Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

Heyman: Prince Fielder signs with Tigers for 9/214

A whole lot of money for a whole lot of man.

prince agrees with #tigers
...
Fielder gets 9 yrs, $200_plus mil.
...
prince deal is $214M, 9 yrs.
...
prince will be the first baseman, for anyone asking. cabrera will have to change role.

Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:19 PM | 365 comment(s) | Login to Bookmark
  Tags: Detroit, General, Milwaukee

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 4 > 
   1. Gamingboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:25 PM (#4044488)
Didn't he say he didn't want to go to any team his Father had been on?

....

Well, anyway, the Twins are now even more screwed than before.
   2. Austin Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:26 PM (#4044490)
Insane.

When I first heard it, I assumed he would be the DH and Martinez would be traded away. But I guess Cabrera's going to be... the left fielder? The third baseman? Yikes.
   3. Every Inge Counts Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:27 PM (#4044493)
Miguel Cabrera is going to play 3B for the Tigers in 2012...or LF...
   4. NYCTigersfan Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:28 PM (#4044494)
Yeah right.
   5. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:28 PM (#4044498)
So this obviously makes Detroit even bigger favorites in the AL Central and a real threat in the AL as a whole.

They're certainly constructed to win right now, so I guess I can't fault them for going all out when they have the chance.

Where are they going to stick Delmon Young if Cabrera is now standing out in left?
   6. Morally Excellent Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:29 PM (#4044500)
Oh.
   7. bunyon Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:29 PM (#4044501)
Geez, it's over 2 months until April 1.
   8. JJ1986 Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:30 PM (#4044503)
Maybe Cabrera will be changing his role to Washington Nationals 1Bmen.
   9. NJ loves his Super Lintendo Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:30 PM (#4044504)
I laughed aloud at my desk at work.
   10. Every Inge Counts Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:30 PM (#4044506)
They need a DH still with Victor Martinez out for the season.
   11. Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:31 PM (#4044507)
I guess he really does want to bury Cecil's records.
   12. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:31 PM (#4044509)
Maybe they're working on trading Cabrera, given his DUI and general alcohol issues.

Or what JJ1986 said.
   13. Wozzyck Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:31 PM (#4044510)
With VMart out, I would imagine Cabrera's the DH in 2012, with either a gradual transition to LF or a VMart trade for 2013
   14. RJ in TO Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:32 PM (#4044513)
This is both longer than I expected, and for more money than I expected. And that's not even including the whole "Tigers? Where the #### did that come from?" part of it.
   15. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:32 PM (#4044515)
I guess the most logical situation would be for Cabrera and Fielder to swap out the 1B/DH duties throughout the season. Cabrera at third and Prince at first would make for one of the more... interesting infields in the American League.
   16. Every Inge Counts Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:32 PM (#4044517)
I really hope we don't trade Miguel Cabrera, he put back-to-back great seasons together after the big alcohol issue came up in 2009. One of my favorite players...
   17. McCoy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:33 PM (#4044522)
And people thought he would never get anything close to this.
   18. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:33 PM (#4044523)
This is batshit insane.
   19. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:33 PM (#4044525)
Trade Miggy Cabrera for Hanley Ramirez! Maybe get Andrew Miller involved somehow.
   20. RJ not in TO Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:35 PM (#4044527)
Where are they going to stick Delmon Young if Cabrera is now standing out in left?

Toledo.
   21. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:35 PM (#4044530)
I guess it's because I'm surrounded by Tigers fans yet not a Tigers fan, BUT, it seems strange that so many people elsewhere are all "OMG GREAT JOB TIGERS!" as though the Tigers slayed a field of other teams bidding for the services of Prince Fielder.
   22. shattnering his Dominicano G Strings on that Mound Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:35 PM (#4044531)
I can't imagine they'd be looking to trade Cabrera, right. It has to be the case that they are thinking they've got the most potent 3 & 4 in the league, right? And maybe they do! Who's better? A-Gon/Ortiz?
   23. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:36 PM (#4044533)
mram

I wrote something similar in the other thread. If folks really understood the depth of Prince's animus toward his father then this signing makes a lot of sense from his perspective.

