Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, July 17, 2008

ESPN.com: Phillies trade for A’s Blanton

The Phillies have reached an agreement with the Oakland Athletics to acquire right-handed pitcher Joe Blanton. Blanton is 5-12 this season after going 14-10 with a 3.95 ERA last season.

The Athletics get second baseman Adrian Cardenas, pitcher Josh Outman and outfielder Matthew Spencer, all minor leaguers.

Hide the cheesesteaks…

SantoFan Posted: July 17, 2008 at 11:28 PM | 115 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: athletics, phillies

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
   1. Darren Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:26 AM (#2863041)
Outman is a good name for a pitcher. Sure beats Balfour.
   2. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt) Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:27 AM (#2863047)
I know Outman was the No. 4 rated prospect before the season, but I've watched a lot at Reading and he hasn't been impressive at all. They moved him to the bullpen and he definitely hasn't had the season they expected.

Cardenas is apparently the real deal, but Blanton's under contract through 2010, so I think this is a solid move for the Phillies.
   3. PASTE is not impressed by Albert Pujols (Zeth) Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:30 AM (#2863059)
From what I can tell mainly from BPro and looking at their stats this year, this is essentially Blanton for Cardenas straight up. Outman may or may not become a competent middle/long reliever, and Spencer is a nobody that allegedly has big-time power.

I don't know. Can't really get excited about this one from either side.
   4. Mike Emeigh Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:33 AM (#2863066)
Outman probably just needs a change of scenery, and Oakland's probably a good place for him; Reading's tough on flyball pitchers. Spencer's filler. Cardenas is for real. Good return for Oakland.

-- MWE
   5. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:33 AM (#2863069)
Blanton is worth less to a contending team than a non-contending one (which are the A's--who knows?), because he eats innings, but his performance is extremely unreliable. One thinks he'll get pasted at CBP, but I thought the A's could have gotten a little more from a desperate, dumb team.

Then I realized that there aren't any dumb teams desperate for pitching in contention! It might stay that way, too. . .
   6. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:35 AM (#2863073)
I was expecting the Phils to get Burnett or Bedard so I am happy about this as a Met fan. Blanton is a solid innings eater who is better than he has pitched this season but I wouldn't give up a premium prospect for him.
   7. Dan Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:35 AM (#2863074)
I think Blanton could be successful in the NL. I don't know if he WILL be, but I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that he'll put up a 5+ ERA in CBP.

So is Blanton taking Myers' or Eaton's spot in the rotation? Myers seems to have done well in his brief send down to the minors, and looked ready to go right back into the rotation. And needless to say, Eaton has been awful. I don't know how the Phillies feel about sunk costs, but it's basically a sunk cost either way, as both Myers and Eaton are under contract through 2009 for big money.
   8. alkeiper Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:43 AM (#2863088)
I can't believe Blanton is the best pitcher Cardenas could bring in. I really hate this deal for the Phillies.
   9. Iwakuma Chameleon (jonathan) Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:43 AM (#2863091)
I'll miss you, Cupcakes.



I think he'll be phine (heh heh) in Philly.


Naw but in seriousness I like Cardenas as a return, and, who knows, maybe Outman can be all Greg Smith-y or something. Hard to make anything of Spencer one way or another.
   10. retro-shiite Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:43 AM (#2863092)
So who's going to end up with Burnett (or Bedard, for that matter)?
   11. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:45 AM (#2863094)
This isn't really how it works, exactly, but Blanton's ERA, if he had pitched exactly the way he's pitched so far this year, but in Philadelphia, would be about 5.75.

(Well, I if we use FIP, then his Philadelphia FIP would be somewhere in the 5.40s.)
   12. Social media assassin (Templeusox) Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:45 AM (#2863095)
Cardenas is a complete beast monstorious.
   13. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:45 AM (#2863097)
I think Blanton could be successful in the NL. I don't know if he WILL be, but I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that he'll put up a 5+ ERA in CBP.

I think so. He could be all right. I'm still glad he's the Phils now. Next up, Bobby Crosby. Is professional baseball really thin in shortstops these days? I have to think the A's would love to bring a SS into the system with one of these trades, but there doesn't seem to be much out there. The Golden Age of Shortstops seems to be over.
   14. Dan Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:46 AM (#2863101)
So are Duchscherer and/or Street next to go? Or is Beane content?

