Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Wednesday, April 18, 2012

Ivan Rodriguez to retire Monday in Arlington

...156 hits short of 3000.

Ivan Rodriguez, the 1999 American League MVP and one of the best defensive catchers in baseball history, will announce his retirement Monday at Rangers Ballpark in Arlington.

Sources confirmed Rodriguez’s plan, which was hatched after no decent playing opportunities arose in the off-season. Four teams showed interest in Rodriguez, who had hoped to get a minor-league deal to Rangers camp with an invitation to big-league camp.

Rodriguez wants to retire in Texas, where he started a 21-year career in 1991. He made 10 of his 14 All-Star appearances won 10 of his 13 Gold Gloves while with the Rangers from 1991 to 2002. The Rangers traded for him late in the 2009 season after a season-ending injury to Jarrod Saltalamacchia.

Repoz Posted: April 18, 2012 at 06:14 PM | 48 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: rangers

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Walks Clog Up the Bases Posted: April 18, 2012 at 06:35 PM (#4110021)
As a kid, I held a grudge against Pudge for several years because I thought he did a poor job of blocking the plate on the final play of the 1994 ASG.

Pudge will be remembered here in Michigan as being the first brave soul of the era to sign with the atrocious Tigers, setting off a series of events that found the suddenly admirable team playing in the World Series three seasons later.
   2. Greg (U)K Posted: April 18, 2012 at 06:40 PM (#4110024)
Pudge will be remembered here in Michigan as being the first brave soul of the era to sign with the atrocious Tigers, setting off a series of events that found the suddenly admirable team playing in the World Series three seasons later.

The Jayson Werth of his era.
   3. Crispix Attacks 2: Swag Airlines Posted: April 18, 2012 at 06:45 PM (#4110030)
Future Nationals fans would probably remember Werth more fondly if he had signed for a measly 4 years and $40 million like I-Rod.
   4. Mark Armour Posted: April 18, 2012 at 06:46 PM (#4110031)
Pudge was a hell of a player for a long time, and he kept playing until he could not find a job. Bravo on both counts.
   5. Fred Lynn Nolan Ryan Sweeney Agonistes Posted: April 18, 2012 at 06:52 PM (#4110034)
Pudge was a hell of a player for a long time, and he kept playing until he could not find a job. Bravo on both counts.

Seconded.
(Listed) at 5'9" and 205#, and therefore the catcher on the All-FLNRSA-Sized All-Star Team. I always keep an eye out for those guys.
   6. Brian C Posted: April 18, 2012 at 06:53 PM (#4110035)
I was at Pudge's last home game for the Rangers in 2002, when it was pretty clear that he probably wouldn't be back. Got a huge ovation from the fans when he came up to bat the first time, and while it's hard to say from the stands, he seemed genuinely surprised and moved by it to the extent that he seemed to be tearing up a bit. Later in the game he homered and the place went nuts. It was a good moment.

I remember thinking at the time that I understood the reasons the Rangers had for letting him go, but looking back I have no idea why the Rangers wouldn't have given him a one-year deal (what he got from the Marlins). At that point, he hadn't played a full season for three years, and looked to be a rapidly aging (though still productive) catcher. Perhaps the Rangers just assumed he'd get a multi-year deal and they wanted no part of it, but certainly it would have been worth their while to take a chance on a one-year deal. But I don't really remember how that all went down.
   7. SG Posted: April 18, 2012 at 06:56 PM (#4110037)
He had a great career, and now he can devote himself to catching up on that big library of his.
   8. Crispix Attacks 2: Swag Airlines Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:00 PM (#4110043)
Let's see, they had top prospect Gerald Laird ready to take over at catch, but didn't want him to play full-time. Instead of bringing back Rodriguez for that theoretical one-year deal they traded a non-top prospect for stopgap Einar Diaz. I guess he wanted to be assured that he would get a chance to play more than 101 games.
   9. ajnrules Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:08 PM (#4110048)
And to think that not only is Pudge nine years younger than Jamie Moyer, he made his debut with the Rangers the season after they released Moyer. And now Moyer is the best starting pitcher with the Rockies while Pudge is retiring. Of course it is impossible to compare a pitcher's durability with a catcher, but I still find it interestng.

While I wish that he would have gotten a chance to go for 3,000 hits, but he had a heck of a career and deserves to make the Hall on the first ballot.
   10. AndrewJ Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:24 PM (#4110066)
Hall of Famer...or inner-circle Hall of Famer?
   11. Brian C Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:27 PM (#4110072)
While I wish that he would have gotten a chance to go for 3,000 hits..