Of course, the money had to be there as well.

Making Detroit forget about his father has to have some appeal
   24. Austin Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:36 PM (#4044534)
Hmm. I suppose Cabrera might be the DH for this year, but then they'll be forced to choose between him and Martinez when Victor is healthy again in 2013 and beyond. That's what makes it a weird move from my perspective (well, ignoring the Pujolsian magnitude of the contract, anyway).
   25. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:37 PM (#4044536)
Holy &*#$@&^% @#$%.
   26. NJ loves his Super Lintendo Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:37 PM (#4044537)
I can't stop laughing. This is absolutely crazy.
   27. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:37 PM (#4044538)
as though the Tigers slayed a field of other teams bidding for the services of Prince Fielder.


Well, they did have to outbid the Nats, at least.
   28. robinred Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:38 PM (#4044540)
9/214? 9/214?

I am not sure what's funnier: the deal, or the Primates who always talk smack about Scott Boras. Yes, I know Boras overshoots sometimes, but when he hits his target, he obliterates it.
   29. Guapo Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:39 PM (#4044544)
First Newt Gingrich becomes the standard bearer for the Republican Party, then a Fielder becomes the Tigers' first baseman... I'm assuming the next thing will be Nirvana announcing a reunion tour.
   30. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:39 PM (#4044545)
I have trouble buying that the Tigers needed to go 9 years, $24M per to make it happen, but this definitely makes the Tigers a lot better in the immediate future. They have Verlander signed through 2014 and Cabrera through 2015. That's one hell of a core to use to take a shot at a WS, and they should be significant favorites in the AL Central for the next two or three years.

After that, they have to pay Prince Fielder almost 150 million dollars to be their 30-something DH.
   31. Bitter Mouse Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:39 PM (#4044546)
Guys remember Delmon Young? Replacing him with someone who can't play defense changes, well, nothing at all. There is room for him.
   32. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:39 PM (#4044547)
Well, they did have to outbid the Nats, at least.


I guess, but their association with Prince this off-season has seemed more like a marriage for lack of other options rather than one of genuine interest on Washington's part.
   33. Tom Nawrocki Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:40 PM (#4044551)
This is going to be the greatest first-base platoon of all time.
   34. William Satterwhite Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:40 PM (#4044552)
Does anyone else find it odd that 2 out of the 3 biggest free agents this off-season ended up signing with teams who already had relatively young All-Star level players at their positions?
   35. Gamingboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:42 PM (#4044555)
First Newt Gingrich becomes the standard bearer for the Republican Party, then a Fielder becomes the Tigers' first baseman... I'm assuming the next thing will be Nirvana announcing a reunion tour.



I demand a Super Nintendo.
   36. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:43 PM (#4044556)

Making Detroit forget about his father has to have some appeal


Won't this get his dad back in the spotlight? I have to imagine every series this year is going to have the visiting announcer saying "Prince Fielder, back in the town his dad played in..." with stuff about the dad/son connection...seems like the worst place to go to if he wants to erase memories of his dad.
   37. Nasty Nate Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:43 PM (#4044559)
I'm sure next offseason the collective amnesia will once again set in and everyone will be cackling about Boras finally getting his comeuppance when a star client isn't signed by Thanksgiving...
   38. Drew (Primakov, Gungho Iguanas) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:44 PM (#4044561)
Making Detroit forget about his father has to have some appeal


Yeah...though that's a pretty ugly thing to aspire to. I hope Prince is better than that.

their association with Prince this off-season has seemed more like a marriage for lack of other options rather than one of genuine interest on Washington's part.


I guess we don't really know. A lot of teams are able to keep their interest in a play pretty darn quiet..

For this offseason, who's the bigger overpay: Prince or Papelbon?
   39. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:46 PM (#4044564)
Does anyone else find it odd that 2 out of the 3 biggest free agents this off-season ended up signing with teams who already had relatively young All-Star level players at their positions?


