Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, January 25, 2012

Henning: Tigers’ grab at Prince Fielder could be boom, then bust

Henning: Illusion and Reality…

This contract has a chance to go bad deeper into Fielder’s tenure. Fielder is 27 and carries way too much weight. He also carries a 50-home-run bat. The Tigers were investing in Fielder and his probable span of explosive, middle-of-the-order power, and forget about the other stuff. For now, anyway.

The front office understands what Ilitch also recognizes and is willing to accept. There could be a whopping parting check handed Fielder as he slides into his 30s. Again, that’s part of an owner’s calculation. If you’re rich enough to own the Tigers, you’re well-heeled enough to buy out a bad contract should it evolve into such deep into Fielder’s tenure.

There are going to be some ugly games the Tigers believe they can win by out-slugging opponents who also play defense.

Fielder at first. Cabrera at third. Young presumably will work his share of time in left field. Raburn will play a good deal of second base. Peralta is sure-handed and has the most automatic arm of any shortstop in baseball. But range isn’t his strong suit.

The Tigers have their share of groundball pitchers, with Doug Fister and Rick Porcello leading the group. Infield defense is important. Infield defense will at times create Fright Night at Comerica Park.

Repoz Posted: January 25, 2012 at 06:59 AM | 43 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: business, projections, tigers

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Derb Posted: January 25, 2012 at 11:26 AM (#4045388)
Defense? Who needs defense?
   2. cardinal Posted: January 25, 2012 at 12:14 PM (#4045425)
This seems like a prime example and perfect time for the whole "pitching to the score" mentality-- With Fielder in the fold, they can score a ton of runs, and so the pitching and defense can give up a ton-1 runs.
   3. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: January 25, 2012 at 01:28 PM (#4045486)
I keep seeing people mention that Fielder could be a 50-homer guy, but that was one season. Other than that, he's only broke 40 homers once. I hope Tigers fans are deluding themselves into thinking he'll be cranking out anywhere close to 50 homers a year.
   4. Bob Evans Posted: January 25, 2012 at 02:03 PM (#4045529)
This just in: someone predicts that long contract will be bad by the end of it.
   5. Walt Davis Posted: January 25, 2012 at 02:11 PM (#4045540)
Now awaiting a slew of media articles decrying the Tigers "beer league softball" approach.
   6. Crispix Attacks Posted: January 25, 2012 at 02:17 PM (#4045545)
So when is Jhonny Peralta going to move to 3B, if they're putting their first baseman at 3B, bringing in a new DH to play first, and putting their old DH in left field?
   7. Shock Posted: January 25, 2012 at 02:34 PM (#4045560)
He also carries a 50-home-run bat.


I love when teams sign new players and these sorts of forecasts are thrown around. Fielder has had one 50+ homer season, and it was exactly 50 homers. It was also 5 years ago. Over the past 4 seasons he has averaged 38 HR per 162 games, which coincidentally is exactly what he did last year.

But I guess it's true what they say, once a 50-hr hitter, always a 50-hr hitter.
   8. bachslunch Posted: January 25, 2012 at 02:39 PM (#4045565)
I keep seeing people mention that Fielder could be a 50-homer guy, but that was one season. Other than that, he's only broke 40 homers once. I hope Tigers fans are deluding themselves into thinking he'll be cranking out anywhere close to 50 homers a year.

