Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, November 28, 2012

Glass willing to spend more than $70 million on Royals’ payroll

Glass also disputed the notion, generally based on industry estimates by Forbes magazine, that he has pocketed more than $100 million in operating profit since purchasing the club in 2000 from the estate of Ewing Kauffman.

“From the time we’ve owned the team until now,” Glass said, “accumulatively we’ve done no better than break even. We’ve actually subsidized it slightly during that period of time.

“Look, you might have a $65-to-$70 million payroll, but then you go out and spend $25-$30 million in amateur bonuses. Everyone says, ‘Well, your payroll is less than some of the other teams,’ but those other teams were spending less than $10 million in amateur bonuses.

Ummm, no.

RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: November 28, 2012 at 05:01 PM | 18 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: amateur draft, david glass, royals

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Magnum RA Posted: November 28, 2012 at 05:18 PM (#4311821)
Whoa, calm down Rockefeller.
   2. The Yankee Clapper Posted: November 28, 2012 at 05:45 PM (#4311840)
“From the time we’ve owned the team until now,” Glass said, “accumulatively we’ve done no better than break even. We’ve actually subsidized it slightly during that period of time.

That might be technically true, but I suspect that it counts Glass' huge salary (and that of many family members, too) as an expense rather than a profit distribution.
   3. Walt Davis Posted: November 28, 2012 at 06:07 PM (#4311857)
spend $25-$30 million in amateur bonuses.

How? On who? Once or twice, maybe, but not every year.
   4. aberg Posted: November 28, 2012 at 06:53 PM (#4311896)
How? On who? Once or twice, maybe, but not every year.


Also far less likely than in previous years. I think the Twins spent the most on the draft this year at around $11m (could be off by some there). With restrictions on international bonuses now, it's hard to imagine any team spending more than $15m in bonuses in one year and staying within the rules. He is either unaware of the rule changes or being very misleading.
   5. Bob Tufts Posted: November 28, 2012 at 07:12 PM (#4311915)
Yeah, Glass is having real financial difficulties. Per Cot's:

David Glass purchased the Royals for $96M in 2000. Forbes magazine valued the club at $354M in March, 2012.


Cash poor and asset rich? Not necessarily. Forbes also claims the team has had positive operating income for the last nine seasons.


   6. i don't care what the real STIGGLES says right now Posted: November 28, 2012 at 08:47 PM (#4311982)
That might be technically true, but I suspect that it counts Glass' huge salary (and that of many family members, too) as an expense rather than a profit distribution.
you should also factor in the fact that, because they own their own regional sports network, they can funnel revenues from their team to their wallets through their RSN.


also, iirc, aren't teams guaranteed something like 100 million in centralized revenue due to national TV contracts, MLBAM, and revenue sharing? and that's before they even play a game.
   7. HowardMegdal Posted: November 28, 2012 at 08:49 PM (#4311983)
So, about the bonuses. Royals spent $24 million, COMBINED, 2008-10. And now they're severely restricted by the new CBA. So... not so much.
   8. spycake Posted: November 28, 2012 at 09:25 PM (#4312001)
BREAKING NEWS: Royals sign amateur free agent "Davíd Vidrio". Estimated bonus: $25-$30 million.
   9. Squash Posted: November 28, 2012 at 09:35 PM (#4312004)
I sometimes wonder if they really do think we're just all a bunch of idiots, or if they're so surrounded by the echo chamber that they really do believe what they say. A combination of both, I suspect.
   10. Bhaakon Posted: November 28, 2012 at 10:12 PM (#4312033)
Glass willing to spend more than $70 million on Royals’ payroll


Translation: Glass to start drawing a salary.
   11. SM Posted: November 28, 2012 at 11:42 PM (#4312081)
In Glass' defence, he's not saying they did that. He's saying they "might" have done that.
   12. charityslave is thinking about baseball Posted: November 29, 2012 at 12:18 AM (#4312098)
It's amazing how none of these teams manage to make a profit.
   13. Bhaakon Posted: November 29, 2012 at 12:24 AM (#4312100)

It's amazing how none of these teams manage to make a profit.