And I know I said Street in the other thread, but with more reflection the A's aren't packing it in until/unless they trade Duke.
   15. Daryn Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:47 AM (#2863102)
So who's going to end up with Burnett (or Bedard, for that matter)?

The Dodgers and Mariners respectively. It will be hard to trade Bedard if he is not healthy.
   16. Crashburn Alley Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:49 AM (#2863109)
The Phillies might not be done dealing. I wouldn't be surprised to see Bedard or Burnett in a Phillies uniform by August 1.

I'm not a huge fan of this deal, but after objectively looking over both sides of the trade, I'm less perturbed about it. It was basically Cardenas-for-Blanton and Cardenas was roadblocked at second base because of Chase Utley. I'd rather have used him as trade bait, obviously. I just think the Phillies could have done better than Blanton, even without giving up Lou Marson or Jason Donald.

EDIT: I'm sad about giving up Cardenas though because I think he would have been really fun to watch.
   17. Iwakuma Chameleon (jonathan) Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:52 AM (#2863118)
And I know I said Street in the other thread, but with more reflection the A's aren't packing it in until/unless they trade Duke.



Yeah, we've kinda gotten by on smoke and mirrors all year as it is, and we haven't hugely downgraded with either of these trades, and I don't think we would by trading Street, but if Duchscherer gets traded that's the official white flag, I think.
   18. A triple short of the cycle Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:52 AM (#2863120)
The A's have now picked up three second basemen in the last month or so. Weeks in the first round of the draft, Patterson from the Cubs in the Harden trade, and now Cardenas... this strikes me as odd.
   19. Pops Freshenmeyer Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:56 AM (#2863131)
The A's have now picked up three second basemen in the last month or so. Weeks in the first round of the draft, Patterson from the Cubs in the Harden trade, and now Cardenas... this strikes me as odd.

I'm not sure what Oakland has been doing with Patterson. The Cubs converted him to a full time OF.
   20. Rich Rifkin I Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:58 AM (#2863140)
"I don't think it's a foregone conclusion that he'll put up a 5+ ERA in CBP."

It's worth considering that for Blanton's career, his home ERA has been 1 run lower than his road ERA. This year, his road ERA is 1.10 higher than at home.

The Coliseum is mostly pitcher friendly, Citizen's Bank is not. These are their PPF's over the last 5 seasons (since CPB opened):

2008 - Oak 93; Phi 104
2007 - Oak 89; Phi 103
2006 - Oak 98; Phi 104
2005 - Oak 104; Phi 105
2004 - Oak 98; Phi 104

While Joe has been healthy so far for Oakland, I think the Phils might consider investing in a neck brace for him.
   21. Dan In Toronto Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:58 AM (#2863145)
Do the Phillies ever look at "home/road splits"? Blanton is a typical Oakland pitcher. Since 2005, his ERA is around 3.50 at home, and 5.00 on the road. I'd be very surprised if Blanton did much to help the Phillies.
   22. Dr Love Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:00 AM (#2863151)
The A's have now picked up three second basemen in the last month or so. Weeks in the first round of the draft, Patterson from the Cubs in the Harden trade, and now Cardenas... this strikes me as odd.


Remember when the Cubs stocked up on second basemen? Now look where they are, best record in their league. Stocking up on 2B is the new market inefficiency.
   23. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:24 AM (#2863228)
The A's have now picked up three second basemen in the last month or so. Weeks in the first round of the draft, Patterson from the Cubs in the Harden trade, and now Cardenas... this strikes me as odd.

Goodbye, Mark Ellis?
   24. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:36 AM (#2863274)
Do the Phillies ever look at "home/road splits"? Blanton is a typical Oakland pitcher. Since 2005, his ERA is around 3.50 at home, and 5.00 on the road. I'd be very surprised if Blanton did much to help the Phillies.
"typical"? Oaktown has played pretty much neutral the last three years. Blanton's FIP numbers have been very good, hanging around high 3s low 4s, and while he's shifting over to a hitter's park, he's also shifting to the weaker league.

The Phillies, who have received really terrible production from the 4/5 slots in the rotation, could definitely use some innings at a 4.20 ERA, and they might even get 3.6o if they're lucky and the league change works in Blanton's favor.

Also, while in general I find that the typical BTF A's nickname smacks of effort, I think "Cupcakes" is pretty awesome and encourage Phillies fans to steal it.
   25. Mike Emeigh Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:38 AM (#2863280)
I'm not sure what Oakland has been doing with Patterson.


