Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Saturday, October 11, 2008

HANK: I’M STILL IN CHARGE HERE! (RR)

Neat! I’m pretty sure The Piss-Ant Employees opened for The Vice Creems at one point.

“There is one very important point here,” Steinbrenner told The Post during an exclusive half-hour session. “The most important thing to remember is this: If you didn’t get it from me or my brother [Hal], it doesn’t mean [anything]. I don’t care about some piss-ant employee. If you don’t get it from me or Hal, it’s meaningless. I have a lot of things [in Tampa] and Hal is in New York, which is good.”

Asked if he has taken a step back, Steinbrenner emphatically said, “No.”

Since The Boss turned over the day-to-day operations to his sons, Hank has one regret.

“I should have pushed harder for the [Johan] Santana deal,” said Hank, who was talked out of signing Santana by Hal and GM Brian Cashman because they believed the Yankees’ talent (Phil Hughes, Ian Kennedy and Melky Cabrera) and the money (Santana signed a six-year, $137.5 million extension with the Mets) was too costly.

“My dad wanted to do that,” Hank said. “But that doesn’t mean we would have won if we got into the playoffs, because [Chien-Ming] Wang was hurt.”

Repoz Posted: October 11, 2008 at 01:39 PM | 123 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2
   101. Joe Bivens, Idiot Posted: October 13, 2008 at 01:35 AM (#2980153)
(I was at one point in my life a higher-up for a Star Trek message board, which I'm sure shocks absolutley nobody that's followed my "career" here at BBTF)

I was not aware of this, but now that I am, you definitely bear watching.
   102. CW hits the pinata for the candy Posted: October 13, 2008 at 01:41 AM (#2980157)
I was not aware of this, but now that I am, you definitely bear watching.


I'm cured, I swear! No more Star Trek for me anymore. (Just Babylon 5, Firefly and Battlestar Galactica.)
   103. fra paolo Posted: October 13, 2008 at 01:43 AM (#2980162)
I saw Dan asking about Fred C. Dobbs

I went and looked, and found it was actually the ding-dong between retro-shiite and Dial that had disturbed. But that may be because I know them, and had never seen them behave like that before.
   104. Designated Sitter (GGC) Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:05 AM (#2980270)
What's a bannable offense on a Star Trek board?
   105. RJ in TO Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:07 AM (#2980275)
What's a bannable offense on a Star Trek board?


Saying Star Wars is better.
   106. aleskel Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:18 AM (#2980291)
What's a bannable offense on a Star Trek board?

"you know, Star Trek V was actually pretty good"
   107. RJ in TO Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:22 AM (#2980299)
"you know, Star Trek V was actually pretty good"


That's not just a bannable offense from a board. That's a bannable offense from life.
   108. Lassus Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:27 AM (#2980310)
What's a bannable offense on a Star Trek board?

"I read this fanfic about Kirk and Spock once, and..."
   109. Tom Cervo, backup catcher Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:55 AM (#2980325)
I'm cured, I swear! No more Star Trek for me anymore. (Just Babylon 5, Firefly and Battlestar Galactica.)


Love the latter two, tried the first one and I couldn't even make it through one episode. Is there something I'm missing about it? The acting was horrible and the special effects looked like some high school kid in the 70's would have put together.
   110. Vaux, A.B.D. Posted: October 13, 2008 at 04:12 AM (#2980329)
I actually liked Star Trek V. I mean, it's terrible, but it's good terrible . . .

Special effects on Babylon V's early seasons are very cheap, but that's not the point of the show.
   111. akrasian Posted: October 13, 2008 at 04:30 AM (#2980335)
I actually liked Star Trek V. I mean, it's terrible, but it's good terrible

The best thing about that movie is that while it didn't destroy Shatner's directorial career - it crippled it.

I will say it was better than Star Trek I - since they weren't pretending to be young. Otherwise, it was the worst of the 6 movies from The Original Series. Only 3 came even close to it.

