Zen and the Art of Garfooseball.
Following last night’s Blue Jays/Tigers game in which Ricky Romero allowed eight walks, newbie TV analyst Dirk Hayhurst had some choice words in evaluating Romero’s performance. I quote:
Jamie Campbell: If the minor league season were to be extended a little further, would you envision (Romero) being demoted the way things are going?
Dirk Hayhurst: He’s absolutely warranted a demotion … 8 walks is just far too many walks to stay in the big leagues with. I’m a big Ricky fan, I played with him, I like the guy, but at some point you have to look at all this failure and realize this is beyond the confines of normal failure, this is now stretching into the area of embarrassment. He’s out there and he’s embarrassed himself. He knows it, the fans know it, the team knows it.
While it is refreshing to see a Sportsnet personality not shilling for his Rogers overlords, Dirk would do well to choose his words a little more carefully.
...I’m not saying you have to have been a Major League All-Star to be able to level criticism at another player, but if you are going to do so, at least have some sort of self-awareness. I understand that making inflammatory comments is part & parcel for a best-selling author seeking publicity. But if Dirk wants any sort of longevity in this media gig, he’ll need to tone down the hyperbole and personal attacks*.
*edit: on second thought, hyperbole and personal attacks will actually ensure his longevity.
Repoz
Posted: August 22, 2012 at 11:10 AM |
35 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
blue jays,
media
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Bruce Markusen Posted: August 22, 2012 at 11:36 AM (#4214678)Apparently, inflammatory comments aren't limited to best-selling authors.
It kind of reminds me of a lesser version of what Halladay was going through in 2000.
Everything in Romero's body language suggests he really can't figure out what's going on.
The Jays are completely out of it at this point (thanks to injuries to every other starting pitcher and half their batting lineup), so I think it would be a good thing to get him out of the spotlight for a while.
As for Hayhurst, he's fantastic and I wouldn't be surprised to see him get poached by ESPN/MLB in the near future.
What is he doing wrong? What part of his mechanics are out of control?
Have you seen this close-up before? What happened and did the pitcher recover?
Did you ever face a similar situation and how did you try to recover? (which could lead to the comment "no, I couldn't solve it and that's why I am sitting next to you today")
Who helped you? What was the best advice that you received?
Dealing with this by merely using emotional phrases adds little information to the conversation.
In the case of the "spat", the blogger is talking from a statistical position, Hayhurst is reading emotions. If you have read his books you would expect him to read it that way.
I agree with #5, it seems like the season can't end quickly enough for Romero. No-one knows what to do and the team is two months into this issue. Hayhurst was being radical but this thing isn't going to fix itself today.
Finally Hayhurst is emotional, this isn't the first back and forward he has had on the twitter. He needs to learn to ignore the trolls and those looking for publicity for themselves. If he keeps reacting like this he is going to burn himself out.
There was no play-by-play guy. Campbell and Hayhurst were analysis from a studio either during or after the game.
I like Hayhurst. It looks like someone at Rogers is high on him, they've given him a daily one hour radio show, and he's been filling in as an analyst on radio broadcasts and in the tv studio. I hope he doesn't change his style, the Jays have far too many sycophants on their broadcasts.
Romero looked awful yesterday, if anything he was lucky to get out with only five runs. He had no command of his fastball at all. It's at the point where I'd be overjoyed if he needed Tommy John, because at least that means he didn't get Blass-ed / Willis-ed.
I'm surprised that Hughson didn't mention what he said about David Cooper! Jamie Campbell asked him what his best role would be, given that although he's a good line drive hitter, he doesn't have much homerun power, is a poor defender and an even worse baserunner. Hayhurst just said "Japan?".
You know, when Willis first started to collapse I'll admit to a little perverse pleasure. But his collapse was just so complete that in the end I actually did start to feel sorry for him. This as opposed to a certain KC RFer who I felt sorry for at first, and as time went on I've kind of wished the league would figure out that he isn't as good as KC pretends he is.