2B in every game he's played at Sacramento.

-- MWE
   26. Excel Hearts Choi Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:39 AM (#2863291)
It seems that people here were a little underwhelmed by the return for Harden, but are surprised by the return for Blanton. Would the total package of players the A's received be considered a good return for Blanton and Harden?
   27. Enrico Pallazzo Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:46 AM (#2863331)
The A's have so...many...prospects...
   28. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:51 AM (#2863347)
"typical"? Oaktown has played pretty much neutral the last three years. Blanton's FIP numbers have been very good, hanging around high 3s low 4s, and while he's shifting over to a hitter's park, he's also shifting to the weaker league.

The NL East can hit though.
   29. MSI Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:56 AM (#2863368)
Harden, Gaudin, Blanton for Gallagher, Cardenas, Patterson, Murton, Outman, Donaldson, and Spencer. Meh. 1 or 2 good players in there, and 7 warm bodies. The bottom line is it helps the future, but the trade as a whole in and of itself doesn't jump off the page. However it's a good GM that looks at the whole picture rather than the small battles.

I said this in the other thread, but the A's are not necessiarly out of it this year. Only a few games back and with the Angels overperforming, they COULD stick in it. However, Beane clearly has a telos and decided before the season that he'd dismantle and build for the future, and he's sticking with that plan now.

Also, wouldn't St. Louis also be a natural fit for Burnett?
   30. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:03 AM (#2863379)
Who is the next to go from the A's? With all the second basemen the A's have, do you think they'd trade Ellis? They'll get draft picks for him so they won't necessarily move him. Street is likely gone soon.
   31. Crispix Attacks Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:06 AM (#2863382)
Blanton is a guy we can count on to be better than Gavin Eaton, and he doesn't take up much of the budget. This isn't something you can say about either Bédard or Burnett (because they both have injury concerns). Fine by me, this is the last year of Burrell's contract, there's maybe one team in the NL without major problems (the Cubs), and this is the year the Phillies should go for it. If they get to the playoffs anything can happen.

Neither of the good prospects were going to be up with the Phils for at least two years, and Cardenas was going to be included in some trade anyway, unless they switched him to third base or something. (hmm, I guess they could have done that. anyway...)
   32. Shock Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:06 AM (#2863383)

Also, wouldn't St. Louis also be a natural fit for Burnett?


Heh, weren't they the main competition for the Jays in signing him?
   33. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:08 AM (#2863387)
Couldn't the A's just move Ellis to shortstop if their 2B prospects develop? If he's putting up defensive numbers this incredible at 2B, how can he be anything less than a good SS? From watching him play, he doesn't have a plus-plus Furcal cannon, but he throws well enough.

What the A's should do with Ellis is make him an everyday player, shifting between 2B and SS, maybe a little 3B. Fill in around him as needed with the prospects, journeymen, and Chavez and Crosby when healthy. Letting go of Ellis, perhaps the most underrated player in baseball, seems foolish.
   34. MSI Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:08 AM (#2863388)
Kozma and Reyes for Burnett.
   35. Pops Freshenmeyer Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:09 AM (#2863390)

Heh, weren't they the main competition for the Jays in signing him?


Carpenter's about to start his minor league rehab assignment. The Cardinals will probably know a lot more about their pitching needs in another week or two.
   36. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt) Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:09 AM (#2863392)
Burnett's always wanted to play in St. Louis.
   37. Rich Rifkin I Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:12 AM (#2863394)
MCoA: Oaktown has played pretty much neutral the last three years.

It's been very pitcher friendly the last 2.5 seasons, counting this year:

2008 PPF - Oak 93
2007 PPF - Oak 89
2006 PPF - Oak 98

I believe that mostly explains why Blanton has been so much worse on the road.
   38. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:13 AM (#2863396)
What the A's should do with Ellis is make him an everyday player, shifting between 2B and SS, maybe a little 3B. Fill in around him as needed with the prospects, journeymen, and Chavez and Crosby when healthy. Letting go of Ellis, perhaps the most underrated player in baseball, seems foolish.