Yea, which is why its always stupid to have the analysis "there is nowhere for Elite FA X to go, all the other high spending clubs are filled at his position!" You can always make room for premium players.
   40. What did Billy Ripken have against Elroy Face? Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:47 PM (#4044569)
Obviously Cabrera will have to move to the left side of the diamond - it's their only chance to even out the weight distribution so the whole stadium doesn't list to the 1B side.
   41. Guapo Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:47 PM (#4044570)
Making Detroit forget about his father has to have some appeal


TWO ####### HUNDRED AND FOURTEEN ####### *MILLION* ####### dollars has to have some appeal.
   42. Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:47 PM (#4044572)
Prince, pretty clearly.
   43. RJ in TO Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:47 PM (#4044573)
I am not sure what's funnier: the deal, or the Primates who always talk smack about Scott Boras. Yes, I know Boras overshoots sometimes, but when he hits his target, he obliterates it.

Unless you think that he arranged the injury to VMart, this is a much better example of luck bailing Boras' ass out than of his incredible negotiating brilliance.

Of course, as you note, he did end up bringing in the cash in the end.
   44. KronicFatigue Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:48 PM (#4044575)
Long Live Scott Boras.
   45. cardsfanboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:49 PM (#4044577)
I'm at a loss as to what is wrong with this deal. He's 26 years old, he's among one of the best hitters in baseball, and he's only averaging 24mil a year, in which at least the first 4 years he'll probably be worth more than that. Yes it's going to hurt towards the end, but that is the way the market works, in order to sign a 25 mil a year value player you have to pay for it in the end.
   46. cpass Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:49 PM (#4044578)
For this offseason, who's the bigger overpay: Prince or Papelbon?

Ugh. They're both ugly. But Papelbon's signing has two things over Prince's: 1) It's not for five years and 2) It's nowhere near $100 million, much less $214 million. So I guess I have to say Prince.
   47. Gamingboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:49 PM (#4044579)
Yeah...though that's a pretty ugly thing to aspire to. I hope Prince is better than that.


Prince Fielder hates his father enough that he COULD aspire to that..
   48. KronicFatigue Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:49 PM (#4044580)
--Unless you think that he arranged the injury to VMart, this is a much better example of luck bailing Boras' ass out than of his incredible negotiating brilliance.--

But then you have to give him credit for the fact that Yankees and Sox were booked at 1st, Pujols was on (and then off) the market, and the Dodgers and Mets are a mess. This was the absolute WORST year for Prince to be on the market in the first place.

   49. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:50 PM (#4044581)
Drew

Think of him what you will but Prince's negative feelings toward his dad run deep.

   50. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:50 PM (#4044584)
I am not sure what's funnier: the deal, or the Primates who always talk smack about Scott Boras. Yes, I know Boras overshoots sometimes, but when he hits his target, he obliterates it.

I think we need to reassess our opinion of the competence of MLB GMs.

It's pretty clear to me that they don't really know much more than the average educated fan. The fact that Boras keeps suckering them, means they're no better negotiators or business men than the average educated fan.

I want to reiterate my claim that the all BBTF front office staff wouldn't be any worse than middle of the pack.

This signing is so godawful it should be a firable offense.
   51. cpass Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:51 PM (#4044587)
I'm at a loss as to what is wrong with this deal. He's 26 years old...

He'll be 28 in May. And there's that body, you know.
   52. Derb Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:51 PM (#4044588)
I say the Tigers just forget about defense and sign Damon. Roll with this lineup:

1. Damon DH
2. Boesch RF
3. Cabrera 3B
4. Fielder 1B
5. Young LF
6. Avila C
7. Peralta SS
8. Raburn/Santiago 2B
9. Jackson CF
   53. RJ in TO Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:52 PM (#4044590)
I'm at a loss as to what is wrong with this deal. He's 26 years old, he's among one of the best hitters in baseball, and he's only averaging 24mil a year, in which at least the first 4 years he'll probably be worth more than that. Yes it's going to hurt towards the end, but that is the way the market works, in order to sign a 25 mil a year value player you have to pay for it in the end.