If one can assume that Comercia is a pitcher's park and Miller Park is hitter-friendly, that's certainly true.
   9. Jim Wisinski Posted: January 25, 2012 at 03:12 PM (#4045586)
I agree with the part of the excerpt saying that everyone with the Tigers understands the risks and was willing to sign off on them in the hopes of winning a World Series or two in the next few seasons, that's obviously the case. What I think they need to worry about though is that this deal might not give them what they're hoping for. Out of six full seasons Fielder only has three where his bat unquestionably made him a very valuable player despite his shortcomings, in the other three he wasn't the kind of guy you would ever think about giving $200+ million to; who knows which player the Tigers will get from year to year. The defense this could force them to put on the field is downright scary if they really plan to play Cabrera at 3B and Young in LF often. If Cleveland can build on their gains from last season at all then it wouldn't be too surprising to see them challenge the Tigers for the division if anything at all goes wrong in Detroit. This is still the team that depended on a few exceptional performances to make up for an otherwise blah roster.
   10. ColonelTom Posted: January 25, 2012 at 03:39 PM (#4045604)
The defense this could force them to put on the field is downright scary if they really plan to play Cabrera at 3B and Young in LF often.


I'm pretty sure they are not done dealing. Delmon Young for Martin Prado makes a ton of sense for the Tigers, who could play Prado at 2B and Cabrera at DH, LF, and/or 3B with strikeout pitchers like Verlander/Scherzer on the mound. If Cabrera can play passably in left, they have an intimidating core (Fielder, Cabrera, Verlander, Martinez, Avila) locked up through at least 2014. If not, they can deal one of Cabrera/Martinez after this season when Martinez returns.
   11. mathesond Posted: January 25, 2012 at 04:44 PM (#4045641)
Out of six full seasons Fielder only has three where his bat unquestionably made him a very valuable player despite his shortcomings, in the other three he wasn't the kind of guy you would ever think about giving $200+ million to

Reminds me of when Vernon Wells got his big contract
   12. Harmon "Thread Killer" Microbrew Posted: January 25, 2012 at 04:51 PM (#4045648)
He also carries a 50-home-run bat.


It's his 50-home-run-bat
He's worked it in (he's worked it in) to look like that . . .
   13. outl13r Posted: January 25, 2012 at 06:03 PM (#4045709)
Defense? Who needs defense?


Isn't this the same that was being said last year when St. Louis signed Berkman to play RF?
   14. jingoist Posted: January 25, 2012 at 07:03 PM (#4045751)
Brady Anderson once had a 50 homer year..........

I really think the Tigers expect 35 to 40 HRs and 100+RBI from The Prince; anything more is a bonus..

Interesting defensive team for sure.

   15. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: January 25, 2012 at 07:29 PM (#4045763)
But I guess it's true what they say, once a 50-hr hitter, always a 50-hr hitter.

The ghost of Billy Loes nods knowingly.
   16. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: January 25, 2012 at 07:40 PM (#4045773)
One thing that has surprised me about this story is how relatively unconcerned most Tigers fans are about the new infield defense. It's as if they forget that Cabrera already had one aborted stint at third wearing a Tigers uniform. It's four years later and he's not in any better shape than he was then.

Fans rightfully bemoan Brandon Inge's bat, but I think a lot of them have been spoiled when it comes to what to expect from a competent third baseman. The offense is going to look a lot stronger, but I wonder how many runs the addition of Prince is really going to add to the team once you figure in the runs the corner infielders are sure to give up in 2012.
   17. Perry Posted: January 25, 2012 at 07:43 PM (#4045778)
Isn't this the same that was being said last year when St. Louis signed Berkman to play RF?


Yes it was, and then Berkman dropped weight (or so it appeared) and played a competent right field.
   18. Shock Posted: January 25, 2012 at 07:57 PM (#4045787)
When did St. Louis sign Berkman to a 9-year contract?
   19. Smyly Smile (Walewander) Posted: January 25, 2012 at 09:19 PM (#4045829)
16 - It's not like Tigers fans have forgotten 2008.
   20. Robert in Manhattan Beach Posted: January 25, 2012 at 09:22 PM (#4045833)
Fans rightfully bemoan Brandon Inge's bat, but I think a lot of them have been spoiled when it comes to what to expect from a competent third baseman. The offense is going to look a lot stronger, but I wonder how many runs the addition of Prince is really going to add to the team once you figure in the runs the corner infielders are sure to give up in 2012.

