User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Page rendered in 0.5324 seconds
47 querie(s) executed
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, September 14, 2011
Keith Law: Moneyball
I’m sorta reminded of the time Effin’ Stink Lad (non-LOSH) cruised a dump on D.O.A.: A Rite of Passage because he was too close to the action.
Moneyball, the movie, is an absolute mess of a film, the type of muddled end product you’d expect from a project that took several years and went through multiple writers and directors. Even good performances by a cast of big names and some clever makeup work couldn’t save this movie, and if I hadnt been planning to review it, I would have walked out.
...Then there’s the baseball stuff, which is not good. For starters, the lampooning of scouts, which draws from the book, isn’t any more welcome on screen (where some of the scouts are played by actual scouts) than it was on the page; they are set up as dim-witted bowling pins for Beane and Brand to knock down with their spreadsheets. It’s cheap writing, and unfair to the real people being depicted. Current Oakland scouting director Eric Kubota also gets murdered in a drive-by line that depicts him as a clueless intern given the head scouting role after Beane fires Grady Fuson in April after a clubhouse argument (that never really happened). I’ll confess to laughing at the scout referring to “this Bill James bullshit,” although the A’s bought into that bullshit years before the film claims they did - and, in fact, hired Paul Depodesta three years before the movie-A’s hired Brand. (In the film, Fuson refers to Brand as “Google boy,” a term applied to Depodesta by Luddite beat writers in LA three years later.)
Repoz
Posted: September 14, 2011 at 10:46 AM | 326 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags: athletics, books, media, reviews, site news
Tags: athletics, books, media, reviews, site news
Login to submit news.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: OTP 2018 Apr 16: Beto strikes out but is a hit at baseball fundraiser
(787 - 5:13pm, Apr 19)
Last: Jess Franco
Newsblog: At long last, have you no sense of OMNICHATTER for March 19, 2017
(37 - 5:12pm, Apr 19)
Last: Moses Taylor, aka Hambone Fakenameington
Newsblog: It’s not just ownership that’s keeping Jose Reyes a Met
(10 - 4:52pm, Apr 19)
Last: RMc's Unenviable Situation
Newsblog: Bryan Price dismissed as Reds manager | MLB.com
(71 - 4:44pm, Apr 19)
Last: vortex of dissipation
Newsblog: OT: Winter Soccer Thread
(1494 - 4:43pm, Apr 19)
Last: AuntBea calls himself Sky Panther
Newsblog: Update: Cubs' Anthony Rizzo calls his shorter-season, pay-cut comments 'my opinion'
(95 - 4:41pm, Apr 19)
Last: Howie Menckel
Newsblog: Braves sign Jose Bautista to a minor-league contract, will play third base
(22 - 4:38pm, Apr 19)
Last: The Interdimensional Council of Rickey!'s
Newsblog: OT - 2017-18 NBA thread (All-Star Weekend to End of Time edition)
(2169 - 4:22pm, Apr 19)
Last: TFTIO is a very stable genius
Newsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 4-19-2018
(10 - 3:59pm, Apr 19)
Last: Tom Nawrocki
Sox Therapy: Lining Up The Minors
(7 - 2:54pm, Apr 19)
Last: Jose is an Absurd Doubles Machine
Newsblog: Deadspin: The Mets Previewed A Dark, Mets-y Future Last Night
(21 - 2:30pm, Apr 19)
Last: The usual palaver and twaddle (Met Fan Charlie)
Gonfalon Cubs: Home Sweet Home
(59 - 12:53pm, Apr 19)
Last: Moses Taylor, aka Hambone Fakenameington
Sox Therapy: Are The Angels A Real Team?
