Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, October 17, 2011

Gelinas: A bailout brews in the Bronx

No one ever said so outright, but bondholders were plainly supposed to assume that, because Bronx Parking’s board is stacked with city officials and city officials talked up the bonds, that the city was there should the deal run into trouble.

It sure didn’t make sense on the merits. The old parking lots generated $7 million a year, but the new lots were supposed to pay twice that in annual debt costs. And Bronx Parking can’t just raise prices to fill the gap. Not many folks will pay $35 to park when there’s a new Metro North station right there.

Reality has caught up. Last week, Bronx Parking made its payment to bondholders only by tapping an emergency fund. The firm must make two more payments by next October—and it doesn’t have the cash.

There’s no mystery about what should happen: The bondholders should take their losses. . . .

The beep clearly hopes Bloomberg will go along to avoid a big bond default. Last week, Diaz’s lawyer, Al Rodriguez, said that if the parking-lot bond investors lose money, it would be “a huge financial disaster for the city,” because “bondholders will look at all city debt, and they’re not going to want to invest.”

No, bondholders should think no such thing. The documents blared warnings: “The bonds do not constitute and will not be a debt of the state of New York or the city,” and “An investment in the bonds involves a significant degree of risk.”

Diaz’s proposal relies on fear of a bond-market panic, which would force another 2008-style bailout of sophisticated investors. Apparently, such bailouts are OK as long as they come in the form of useful goodies, like the promise of taxpayer-subsidized construction jobs for Bronx voters.

But bondholders need to be taught a lesson. It’s bad enough national taxpayers have too-big-to-fail banks. Local taxpayers don’t need too-big-to-fail parking lots.

Bloomberg isn’t blameless, either. He should’ve stopped playing these coy debt games years ago. Now, the mayor’s office won’t say much more than to point out that the bonds aren’t city obligations, and that the city is working with the company “to try to generate more value from the project, if possible.” That value would come in the form of speeding up affordable housing at the site—housing that needs subsidies, too.

Bloomberg should say categorically that the city won’t step in with any bailout money. There’s no sense leaving bondholders room to hope when the mayor, as fiscal steward, has no choice.

The city has used the same wink-and-nod process it used for the Yankees’ parking to help “private” entities issue all kinds of debt, from $680 million for the Mets’ stadium to $2 billion issued by the Hudson Yards Infrastructure Corp.

Stormy JE wanted to milk the soft power dividend Posted: October 17, 2011 at 06:06 PM | 6 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: business, special topics, yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. There are a lot of good people in alt-Shooty Posted: October 17, 2011 at 06:28 PM (#3966384)
Bloomberg isn’t blameless, either. He should’ve stopped playing these coy debt games years ago. Now, the mayor’s office won’t say much more than to point out that the bonds aren’t city obligations, and that the city is working with the company “to try to generate more value from the project, if possible.” That value would come in the form of speeding up affordable housing at the site—housing that needs subsidies, too.

Wait, what? They are going to pump money into subsidized housing to help out a ####### parking lot? How many people in these subsidized apartments are even going to own cars? Let the bonds default. #### it. Everyone knew that was a crooked deal from the beginning.

The beep clearly hopes Bloomberg will go along to avoid a big bond default. Last week, Diaz’s lawyer, Al Rodriguez, said that if the parking-lot bond investors lose money, it would be “a huge financial disaster for the city,” because “bondholders will look at all city debt, and they’re not going to want to invest.”

Robert Moses would be proud.
   2. LionoftheSenate Posted: October 17, 2011 at 06:53 PM (#3966420)
It was only 2004 when I remember paying $13 to park no more than 150 yards from the "big bat" at Yankee Stadium.
   3. jingoist Posted: October 17, 2011 at 06:59 PM (#3966432)
I say spin up a story to Goldman Sachs; they'll collateralrize these sh*t bonds into a derivative and sell it back to TIAA-CREF.
That way the NY City school teachers retirement program can sustain another set of losses sililar to 2008.
   4. aleskel Posted: October 17, 2011 at 07:11 PM (#3966449)
Wait, what? They are going to pump money into subsidized housing to help out a ####### parking lot?

Since the City doesn't own the lots, this wouldn't be a city-funded project. I'm not sure what the author meant by "subsidies," but it's likely she meant tax abatement.
   5. Rally Posted: October 17, 2011 at 07:45 PM (#3966499)
Last week, Diaz’s lawyer, Al Rodriguez, said that if the parking-lot bond investors lose money, it would be “a huge financial disaster for the city,” because “bondholders will look at all city debt, and they’re not going to want to invest.”


Rodriguez makes 30 million dollars per year, can't stay on the field, can't buy a hit in the postseason, and moonlights as a lawyer? Let him fork over the money.
   6. valuearbitrageur Posted: October 17, 2011 at 11:05 PM (#3966684)
Since the City doesn't own the lots, this wouldn't be a city-funded project. I'm not sure what the author meant by "subsidies," but it's likely she meant tax abatement.


Which of course is a direct and blatant subsidy not available to developers not building politically favored developments.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Ray (RDP)
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP 22 January 2018: What the Baseball Hall of Fame can teach us about elections
(346 - 12:41am, Jan 23)
Last: tshipman

NewsblogRosenthal roundtable: Five MLB players weigh in on the pace-of-play rules and the need for change – The Athletic
(120 - 12:28am, Jan 23)
Last: DFA

NewsblogOT - NBA 2017-2018 Tip-off Thread
(2807 - 12:25am, Jan 23)
Last: tshipman

NewsblogThe Mets Have Been Operating As A Small-Market Club For Almost A Decade
(3 - 12:14am, Jan 23)
Last: thetailor (Brian)

NewsblogOT - 2017 NFL thread
(1588 - 12:05am, Jan 23)
Last: Tom Nawrocki

NewsblogFangraphs: Lars Anderson Discovers Australia
(3 - 11:54pm, Jan 22)
Last: Jay Seaver

NewsblogThe MLBPA Is Failing Its Players
(13 - 11:53pm, Jan 22)
Last: Michael Paulionis

NewsblogGrichuk to Jays for Leone
(14 - 11:51pm, Jan 22)
Last: Meatwad

NewsblogRyan Thibs has his HOF Ballot Tracker Up and Running!
(1592 - 11:11pm, Jan 22)
Last: The Ghost of Logan Schafer

NewsblogTop 100 MLB Prospects 2018 | BaseballAmerica.com
(37 - 9:57pm, Jan 22)
Last: formerly dp

NewsblogComparing a Player Outside His Era | Articles | Bill James Online
(43 - 9:51pm, Jan 22)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogPuckett's Toledo number turns up in Maumee basement
(9 - 9:16pm, Jan 22)
Last: vortex of dissipation

NewsblogOT: Winter Soccer Thread
(579 - 7:56pm, Jan 22)
Last: Mefisto

NewsblogIs Scott Boras Working on Another End-Around? | FanGraphs Baseball
(1 - 5:40pm, Jan 22)
Last: Steve Parris, Je t'aime

NewsblogTaking Back the Ballparks - Kansas City Royals
(21 - 4:36pm, Jan 22)
Last: Zach

Page rendered in 0.1469 seconds
47 querie(s) executed