|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Monday, November 19, 2012
As Oscar Villarrealwilde Child once said…“The teams that the world calls immoral are teams that show the world its own shame.”
The Marlins last offseason were like a gluttonous fat man at the all-you-can-eat buffet, stacking the plate with his eyes and appetite without regard to practicality or the oncoming food coma. The team overspent assuming we’d fill the ballpark, which we didn’t, and that meant losing about $40 million in that calamity of a season. Even though management didn’t have to serial-killer slash the payroll, there were going to have to be cuts, so the team decided to take a wrecking ball to the blueprint and just start again. It is terrible for public relations and awful for fans, but they were going to cut $40 million somewhere. Unlike Micky Arison, who lost money every year he owned the Heat except last year, Jeffrey Loria doesn’t have enough money to keep losing $40 million a year even as the ballpark appreciates his and the franchise’s value. We might feel better if Jose Reyes was still here, but what’s the point of that if you are going to have to trade your pitching staff to cut costs anyway?
This was businessmen behaving like businessmen. Sports owners didn’t get rich in their cutthroat worlds by doing the moral thing. There are no charities in charge of sports teams. Although what the Marlins did feels immoral and indecent, it is up to our politicians to protect us from it instead of just assuming that people who have behaved badly before would act now in good faith. And we didn’t even get to vote. You can’t blame snakes for being snakes without putting responsibility on the zoo keepers.
And now? Well, this betrayal is going to echo and cost the Marlins paying customers. There is only one thing about this entire organization that anyone trusts today. It is Giancarlo Stanton’s bat. That’s it. Word is he didn’t want to be here long-term even before this recent mess, preferring California. If the Marlins can’t afford him, and he doesn’t want to be here, you know what that means. His value is high, his salary is cheap, and the franchise is back to its core philosophy after all that drunken spending. You will never get more prospects for Stanton than you will today. And, already surrounded by howling, how much worse can the customer hostility possibly get?
Repoz
Posted: November 19, 2012 at 10:10 AM | 12 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
marlins
|
Support BBTF
Thanks to dirk for his generous support.
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: PressBox: Boog Powell: Meat Of The Order (18 - 2:55am, May 19)Last: The John Wetland Memorial Death (CoB)Newsblog: [OTP-May] Politico: Congressional baseball game, May 1, 1926 (3278 - 2:21am, May 19)Last:  tshipmanNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread - May 2013 (936 - 2:09am, May 19)Last:  MaxwnNewsblog: Brian Cashman is keeping Ben Francisco around to “piss everybody off” (9 - 2:08am, May 19)Last: MM1fNewsblog: Pinstriped Bible: Albin: Is Ichiro done? (46 - 1:47am, May 19)Last: PerryNewsblog: Draft Features Rarest of Prospects: Redheads (26 - 1:42am, May 19)Last: Jarrod HypnerotomachiaPoliphili(Teddy F. Ballgame)Newsblog: Phil Wood: It's time for baseball to use technology to make sure umps get it right (6 - 1:08am, May 19)Last: Dale SamsNewsblog: BBTF SOFTBALL GAME IN NEW YORK--AUG 17 (294 - 12:17am, May 19)Last:  bobmNewsblog: Josh Hamilton's allergies not linked to drug use, doctors say (36 - 12:15am, May 19)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Powerball odds? Juan Pierre's homers are long shots, too (15 - 11:50pm, May 18)Last: bobmNewsblog: Holmes: Where does Miguel Cabrera rank among Tiger greats? (26 - 11:42pm, May 18)Last: Tulo's Fishy Mullet (mrams)Newsblog: OMNICHATTER for MAY 18, 2013 (145 - 11:05pm, May 18)Last:  botemanNewsblog: SoE (Megdal): It's Time to Finally Believe in the Orioles (16 - 10:08pm, May 18)Last: DJ Funky and the Smile Time Variety PlayersNewsblog: Bradford: Could this be the smartest Red Sox team since '07? (8 - 8:57pm, May 18)Last: TVerikNewsblog: Generation K: Baseball’s strikeout trend is growing at record pace (59 - 8:32pm, May 18)Last: Eric J can SABER all he wants to
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John Northey Posted: November 19, 2012 at 10:36 AM (#4305809)Sheesh - just looked at the Marlins payroll commitments for 2013 and beyond - Nolasco at $11 mil is the highest, then Escobar (via Toronto) $5 mil, then Hechavarria (via Toronto) $2.75 mil. Remove the $12 mil they paid out to Toronto & for Heath Bell and you have a net of just shy of $25 million before filling the roster with pre-arb players. Yikes. Given we all expect them to trade Nolasco and Escobar that would cut them to sub-$10 mil for non-pre-arb players.
I'll believe that when they open their books, and not a minute before.
Agreed. Not a chance in hell that this is accurate, unless Loria is taking even more from the franchise than previously expected before he submits the end number.
I also don't believe this, along with agree with 3 & 4, and said as much in the NBA thread when Arison claimed so during the NBA lockout.
The way the Reyes and Buehrle contracts were backloaded, and both lacking no-trade clauses, I think the Marlins made a cool, calculated decision about 2012. I'm sure the results for 2012 were worse than expected, but they had an exit strategy planned all along.
If the marks are angry enough at the end of the con that the con man ends up taking a long drop with a short piece of rope, then he's pretty foolish, too.
It has been all but forgotten, but Loria found an "anonymous" buyer for 20,000+ tickets for the final home date, just so that the Marlins would finish the season above the Expos in attendance.
James Woods's character in "Diggstown" said the difference between a hustler and a con man is that,
"A hustler has to get out of town as quick as he can, but a good con-man - he doesn't have to leave until he wants to."
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main