He's 27, his defense is already below average, he's slow as molasses, and he appears to be made entirely of ham and jello. Everything about him warns of the possibility of him aging incredibly poorly, and there's likely to be some roster issues next year with him, VMart, and Cabrera only having two lineup spots for three people.

With that being said, I agree that it's not exactly terrible, since the Tigers have to be thinking about winning now, rather than worrying about figuring a way out to contend in 2016 and later.
   54. Kurt Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:52 PM (#4044591)
Robinred and KronicFatigue beat me to it. Scott, you magnificent bastard.
   55. Yeaarrgghhhh Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:53 PM (#4044593)
ATTENTION: The Orioles signed Wilson Betemit for 2 years, $3 million.
   56. robinred Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:55 PM (#4044597)
Unless you think that he arranged the injury to VMart, this is a much better example of luck bailing Boras' ass out than of his incredible negotiating brilliance.


Not seeing it. If Prince had signed in Detroit for 3/45 after Martinez went down, OK. But if this report is accurate, he is going to sign for 9/214.

Edit: And what Kronic said up there in post 48.
   57. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:56 PM (#4044598)
Guapo

I did mention that the money had to be there.

RJ

His defense is worse than below average.
   58. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:57 PM (#4044602)
I'm at a loss as to what is wrong with this deal. He's 26 years old...
And he can't run or field. Because of that, he's not an elite talent.

Baserunning value numbers are based on simple calculations - we're not talking about the difficulties of properly measuring play-by-play fielding. B-Ref has Fielder typically 5-10 runs below average on the bases. You can quibble with the defensive numbers as you wish, but I don't think anyone's seriously considering Fielder to be a good or even solidly average glove.

So, when you consider the quality of his bat, you have to cut 10-20 runs off that figure for defense and baserunning. He projects as maybe a $20M player right now, and he certainly doesn't project to be that good five years from now.
   59. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: January 24, 2012 at 03:57 PM (#4044603)
If anyone is curious, the Brewers allegedly offered similar annual amounts but only five years versus nine.
   60. RJ in TO Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:00 PM (#4044605)
RJ

His defense is worse than below average.


I'm not surprised to hear this. I was trying to stay on the conservative side in my criticism of his defense, since I haven't seen him play much. I'll cheerfully defer to your knowledge in this matter.
   61. cardsfanboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:00 PM (#4044608)
He'll be 28 in May. And there's that body, you know.


I think most of the complaints is all about the body, because nobody big ever had a lengthy dominant career, it's the string beans like Pedro Martinez who last forever.

(sorry about the age, just going off of memory, but still I should have said going into his 27 age season as I knew he wasn't 26--still would have been wrong though)

I just don't see the issue, for five years he'll probably at worse be a break even candidate. Fangraphs dollar war value system, even though it is flawed, ultimately shows that in order to get a 25 mil value player you have to pay for more years, that is how the system is allowed to pay mlb players on a linear scale, when talent is on an exponential scale.
   62. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:01 PM (#4044610)
Is there an opt-out?
   63. toratoratora Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:01 PM (#4044611)
9 years? 214 million?
Holy cripes-Boras has finally mastered the Jedi Mind Trick.


How the hell does he drum up that much loot for that long when there's no freaking competition in the market? This makes the Arod contract look almost sane.
   64. Nasty Nate Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:02 PM (#4044612)
This signing is so godawful it should be a firable offense.


Uh, don't you think ownership signed off on this?
   65. Swedish Chef Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:02 PM (#4044613)
This signing is so godawful it should be a firable offense.

The GM is a junior partner in these kinds of deals. This is driven by executives and ownership.
   66. Jose Can You Seabiscuit Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:05 PM (#4044616)
I'm at a loss as to what is wrong with this deal. He's 26 years old, he's among one of the best hitters in baseball, and he's only averaging 24mil a year, in which at least the first 4 years he'll probably be worth more than that. Yes it's going to hurt towards the end, but that is the way the market works, in order to sign a 25 mil a year value player you have to pay for it in the end.


