User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.2285 seconds
53 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. KT's Pot Arb Posted: February 19, 2013 at 11:28 PM (#4372333)No, but he would have played shortstop for Canada.
Whereas Major League Baseball was a non-profit association founded for the betterment of human-kind?
EDIT: I should add, if a guy doesn't want to play in the WBC that's his choice. But clearly some players want to play for their country (admittedly probably more than non-Americans than the Americans), and a lot of fans want to see their country play. I couldn't care less about Bud Selig's motivations for putting it on.
I actually have the same question about mlb.tv. In both previous tournaments I was in Canada so could just watch it on TV.
Top Canadian players routinely say that they'd planned to wash their hair that week and aren't available.
All three?!
In 2010, for example, Messi looked lost for much of the Cup as he just wasn't really in sync with his Argentina teammates the same way he would be playing for Barcelona.
Point being, I guess, that to me it seems the best soccer in the world is really being played in the Champions' League, and not at the World Cup, although it is probably blasphemous to say so.
I see a lot of the same issues with the WBC. I don't think this is ever going to completely take off in popularity, certainly not here in the US. You might be better off having the US "World Series" champion take on the Japanese league champion or something like that if you want to see the highest levels of performance.
This of course supposes that the highest level of performance is the goal of the WBC. I think the draw of the WBC (for those who are drawn to it) isn't so much the calibre of play as the chance to see your country play. Adam Stern isn't anybody's idea of a good player, but the fondest memory of my baseball fandom is his performance in the Canadian victory over the US in 2006. The Japanese, Koreans, Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, and Cubans that follow the WBC aren't necessarily watching to see the best baseball in the world, they're watching to see their country represented. I think US fans are at a bit of a disadvantage in the WBC in that there isn't a whole lot for the US to play for. Any rational observer can see that the US is the best baseballing nation in the world, you don't need a tournament to prove that...there's noting to play for. But for a Cuban, Dominican, Japanese fan, winning means a lot. They're watching with a chip on their shoulder as it were.
I think the comparison is there are a lot of people in Argentina who would rather see Messi win with Argentina rather than Messi win with Barcelona even if he plays much better with the latter.
I disagree. If you want the "highest levels of performance", you've got that in the MLB playoffs. The Japanese champions aren't usually going to be any better than MLB playoff teams, and might be worse, so that won't help.
Moreover, baseball doesn't really have the same synergies as soccer. There's no reason to assume someone will hit worse because they're unfamiliar with the hitter behind him. With that in mind, I think the top teams in the WBC are probably the best teams in the world, even if they are not the best possible teams in the world.
This of course supposes that the highest level of performance is the goal of the WBC. I think the draw of the WBC (for those who are drawn to it) isn't so much the calibre of play as the chance to see your country play. Adam Stern isn't anybody's idea of a good player, but the fondest memory of my baseball fandom is his performance in the Canadian victory over the US in 2006. The Japanese, Koreans, Dominicans, Puerto Ricans, and Cubans that follow the WBC aren't necessarily watching to see the best baseball in the world, they're watching to see their country represented. I think US fans are at a bit of a disadvantage in the WBC in that there isn't a whole lot for the US to play for.
That's just it. There is exactly nothing to play for. The highest title in the game is the World Series. Everything else is just short of a beer league trophy. Its nice and the beer was cold. Hopefully. But it isn't the World Series. Its contrived and intrusive.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main