On a tangent - for being reputedly such an arschloch to his fellow cast members, and being such a ham - Shatner has built an amazingly good resume late in his career. I think it started when he mocked Star Trek on SNL.
   112. CW hits the pinata for the candy Posted: October 13, 2008 at 07:57 AM (#2980356)
Love the latter two, tried the first one and I couldn't even make it through one episode. Is there something I'm missing about it? The acting was horrible and the special effects looked like some high school kid in the 70's would have put together.


There are a few things that make Babylon 5 worthwhile:

* It's not, strictly-speaking, hard science fiction, but it takes the science seriously. There's no ridiculous technobabble, no deus-ex-machina of the week, no nagging inconsistencies. And it will from time to time wander into hard sci-fi concepts.
* It tells a whole story from start to finish; a lot of things that seem inconsequential or throw-away early on pay off and pay off big in later seasons.
* It has real comments on things like politics, religion and the meaning of life that are serious, thoughtful and interesting.
* I think a lot of the dialogue is clever.

That said, I don't think any of what you said is necessarily wrong, and if you can't get over that hump and engage the show on its level, I can really understand that.
   113. bunyon Posted: October 13, 2008 at 11:43 AM (#2980362)
My general experience with short-term bans moderating online forums (I was at one point in my life a higher-up for a Star Trek message board, which I'm sure shocks absolutley nobody that's followed my "career" here at BBTF) is that rarely do they show remorse upon return, and in fact (in general) return even more antagonistic.


So, then, your conclusion would be that every crime should have the same penalty and that that penalty should be death. Is that what you're saying?
   114. CW hits the pinata for the candy Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:38 PM (#2980451)
So, then, your conclusion would be that every crime should have the same penalty and that that penalty should be death. Is that what you're saying?


That would be a very liberal reading of things I didn't say, I would think. If I said:

"Gun buyback programs do not seem to have a positive effect in reducing crime."

I don't think the appropriate surmise is:

"Colin Wyers thinks that cities with gun crime problems should be burnt to the ground and have salt sewn in their fields, because gun buyback programs don't work."
   115. JMPH Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:43 PM (#2980454)
I can safely say I didn't expect this thread to go in this direction.
   116. aleskel Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:44 PM (#2980455)
I actually liked Star Trek V. I mean, it's terrible, but it's good terrible . . .

it did provide a jumping-off point for Futurama's Star Trek episode, I'll give it that
   117. JPWF13 Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:53 PM (#2980462)
My general experience with short-term bans moderating online forums (I was at one point in my life a higher-up for a Star Trek message board, which I'm sure shocks absolutely nobody that's followed my "career" here at BBTF) is that rarely do they show remorse upon return, and in fact (in general) return even more antagonistic.



When BL returned he didn't show any remorse- but he did seem quite a bit less antagonistic... Since his banning (from my POV) was unjustified- I really wouldn't have thought any less of him had he returned more antagonistic than ever.

Of course if you are trying to be consistent, if you banned BL for a series of posts belittling Furtardo and deliberately misstating Furtado's positions, then I guess you have to ban Kevin's Innermost Thoughts as well.

Speaking of Kevin's Innermost Thoughts- who is that? I always assumed that it was a sock puppet for a regular poster.
   118. Dan Szymborski Posted: October 13, 2008 at 03:55 PM (#2980464)
I'm not the one who banned BL.

I'm going ahead and closing the threads to comments. If you would like to continue discussion of this topic, please proceed to the Primer Lounge.
Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Kiko Sakata
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(57 - 3:16am, May 26)
Last: bjhanke

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012
(1834 - 3:06am, May 26)
Last: Spivey

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(8 - 2:43am, May 26)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(119 - 1:28am, May 26)
Last: Swedish Chef

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(8 - 12:40am, May 26)
Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamurai

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(12 - 12:25am, May 26)
Last: Tripon

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(86 - 11:59pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(4 - 11:26pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(18 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielder

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(20 - 11:24pm, May 25)
Last: Dan

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(27 - 11:16pm, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogTBO: Nerdy Rays head north
(17 - 10:07pm, May 25)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(22 - 9:38pm, May 25)
Last: Cris E

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.1862 seconds
54 querie(s) executed