Baseball owners aren't in it for profit; they're in it for the swag.
   14. charityslave is thinking about baseball Posted: November 29, 2012 at 12:45 AM (#4312105)
Baseball owners aren't in it for profit; they're in it for the swag.


It's not the money. It's the stuuufff.
   15. Bhaakon Posted: November 29, 2012 at 07:34 AM (#4312151)
It's not the money. It's the stuuufff.


Owners get to wear a fresh, new, flat brimmed, hologram-stickered hat every day of the year, and in any colors they want, regardless of the team logo. It's the new American dream.
   16. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: November 29, 2012 at 08:58 AM (#4312182)
Your money's not here you see...its at Bubba's house, and Moose's house, and Hosmer's house....
   17. HowardMegdal Posted: November 29, 2012 at 09:03 AM (#4312186)
"In Glass' defence, he's not saying they did that. He's saying they "might" have done that."

That ain't much of a defense. They didn't do that. That rules out "might". He's the owner. He knows that.
   18. geonose Posted: November 29, 2012 at 01:53 PM (#4312568)
you should also factor in the fact that, because they own their own regional sports network, they can funnel revenues from their team to their wallets through their RSN.

The Royals got rid of their regional sports network several years ago.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
JPWF13
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOT: 2016 Summer Soccer Thread
(1265 - 4:47pm, Jul 01)
Last: Tike Redman's Shattered Dreams

NewsblogMLB must permanently retire ‘God Bless America,’ a song that offends everyone
(21 - 4:42pm, Jul 01)
Last: You Know Nothing JT Snow (YR)

NewsblogSource: Red Sox banned from signing international amateurs for a year - Yahoo Sports
(4 - 4:42pm, Jul 01)
Last: Jim Furtado

NewsblogOTP 2016 June 27: Republican comeback after eight years? Yeah, on the baseball diamond
(1782 - 4:41pm, Jul 01)
Last: Johnny Sycophant-Laden Fora

NewsblogOT: NBA Playoffs Thread 2016
(6492 - 4:40pm, Jul 01)
Last: maccoach57

NewsblogMLB Penalties For Red Sox International Signings Could Come Soon - BaseballAmerica.com
(10 - 4:38pm, Jul 01)
Last: Norcan

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 7-1-2016
(11 - 4:18pm, Jul 01)
Last: Mike Emeigh

NewsblogMad hacks: SF ace makes case vs. DH
(13 - 4:11pm, Jul 01)
Last: Tom Nawrocki

NewsblogIt's Bobby Bonilla's payday ... and every July 1 through 2035 - Mets Blog- ESPN
(23 - 4:01pm, Jul 01)
Last: Never Give an Inge (Dave)

NewsblogCongress members introduce act to limit minor league wages
(49 - 3:17pm, Jul 01)
Last: RMc's Got a Lot of Trouble at Stake

NewsblogDodgers acquire Bud Norris from Braves
(18 - 3:10pm, Jul 01)
Last: Orange Julius Is the New Black

NewsblogCan You Tell Which One of These Baseball Stories Was Written By a Robot?
(7 - 3:07pm, Jul 01)
Last: Orange Julius Is the New Black

NewsblogThe Sonoma Stompers are set to make more history by signing two women to their roster | MLB.com
(23 - 3:03pm, Jul 01)
Last: RMc's Got a Lot of Trouble at Stake

NewsblogJose Reyes and the Question of Responsibility | VICE Sports
(1 - 2:48pm, Jul 01)
Last: Captain Supporter

NewsblogHeyman - Yankee Intrigue Over Trades And A-Rod - TKB
(2 - 2:06pm, Jul 01)
Last: Avoid running at all times.-S. Paige

Page rendered in 0.1749 seconds
47 querie(s) executed