I wish he could have gotten there, but 156 more hits is pretty unrealistic at this point. He only had 133 total in his two seasons with Washington.

The last five seasons he's posted a cumulative .265 batting average. Assuming that going forward, he'd need nearly 600 AB to get to 3,000 hits, so even if we make the huge assumption that he can be healthy and start on a regular basis, he's still not getting there this year (he hasn't come close to 600 AB since 1999). Even assuming his career .296 BA, it'd still take a year of uncommonly good health to get him there (about 530 AB, which he hasn't done since 2006).
   12. Brian C Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:28 PM (#4110074)
Instead of bringing back Rodriguez for that theoretical one-year deal they traded a non-top prospect for stopgap Einar Diaz.

Ha ha, I had totally forgotten about that. John Hart ftw!
   13. Robert in Manhattan Beach Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:29 PM (#4110077)
Hall of Famer...or inner-circle Hall of Famer?

Well he was on those Rangers teams and got pretty big there for a while so.....
   14. BDC Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:31 PM (#4110080)
In retrospect, the Rangers kept Pudge just about long enough, on the Branch Rickey "better to trade a year too early" principle. The original "Sign Pudge" moment was in 1997, when the Rangers signed him to a long-term extension in midseason. That turned out to be the great move (there was some local resistance, though, in the media, where Pudge was seen as an underachiever). Signing Pudge in '97 meant two more division titles and an MVP in Texas. He accomplished amazing things, and it is even more amazing to think of the trajectory his career was on in 2000, when he broke the bone in his (hand? thumb?) that sidelined him while he was hitting .347 and still getting better every year. I realize that he wasn't likely to have just kept improving, but in 2000 he was hitting like Mike Piazza and fielding like Pudge Rodriguez. Incredible player.
   15. Brian C Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:34 PM (#4110083)
Hall of Famer...or inner-circle Hall of Famer?

As great as he was, his 67.3 career WAR seems surprisingly low. And coincidentally, it's exactly equal to Carlton Fisk.
   16. BDC Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:34 PM (#4110084)
he was on those Rangers teams and got pretty big there for a while

Pudge was named as a juicer by Canseco, who hasn't been proven wrong yet. It just hasn't been an issue because he wasn't one of the big HR-record guys, never failed a test, and never wagged fingers in front of Congress. He just got small again and kept playing ball. I think it's irrelevant anyway, but barring scandalous disclosures, it's going to be a non-issue for the BBWAA, too.
   17. AndrewJ Posted: April 18, 2012 at 07:40 PM (#4110090)
Answering my own open question, he's inner-circle if you go by career length, regular HOF if you go by peak. But either way, an easy first-ballot pick.
   18. Maxwn Posted: April 18, 2012 at 08:24 PM (#4110126)
As great as he was, his 67.3 career WAR seems surprisingly low.

Isn't that like second or third all time for catchers? Catching is hard.

Edit: Just eyeballing it on BBref, the only catcher I see above Ivan and Fisk is Bench at 71.3.
   19. Brian C Posted: April 18, 2012 at 08:39 PM (#4110144)
Isn't that like second or third all time for catchers? Catching is hard.

Yeah, that's kind of what I was getting at, I guess. I would have expected one of the all-time great catchers to top out higher than 67 WAR.

I guess I'd put it this way: if I told you that Jim Thome had a higher career WAR than Ivan Rodriguez (and Johnny Bench for that matter!), would you do a double-take and look it up for yourself? I know I would have if you had told me that. But there it is.
   20. Squash Posted: April 18, 2012 at 08:45 PM (#4110155)
Pudge was named as a juicer by Canseco, who hasn't been proven wrong yet. It just hasn't been an issue because he wasn't one of the big HR-record guys, never failed a test, and never wagged fingers in front of Congress. He just got small again and kept playing ball. I think it's irrelevant anyway, but barring scandalous disclosures, it's going to be a non-issue for the BBWAA, too.

It also helped that he ceased hitting like a star right around the time Juiced came out and the ensuring brouhaha, so he started flying under the radar in the ensuing years. If he had continued putting up huge numbers in the 05/06/07 fallout he probably would have come under the microscope more.
   21. TerpNats Posted: April 18, 2012 at 08:55 PM (#4110166)
He didn't have great offensive stats in Washington, but he seemed to have his share of clutch hits. More importantly, he helped both the young pitchers on the staff and fellow catchers Ramos and Flores. If the Nats somehow make it to the postseason (now not so wild a dream), Frank Howard should throw out the first ball for the first home game, and Pudge the second.
   22. michaelplank Posted: April 18, 2012 at 09:57 PM (#4110234)
His career demonstrates how hard it is for a catcher to ever get 3000 hits. He was a regular at age 20, swung at everything (career high, by far, in BB: 55), hit .300, played a huge percentage of his team's games... and fell considerably short. Sure, he was banged up toward the end of his career, but that's kind of the point. The strike didn't help his career totals, but adding in those 50+ games wouldn't have gotten him there either.
   23. Christopher Linden Posted: April 18, 2012 at 10:33 PM (#4110250)
Amazing, wonderful career. The broadest skill set of any catcher in modern major-league history. He had his warts (no walks, GDP machine), but no other catcher in memory did as many things as well as he did for nearly as long.