Ellis is underrated but do you really want to pay a 2b on the wrong side of 30 a 4y/40m dollar contract, possibly more? Luis Castillo got 4y/24m and he's not the player Ellis is. He'll get that.
   39. cardsfanboy Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:17 AM (#2863397)
Kozma and Reyes for Burnett.

only if the Jays agree to pay a large portion of that massively overpriced salary. even that I'm not sure that Burnett is worth acquiring, Going by just this year alone he would barely beat out Looper for a job.
   40. Shock Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:19 AM (#2863399)
Going by just this year alone


That would be a dumb thing to do.
   41. cardsfanboy Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:22 AM (#2863402)
That would be a dumb thing to do.


agreed, unless you think there is a reason why he is performing this badly.
   42. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:30 AM (#2863406)
agreed, unless you think there is a reason why he is performing this badly.

It could be in part that he's been a little bit unlucky. His stuff is second to none and he has strong peripherals. He could have a dominant second half.
   43. greenback Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:33 AM (#2863407)
Carpenter's about to start his minor league rehab assignment. The Cardinals will probably know a lot more about their pitching needs in another week or two.

Supposedly Wainwright isn't too far behind.

Reyes/Kozma for Burnett would be a fair deal for the Cardinals though.
   44. Brian White Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:33 AM (#2863408)
When does Blanton become a free agent? After the 2010 season, right?
   45. Rich Rifkin I Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:35 AM (#2863410)
BW: yes.
   46. Ivan Grushenko of Hong Kong Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:40 AM (#2863411)
Couldn't the A's just move Ellis to shortstop if their 2B prospects develop?

A's stopped playing Ellis at SS and 3B after his shoulder labrum injury. Patterson at 2B now and Cardenas at 3B in a couple of years isn't all that unlikely. Who knows about Weeks.
   47. Crispix Attacks Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:40 AM (#2863412)
Hamels, Howard, Victorino and now Blanton will all be contentious arbitration cases after this year, am I right? And this will be right after someone else takes over from Gillick as GM? Hmmmmmmmm.
   48. ColonelTom Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:54 AM (#2863418)
I'm with Crashburn Alley - I don't think Gillick is done looking for starting pitching. Blanton's affordable ($3.7M this year, arbitration eligible but lousy numbers so far in '08) and under team control for a couple more seasons. He'll at least give the Phils a lot of competent-if-not-great innings to keep the bullpen from burning out. But he's not the #1/#2 starter the Phils need to put them over the top.

With McGowan facing possible shoulder surgery, the Jays probably won't move Burnett without getting an MLB-ready starting pitcher in return. Now the Phils can afford to send one (Blanton, Kendrick, or possibly even Myers) in a deal for Burnett, and might even be able to get a deal done without moving Carlos Carrasco. Jason Donald (Phils SS prospect) would also be a great fit for the Jays. The pieces are now there for the Phils to get Burnett - it's up to Gillick to close the deal.
   49. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt) Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:02 AM (#2863425)
Donald and Myers for Burnett? Not sure if that would fly. An interesting idea, though.
   50. ValueArb Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:03 AM (#2863426)
"typical"? Oaktown has played pretty much neutral the last three years. Blanton's FIP numbers have been very good, hanging around high 3s low 4s, and while he's shifting over to a hitter's park, he's also shifting to the weaker league.


The latter can't be underestimated. When the trade was made for Haren, the biggest concern from the DBack's perspective was how a flyball pitcher would succeed in Chase field. Now, Haren has been lucky this year, no doubt, but I think his results also indicate that he's benefited from facing hitters in the NL. And he's certainly has handled pitching in Chase well, 5 HR in 66 innings with a 2.43 ERA, better than his road ERA of 3.05.

My guess is that Blanton surprises people by how well he pitches in the NL, and in the CBB. Certainly he's not pitching in the NL Worst, but he'll still see some benefit from seeing no DH and less talented hitters.
   51. jyjjy Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:05 AM (#2863429)
only if the Jays agree to pay a large portion of that massively overpriced salary.

Initially the contract was overpriced but in comparison with what FA pitchers have been getting the last few years Burnett has become a slight bargain.
   52. Walt Davis Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:12 AM (#2863431)
So what are Cardenas' mean and upside projections? Peaking at his minor-league numbers, it's not WOW territory. Nothing in his batting line to dislike but are we talking 280/340/420 as his likely ML peak? Nothing wrong with that, it's Mark Ellis' bat, but it doesn't seem like "ripoff" territory.