Not to mention that Astbury is also wrong about the amount of casually hateful speech these days. That kind of thing has always been around, and is just more visible now because of the internet. When my dad was young, he and his friends would make the exact same kind of comments to each other about the popular music of the day. They just didn't have a soapbox.
In short, he should be embarrassed to have written that post. At best, it's cynical linkbait, and at worst, it displays a near-complete lack of understanding of the material under discussion. (Per the Astbury standard, I'm coming to that position from around five years of blogging about the Pirates for a major blog network. As such, I guess I'm qualified to "hate" on him for his sloppy work.)
He's probably not wrong. You can make a hell of a lot of money in Japan with that skill set, if you catch a few breaks.
Oh, I know, but its odd for him to say it when the player in question is still on the ML roster.
I don't agree with the blogger here, however.
Seconded, and my disappointment isn't just about the potential book. I don't know all the particulars, but from what I read, he hung that team out to dry.
Those are good questions, Bob, and it makes me curious how you would answer those questions.
As for myself, I had trouble throwing strikes, which I never did solve. Which is why I'm typing here today instead of shagging flies in BP right now. Well, that and not being able to top 80 MPH, or throw a breaking ball. Oh, and being 41 years old, so even if I had been good enough to have a pitching career, it would likely be over by now.
I hadn't heard that, but what I read was only from The Garfoose blog and from HardballTalk posts largely quoting him. Can you shed any more light?
When Cooper had that brain freeze at 1B, didn't throw home, and then tried to beat out the batter to first base (without even trying to tag him, even though they were right beside each other for the last three steps), I'm guessing he was starting to think about Japan as well...
I was about to argue that the emergence of Encarnacion was pretty cool and that there must be some other cool stuff going on, but I didn't realize how disappointing the rest of the team was. Geez.
These questions can often get interesting answers. When I played with the Giants, pitching coach Don McMahon hung around the guys who were throwing well and tended to avoid those who were struggling - he was very open about this. Whwn I needed help, bullpen coach John Van Ornum was the one who was active and proactive. He helped with bullpen sessions and did things like introduce me to fellow lanky lefty Gary Lucas. I was able to compare physical and mental notes with him before a game in San Diego. In Kansas City, Cloyd Boyer acted like VO and not McMahon.
In AAA in Phoneix, the trainer Harry Jordan noticed a key flaw in my motion (or the motion in my flaw) regarding opening up my right shoulder too quickly and I was able to rescue my season in 1980 after a horrid first three months.
Unless a team had a large investment in you, you were pretty much on your own. I'm meeting the Phillies minor league pitching coordinator tomorrow and will ask how they treat their prospects and suspects in today's game.
Can't find the original piece I read, but digging around, this may just be a he said/they said thing. He left the team after less than a week to take a more lucrative media job back home (the one he has now, I suppose) and the team claims he wasn't in pitching shape when he showed up anyway. That part's probably just sour grapes. The team was certainly left in a bit of a lurch, though, as they'd used up their allotment of visas for international players and couldn't get a comparable replacement.
The highlight of one article I found and read with the help of Google translate is the photo caption: In the photo, Hayhurst launches with the coat of the San Diego Padres in Major League.
For about the first two months of the season, the team was pretty entertaining - Morrow and Hutch coming into their own, Drabek actually throwing strikes, EE&JB; forming an elite duo. Then it got real ugly, real quick. EE has been a great story, but he's been surrounded by pretty close to nothing to help him out - Mike McCoy of the .600OPS, batting 2nd!, Copper hitting behind him. He could very well hit 40 homers this year and still not crack 100 RBI. His game logs are just littered with a home run and only 1 or 2RBI days.
The Jays have had 31 different pitchers this year; 32 including Jeff Mathis.
The Jays lineup, with Escobar, Vizquel, Mathis, Gose, Hechavarria and the rotting corpse of Kelly Johnson is so eye-bleedingly bad that Jeff Mathis has been a bright spot (although he too has cratered in the second half). If I was watching the games on DVR/MLB.tv, I'd be tempted to skip everyone outside of Encarnacion and maybe Rasmus.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main