I don't think it's a bad signing. If you're the Tigers you bite the bullet on the out years with the goal towards winning a World Series in the first five. There is a very good chance that the last three-four years of this deal are laughably bad, like Mo Vaughn with the Mets bad.
   67. cardsfanboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:05 PM (#4044617)
How the hell does he drum up that much loot for that long when there's no freaking competition in the market? This makes the Arod contract look almost sane.


Arod's contract was sane, a more apt comparison is that this deal is only slightly better than the Ryan Howard deal.
   68. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:06 PM (#4044618)
As I have mentioned elsewhere, Scott does the smart approach in circumventing the baseball people and going directly to ownership.

Owners like to THINK they are good negotiators. Typically, they stink.

For those not aware this approach is termed "Hitting the C-suite" or similar references to only speaking to folks with C in their title. CEO. COO. Avoid the CFO who will think any expenditure is a bad idea.

Sorry if I am boring anyone. But what Scott is doing is VERY common as a Sales approach in corporate American and is typically ignored.
   69. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:07 PM (#4044619)
If anyone is curious, the Brewers allegedly offered similar annual amounts but only five years versus nine.

That's a sane offer.
   70. Guapo Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:07 PM (#4044620)
So let's play rank the contracts:

Pujols: 10yr/$240 mill
Fielder: 9yr/$214 mill
Teixeira: 8yr/$180 mill
Gonzalez: 7yr/$154 mill
Howard: 5yr/$125 mill

Boy, that Gonzalez contract looks pretty good.
   71. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:07 PM (#4044621)
I think I'd basically sort of like this signing if I were a Tigers fan. Detroit are now clear, way-ahead-of-the-pack favorites to win the AL Central in 2012, and they are likely to be solid or better favorites in 2013 and 2014. That's three big juicy shots at a World Series.

After that, well, who knows what will happen in 2015? Maybe baseball will be eclipsed by blurnsball. Maybe Detroit will be sucked into the mirror universe. Maybe President-for-life Avakian will make profit-takings of all kinds illegal. Gather ye rosebuds while ye may, says Dave Dombrowski.
   72. RJ in TO Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:08 PM (#4044623)
Arod's contract was sane, a more apt comparison is that this deal is only slightly better than the Ryan Howard deal.

Wait, didn't you just say that this deal seemed okay to you? And isn't the Ryan Howard deal generally viewed as a potential screaming disaster? There seems to be a mild mismatch here.
   73. snapper (history's 42nd greatest monster) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:08 PM (#4044625)
The GM is a junior partner in these kinds of deals. This is driven by executives and ownership.

Then I'm more qualified than they are to run an MLB team.

More ammunition for those who claim wealth is largely obtained by luck and theft, rather than intelligence and acumen.
   74. toratoratora Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:08 PM (#4044626)
Arod's contract was sane, a more apt comparison is that this deal is only slightly better than the Ryan Howard deal.


I'm reeling from the numbers.

I see your points above CFB re the contract, and actually agree with some of them-my main beef is who the hell else was gonna pay anything close to those figures.
I said Arod because it reminded me of a team bidding against themselves.
   75. RB in NYC (Now with New Running Goal!) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:09 PM (#4044628)
How bad is Cabrera likely be if he's playing 3B with any kind of regularity? If he's the Tigers' starting 3B in 2012, it will be five seasons since he last played there full-time, and during that season he made 23 errors and his UZR/150 was -4.4, which is less terrible than I thought it would be. On the other hand, his UZR/150 at 1B the last two seasons has averaged worse than -5, so moving across the diamond isn't likely to do him any favors. And he's apparently even worse in the OF than he was at 3B. It seems to be Miggy pretty much has to DH more than he plays the field or he's going to be giving back a good-sized chunk of his value.
   76. Swedish Chef Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:10 PM (#4044629)
More ammunition for those who claim wealth is largely obtained by luck and theft, rather than intelligence and acumen.

