User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.3841 seconds
55 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Hello Rusty Kuntz, Goodbye Rusty Cars Posted: June 27, 2009 at 12:57 PM (#3235038)Fixed.
And he and Beane had an angry meeting, where Bradley later said that he wished he had decked Beane.
Was that a rumor somewhere? I don't know the backstory to that...
Edit: coke to Kyle C.
A typical rumor was Johan Santana to LA, with MIN receiving Billingsley, Kemp, Kershaw and LaRoche.
So, Cleveland may have been willing to part with Lee for Kershaw and a bunch of other prospects.
Edit: Yeah. What they said, too.
By this time last year, we had multiple rumors of the Dodgers trading for C.C., Holiday, etc. Even a ridiculous on its face yet reported anyway Matt Kemp for the Pirates Jack Wilson rumor.
The haters would hear something like the Santana rumor and then call Ned a moron - although no trade like that was made or would _ever_ be made.
But this year I doubt there's the same level of discussion, since the Dodgers have a large lead, are about to get Manny back, and their most valuable trade pieces are mostly up in the big leagues, contributing to the Dodgers having a large lead. The Dodgers can stand pat unless the right deal comes along, and nobody will question the decision.
Santana/Meloan is nothing like Billingsley/Kemp/Kershaw/LaRoche - yet people judge Colletti as if he had traded away the latter.
In 132 games at 3B for the Dodgers, Blake has 32 DPs to 7 Es. Considering he was 98-75 at the moment of the trade, I wonder what's changed.
I don't understand why Torre keeps waffling with Weaver as a starter vs. reliever.
Elbert's back and doing well, but he's probably not a sexy enough name for Cleveland.
And Blake is nothing like CC. He has done some overpays. But you're right, he's avoided trading the best prospects - even the good prospects he's traded have mostly been guys who've fallen out of favor of the Dodgers or were blocked - although at times he's gotten almost nothing back for blocked players, which seems to me would mean you should keep them instead.
But I doubt the Dodgers trade for anyone like Cliff Lee, or even Washburn. Teams are going to value their own players too much to deal for prospects.
I sure hope so. When Schmidt was with the Giants he was a top tier starting pitcher, I'd go as far as saying he was as good or better than Derek Lowe with LA, the top pitcher on two playoff teams. A healthy Schmidt would make that rotation just plain sick, even with Wolf's predictable drop off.
Colletti took over in November 2005. Here are is trades since then:Looking at the players Ned traded off, I'd say there's no one who contributed to their new teams either immediately or consistently. EdJax is having a good year, but it's the fourth season since the trade. Navarro was an all-star last year, but has fallen off the cliff. Really, the one player I wish we could have back is Cody Ross.
As for what Colletti got in return, I suppose the contributions of Manny, Maddux, Blake and Marlon Anderson are enough to wash out the damage done by duds like Lance Carter, Mark Hendrickson and Julio Lugo.
Carlos Santana has a good chance of biting us in the ass if the Indians ever moved away from the V-Mart era. Or at least the Kelly Stoppach era.
I pin the loss of Werth squarely on the Dodgers training staff of the time.
Those fools couldn't keep Cal Ripken Jr. in the lineup
I had no problem with the Manny trade at the time - it was obvious that LaRoche's wrist wasn't right, and getting a great player is going to cost. I liked the first Maddux trade - dumping Izturis' contract was nice on its own, and Maddux was still a useful starter (not so much the second time around).
The big problem I have with Colletti's trades isn't that he has traded future stars, but that he has stripped the minors of much of its depth in trades that were unlikely to help, rather than conserving the depth for trades that actually would help. Manny was supposedly being shopped before the 2008 season, and while Navarro wouldn't have been a centerpiece, he might have been a very useful part of the trade, and in the meantime maybe Martin might have been getting more rest during the season. Guzman didn't work out, but as a former top prospect he likely had some actual trade value. Ditto for Jackson if he'd been a swingman for the Dodgers.
Don't go too far out on that limb. Soon it might think about shaking.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main