The speed looks great but not a huge use of base-stealers these days and, unless Beane's gone, it's hard to imagine the A's letting him loose on the basepaths.
   53. ColonelTom Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:12 AM (#2863432)
Burnett's annual salary isn't bad at all - in this market, it's a steal. The problem is that he can opt out after this season if he chooses, and if he's healthy, he'd be a fool not to.

Unless he's willing to waive his player option, the Jays are going to struggle to get a good return for him. CC Sabathia, who's clearly superior to Burnett, only brought one premium prospect (LaPorta) and a handful of marginal minor leaguers in return. Myers and Donald, perhaps with another B-list prospect in the deal, are probably more talent than they'll get anywhere else for a half-season rental of Burnett.
   54. billyshears Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:18 AM (#2863435)
The A's have now picked up three second basemen in the last month or so. Weeks in the first round of the draft, Patterson from the Cubs in the Harden trade, and now Cardenas... this strikes me as odd.


Aren't the A's also waiting on Taylor Green, the rumored PTBNL in the Sabathia deal, to see if he can handle second base?
   55. ColonelTom Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:26 AM (#2863442)
I guess Mark Ellis should probably put his Bay Area house on the market, no?
   56. Davo Malvolio Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:36 AM (#2863451)
Mark Ellis is 31? I was thinking....25, 26. Now I feel stupid. :)
   57. bibigon Posted: July 18, 2008 at 05:01 AM (#2863464)
I'm going to guess that Blanton will have better than average transition to the NL. This is based on a totally unsubstantiated idea. Keith Law has speculated that the pitchers who benefit most from the NL transition are guys with fringy stuff, but good control. This makes a lot of sense to me, but I haven't seen any evidence or anything.

Blanton's AL true talent was around 4.45 ERA I'd guess, using a 3-2-1 projection. Park adjust that, and we get 4.61. AL-NL transition is around .60 counting the DH. Add some special "bigger than average transition" points, and we're looking at a 3.80 ERA? Park adjust that back to Philly, and we're at a 3.87 ERA?

No point subtracted for the NL East since he's not facing the Phillies offense. Facing the 3rd, 4th, 8th, and 15th offenses (average rank, 7.5 of 16 teams) disproportionately often doesn't seem to warrant an adjustment there.

That analysis was obviously lots of random guesswork, but it's as good a guess as any I think.
   58. MSI Posted: July 18, 2008 at 05:14 AM (#2863468)
If Burnett ends up with a 4.50 ERA, would it make sense for the jays to tack on one extra year at 12 million? GIving him essentially 3/36, given that some young pitching might not be healthy. Would Burnett go for that?
   59. A triple short of the cycle Posted: July 18, 2008 at 05:16 AM (#2863469)
The graffiti is on the wall, Mark Ellis is gone. Whether in trade now or via free agency in the offseason. I hope he gets a good contract and lives up to it. He's been a great guy to root for.
   60. akrasian Posted: July 18, 2008 at 05:22 AM (#2863471)
So who's going to end up with Burnett (or Bedard, for that matter)?

The Dodgers and Mariners respectively. It will be hard to trade Bedard if he is not healthy.


I don't see the Dodgers going after starting pitching, unless it's part of a larger trade for several parts. They are fourth in the league in starter ERA - .10 behind the Cubs, even with Penny having spent an extended period trying to pitch through an injury (and consequently biting the big one in that period). Their problems have been on the offensive side - several huge holes, with nobody except Martin really excelling offensively at their position. And of course, Saito's likely end as a Dodger leaves another hole. But starting is something that the Dodgers are unlikely to touch, unless they can get a good starter at a bargain - even Ned knows the holes are elsewhere.
   61. SoSHially Unacceptable Posted: July 18, 2008 at 06:17 AM (#2863485)
Aren't the A's also waiting on Taylor Green, the rumored PTBNL in the Sabathia deal, to see if he can handle second base?


I think we can all agree that if Beane pulls that off, that would undeniably constitute a steal.
   62. Petuniaviles Posted: July 18, 2008 at 07:37 AM (#2863491)
Goodbye, Mark Ellis?

