User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.3736 seconds
55 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Russlan will never be fond of Jason Bay Posted: March 29, 2010 at 08:18 PM (#3488164)The SABR love for the Indians is sad. There is a lot of unwarranted optimism about this team.
a classic Gammons sentence.
Because they are going to score runs.
They just won't score very many.
Seriously, their best hitters are Grady Sizemore and Shin-Soo Choo. That's not the recipe for a high-powered offense.
Ummm, those guys are both pretty awesome. Their problem is they don't have anyone else who's any good.
That's what I mean. Neither one of them is Albert Pujols, and everyone else on the team is a lot worse than them, so I don't see how they're not going to have problems scoring runs.
OK, but you didn't phrase it that way.
1. Rockies
2. Dodgers
3. Reds
4. White Sox
5. Indians
There's a lot of "if this guy and that guy and the other guy make big steps forward, and everyone stays healthy then the team can compete." That's true, but it's also true of every team except the Royals and Pirates.
Probably Gammo, but he doesn't know it's actually the Mets' PR department sending the texts. Or maybe Delta's people.
Gammons has been writing columns like that since the dawn of baseball
Ri-ight.
Ri-ight.
Is that code for "I'm back on the juice. The good stuff they can't test for."?
This is true. Unfortunately, his preview of the 1899 Cleveland Spiders (excerpt: "If the Spiders can get better than expected production out of the guys they got from St. Louis, they could surprise people.") is not available on line.
And is "good stuff" code for "stuff so spectacularly good that it turns a guy with a career high of 32 doubles into a 50-doubles hitter"?
Now, admittedly, that ain't a real high bar to clear, but everyone in that division has big flaws.
Theoretically their best _hitter_ is Travis Hafner for whatever that's worth.
We'll see exactly how ell their Branyan gamble pays off. So far, it's not going so good...
And the Jays.
I just laughed at the 50 doubles. Nobody hits 50 doubles. Only 88 times in baseball history has a player hit 50 or more doubles in one season.
Now, admittedly, that ain't a real high bar to clear, but everyone in that division has big flaws.
The second-best offense in that division is still a below-average offense. And their pitching staff is a complete train wreck. The Indians will struggle to win 70 games.
I miss the Score Bard. And Mike Crudale.
29 of those being in the past decade. But except for those guys, nobody does it.
1. Biggio.
Gammons has been writing columns like that since the dawn of baseball
As someone whose memory harkens back nearly to the dawn of baseball, these kind of articles take me back. In them days we didn't have none of this fancy-dancy internet stuff (and we LIKED it!), so I was a devotee of the off-season magazines and guidebooks -- my god what trash most of them were. Even as a 12-or-so-year-old, I recall reading the typical pre-season preview, and thinking, "Well, no sh!t, Sherlock, if everybody has a good year and no one gets hurt, Team X will be right in the thick of the race this year. Tell me something I don't already know."
Street & Smith's tended to be better than that, and the Zander Hollander guidebooks were pretty hard-nosed. But most of the stuff that was available was just featherweight.
1. Biggio.
It's especially short given that when Biggio hit 50 doubles, he was a second baseman.
BTW, I had the chance to meet Larry Dierker at the Nine Conference a couple of weeks ago. The stuff he said about Biggio was classic. Dierker loved Biggio's play on the field, of course (who wouldn't?), but he said that off the field Biggio was just insufferable. Dierker described him as "just such a baby, and an idiot."
I'll never forget that time I fell into a well, and Milton Bradley stayed with me all night long until the paramedics came to rescue me.
I suspect Gammons is referring to the stroke he suffered a couple of years ago.
I think Guapo understands that, but it's funny anyway, given that Gammo referred to himself in the plural form.
Thanks, Ed McMahon.
This is true, so I got on the old college alumni library database and looked at some old Gammons spring training columns. These are actual Gammons nuggets from March 1980, 30 years ago:
Anyway, he's right some of the time, wrong some of the time, and he's my favorite baseball journalist and has been for 20 years. God bless Peter Gammons.
That could be from the Score Bard.
STEROIDS
Nah, the cheap shots into the short porch at Lake Front Park counted as ground rule doubles that year and home runs the next.
It seems the Score Bard is updating his Gammons-O-Matic!
STEROID APOLOGIST
I think the software might be able to access somebody's database of active players. It's pretty awesome.
I really don't get where "Ryan Garko, good hitter" came from. Brian Sabean's dreams?
Gedman was dangerous, though mostly to the Red Sox.
Is that the Happy Hooker? I wonder if she thinks Andruw has anything left.
Seriously, though, I remember his basketball books, but not his baseball books. The NBA books were pretty funny.
Hey, fans of mediocre to bad teams need Gammons articles telling them they can win it all it everything goes right.
The Indians actually are pretty interesting, though, for the reasons everyone's mentioned.
They were good, the best of the late-60s/early 70s offerings. Significantly superior to the Jack Zanger series from the '60s.
Seconded.
# Matt Antonelli has been bothered by a chipped buttock, so Padres GM Kevin Towers has been out shopping for help, and while one name that keeps coming up is Austin Jackson, the Padres don't want him because he's so self-confident.
# Isn't it ironic that Growing Up by Peter Gabriel was playing on the Red Sox public address system, just as Theo Epstein, who is as rainy as they come, was talking to Terry Francona about Casey Kotchman, who showed up at spring training looking like a shrimp, totally contrasting Dustin Pedroia, whose subscription to ESPN The Magazine was impressive, which makes one wonder if in their disgust and disappointment they were discussing the widely rumored deal with the Cardinals for Nick Stavinoha?
CHONE has him at eight runs above average (err, I'm pretty sure it's RAA) as an offensive player. He's got a career line of .279/.351/.441 (109 OPS+). I don't know -- he's not great and might not even be average for a 1B/DH, but as a platoon type and short-term fill-in, he's a fine player. The Mariners are paying him what -- $500K? There are a bunch of players who are much worse than Garko who will nonetheless occupy 25-man roster spots this time next week ({cough} Mark Kotsay).
The Mariners must not have heard that he can play the outfield, too. Where's Wedgie when you need him?
I couldn't resist. I love it too.
From Spring Training, 1985
Shame is that long preceding paragraph didn't mention the pitching and pitching is kind of important. Like the offense there are potential "ifs" on the pitching side. However, I'm not as encouraged by the pitching, especially since the bullpen gave up 7 runs in 2 innings last night.
Good new is six days from now we will start to get the answer to these questions.
They won 65 games last year. The chances are very, very good that they'll be better than that this year, simply by regressing to the mean.
It is unrealistic to expect them to contend for first place in the AL Central, however.
They also lost six of their top thirteen hitters by OPS+ - Martinez (123), Garko (121), DeRosa (114), Francisco (104), Shoppach (98) and Carroll (90) as well as their best pitcher - Lee. It won't be regression to the mean because you're counting on a lot of new parts to come through - LaPorta, Brantley, Marson, and counting on guys that found new levels of performance last season - Cabrera, Valbuena, Choo - are for real.
Peralta and Sizemore are really the only hitters returning from last year that had down years in 2009.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main