User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.2165 seconds
55 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. joker24 Posted: February 21, 2008 at 04:59 PM (#2696509)That's awesome.
Here's mine: not only will the Orioles have consecutive losing season number 11, they'll finish with a worse record than the Nationals again, for the fourth year in a row.
If I had done this every year for the last century, I would have been right 99% of the time.
Nope. If you're talking the 20th century, he'd have been right only 96 percent of the time (not counting 1900). If you're talking the last 100 years, then his 99 percent is correct.
Funny, if y'all had shut the TV off and put your head in a spreadsheet once in a while, you'd know these things.
"Oh, that guy? I always wondered what his name was. OK, never mind, he's cool, his team can win the World Series."
Worse, he thinks he's still on the Red Sox, and that the Red Sox are in the same league as the Cubs.
didn't happen
Instead of "eerie", I'd go with "predictable".
If someone makes a great point about baseball but accidentally thinks that Lieutenant Commander Data served aboard Deep Space Nine, he's immediately shouted down and shamed on this board.
I once saw a disagreement between posters here in which one poster criticized the number of dots in the other poster's ellipses.
I wasn't commenting on the fact that we both had the same correction, but the similar way we structured our posts.
And if Kevin feels shouted down and shamed by my post, I offer my humblest apologies.
I meant the century from 1908-2007. Or does a century have to start with one and end with a nice round number?
Were we arguing?
If someone makes a great point about baseball but accidentally thinks that Lieutenant Commander Data served aboard Deep Space Nine, he's immediately shouted down and shamed on this board.
I was hoping to throw back a snark-laden post about how Data never achieved the rank of Lieutenant Commander, or that he did appear on the 28th Episode of Deep Space Nine but it's debatable whether he "served" or merely visited, but the amount of research I'd have to do to learn such details about a show (or shows) I never watched didn't seem like the proper investment of my time. I think I had enough snark at the bottom of post 8 to satisfy your concerns.
And if Kevin feels shouted down and shamed by my post, I offer my humblest apologies.
Just to be different from SoSH U, I've decided that I want kevin to feel shouted down and shamed by my post. I think it's about as likely as Crisp having an offensive resurgence, but what the hey.
I meant the century from 1908-2007. Or does a century have to start with one and end with a nice round number?
I think posts 7 and 8 both give that as a viable option - not that you need our permission.
I'm pretty sure he did in one of the movies, he had to walk on a plank on a ship in the Holo deck or something. It's been about 6 years since I've watched anything related to Star Trek though, so I am probably wrong.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main