#23, this was my take as well (borne out by #55 and #59). Let Ellis go (or take arbitration, that's a sure win for Oakland) and take the picks; Cardenas can handle it. Patterson in the wings if he implodes and/or to back up 2B and LF. I like this series of moves for Los Athleticos, and if Beane can get any serious return for Duchscherer having the season of his lifetime at age 30, they should be well equipped to bring a title to Fremont.
   63. MM1f Posted: July 18, 2008 at 08:49 AM (#2863499)
I don't think this trade means anything as far as the immediate future of Mark Ellis as an Oakland Athletic. ESPECIALLY as far as next year is concerned. Cardenas is a 20 year old in A-ball one spring removed from high school. He isn't stepping in next year and might not be ready to step in til the start of the 2011 season, if he does in fact pan out.
Cardenas was probably the best prospect attainable from the Phillies and might have been their best prospect overall, so needing a 2b didn't have to factor into things for the As to try to pick up Cardenas.

It seems like Beane is confident enough in his plans that if he decided earlier this year to not resign Ellis than he wasn't ever going to resign Ellis, no matter who they did or didn't pick up in trades.
   64. Gambling Rent Czar Posted: July 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM (#2863505)
Thoughts on the Oakland Rotation?

Duchscherer
Greg Smith
Dana Eveland
Sean Gallagher
Gio Gonzalez/Andruw Brown
   65. JMM Posted: July 18, 2008 at 11:06 AM (#2863506)
No chance it's Brown, who can actually spell Andrew, given that he's a 1.3 pitch pitcher. I'd assume Gio Gonzalez, with Dallas Braden (and/or Dan Meyer, maybe) in the wings should someone go down/hyperextend a suck muscle.
   66. ColonelTom Posted: July 18, 2008 at 11:42 AM (#2863512)
This trade alone doesn't mean anything for Ellis, but Eric Patterson's playing 2B every day in the minors for a reason. He'll take over as a cheap replacement next year, and he'll hold the fort until one of the other minor leaguers (probably Cardenas, if he sticks defensively at 2B) gets to the majors.
   67. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: July 18, 2008 at 12:00 PM (#2863516)
Three guys I don't want to hear about until they finally DO something in the major leagues for more than five minutes:

(in no particular order)

Anthony Reyes
Lastings Milledge
Homer Bailey
   68. tribefan Posted: July 18, 2008 at 12:13 PM (#2863518)
So who's going to end up with Burnett (or Bedard, for that matter)?

The Dodgers and Mariners respectively. It will be hard to trade Bedard if he is not healthy.


http://sports.yahoo.com/mlb/players/6910/news

"Mariners manager Jim Riggleman said Thursday that Bedard likely will not pitch early next week, meaning he also likely won't be traded before the deadline on July 31."
   69. A Random 8-Year-Old Eskimo Posted: July 18, 2008 at 12:39 PM (#2863525)
GIving him essentially 3/36, given that some young pitching might not be healthy. Would Burnett go for that?


Not a chance, IMO.
   70. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:25 PM (#2863551)
The dissembling of Beane's latest A's iteration is complete.

kevin, you crack me up.
   71. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:31 PM (#2863557)
The dissembling of Beane's latest A's iteration is complete.

Wonder if that was misuse of a word, or just an inspired one.

Ahh, the thin line between genius and folly.
   72. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:36 PM (#2863558)
Wonder if that was misuse of a word, or just an inspired one.

But which word?
   73. Teheran's Uranium Enriched Missiles Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:37 PM (#2863559)
I thought he wanted to say disassembling and landed on dissembling.
   74. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:43 PM (#2863561)
I thought he wanted to say disassembling and landed on dissembling.

Yeah, but it's a funky use of the word iteration, too.
   75. MSI Posted: July 18, 2008 at 01:45 PM (#2863563)
No one's mentioning this but aren't the Rangers an ideal fit for AJ Burnett? Best hitting in the majors, worst pitching, and a loaded farm system. Not that far off from contention.
   76. A triple short of the cycle Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:08 PM (#2863584)
While we're picking on Kevin's comment, the disassembling probably isn't "complete", either. There's still Street to go, for one. Ellis? Duke?

Shooty it never occurred to me they would trade Crosby too. I hope not. I would really miss his D.
   77. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:14 PM (#2863588)
Shooty it never occurred to me they would trade Crosby too. I hope not. I would really miss his D.