A historic player.

Happy Base Ball
   24. Mayor Blomberg Posted: April 18, 2012 at 10:48 PM (#4110257)
16.9 dWAR (11th all time) is pretty damned impressive. Bench = 6.5. Most games caught by >200.
   25. Shock Posted: April 18, 2012 at 10:48 PM (#4110258)
Sources confirmed Rodriguez’s plan, which was hatched after no decent playing opportunities arose in the off-season.



Ahhh yes, a deeevious plan, Mr. Rodriguez! Twirl that moustache.
   26. Booey Posted: April 18, 2012 at 10:52 PM (#4110260)
I think it's irrelevant anyway, but barring scandalous disclosures, it's going to be a non-issue for the BBWAA, too.

I don't know. I hope that's true, but we've entered an era of irrational hysteria amongst writers where a player who even LOOKS like he might have used steroids could be left on the outside looking in for several years. What happens next year to Piazza might be a good indicator of Pudge's chances.
   27. tshipman Posted: April 18, 2012 at 11:03 PM (#4110265)
WAR almost certainly underrates catchers (although maybe not Pudge specifically, since he was generally regarded as a poor receiver). It's not really useful or relevant to compare catchers to other position players or pitchers with WAR.
   28. theboyqueen Posted: April 18, 2012 at 11:11 PM (#4110267)
since he was generally regarded as a poor receiver


Huh? He was?
   29. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: April 19, 2012 at 12:17 AM (#4110282)
Oh yes, absolutely, especially when you focus on those six of his nineteen full seasons when Rodriguez DIDN'T get the Gold Glove.
   30. DanG Posted: April 19, 2012 at 12:17 AM (#4110283)
Most seasons 4.5 WAR (all-star level) and 60+ G at catcher

Rk                   Yrs From   To   Age
1       Johnny Bench   9 1968 1979 20
-31 H
2        Gary Carter   8 1977 1985 23
-31 H
3     Ivan Rodriguez   7 1996 2004 24
-32
4        Mike Piazza   6 1993 2000 24
-31
5        Gene Tenace   6 1974 1979 27
-32
6         Yogi Berra   6 1950 1956 25
-31 H
7    Mickey Cochrane   6 1929 1935 26
-32 H
8          Joe Mauer   5 2006 2010 23
-27
9        Ted Simmons   5 1973 1980 23
-30
10      Carlton Fisk   5 1972 1990 24
-42 H
11       Bill Dickey   5 1933 1939 26
-32 H
12        Buck Ewing   5 1883 1889 23
-29 H
13      Jorge Posada   4 2000 2007 28
-35
14     Jason Kendall   4 1997 2004 23
-30
15    Thurman Munson   4 1970 1976 23
-29
16         Joe Torre   4 1963 1970 22
-29
17    Roy Campanella   4 1949 1955 27
-33 H 
   31. Brian C Posted: April 19, 2012 at 12:39 AM (#4110287)
since he was generally regarded as a poor receiver

Come on now, don't get all passive-voiced on us when you're saying something this counterfactual. Regarded by whom?
   32. KJOK Posted: April 19, 2012 at 12:43 AM (#4110288)
Probably a good place to tell my Ivan Rodgriguez story. Rodriguez was to be married between games of a Texas League double-header on Thursday, June 20, 1991. Rodriguez and the players actually held the rehearsal before the game Wednesday night, with the players practicing forming a bat canopy for the bride & groom to walk through. The Tulsa Drillers had special 'tuxedo' uniforms for the ballpark ushers to wear, and wedding-themed bunting was placed all throughout the stadium. Relatives of the couple had all flown in from Vega Baja, PR for the big event of the priest marrying them at home plate.

But Gino Petralli, who had been hurt earlier in the week, was finally placed on the DL that night by the Rangers, and Rodriguez was being called up to go to Chicago on Thursday. So Ivan and Maribel were married by a JOP at 8:30 a.m. at the Tulsa courthouse, then got on a plane for Chicago. The decked out stadium and the relatives were all at the game in Tulsa that night, but no bride & groom, and no home plate wedding. Rodriguez made his MLB debut that night, on the same day as his wedding.



