculous thing to say. I merely said that the 18.5% they had us at a couple of days ago is absurdly low.

Fair enough.
   21. DKDC Posted: May 24, 2012 at 11:41 AM (#4139286)
Cool Standings completely ignores preseason projections and relies solely on 2012 performance to project team W-L for the rest of the season.

BPro completely ignores 2012 performance and relies solely on preseason projections to project team W-L for the rest of the season.

The truth is probably somewhere between the two, but I’d lean towards BPro this early in the season.
   22. Joey B. has ignited his October #Natitude Posted: May 24, 2012 at 12:40 PM (#4139336)
The truth is probably somewhere between the two, but I’d lean towards BPro this early in the season.

I agree with the basic idea here, but I also think that we're not that far away from the point of the season where performance should be starting to take precedence over the projections.
   23. cardsfanboy Posted: June 01, 2012 at 01:00 AM (#4144915)
I agree with the basic idea here, but I also think that we're not that far away from the point of the season where performance should be starting to take precedence over the projections.


Isn't that what Dan is doing with his projections?(you know the article that was linked here---that most of us couldn't read)
   24. Joey B. has ignited his October #Natitude Posted: June 04, 2012 at 04:37 PM (#4147995)
Isn't that what Dan is doing with his projections?(you know the article that was linked here---that most of us couldn't read)

Yes, I believe so, but none of my comments in this thread were critical of Dan or his projections. All my comments were directed at Baseball Prospectus, because frankly I find a season projection system that completely ignores all performance during that season to be idiotic.
   25. Nineto Lezcano hits the pinata for the candy (CW) Posted: June 04, 2012 at 05:15 PM (#4148064)
BPro completely ignores 2012 performance and relies solely on preseason projections to project team W-L for the rest of the season.


It's a weighted average, actually, with the weight on current-season performance increasing as the season progresses.
   26. Randy Jones Posted: June 04, 2012 at 06:16 PM (#4148128)
Since someone resurrected this thread, I'll link to SG's updated projections on RLYW. They are based on 2/3 preseason projection and 1/3 YTD performance.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Sponsor

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Ray (RDP)
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogBBTF SOFTBALL GAME IN NEW YORK--AUG 17
(292 - 10:58pm, May 18)
Last: Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams)

NewsblogOMNICHATTER for MAY 18, 2013
(143 - 10:56pm, May 18)
Last: cardsfanboy

Newsblog[OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926
(3273 - 10:49pm, May 18)
Last: tshipman

NewsblogDraft Features Rarest of Prospects: Redheads
(8 - 10:48pm, May 18)
Last: Mefisto

NewsblogPressBox: Boog Powell: Meat Of The Order
(14 - 10:36pm, May 18)
Last: boteman

NewsblogPhil Wood: It's time for baseball to use technology to make sure umps get it right
(3 - 10:34pm, May 18)
Last: Kiko Sakata

NewsblogBrian Cashman is keeping Ben Francisco around to “piss everybody off”
(6 - 10:32pm, May 18)
Last: Knock on any Iorg

NewsblogSoE (Megdal): It's Time to Finally Believe in the Orioles
(16 - 10:08pm, May 18)
Last: DJ Funky and the Smile Time Variety Players

NewsblogHolmes: Where does Miguel Cabrera rank among Tiger greats?
(23 - 8:57pm, May 18)
Last: TJ

NewsblogBradford: Could this be the smartest Red Sox team since '07?
(8 - 8:57pm, May 18)
Last: TVerik

NewsblogJosh Hamilton's allergies not linked to drug use, doctors say
(35 - 8:36pm, May 18)
Last: smileyy

NewsblogGeneration K: Baseball’s strikeout trend is growing at record pace
(59 - 8:32pm, May 18)
Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants to

NewsblogPowerball odds? Juan Pierre's homers are long shots, too
(12 - 8:27pm, May 18)
Last: RB in NYC (Now Semi-Retired from BBTF)

NewsblogBabcock: Can The 2013 Cubs Channel The Turnaround Artists Of 1967?
(10 - 8:14pm, May 18)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogBeer and Loathing: Taking Stock of the Best and Worst Ballpark Suds | Extra Mustard - SI.com
(140 - 8:03pm, May 18)
Last: Shredder

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out!

Baseball Autograph Signings
Baseball Card Supplies
Baseball Memorabilia
Baseball Collectibles
Baseball Equipment
Baseball Protective Gear

Page rendered in 0.1963 seconds
53 querie(s) executed