If they're dumping guys who they fear are going to depreciate in value, I have to think Crosby is on the list. Chavvy would be, too, if he could stay on the field for more than 3 days at a time. Duke and Ellis are they guys I hope they keep.
   78. A triple short of the cycle Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:14 PM (#2863589)
The Angels have to be a bit worried. What if they can't pull away from a team that keeps trading it's best players? In A's-fan fantasy land, the A's win the division despite conceding it and building for the future... Well even if the A's fade in the second half, this has been a really interesting season.
   79. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:16 PM (#2863591)
The Angels have to be a bit worried. What if they can't pull away from a team that keeps trading it's best players? In A's-fan fantasy land, the A's win the division despite conceding it and building for the future... Well even if the A's fade in the second half, this has been a really interesting season.

Yeah, it has been. Last season was a snooze. The team stunk and the FO seemed asleep at the wheel.
   80. A triple short of the cycle Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:16 PM (#2863592)
What is Crosby's contract situation? (Where do I look that up myself?)

I don't see Donnie Murphy as being the A's next full time shortstop, though I'm just going on feeling/first impressions. Is Pennington the shortstop of the future?
   81. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:22 PM (#2863599)
I don't see Donnie Murphy as being the A's next full time shortstop, though I'm just going on feeling/first impressions. Is Pennington the shortstop of the future?

He's due to make $5 million next year. I don't know who replaces Crosby. Petit, probably. Ironically, according to Dial's #'s, Scutaro is kicking Crosby's butt this year.

Crosby is 28 years old now. Man, time flies.
   82. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:33 PM (#2863606)
A's fans, just how superduper is Ellis's defense? It sounds like he's been helping make pitchers like Blanton and Duke look better than they really are, which helps creates trades like these. It seems to me that Mark Ellis's value to the team extends further than mere offense plus defense, so would it be worth it for Beane to re-sign Ellis, if he can help pretty up the pitchers so they can keep trading them for packages like these?
   83. A triple short of the cycle Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:34 PM (#2863607)
Murphy has gotten most of the non-Crosby innings at shortstop this season. 86 innings for Murphy, 25 innings for Petit.

If the A's contend down to the wire but fall short this season, will the Beane haters say he made a big mistake by rebuilding? "He could have won it, but he gave up instead."
   84. A triple short of the cycle Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:36 PM (#2863609)
Dock: I think there is a strong consensus that Ellis is as good a defensive second baseman as there is. Whether he's ever been awarded a gold glove or not.

EDIT:
I agree the A's defense, especially the infield defense, makes their pitchers look better than they are. The ballpark also makes their pitchers look better. The A's have a pitching-factory going on here, where they develop these young pitchers, who look great pitching in Oakland, and trade them to other teams in the league for more prospects.
   85. Dock Ellis on Acid Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:42 PM (#2863614)
Thanks, Johnny. That's certainly his reputation. I wonder if his defense is actually worth what he'll get on the market, as least as far as the A's are concerned. Because, my god, there's a lot of B-/C+ pitchers in that system now, and Ellis's defense could help drive up their stock.

Also, since no one else has provided it:

http://mlbcontracts.blogspot.com/

Cot's is an excellent resource for contract information.
   86. retro-shiite Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:42 PM (#2863615)
The dissembling of Beane's latest A's iteration is complete.

kevin, you crack me up.


Indeed--I'm amused, in the good way. I honestly have no idea what that sentence means.
   87. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:42 PM (#2863616)
Dock: I think there is a strong consensus that Ellis is as good a defensive second baseman as there is. Whether he's ever been awarded a gold glove or not.

Yes. I'd hate to see him go as there is no way they could trade him for full value. His D is so good, he should be great even with a decline over the next 2 or 3 years.

If the A's contend down to the wire but fall short this season, will the Beane haters say he made a big mistake by rebuilding? "He could have won it, but he gave up instead."

Screw the Beane haters. Just watch the games Gallagher pitches. If the A's do well in those games, then the haters can lump it. I'm not going to worry about losing Blanton. If the A's lose the division because they lost him, I won't cast any stones.
   88. retro-shiite Posted: July 18, 2008 at 02:48 PM (#2863624)
Yeah, I think I'm gonna miss Gallagher.
   89. The importance of being Ernest Riles Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:00 PM (#2863642)
A's fans, just how superduper is Ellis's defense?

Super-superduper good. Like 15-20 runs per year with his glove alone good. Like makes you want to poke Mark Grudzielanek in the eye for winning a gold glove good.
   90. Don't want the truth; just wanna see some dingers Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:09 PM (#2863656)
Yeah, I think I'm gonna miss Gallagher.


