Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Monday, January 21, 2013

LATimes: Dodgers TV deal could mean another sports channel for Los Angeles

Get ready, Angelenos, another regional sports network may be headed your way!

Time Warner Cable is in advanced talks with the Dodgers for a deal involving the storied franchise’s television rights. According to the Los Angeles Times, Time Warner Cable is prepared to pay upward of $7 billion for the right to be in business with the Dodgers for the foreseeable future. A contract could be announced as early as later this week. This would be the biggest local sports contract in television history.

Currently, Dodger games can be seen on News Corp.‘s Prime Ticket channel. But that deal expires at the end of the 2013 baseball season. While News Corp. is still in the hunt, right now it appears that Time Warner Cable has the lead heading into the ninth inning of negotiations with the team’s new majority owner, Guggenheim Partners.

Although Time Warner Cable also has a Los Angeles sports outlet (SportsNet), which is home to the Lakers and has plenty of room to accommodate the boys in blue, the Dodgers are hot for their own channel that they would control. Given that Guggenheim spent $2.15 billion for the team, that’s hardly a surprise. It is banking on TV money to justify that cost and if it can own the channel too, that’s more potential gravy.

Tripon Posted: January 21, 2013 at 04:26 PM | 6 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: dodgers

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. Walt Davis Posted: January 21, 2013 at 09:05 PM (#4352212)
Huh? I thought the Dodgers-Fox deal was already in place?
   2. Gold Star - just Gold Star Posted: January 21, 2013 at 09:32 PM (#4352229)
Fox had exclusive negotiating rights through... end of autumn, about. But once that deadline passed, the TV rights were on the market.
   3. TerpNats Posted: January 21, 2013 at 09:36 PM (#4352232)
Someone explain to me what each of these two Time Warner channels would show out of season. Based upon MASN, I'm guessing the Dodger channel would show plenty of low-level college conferences (assuming Fox has already snapped up Pac-12 tier rights). Lots of Mountain West, WCAC and Big West action...go Anteaters!
   4. Tripon Posted: January 21, 2013 at 10:05 PM (#4352256)
Fox lost the Pac-12 rights when the Pac-12 created their own network.
   5. puck Posted: January 21, 2013 at 10:14 PM (#4352265)
So, this is about creative accounting? I too was surprised about the Time Warner talk, as I thought the Fox deal was all but done. When googling to find out what happened there, I came across this article talking about how the Dodgers were trying to structure the deal so MLB would take less money for revenue sharing.

Forbes reported that one possible scenario would have the Dodgers and Fox joining together to create the regional sports network. Fox would handle the money (ad sales) and pay the team the $84 million annual rights fee, plus the annual increases, but also would pay a guaranteed dividend of $100 million a year. It is that bonus payment that the Dodgers and baseball are at odds over, say sources. MLB argues that the payment is part of the TV revenue and therefore is subject to profit sharing. But the team believes it is a payment for the risk the owners took when they bought the team and that the payments could vary along with the value of the team, so MLB should not be able to claim it.
   6. puck Posted: January 21, 2013 at 10:20 PM (#4352270)
Would an a-la-carte pricing model be cheaper for most people?

The article gives the example of the Disney Channel being $1 per subscriber, but it would have to be higher on an a la carte model. I would guess most households think they watch a lot of different channels.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
SBB, Live from the Alt-Center
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOT-NBA off season thread
(1872 - 12:21am, Aug 23)
Last: tshipman

NewsblogOTP 22 August 2017: The myth of baseball’s depoliticalization
(263 - 12:21am, Aug 23)
Last: SoSHially Unacceptable

Sox TherapyThe Gauntlet
(87 - 12:01am, Aug 23)
Last: the Hugh Jorgan returns

NewsblogNever get involved in a land war in OMNICHATTER!, for August 22, 2017
(132 - 12:00am, Aug 23)
Last: LA Podcasting Hombre of Anaheim

NewsblogJustin Verlander's domination of Dodgers looked like an Astros audition | ESPN
(54 - 11:54pm, Aug 22)
Last: LA Podcasting Hombre of Anaheim

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 8-22-2017
(16 - 11:46pm, Aug 22)
Last: stanmvp48

Gonfalon CubsThat counted as Now
(20 - 11:42pm, Aug 22)
Last: Brian C

NewsblogMets' Steven Matz goes on disabled list | MLB.com
(36 - 11:13pm, Aug 22)
Last: Lassus

NewsblogThe totality of Rafael Devers, who is eclipsing everything thought possible
(26 - 10:19pm, Aug 22)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogThe Segregated Cornfield
(67 - 8:46pm, Aug 22)
Last: Renegade (((JE)))

NewsblogHow much is Tanaka worth? MLB execs weigh in on $67M mystery | New York Post
(2 - 6:28pm, Aug 22)
Last: Captain Supporter

NewsblogTaking Back the Ballparks - San Diego Padres
(75 - 6:18pm, Aug 22)
Last: Manny Coon

NewsblogColon becomes third active pitcher to beat all 30 teams
(70 - 6:11pm, Aug 22)
Last: villageidiom

NewsblogCan Scouts and Statcast Coexist? | FanGraphs Baseball
(6 - 5:48pm, Aug 22)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT: New Season August 2017 Soccer Thread
(167 - 4:49pm, Aug 22)
Last: He who brought the butter dish to Balshazar (CoB)

Page rendered in 0.2877 seconds
47 querie(s) executed