I think they'll be fine. Cabrera and Fielder will both be within a step of competent at their positions and they get Inge's 51 OPS+ out of there and replace it with something like a 150. It's a big step up. It would be one thing if Inge were a decent hitter and plus fielder but he's an offensive black hole.
   21. Jim Wisinski Posted: January 25, 2012 at 09:41 PM (#4045841)
#10, the first obstacle to any trade of Delmon Young is to find another team that thinks that paying $6 million to an unlikeable barely above replacement level is a productive idea.
   22. TDF, situational idiot Posted: January 25, 2012 at 09:50 PM (#4045850)
The offense is going to look a lot stronger, but I wonder how many runs the addition of Prince is really going to add to the team once you figure in the runs the corner infielders are sure to give up in 2012.

Cabrera and Fielder will both be within a step of competent at their positions
Each of Cabrera and Fielder were -8 runs (per BBRef) at 1B, which seems like more than "a step"; how much worse is Cabrera going to be than that at 3B?

Which really makes the equation the step up from Inge to Fielder on offense (they already had Cabrera's bat) and the step down from Inge to Cabrera at 3B defense. Fielder has averaged 38 runs/season on offense the past 5 years(hitting, running, ROE); Inge has averaged -13. Inge has been worth 7 runs/year for fielding; I can't imagine Cabrera will be 45 runs worse than average at 3b (which would make this a wash), but if he's even 10 runs worse than average (which is a distinct possibility), it makes the $24M/yr investment look iffy.
   23. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: January 25, 2012 at 10:30 PM (#4045871)
It's not like it's the sort of thing that's going to be all that perceptible to the casual fan, since Cabrera and Fielder will hit plenty of dingers to appease those folks. It's just that Cabrera was, um, interesting in the 14 games he manned third for the Tigers in 2008 (committing 5 errors). I don't see how Cabrera, four years later, is a strong bet not to be even a bit worse than that. Maybe if he shows up to camp "in the best shape of his life" or some such, he'll have a fighting chance. But Miggy, for all of his natural ability, has never really shown much dedication to the conditioning component of his game.
   24. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: January 25, 2012 at 11:04 PM (#4045893)
I think they'll be fine. Cabrera and Fielder will both be within a step of competent at their positions

I think this is wildly optimistic.

Fielder is a bad 1B, and at 275 lbs, ain't getting any better. The consensus of the defensive ratings seem to have him at -8-10 runs.

Cabrera is a below avg. 1B, looks to be about -5. He last played any significant time at 3B in 2007, and was lousy, ~-15. He's 5 years older and weighs 240 lbs.

I think it would be a minor miracle for Cabrera to be -20 at 3B. I think they give up on it by May, like they gave up in 2008.

They should just leave Cabrera at 1B, and DH Prince.
   25. Matt Welch Posted: January 25, 2012 at 11:19 PM (#4045901)
This is like one of those Strat-o-Matic seasons when all your defenders have a 4. Dick Allen and Dave Parker at 2B! etc.
   26. Robert in Manhattan Beach Posted: January 25, 2012 at 11:45 PM (#4045919)
Ah, they'll both DH a lot. If the defense is truly dreadful, they'll DH more. There's no way they are getting into -20. The pluses far outweigh the minuses.
   27. Buddha Posted: January 25, 2012 at 11:51 PM (#4045921)
You know who worries a lot about defense? Seattle.

I'll take the offense. This is the american league, you need to score a lot to win.
   28. ray james Posted: January 25, 2012 at 11:53 PM (#4045922)
I'm trying to think, has there ever been a successful team that was bad at defense? Now just below average but bad, like the Tigers could be. I can't think of one.

The problem is, the team gives away too many outs, the pitchers get exhausted as the season wears on and the team crashes and burns in August.
   29. Moe Greene Posted: January 26, 2012 at 12:10 AM (#4045932)
I'm trying to think, has there ever been a successful team that was bad at defense? Now just below average but bad, like the Tigers could be. I can't think of one.

