It cannot be a coincidence then that in the past two seasons protecting Pujols has become more of a crusade for manager Tony La Russa, especially since the departure of Scott Rolen and Jim Edmonds. Consider Pujols batting average and slugging percentage over the previous two seasons split between wins and losses:
Pujols in wins: .391 BA … .820 SLG
Pujols in losses: .282 BA … .458 SLG
Differences: +.109 BA … +.362 SLG
For context, realize that Pujols slugged .431 better in wins this season than in losses, and that difference was bigger than Chipper Jones’ total slugging percentage, Alfonso Soriano’s total slugging percentage and Jimmy Rollins’ total slugging percentage. Thirty-four of the 76 players who qualified for the batting title in the NL this season had a lower slugging percentage than the difference between Pujols’ win SLG and loss SLG.
The going theory has been if an opponent pitches around Pujols, it takes another Cardinal to win the game. These splits appear so profound that maybe the theory isn’t simple enough. Unplug Pujols, and you unplug the Cardinals. The uncanny impact he has on the lineup in wins was a .400 average one season and an .800 slugging the next. He gets so many hits that it seems almost trivial to cite the Cardinals’ record when Pujols has a hit or has an RBI. But these splits show that the Cardinals were overly reliant on Pujols. There’s no chicken-egg concern in this no-brainer. Pujols’ hitting comes first, Cardinals’ wins follow. And it’s an even bigger difference between wins and losses and than you expected.
Go ahead. Ask the Los Angeles Dodgers.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Dewey, Steven Wright Wannabe and Soupuss Posted: October 13, 2009 at 05:36 PM (#3350981)It may well be that the Cardinals offense is heavily Pujols-dependent. But looking at his numbers in wins and losses doesn't confirm that.
My uninformed opinion agrees with you. You'd have to some comparative work (is anyone else on the Cards showing this kind of split? What about other superstar hitters?). My guess is that you'll find that he is some huge percentage of the Cards' offense, but I seriously don't think there's some magical effect here.
My gut tells me that almost all everyday hitters probably hit significantly better in wins than in losses.
Joe Mauer hit 377/479/598 in wins this year, and 352/399/575 in losses. Not nearly as big a gap as Pujols.
OTOH, Mark Teixeira hit 327/427/628 in wins and 230/299/452 in losses. Good thing the Yankees had a lot more wins than losses, or he'd have had a real lousy season :)
That's for 2009 alone, while I guess the numbers shown for Pujols are 2008-09.
And now I'm tired. Somebody else do some real data-gathering.
In wins - .357/.410/.502
In losses - .250/.295/.321
Wins - .362/.453/.676
Losses - .173/.253/.266
& this year's .306/.396/.498 in losses would have made a lot of players happy.
Or the Cubs as a whole: 293/377/496 vs. 212/278/308 ... 6.3 r/g in wins, 2.3 in losses.
I wish god had never created splits ... and the win/loss split is probably the stupidest of them all.
Wins .329, .468, .586
Losses .228, .334, .444
It is kind of a "so what?" I am guessing that the split is wider for Pujols than others because he is just that much better hitter. Pujols and Berkman have similar SLG in losses, a slugging percentage which isn't that bad, by the way. But Pujols is just destroying the opposing pitchers in wins. If this is just a reflection that Pujols is a great hitter and when he has great games, then the Cards win, I'm not sure protection is all that relevant. If Pujols had a very poor slugging percent in losses (say, below .400), maybe the protection issue would make more sense.
Which is a more nuanced way to look at this (and still doesn't really describe it as elegantly as runs created -> wins.)
if anything, those numbers say something positive about the Cardinals. Clearly the Cardinals did a great job of taking advantage of the times when Pujols hit. If there is any systematic difference between, say, Pujols and Berkman, I bet you'd find that Berkman had a larger number of good games that the Astros lost.
Even Nick Punto does!
I Split G PA AB R H 2B 3B HR RBI BB SO BA OBP SLG BAbip in Wins 400 1452 1242 224 335 59 15 7 132 160 223 .270 .350 .358 .320 in Losses 336 1078 974 77 215 34 5 5 46 90 192 .221 .285 .281 .268Provided by Baseball-Reference.com: View Original Table
Generated 10/14/2009.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main