(8 - 11:23am, Apr 19)
Last: Jose is an Absurd Doubles Machine
Hall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1942 Discussion
(10 - 9:55am, Apr 19)
Last: DL from MN
Newsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 4-17-2018
(36 - 7:46am, Apr 19)
Last: Hysterical & Useless
(787 - 5:13pm, Apr 19)
Last: Jess Franco
Newsblog: At long last, have you no sense of OMNICHATTER for March 19, 2017
(37 - 5:12pm, Apr 19)
Last: Moses Taylor, aka Hambone Fakenameington
Newsblog: It’s not just ownership that’s keeping Jose Reyes a Met
(10 - 4:52pm, Apr 19)
Last: RMc's Unenviable Situation
Newsblog: Bryan Price dismissed as Reds manager | MLB.com
(71 - 4:44pm, Apr 19)
Last: vortex of dissipation
Newsblog: OT: Winter Soccer Thread
(1494 - 4:43pm, Apr 19)
Last: AuntBea calls himself Sky Panther
Newsblog: Update: Cubs' Anthony Rizzo calls his shorter-season, pay-cut comments 'my opinion'
(95 - 4:41pm, Apr 19)
Last: Howie Menckel
Newsblog: Braves sign Jose Bautista to a minor-league contract, will play third base
(22 - 4:38pm, Apr 19)
Last: The Interdimensional Council of Rickey!'s
Newsblog: OT - 2017-18 NBA thread (All-Star Weekend to End of Time edition)
(2169 - 4:22pm, Apr 19)
Last: TFTIO is a very stable genius
Newsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 4-19-2018
(10 - 3:59pm, Apr 19)
Last: Tom Nawrocki
Sox Therapy: Lining Up The Minors
(7 - 2:54pm, Apr 19)
Last: Jose is an Absurd Doubles Machine
Newsblog: Deadspin: The Mets Previewed A Dark, Mets-y Future Last Night
(21 - 2:30pm, Apr 19)
Last: The usual palaver and twaddle (Met Fan Charlie)
Gonfalon Cubs: Home Sweet Home
(59 - 12:53pm, Apr 19)
Last: Moses Taylor, aka Hambone Fakenameington
Sox Therapy: Are The Angels A Real Team?
(8 - 11:23am, Apr 19)
Last: Jose is an Absurd Doubles Machine
Hall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1942 Discussion
(10 - 9:55am, Apr 19)
Last: DL from MN
Newsblog: Primer Dugout (and link of the day) 4-17-2018
(36 - 7:46am, Apr 19)
Last: Hysterical & Useless
About Baseball Think Factory | Write for Us | Copyright © 1996-2014 Baseball Think Factory
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
I quite liked that one actually. Stephen Fry's detective was perfect. Though I tend to love Fry in everything so maybe I'm not the best judge.
Speaking of which, not a movie I entered with low expectations, more of a movie I had never heard of, but "Peter's Friends" is now one of my favourites. Fry and Laurie, Emma Thompson, Branagh...how could you go wrong?
Most annoying thing I recall is the audience applauding at the end of avatar. wtf is that?
I was also really surprised with the 2 recent Harry Potter films, esp part 1. My Wife's a fan of the books and so I've watched all the movies with her (To be honest, I'm not sure how many total there are or how many I've seen). The last 2 were the only ones that were complete piles of ####.
Same here. I saw Judd Apatow's name attached to it so I had high expectations. Upon repeat viewings on HBO, I've gone from being indifferent to at least liking it.
Isn't having sex/losing virginity the plot of every comedy movie featuring "high schoolers"?
Well, there is that element to Superbad, but it's really more a movie about two adolescents learning to gain independence from each other.
Most annoying thing I recall is the audience applauding at the end of avatar. wtf is that?
People applauded at the end of Avatar when I saw in theater too. Utterly perplexed me since I was massively underwhelmed.
Ocean's 13: All by myself. Kept my clothes on.
Greenberg: With my girlfriend. Kept out clothes on.
Low expectation movie: Well from this summer, Fast Five would be there, though it got pretty good reviews.
Two movies that I have seen in the past year, that I had high expectations for and still have no idea where to place them:
Observe and Report-which is a pretty damn dark comedy.
30 Minutes or Less-which is a dark comedy as well, my girlfriend did not like it, but I really enjoyed it...
Yeah the girls are almost incidental in Superbad. I think the final scene makes that pretty clear.
I've applauded at the end of some movies, although it's pretty rare. Honestly, I didn't at Avatar, but the theater did and I didn't begrudge them for it. The visual accomplishment deserved applause, even if the scripting ruined the finished product for me.
What did you think of Greenberg? I'm still mulling it over. My initial reaction was that it was a poor man's Punch-Drunk Love. I think I'm officially a big Rhys Ifans fan now though.
I think the final shot of them (uncomfortably) saying goodbye to each other is the takeaway. The girls are just a vehicle to that emotion.
Grady Fuson is in the movie as a character. He's just called Grady when he's onscreen. Later on he's identified as Grady Fuson when he's interviewed by a sports radio show. IMDB doesn't quite got everything right. They still have Kathryn Morris as Billy's second wife and she got left on the cutting room floor. I'm actually curious about the actor that played Grady, but he's not on IMDB or the official Moneyball site. I didn't catch his name when the credits rolled.