*smashes watermelon*
   91. robinred Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:15 PM (#2863661)
So, it seems Beane sees teams overvaluing SPs in their late 20s/early 30s, as the new "market inefficiency," having now moved:

Mulder
Hudson
Haren
Harden
Gaudin
Blanton

Some of these have worked out well, and I can see the reasoning with all of them. Still, though, if I were an A's fan, Beane's trading away ALL of those guys, including the last four within that last year, would give me real pause. Harden I can see with the injuries, and Hudson and Mulder because of the money, but I think Haren/Gaudin/Blanton is a nice start on a rotation--your #1, #3 and #4, maybe, and it's not they they cost a lot. I do agree with Joey B on one thing: Beane has balls.
   92. Danny Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:37 PM (#2863671)
So, it seems Beane sees teams overvaluing SPs in their late 20s/early 30s, as the new "market inefficiency," having now moved:

That, or he thinks teams that are trying to win now and need SPs value good SPs more than teams who are rebuilding/reloading do.

And I don't think age has anything to do with it--it's just a circumstance of service time.
   93. Don't want the truth; just wanna see some dingers Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:44 PM (#2863674)
Whatever happened to that Dan Meyers guy?
   94. Shooty: Applying to be Fearless Leader Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:48 PM (#2863676)
Whatever happened to that Dan Meyers guy?

Still around, believe it or not.
   95. robinred Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:48 PM (#2863677)
That, or he thinks teams that are trying to win now and need SPs value good SPs more than teams who are rebuilding/reloading do.

And I don't think age has anything to do with it--it's just a circumstance of service time.


Well, fine, but when does this "future" start, and why couldn't a guy like Dan Haren be part of it? Beane may know exactly what he is doing and may be putting a cheap, 95-win team on the field in 2011. But I think what he is doing has some major risk attached to it and is very speculative.
   96. JC in DC Posted: July 18, 2008 at 03:56 PM (#2863685)
   97. Bad Doctor Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:05 PM (#2863689)
I guess I'm the last Phillies' fan to get the memo about loving Cardenas. My understanding is that he won't stick at second, and although he's got a nice bat, I don't know where else he could fit where a "nice" bat would play. Maybe center? He did have some good PECOTA comps coming into the year and has acquitted himself well, but he's still so far away.

The next step now is to go all in. For me, that probably means Bedard. Carrasco, Marson, Golson, whatever. Their window is the next couple of years. Howard/Utley/Rollins/Burrell (assuming the latter is resigned) still producing well, Feliz and Victorino shoring up the D, Hamels/Bedard/hopefully resurrected Myers/Blanton in the rotation, Lidge and whatever else closing the deal. I'm usually with the prospect loving people around these parts, but for this Phillies' team, get rid of everybody under 23 to take a run in '08 and '09.
   98. retro-shiite Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:08 PM (#2863695)
It means what you THINK it means!

Ah--that clears it right up!
   99. retro-shiite Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:10 PM (#2863697)
*smashes watermelon*

You know, I don't even like Gallagher the Comedian, but every time I picture Sean Gallagher with a receding whiteguy-fro smashing watermelons on the mound, I break into a ridiculous grin. Just cracks my ass up.
   100. A triple short of the cycle Posted: July 18, 2008 at 04:17 PM (#2863703)
Blanton eulogy... Blanton was great fun to have on the team. First, he showed his socks, which is of course symbolically and stylistically important. He was chubby. He didn't have great stuff. He was a total bulldog, though. And he pitched REAL QUICKLY, which everyone (defense, fans) loved him for. If two Blantons could start a game, it would last about 1:45. I wish him well in Philly. Go Blanton.
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Kiko Sakata
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(8 - 12:40am, May 26)
Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamurai

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(12 - 12:25am, May 26)
Last: Tripon

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(118 - 12:15am, May 26)
Last: Paul D(uda)

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(86 - 11:59pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(4 - 11:26pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(18 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielder

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(20 - 11:24pm, May 25)
Last: Dan

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(27 - 11:16pm, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogTBO: Nerdy Rays head north
(17 - 10:07pm, May 25)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(6 - 9:57pm, May 25)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(22 - 9:38pm, May 25)
Last: Cris E

NewsblogGreenberg: Cubs' Ricketts decries proposal
(817 - 9:08pm, May 25)
Last: The Yankee Clapper

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(55 - 8:48pm, May 25)
Last: Squash

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.7463 seconds
57 querie(s) executed