Playing first base is also a pretty good way to obtain wealth.
   77. Harveys Wallbangers Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:10 PM (#4044630)
Let's remember that supposedly the Nationals Board of Directors rejected the proposed contract negotiated by the Lerners.
   78. zonk Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:11 PM (#4044633)
I'm at a loss as to what is wrong with this deal. He's 26 years old, he's among one of the best hitters in baseball, and he's only averaging 24mil a year, in which at least the first 4 years he'll probably be worth more than that. Yes it's going to hurt towards the end, but that is the way the market works, in order to sign a 25 mil a year value player you have to pay for it in the end.


I don't know -- even setting aside the defense and such, this is nearly Pujols money and even just limiting it to offensive contributions, he's clearly a notch below Pujols.... He's generally been top 10/top 5 in oWAR, OPS+, etc... but there's virtually no black ink there. I know he's had Pujols to deal with, but for 20something mil a year - I'm expecting something more.

At this price, no way in the world I'd have wanted my team involved.
   79. The District Attorney Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:13 PM (#4044638)
It has to be the case that they are thinking they've got the most potent 3 & 4 in the league, right?
More specifically, has another team had two other players who were both this good as hitters and both such humongous tubs of goo? You know power-speed number? I want to see a weight-offense number.
   80. cardsfanboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:14 PM (#4044640)
Wait, didn't you just say that this deal seemed okay to you? And isn't the Ryan Howard deal generally viewed as a potential screaming disaster? There seems to be a mild mismatch here.


The deal seems good to me based upon the standards that baseball has established, and there is no reason for me to think it won't be a break even deal for the first 4-5 years for the Tigers. Ultimately though the last couple of years are major risks of being a Moo Vaughn type of deal. I think it's a much better deal than the Ryan Howard deal, but I know that the people around here will view it as on par or worse. I was trying to put it into the terms that people around here might view it.

But yes I think the Ryan Howard deal was a horrible signing, not a Gary Mathews bad signing, but still a bad deal for multiple reasons, but the Phillies can afford to make bad moves like that(same with the Yankees)
   81. Double-Spin Mechanic Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:15 PM (#4044641)
I sincerely hope the mystery destination is LF and not 3B. Verlander gets all assed-up if you bunt on him. With Prince and Miggy at the corners, he may give up more bunt hits than he currently gives up hits.

On the other hand, Miggy in left isn't pretty sight, but to be worse than Delmon Young would have to involve both a couch and a blindfold.
   82. alilisd Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:16 PM (#4044643)
I'm at a loss as to what is wrong with this deal. He's 26 years old, he's among one of the best hitters in baseball,


Actually, he'll be 28 in May. (Edit: Sorry, should have read down further; cokes all around.) I think one perception is that it is problematic from the standpoint of the Tigers already having a good hit/no field 1B. That's less of a problem for them though as one can DH.

I also think many people believe Prince will not age well. This is possible, but you have to admit he's been healthy and an everyday player thus far. I'm very impressed by how much he plays each year.
   83. Matt Clement of Alexandria Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:17 PM (#4044644)
More specifically, has another team had two other players who were both this good as hitters and both such humongous tubs of goo? You know power-speed number? I want to see a weight-offense number.
Manny Ortez is the first comp that sprung to mind, but Manny was actually in ridiculous physical condition - he just got bored by fielding and baserunning. If Manny had been a terrible fielder and baserunner because of physical rather than psychical shortcomings, it would be a great match.
   84. cardsfanboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:19 PM (#4044647)
I see your points above CFB re the contract, and actually agree with a lot of em-my main point is who the hell else was gonna pay anything close to those figures.
I said Arod because it reminded me of a team bidding against themselves.


I do wonder how many times we as fans/observers feel this is the case when it may not actually be the case. The teams that lose out on the bidding don't always want to advertise how high they were willing to go, or even how serious they were in case they had someone already at that position or an up and comer, or it tells the fans that they were willing to up their payroll.