It's not at all common in my experience. At most, I've seen people should out "YEAH!" at big fist-pump-type moments.
See, what you're really saying here is, "All those stupid people applauded at a movie I feel is vastly overrated. How dumb are they?"
So just come out and say it instead of pretending to be baffled by something that's obvious to even the most casual observer.
Fun fact: An ex-gf claimed to have dated Wiseau briefly when she was 18.
Funner fact: Said ex-gf was going to be named "Mookie" if she was a boy, in honor of the Met.
Irrespective of the fact that I found the movie lame, it was the first time I've experienced people appluading in a movie theater. It caught me by surprise. Maybe this is a common thing that I'd just missed somehow until then, but that's what the "wtf is that" is referring to. Yes, applauding a movie (any movie) in a theater is perplexing to me.
I guess maybe unless it's a first screening with the movie's director in attendance or some strange scenario.
Or I could just be surprise. It is possible to disagree with someone else without believing they are dumb.
BIG cheer AND applause back in '77 for that one.
You need to go to a Woody Allen movie in Manhattan. Every one I've been to gets applauded, no matter how crap it is.
On a related note, on the night it was revealed Who Shot J.R., I was scheduled to umpire 4 rec league slow-pitch softball games in Austin. Not a single player from the 8 teams showed up, and my partner and I got paid for 4 games while sitting around shooting the #### all night.
youre tearing me apahhhht mookie!
Also, I might have been the only person in the theater when they needed to check the print for serious breaks in the physical film itself. I guess the projectionist wasn't paying attention so they wanted someone who actually wanted to watch the movie.
I've experience applause at the end of a movie a few times, and it always perplexes me.
Agree. I was blown away by Apes. They were able to communicate a lot just through animated body language, and the interactions with the live actors as fantastic as well.
Not a first date, but I took a college girlfriend to see "The Crying Game". I had been really eager to see the movie; she was really eager to make out in the theater balcony. When the weiner showed up, it definitely shifted the tone of the date.
Wasn't this in Brave New World
But what about the movie?
I'm kind of perplexed you guys are perplexed. People just want to express appreciation and I don't think it matters that the movie can't hear them. I think for a lot of people it's just a way to release the emotion/tension/whatever they were feeling after an experience they found engrossing, so that the director or the actors aren't there to take a bow doesn't really matter.
I tried to get an applause thing going at a packed screening of "Independence Day," right after the President's big speech.
Sadly, the sarcasm must've been audible somehow, because it didn't take. Stupid Berkeley crowds.
She was compelled enough to take an interest in the story and you got the urge to make out?
You must've left pretty early. I didn't finish watching this, but certainly not because it was boring. Excruciating, yes. Boring, no.
The only movie I ever walked out of was "Three Amigos." There was a party to go to, and just wasn't feeling it despite being a big Chase/Martin fan.
Well that's definitely an Option J moment if I ever heard one.
Not a movie, but still sort of relevant: My parents' first date was to a performance of "Equus".
1) I went to the Crying Game on a first date in high school. I wasn't super interested in the girl anyway, and then the movie was ... whatever it was. Sparks did not fly.
2) I have never walked out of a movie, but the only one that tempted me was Sabrina. (Date, with the future wife this time.)
3) On a related note, Harrison Ford is a terrible actor. I enjoyed Indiana Jones and Star Wars, so maybe he was good back then, but he has been awful for multiple decades now. One of the worst actors ever. Just terrible. Was he good in those old good movies? Or were the movies good enough for his suckiness to go unnoticed?
4) When was the last movie with Harrison Ford that was good? The Fugitive? I liked that one too. Did he suck then?
When I was little, I talked my dad into taking me to 'Starship Troopers', and he made me leave after the first 5 minutes (when I say little I mean sub-10, which is weird because he'd let me see a lot worse). I couldn't wait for that one to come out on home video.
I walked out of 'The Recruit' because I was there on a date with the dumbest girl who ever lived. I left her sitting there and went back to see the movie alone the next day.
*shrug* if you say so. Still seems queer to me. Do you applaud after each song finishes on your car radio? Haha, teasing.
Not sure when it happened -- I'd have to go back and re-watch his movies. But he was definitely good back in Star Wars/etc. In fact, in Star Wars he's clearly out-acting almost everybody around him (the difference between him and Hamill is striking).