I vote for these guys.
   30. LionoftheSenate (is the grammer police!) Posted: January 26, 2012 at 12:23 AM (#4045936)
I agree with Buddah. Defense is a recent discovery of the stats crowd, yet we really don't have the numbers completely nailed down just yet. We all agree Prince and Miggy are well below average on D, we don't quite know how much that will impact the record. I tend to think defense got a bit overrated in the past few years.

This is still an entertainment business, most (casual) fans probably find offense a little more entertaining, even though I don't (of course I'm hardcore).

#28, Milwaukee in 2012 was bad at defense. Making the final 4 is pretty successful considering they are the smallest market in the game. Defense probably did them in during the NLCS however....although pitching was probably even worse (even if you factor out pile the errors).

The 2003 Yankees link is a good one.

I'm guessing Cabrera/Prince will share DH for the first few months and whomever hits better as DH will "win" that gig. Even though the deciding factor should be whomever plays D better should win 1b.
   31. bookbook Posted: January 26, 2012 at 01:07 AM (#4045962)
The apt comparison isn't exactly to Berkman in Right, it's more to if they signed Berkman to play center again.
   32. Jim Wisinski Posted: January 26, 2012 at 02:25 AM (#4045981)
You know who worries a lot about defense? Seattle.

I'll take the offense. This is the american league, you need to score a lot to win.


The more useful example would be "You know who worries a lot about defense? Tampa Bay." Bringing up Seattle is like saying that trying to improve the offense by signing power hitting free agents is a poor bet because the Hit Show was such a fiasco. It's not the strategy that's flawed, it's the people trying to implement it. The Rays have placed a high priority on defense the last four years and reaped the benefits (Fangraphs has them with the greatest difference between FIP and ERA over that time period as well as being way ahead of everyone else in UZR) while also scoring the sixth most runs despite playing in a pitcher's park. Unless you have an elite offense, which the Tigers certainly don't even with Fielder, you better be able to prevent runs pretty well to win 90+ games. The 2003 Yankees won 101 because although their offense was merely very good they also had tremendous pitching (7th in K% and HR/9, lowest BB% in MLB) that did a lot to neutralize their awful defense. The Tigers pitching quality is dependent on a few guys, the rest are highly questionable.
   33. Crispix Attacks Posted: January 26, 2012 at 03:03 AM (#4045986)
I was very young when this team won the World Series, but they always seemed to be portrayed as bad defensively.
   34. Rants Mulliniks (formerly Cold Prosimian) Posted: January 26, 2012 at 09:57 AM (#4046032)
I'm pretty sure they are not done dealing. Delmon Young for Martin Prado makes a ton of sense for the Tigers, who could play Prado at 2B and Cabrera at DH, LF, and/or 3B with strikeout pitchers like Verlander/Scherzer on the mound.


This incorrectly assumes that Jim Leyland has a clue about lineup construction.
   35. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: January 26, 2012 at 10:02 AM (#4046036)
Ah, they'll both DH a lot. If the defense is truly dreadful, they'll DH more. There's no way they are getting into -20. The pluses far outweigh the minuses.

Well, that's exactly what I said. If they're so bad one has to DH all the time, then the 3B D is likely worsr than -20. I said Cabrera will be so bad he has to be taken off third by May.

And if he has to DH instead of playing third, you're basically getting the -20 from the positional adjustment to his value.
   36. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: January 26, 2012 at 10:05 AM (#4046037)
The 2003 Yankees link is a good one.

The more useful example would be "You know who worries a lot about defense? Tampa Bay."