   33. CFBF Hates Hyphens Posted: April 19, 2012 at 12:50 AM (#4110290)
Not to speak for tshipman (as I speak for tshipman), but I think he's referring to the idea, widely whispered during Pudge's peak, that Rodriguez would get fastball-heavy in his signals with runners on base. This was, theoretically, in order to give him a better shot at gunning down base stealers.

"Receiver," in this context, is not a word referring to catcher defense in general. It has a very specific meaning.
   34. Why Bloody Valdespin? Posted: April 19, 2012 at 12:56 AM (#4110293)
Only negative thing I can recall hearing about Pudge's receiving skills is that some people thought he called for too many fastballs with runners on base, in order to give himself the best chance at throwing out attempted base stealers. I'm sure there's other stuff out there, but I don't remember any of it. The managers seemed to think OK of his defense.

EDIT: Beaten by 6 minutes.
   35. Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams) Posted: April 19, 2012 at 01:04 AM (#4110296)
He had a great career, and now he can devote himself to catching up on that big library of his


LMFAO. I need to find that original thread.
   36. Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams) Posted: April 19, 2012 at 01:06 AM (#4110297)
   37. The Yankee Clapper Posted: April 19, 2012 at 01:07 AM (#4110298)
I'm not sure the notion that Rodriguez called "too many" fastballs with runners on base was actually true or just an attempt to explain why he threw out so many runners in his prime.
   38. CFBF Hates Hyphens Posted: April 19, 2012 at 01:12 AM (#4110299)
I also feel like there was a more general sense in Rodriguez's younger days that he didn't handle pitchers very well or do those "little things" behind the plate that supposedly great defensive catchers do. I can't back that up with anything specific like the "calls too many fastballs" accusation, and it's certainly true that all those whispers were drowned out by people talking about his arm. And he eventually acquired the wily veteran and handler of young arms sheen in his veteran years.
   39. baudib Posted: April 19, 2012 at 02:14 AM (#4110310)
The stuff about Rodriguez being a poor catcher was reasonably widespread by saber-types or wannabe saber-types in the late 1990s. I suspect this had something to do with the idea that stolen bases were overrated, so stopping stolen bases wasn't a big deal, and it was related to the notion that it's just easier for stat-type guys to prefer hitters, and everyone wanted to say Piazza was way better than Rodriguez, and, hey, "Piazza's probably better defensively than Rodriguez when you factor catching and blocking the plate and calling games."

All you really need to put this idea to bed is to take a look at the Rangers' 2000 and 2001 seasons. Pudge missed a ton of time in both years. Check out what happened to the Rangers team, particularly the pitching staff, when he got out. I invite you to do this yourself because the results are mindboggling.

   40. tshipman Posted: April 19, 2012 at 02:23 AM (#4110311)
Not to speak for tshipman (as I speak for tshipman), but I think he's referring to the idea, widely whispered during Pudge's peak, that Rodriguez would get fastball-heavy in his signals with runners on base. This was, theoretically, in order to give him a better shot at gunning down base stealers.


This is what I was referring to. I have no idea of the basis in fact of it, but given that a lot of the recent research in catcher defense is surrounding pitch framing and general "pitcher handling" it seems unlikely (based on reputation only!) that Pudge is being significantly ripped off in the standard evaluation for defense (like say, Jose Molina).

I certainly have not done the work to determine this, however. I would say that Pudge is shortchanged in terms of WAR regardless if you compare him to other players (especially first basemen).
   41. PreservedFish Posted: April 19, 2012 at 02:25 AM (#4110312)
I also feel like there was a more general sense in Rodriguez's younger days that he didn't handle pitchers very well or do those "little things" behind the plate that supposedly great defensive catchers do... he eventually acquired the wily veteran and handler of young arms sheen in his veteran years.


Also my impression.
   42. The Good Face Posted: April 19, 2012 at 09:50 AM (#4110400)
I also feel like there was a more general sense in Rodriguez's younger days that he didn't handle pitchers very well or do those "little things" behind the plate that supposedly great defensive catchers do... he eventually acquired the wily veteran and handler of young arms sheen in his veteran years.


There were definitely whispers along those lines early in his career, and it wouldn't surprise me if there was some truth there. He was very young when he came up, had an astonishingly strong and accurate throwing arm, and a ton of confidence. Young, super talented guy blows off advice and instruction from wiser elders... go figure. Once he grew up a bit, you stopped hearing that stuff.