It's possible that the swashbuckling rogue is the only part he can handle, I suppose. My memory insists he was good as Jack Ryan in all those Clancy movies, but as I hit the mid-40's I've found my memory isn't worth a pair of dingo's kidneys.
Not a Ferrel movie by any stretch but you might want to check out the Aussie film Jindabyne which is based on "So Much Water So Close to Home." Far from brilliant but OK for what it is and Laura Linney's in it.
And I like Love, Actually although that's for the Alan Rickman-Emma Thompson and Laura Linney scenes. And Keira Knightley is super dreamy cute in that one.
Did walk out on The Frisco Kid ... I think we went over to one of the other theaters and caught the Muppet Movie actually.
I do remember seeing Romeo & Juliet in high school with a girlfriend on opening night, in a packed theater with plenty of other high school kids, mostly girls. When Leonardo DiCaprio made his appearance on-screen, the audience cheered and whooped wildly. This was just before the peak of DiCaprio's heart-throbbiness.
If you missed the end, you're in luck, because the re-make opens this week.
I don't go to the movies very much any more (damn kids) but occasionally I sneak out after everyone's gone to bed to the late show. At least three times in the last year, somebody's conversation in the back of the theater has caused some sort of confrontation (theater employees summoned in the middle of the movie, actual physical fight after the movie between the offender and the offended, etc.) So while I appreciate the MST3K mindset- it really is better if you just shut your hole.
I don't think I've ever left a movie early. I also went to see The Crying Game for a date in college on opening night. It's weird so many people here did the same thing.
Agreed. Another one my kids pushed me into watching. And Jack Black is one of those guys I usually can't stand, but every once in a while he's funny, and when he is, he's REALLY funny (IMO).
We yelled up but nobody seemed to hear. We didn't know whether to search around for people or hightail it out of there. Being thoroughly chicken, we chose the latter.
It was even more disconcerting than ogling a 15-year old Reese Witherspoon for 2 hours.
In 1994, the parents decided to take the family to The Lion King. I complained that I was too old (16) to care about a Disney cartoon (the other three kids were younger). So we agreed that I could go see a different movie instead, and the most suitable choice playing was Forrest Gump. What none of us realized was that Gump is like nine hours longer than a Disney cartoon, so the entire family ended up waiting forever in the car for me; couldn't come get me but couldn't drive away and strand me either. I would have left Gump if I'd realized; it was actually kind of boring for a teen who didn't really grasp AIDS and the cinematic history references.
I do wonder what this says about the Primates as a population.
Was she still there when you got back?
Only one movie has ever broken while I was watching it in a theatre.
At about the halfway point, it image started shaking, froze, and melted (just like you'd expect).
All that was left was the blinding white light.
Everyone waited in the theatre for 10 seconds, and finally someone stepped outside to complain.
The management came in and explained that by the time they got everything fixed, it would be too late to start again.
They gave everyone a refund AND a free ticket to a future showing of the movie.
Our group decided to hang around the mall for another 90 minutes and watched the next showing.
The movie?
No word of a lie, it was this one.
It's really hard for a really bad actor to be on screen a lot and the movie to turn out well. The exception that proves this rule is Keanu Reeves in Speed or The Matrix: surround him with enough activity, and the film can be watchable.
Is that true of Ford? I don't really think so. He's good in an important small part in The Conversation, for instance, an exceptionally good movie. He was good in Star Wars, Empire, Blade Runner, and Raiders in an action-hero kind of way, which might tend to put him in the Keanu category. But he's also good in Witness, Presumed Innocent, and The Fugitive, much quieter movies with actual human psychology on display.
As for stuff he's done since ... yes, a lot of it has been bad. He's one of the major stars who after reaching stardom never really wanted to work unless he was top-billed and the film was a vehicle for him. That's OK, but soon enough there are no parts left for you. Even Sean Connery (in The Untouchables) realized he would have to do some character stuff to gain more respect as an actor. Ford tried that last year in Morning Glory, but the results were mixed. (Some reviewer said of Morning Glory that Ford, playing a guy who doesn't want to be in a TV show, acts like he doesn't even want to be in the movie.)
Ghostbusters is returning to theaters this fall.
Bad news, it's in support of the sequel Dan Aykroyd insists on making, with, or without, Bill Murray.
Doesn't that sound fun?