And since those early to mid 2000's teams, the Yankees have changed their tune as well. They now have among the best OF defenses in the majors b/c they're willing to play a completely non-traditional LF, who generates much of his value through D and baserunning. They also brought in Russell Martin, b/c of his D. Really, Jeter is the only below avg. defender at this point, at least when ARod is not hindered by injury.
   37. spike Posted: January 26, 2012 at 10:30 AM (#4046048)
Delmon Young for Martin Prado makes a ton of sense for the Tigers

Boy, I am not sure it makes much for the Braves though. They'd have to seriously think Prado was toast to take on more salary and lose positional flexibility.
   38. Something Other Posted: January 26, 2012 at 12:04 PM (#4046109)
Ah, they'll both DH a lot. If the defense is truly dreadful, they'll DH more. There's no way they are getting into -20. The pluses far outweigh the minuses.

Well, that's exactly what I said. If they're so bad one has to DH all the time, then the 3B D is likely worsr than -20. I said Cabrera will be so bad he has to be taken off third by May.

And if he has to DH instead of playing third, you're basically getting the -20 from the positional adjustment to his value.
Yup. I made a similar point on another thread, that the Fielder signing is AT BEST dicey. Once you factor in the cost of moving Cabrera, it becomes little short of lunacy. It's not that his attitude is the problem, it's that it turns a -5 1Bman into a DH.

   39. Don't want the truth; just wanna see some dingers Posted: January 26, 2012 at 12:26 PM (#4046131)
Boy, I am not sure it makes much for the Braves though. They'd have to seriously think Prado was toast to take on more salary and lose positional flexibility.


Yep; Prado's bat looks better at 2B than LF, but I'd still take him every day of the week over Young. Prado's career slash stats and OPS+ are all better than Young's.
   40. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: January 26, 2012 at 12:26 PM (#4046135)
Yup. I made a similar point on another thread, that the Fielder signing is AT BEST dicey. Once you factor in the cost of moving Cabrera, it becomes little short of lunacy. It's not that his attitude is the problem, it's that it turns a -5 1Bman into a DH.

Which is compounding the error of the signing, b/c Fielder is a -10 1B. He should be the DH.

They probably could've improved the team as much by signing Edwin Jackson and a generic veteran DH.

Jackson and Carlos Pena would've added more than Fielder.
   41. The Long Arm of Rudy Law Posted: January 26, 2012 at 12:52 PM (#4046167)
I love when teams sign new players and these sorts of forecasts are thrown around.


Adam Dunn just missed 50 home runs last year. No, wait, not home runs- RBI. Actually, he wasn't all that close to 50 RBI. His batting average was waaaay over .050 though.
   42. Bob Dernier Cri Posted: January 26, 2012 at 01:43 PM (#4046210)
The Angels have always worried about defense, and the Rangers just won two pennants by installing a watertight infield to replace the old Michael-Young-led contingent, and keeping 3 or 4 guys around who can play CF. I really like the American League now for that reason: lower scoring environments in the past couple of years have gotten teams thinking more about defense. (Though that's an oversimplification; the '05 White Sox and '06 Tigers had good defensive units, and the '07 Red Sox featured classic defensive strength up the middle, power at the corners.)
   43. Something Other Posted: January 28, 2012 at 12:42 AM (#4047984)
They probably could've improved the team as much by signing Edwin Jackson and a generic veteran DH.
Yup--there were a number of combination signings that would have likely outplayed Fielder AND minimized the team's risk.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Darren
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(87 - 3:55am, May 26)
Last: Athletic Supporter leads the nation in drifters

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(57 - 3:16am, May 26)
Last: bjhanke

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012
(1834 - 3:06am, May 26)
Last: Spivey

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(8 - 2:43am, May 26)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(119 - 1:28am, May 26)
Last: Swedish Chef

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(8 - 12:40am, May 26)
Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamurai

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(12 - 12:25am, May 26)
Last: Tripon

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(4 - 11:26pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(18 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielder

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(20 - 11:24pm, May 25)
Last: Dan

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(27 - 11:16pm, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogTBO: Nerdy Rays head north
(17 - 10:07pm, May 25)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(22 - 9:38pm, May 25)
Last: Cris E

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.2983 seconds
54 querie(s) executed