I do find it hard to believe that Fielder/Boras would have even answered a phone call that didn't put 125mil and an annual value over 20 mil out there. I'm pretty sure that if Boras would have walked into a room with 30 gms and say "the first person to put their name on this 6 year, 150 mil contract gets him" that he wouldn't have multiple gms jumping at that chance. There was a floor that Fielder was going to get and that seems about it. It's just a matter of getting the (relatively) incremental amounts over that.
   85. AROM Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:19 PM (#4044648)
On the other hand, his UZR/150 at 1B the last two seasons has averaged worse than -5, so moving across the diamond isn't likely to do him any favors.


Watching the playoffs I was just struck by how huge Cabrera is. He was always a big boy but he seems to have considerably grown since he left Florida. If he does play any 3B, it will be very interesting to see how he fields a bunt.
   86. Crosseyed and Painless Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:19 PM (#4044649)
I think I'd basically sort of like this signing if I were a Tigers fan. Detroit are now clear, way-ahead-of-the-pack favorites to win the AL Central in 2012, and they are likely to be solid or better favorites in 2013 and 2014. That's three big juicy shots at a World Series.

After that, well, who knows what will happen in 2015? Maybe baseball will be eclipsed by blurnsball. Maybe Detroit will be sucked into the mirror universe. Maybe President-for-life Avakian will make profit-takings of all kinds illegal. Gather ye rosebuds while ye may, says Dave Dombrowski.


Not to be morbid, but Illitch can't really wait forever. He's getting up there.
   87. Pops Freshenmeyer Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:20 PM (#4044652)
This makes Pujols look like a complete steal. Was Detroit invloved much with Albert?
   88. CWS Keith plans to boo your show at the Apollo Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:21 PM (#4044653)
Ultimately though the last couple of years are major risks of being a Moo Vaughn type of deal.

I laughed.
   89. Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:23 PM (#4044657)
As I have mentioned elsewhere, Scott does the smart approach in circumventing the baseball people and going directly to ownership.

Owners like to THINK they are good negotiators. Typically, they stink.

For those not aware this approach is termed "Hitting the C-suite" or similar references to only speaking to folks with C in their title. CEO. COO. Avoid the CFO who will think any expenditure is a bad idea.

Sorry if I am boring anyone. But what Scott is doing is VERY common as a Sales approach in corporate American and is typically ignored.


This. The small handful of times I've considered quitting or 'moving on' are the few times where the "CEO" was bamboozled by the seller.
   90. Derb Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:23 PM (#4044658)
This makes Pujols look like a complete steal. Was Detroit invloved much with Albert?


Not that I heard of. But Dombrowski is excellent at keeping quiet. You rarely hear rumors coming out of Detroit. And if you do, they're probably wrong.
   91. Every Inge Counts Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:25 PM (#4044662)
This makes Pujols look like a complete steal. Was Detroit invloved much with Albert?


Not that I heard of, I honestly think the Victor Martinez injury was the more likely factor. Then Detroit decided instead of putting a band-aid on something....
   92. RB in NYC (Now with New Running Goal!) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:25 PM (#4044663)
If he does play any 3B, it will be very interesting to see how he fields a bunt.
I have the mental image of an elephant running away from a mouse
   93. cpass Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:26 PM (#4044665)
Jim Bowden says he has confirmed there is no opt-out.
   94. Derb Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:26 PM (#4044666)
I hope to make it to a few games in Detroit this year. If Cabrera is playing third, I'm not sitting behind first!
   95. cardsfanboy Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:28 PM (#4044669)
I also think many people believe Prince will not age well. This is possible, but you have to admit he's been healthy and an everyday player thus far. I'm very impressed by how much he plays each year.