I've only been amused by audience yelling once - at the end of the first LOTR flick, a moviegoer on the front row, not knowing this was the beginning of a series, stood up and shouted 'oh no you didn't ... I'm gonna call the mayor!"
Portman is fine, she just doesn't have a lot of range.
Three Amigos was great. (Granted that's based on kid recollections.) So was the Frisco Kid (same deal).
I saw the Crying Game on a date too (not knowing the twist).
Gump was boring for non-teens too.
I am shocked this movie was re-made. I am not violently opposed to remake of relatively contemporary films like some people are but I just can't understand why a studio would greenlight this. I found it psychologically torturous, and I can't see how some executives thought this would be a profitably good idea.
But I have no idea how it ends. Maybe I missed something crucial enough to influence my opinion of the film.
It's possible that the swashbuckling rogue is the only part he can handle, I suppose. My memory insists he was good as Jack Ryan in all those Clancy movies, but as I hit the mid-40's I've found my memory isn't worth a pair of dingo's kidneys.
He used to be a terrific actor. The main problem IMO is that he lost his sense of humor in the early 90's, and ever since has played every role with the same grim monotone. It works in the Fugitive because of the part, but it gets really boring after a while. What made him so great in Raiders, Star Wars, Working Girl, and Witness is the humor and sense of fun he brought to those roles. Compare his performances in Raiders vs. the fourth Indiana Jones movie.
(BTW, Alec Baldwin was Jack Ryan in The Hunt for Red October and was much better in the role IMO.)
Wouldn't have surprised me if she had been. It wasn't exactly a complicated movie, but at one point I had to make a flow chart on a napkin for her.
Incidentally, I've walked out on more dates than movies. There was that one, and two where the girl talked on her cell phone at the table in a restaurant, in both cases I went to the bathroom when she picked up the phone and never came back. (I did call both of them cabs though)
Did you know there's a sequel coming out? I forgot the title (Hanna maybe?). Anyway it's got Mark Ruffalo in it and Anna Paquin too. Ruffalo plays a bus driver who hits a baby with his vehicle, or something like that.
Hate hate hate this movie. I fully agree with this review.
Nick Nolte, now there is a matched pair with Harrison Ford. Similar image and range and stature and talent, they're the same age; except Nick Nolte would never do a movie he didn't think was going to be interesting. Couldn't give a #### about how big the part or how much of a star he was.
I had a friend in Little Rock who pronounced it the greatest movie ever made. Nice guy, but a cornily earnest type of the sort who gets off on barbershop quarters & reading old children's classics & community theatre & growing vegetables & that sort of eye-rolling inspidness; it got to the point that I blocked his Facebook posts sometime last year lest I say something unfortunate.
Didn't see Godfather 2. I saw Godfather 3 and I knew my suspicions were confirmed.
This could be a worse sequel than Blues Brothers 2000.
I would not have thought that possible.
I was in a nearly full theater watching "Deconstructing Harry" (neither great nor crap). There's a scene where Woody's nihilist character is arguing with his Zionist sister, and she says, "What kind of Jew are you? You don't even care that six million Jews died in the Holocaust!" To which Woody replies, "Well, my attitude is, records were made to be broken." I laugh long and hard, and absolutely no one else in the theater does. After about ten seconds, my friend starts laughing-- not at the joke, but at the sound of single person laughing in a packed theater.
While watching "City Lights," the film broke at the 87 and a 1/2 minute mark. The only reason I can be so precise is that I just looked the movie up, and it is 88 minutes long. We had to wait about 20 minutes to see the last 15 seconds.
Heh, I get what you're saying, and it's a funny example, but even I wouldn't walk out on a movie that early. If a movie is garbage through an entire hour, it isn't going to get any better.
Also I know it's a hot topic, but I didn't think III was that bad; worse than the prior too but better than a lot of movies. I think the context of how the movie came into existence has as much to do with its perception as anything.
As for movies being impossible, well, apparently there is a movie coming out soon based on the board game Battleship. No, I don't know...
I recently watched it and thought it was unbelievably dull, with a dopey plot about whacking a pope.
Ridley Scott was also rumored for a while to be attached to a Monopoly movie.
Ridley. Scott.
Last year some neighbors were watching the ninth inning of Game Three of the World Series on a big outdoor screen, and a minor emergency erupted, firetrucks on the street, etc. – somebody put the (satellite) broadcast on "pause." A still image of Neftali Feliz towered over the street while everything got sorted out, and then the firemen came over to watch the end of the game on DVR delay.