Anyway, he was a truly great player and one of my favorites from the 90s. Thanks for the memories Pudge.
   43. BourbonSamurai, vassal of the Harpsburg Empire Posted: April 19, 2012 at 10:31 AM (#4110437)
I enjoyed him in Washington, he was a really good soldier.

lord, he couldn't hit anymore though.
   44. BDC Posted: April 19, 2012 at 10:55 AM (#4110464)
there was a more general sense in Rodriguez's younger days that he didn't handle pitchers very well or do those "little things" behind the plate that supposedly great defensive catchers do

Some of this came from Bobby Witt, who was unable to get any of his pitches over the plate in his original Texas stint, didn't get along well with Pudge, and didn't like throwing to him. When Witt returned to Texas in the late '90s, his maturity and control had increased, suddenly Pudge was no problem, and the "whispers" dissipated. I don't know how much of this issue was due to language problems, or to the unsurprising inability of two proud young guys of any ethnicity to get along well, but the Anglo media in Texas tended to see it as Pudge's problem, not Witt's.
   45. Der_K Posted: April 19, 2012 at 11:06 AM (#4110473)
Not to speak for tshipman (as I speak for tshipman), but I think he's referring to the idea, widely whispered during Pudge's peak, that Rodriguez would get fastball-heavy in his signals with runners on base. This was, theoretically, in order to give him a better shot at gunning down base stealers.

This idea was not a stathead creation.
   46. Dag Nabbit has the talking pillow Posted: April 19, 2012 at 11:24 AM (#4110487)
Cal Ripken Jr.'s all-time GIDP record is now safe.
   47. Lassus Posted: April 19, 2012 at 12:09 PM (#4110523)
Watching Ivan Rodriguez receive and throw at what seemed an actually inhuman speed was one of the true joys of baseball.
   48. Moloka'i Three-Finger Brown (Declino DeShields) Posted: April 19, 2012 at 12:46 PM (#4110562)
44: You'd think that, when a guy has a history of walking pretty much a batter per inning, he'd think to take the plank out of his own eye first.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Sponsor

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
JE (Jason Epstein)
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

Newsblog[OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926
(3912 - 1:45pm, May 22)
Last: Jolly Old St. Nick Done Jumped The Ship

NewsblogMegdal: The Reds have grown up together as a team
(12 - 1:45pm, May 22)
Last: Rants Mulliniks (formerly Cold Prosimian)

NewsblogSources: O's calling up Kevin Gausman
(1 - 1:43pm, May 22)
Last: rlc

NewsblogWhite Sox Ace Chris Sale Eats and Eats and Eats Without Gaining Any Weight
(101 - 1:40pm, May 22)
Last: Rants Mulliniks (formerly Cold Prosimian)

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013
(1080 - 1:39pm, May 22)
Last: Booey

NewsblogOMNICHATTER for MAY 22, 2013
(24 - 1:39pm, May 22)
Last: Mike Emeigh

NewsblogPosnanski: Jeff Francoeur and ANT
(68 - 1:36pm, May 22)
Last: gef the talking mongoose

NewsblogESPN: Chapman Eats18 Pastries, Blows Save
(9 - 1:31pm, May 22)
Last: Gonfalon Bubble

NewsblogGattis, Freeman lead Braves past Twins 5-4 in 10th
(7 - 1:30pm, May 22)
Last: DA Baracus is gritty and hits with RISP

NewsblogLATimes: Microsoft unveils new Xbox One console
(13 - 1:28pm, May 22)
Last: deputydrew

NewsblogGonzales: No plans to dismantle White Sox
(9 - 1:26pm, May 22)
Last: What did Billy Ripken have against Elroy Face?

NewsblogOT: The Soccer Thread, May 2013
(1065 - 1:23pm, May 22)
Last: FancyPantsHandle glistening with foreign substance

NewsblogArizona Diamondbacks broadcaster Bob Brenly says it’s time for robo-umps in baseball
(16 - 1:22pm, May 22)
Last: stanmvp48

NewsblogMike Trout hits for the cycle in Angels' 12-0 win over Seattle
(19 - 1:00pm, May 22)
Last: Hang down your head, Tom Foley

NewsblogSeamheads.com Adds 1928 Negro Leagues Data
(1 - 12:56pm, May 22)
Last: Eric Chalek (Dr. Chaleeko)

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out!

Baseball Autograph Signings
Baseball Card Supplies
Baseball Memorabilia
Baseball Collectibles
Baseball Equipment
Baseball Protective Gear

Page rendered in 0.2940 seconds
50 querie(s) executed