That is what I honestly think is the driving focus on anything with Fielder. I don't agree with it, he's been healthy, his weight has been pretty steady (more or less) for his whole career, it's not like he's Tony Gwynn or Kirby Puckett going from a fit guy to a not so fit guy, but a guy who has always been big, has always had questions about his physique, and who has ultimately proven that it's not an issue. If he had Andruw Jones in the last couple of years where he just ballooned up overnight it would concern me, but since that isn't the case, the only real concern is how he is going to handle himself now that he's signed his (likely)last contract. He wouldn't be the first player (of any size) to let themselves go after a big(no pun) contract. Personally, I don't see it in him to let himself go like that, everything I've seen about him has indicated that he's a guy who is driven, even if he's relaxed about it.
   96. alilisd Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:29 PM (#4044670)
On the other hand, Miggy in left isn't pretty sight, but to be worse than Delmon Young would have to involve both a couch and a blindfold.


Cabrera has both of these in his dressing room stall right now.
   97. Matt Waters Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:33 PM (#4044677)
Simply put, this has to work, and work extremely well, within five years. It could be kind of justified if Detroit wins a World Series, and Prince maintains his impressive record of durability. But you can't really make a rational case for this contract making sense at nine years. That's indefensible. I could see us, five years from now, saying "Man, that backlash was really overblown. Prince has been a lethal hitter on a consistent pennant contender, he's been healthy, and who cares about defense and base-running when the ballpark is full and the guy has been money in the bank for an .OPS over .900. That has incredible value!" Then the next four years of the contract hit and we're all like, "We were so right about this being a bad idea."
   98. phredbird Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:35 PM (#4044679)
i kept thinking why can't the dodgers make some sort of play? ... now i know why. 9/214. heavens above.

i know i shouldn't say this -- i'll be accused of sour grapes and all -- but the pujols contract still looks like the biggest overpay.
   99. RoyalsRetro (AG#1F) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:35 PM (#4044681)
This picture of Prince is awesome. Alan Trammell approves.
   100. Moneyball can't buy you love (Joey B.) Posted: January 24, 2012 at 04:37 PM (#4044683)
Yep, Crazy Eddie had absolutely nothing on Crazy Scottie. The only thing more insane than his prices are the idiots who keep paying them.
Page 1 of 4 pages  1 2 3 4 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Backlasher
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogCubs' Byrd sports a new look
(22 - 1:19pm, Feb 22)
Last: Bring Me the Head of Alfredo Griffin (Vlad)

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1969 Ballot
(48 - 1:18pm, Feb 22)
Last: fra paolo

NewsblogAn Invisible Menace: Big-leaguer Buchholz describes battle with depression
(26 - 1:15pm, Feb 22)
Last: zenbitz

NewsblogYu Darvish arrives in Surprise, throws 30 pitches in bullpen session
(3 - 1:14pm, Feb 22)
Last: Pasta-diving Jeter (jmac66)

NewsblogWashington Post: Ask Boswell
(7 - 1:13pm, Feb 22)
Last: ess eff

Transaction Oracle2012 ZiPS Projections Spreadsheets, v. 1
(4 - 1:12pm, Feb 22)
Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)

NewsblogBrian Cashman admits that the Bombers didn't try to win AL East in final weeks of 2010 season
(107 - 1:12pm, Feb 22)
Last: Dale Sams

NewsblogRonald Belisario says positive cocaine test was reason for absence
(1 - 1:12pm, Feb 22)
Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)

NewsblogDeadspin: The Making Of "Homer At The Bat"
(254 - 1:08pm, Feb 22)
Last: zenbitz

Newsblog[OT] Q4 NFL Thread
(2584 - 1:04pm, Feb 22)
Last: stanmvp48

NewsblogWedge: Ichiro will bat third this season
(49 - 12:55pm, Feb 22)
Last: Downtown Bookie

NewsblogShaikin/LA Times: Peter O'Malley reportedly out as bidder for Dodgers
(19 - 12:55pm, Feb 22)
Last: phredbird

NewsblogOT: The Soccer Thread: February 2012
(524 - 12:55pm, Feb 22)
Last: Mefisto

NewsblogBaseball America: 2012 Top 100 Prospects
(37 - 12:51pm, Feb 22)
Last: Old Man James

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, February 2012
(1001 - 12:37pm, Feb 22)
Last: andrewberg

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.5235 seconds
48 querie(s) executed