Maybe I should have taken that to the video time-shift thread. Are there any baseball threads on this site?
Here's the description:
Peter Berg produces and directs Battleship, an epic action-adventure that unfolds across the seas, in the skies and over land as our planet fights for survival against a superior force. Based on Hasbro's classic naval combat game, Battleship stars Taylor Kitsch as Hopper, a Naval officer assigned to the USS John Paul Jones; Brooklyn Decker as Sam, a physical therapist and Hopper's fiancée; Alexander Skarsgård as Hopper's older brother, Commanding Officer Stone of the USS Samson; Rihanna as Lt. Raikes, Hopper's crewmate and a weapons specialist on the USS John Paul Jones; and international superstar Liam Neeson as Hopper and Stone's superior (and Sam's father), Admiral Shane
That's right, Liam Neeson is in the ####### Battleship movie.
Here's the trailer, so everyone can see for themselves ...
I loved Cabin Boy at that age with such a deep passion that I'm afraid to revisit it and ruin the memory.
I think the obvious next step is "3e24: The Strat-o-Matic Story"
this is all kinds of funny, intentional or not.
As far as empty theaters, some brave and hearty soul made the decision to book Greenaway's The Cook, the Thief, his Wife, and her Lover at a local mall in north Utica. There were seven people in the theater, counting me and a friend, and three left. I found out one of them tried to get them to stop the film, and while they failed in that, they did succeed in having them pull the movie from the theater that night after only showing one day.
Yeah, they could probably do better, but I guess the guy needs work.
what gets me about allen nowadays is that its just so obvious he's writing the main character part for himself, but he's just too old to play the part now. i first noticed this watching john cusack in bullets over broadway. the trouble is the actor he picks to play him ends up doing a bad woody allen imitation -- see owen wilson in midnight in paris.
This was extremely painful with Branagh in "Celebrity".
Lucky for you, Vlad, Ridley's also got a Blade Runner
prequelsequel"reboot" in the works.I don't know how much better they could do. It's Monopoly. Bigger directors have more interesting projects they'd rather do.
anybody ever watch 'fortunes of war', that miniseries he made with emma thompson? he played guy pringle perfectly. which is to say i hated him with a passion, because guy pringle was a perfect idiot in the books the series was based on. but the more i see of branagh, the more i'm convinced he's exactly like guy pringle, so he's not a great actor, he's an idiot.
YOU SHUT YOUR WHORE MOUTH!
Larry David did a great Woody impression (or is Larry David always doing a Woody impression?) In Whatever Works. Really oddball movie with rapidly changing pace, but some fun moments.
Loved that movie, and you are right- I remember a massive exodus of other theater-goers when I saw it.
Six months later the film society showed it at my college, and some random middle-aged man came to campus and picketed outside with a sign that said: "WARNING: THIS MOVIE WILL RUIN YOUR ENTIRE DAY."
There was a Burke and Wills joke during Gallipoli and I was the only one who laughed in the American movie theater. I'm not Australian, I just know crap like that. I explained it later to my date who figured out that yeah, it was something that only I knew about.
Apparently it was a bad idea for me to rent Dolores Claiborne to watch with my wife's family, for reasons I still don't know.
i don't know why, but i went to that expecting to see an adaptation of 'officers and gentlemen', the book by waugh. boy was i pissed.
It can had really cheaply; it was probably one of the first $5 DVD bin denizens years ago.
One of those films that the studio really messed with - the ending exorcism stuff was tacked on with reshoots - but still excellent.
Blatty's other film that he directed himself is the also-excellent NINTH CONFIGURATION, with Stacy Keach and a ton of character actors you'd recognize if you were watching movies heavily in the 70s and early 80s. DVD is OOP, I think, but Warner's stuck it in one of those cheap multi-movie packs (EDIT: the "4 FILM FAVORITES: CULT THRILLERS" pack).
It seems that Vlad does not like Ridley Scott
Look, the guy's not perfect -- we knew that way back when, thanks to that snoozefest with Tom Cruise. But Alien? Blade Runner? Gladiator? Black Hawk Down?
Lifetime pass.
That was me in the theater for "Ed Wood." I still adore that movie beyond all reason.
Repeat until it sinks in: "Extended warranty! How can I lose?"
Don't forget it had Paul Dano and Emile Hirsch, two of our finest young actors.
Me too! I need to watch it again; it's been a while, but I do love that flick.
"Who wants lottery tickets?"
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main