It’s rarely pretty when our young conservatives try to “hip” themselves to popular culture in general, but their attempts at wedging sports into the ongoing shouting match between the voices in their heads are usually the most hilarious. (A while back, The Weekly Standard essayed an all-sports issue that actual sportswriters laugh at to this day. I mean, honestly, Fred Barnes on the NBA? That would have been like sending young Bill Kristol to CBGB back in the day.) This is an attempt to enlist Bryce Harper, the authentic phenom of the Washington Nationals — and I’m not kidding, he came into Fenway and lit the joint on fire a week or so ago, and you should see him if you have the chance — into the author’s [Mark Judge] personal quest for a guest slot on Hannity. ...
Let us begin with the lead, wherein the author makes sure we know right from the opening pitch that this is more than just his appreciation of a young baseball player’s talents:
Bryce Harper is a conservative hero. The star rookie for the Washington Nationals has woken up Major League Baseball, and watching it unfold has reminded me of nothing so much as the collapse of the old political paradigms and the inevitable and upcoming rebirth of conservatism in November.
In other words, Bryce Harper is a conservative hero because my own very bizarre interpretation of his ascendance makes him one. Bear in mind, I can look at a tackhammer, and it will remind me of nothing so much as the collapse etc. etc. etc. SOROS!!!
This became clear to me on May 26 of this year. The Nationals were playing Atlanta, and in the fifth inning Harper, with his team leading by two, singled to right. The ball was hit to Braves right fielder Jason Heyward. Heyward strolled up to the ball as if he were walking to the corner for a paper. Harper promptly headed for second base. Heyward suddenly woke up and fired to second base, but too late. More than one sports writer has noted that this moment was no small thing for baseball. It was like the part in the movie “Awakenings” when the guy who was asleep for 30 years wakes up.
Yes, because no player in the past three decades ever has taken an extra base on a dilatory outfielder. Then, everybody read Hayek’s Baseball Abstract, and started hustling again. And surely I’m not the only person who’s noticed that the hustling white player and the lazy black player — baseball archetypes since the author’s grandfather was playing in the segregated major leagues — have made an appearance here, which is surely accidental.
Joe Judge not, lest ye be Judged.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. AndrewJ Posted: June 19, 2012 at 05:57 AM (#4160827)And Mark Judge is indeed a good guy personally, but this is beyond hilarious. I've got to get a hold of that all-sports issue of the Weekly Standard and put it with my collection of the National Lampoon.
P.S. My ideology swings between Mugwump and Know Nothing.
201 AB, 254/330/388, 4 HR, 40 K
Was Harper bored in the high minors? Annoyed at not being called up to the majors? Receiving bad instruction in the minors or good instruction in the majors? Did he just fluke into 200 bad PA at a weird time?
I do think that Harper's poor performance in the high minors suggests that he's overperforming right now, but I don't think there's any doubt he's a good and productive major league player. I guess talent wins out.
davey has a record of putting kids in the lineup and having them succeed.
Harper to date: 192 PA, 294/370/524
Griffey in the first 2 months of his age 19 season: 178 PA, 302/362/519
I'd give Harper a few more PA before you start calling him unprecedented.
I think some combination of bored/annoyed/fluke probably explains it. When I read your post the first name that came to mind was Hanley Ramirez;
2005 AA - .271/.335/.385
2006 MLB - .292/.353/.480
Not quite as extreme as Harper but similar. There is an off-season and a trade between Ramirez' seasons of course. I think there are players who play to the level of their competition and Harper may be one of them. Off the cuff a hyper-intense guy like Harper seems to be would be the sort of player I would expect to have that particular trait.
A RW libertarian likes a self-obsessed douchenozzle? Shocking.
Thanks for the spoiler alert jackass!
Personally it reminded me more of the part in the movie "Kiss Kiss Bang Bang" when the guy who went to sleep the night before wakes up.
(In response to [10], I was trying to think who _wouldn't_ like Bryce Harper a lot)
And Heyward still had presence of mind to throw Harper out trying the same trick the very next night.
Jimmie Foxx? Mel Ott? Ty Cobb? Tony Conigliaro? Those are four guys I thought of right off the top of my head. Looking a BB-Ref, all four of those guys had OPS+ between 130 and 140 at age 19.
How can you be reminded of something that hasn't happened yet?
It's mandatory when you're a pundit.
Dude, it's called "Inception!" and it's really ####### deep.
It's *ordained.* Because Baby Jesus wants it to happen.
The treatment of the anecdote reminded me a little bit of "Birth of a Nation," unfortunately.
Why are you hating on a perfectly good caper flick? Nobody gives "Ocean's 11" this kind of ####...
Oh, let me guess! Let me!
I enjoyed Inception, but it took a lot of purging for me to do so-- way too many people claimed the film made some sort of profound statement about the nature of blahblahblah. Waited for it the whole film and it never came.
I liked The Prestige way better.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main