Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, November 20, 2012

Luck and Skill Untangled: The Science of Success | Wired Science | Wired.com

When we post articles which aren’t interesting to you, consider it regression to the mean.

Mauboussin: I think this is a cool analysis. I learned from Tom Tango, a respected sabermetrician, and in statistics it’s called “true score theory.” It can be expressed with a simple equation:

Observed outcome = skill + luck

Here’s the intuition behind it. Say you take a test in math. You’ll get a grade that reflects your true skill — how much of the material you actually know — plus some error that reflects the questions the teacher put on the test. Some days you do better than your skill because the teacher happens to test you only on the material you studied. And some days you do worse than your skill because the teacher happened to include problems you didn’t study. So you grade will reflect your true skill plus some luck.

Of course, we know one of the terms of our equation — the observed outcome — and we can estimate luck.  Estimating luck for a sports team is pretty simple. You assume that each game the team plays is settled by a coin toss. The distribution of win-loss records of the teams in the league follows a binomial distribution. So with these two terms pinned down, we can estimate skill and the relative contribution of skill.

To be more technical, we look at the variance of these terms, but the intuition is that you subtract luck from what happened and are left with skill. This, in turn, lets you assess the relative contribution of the two.

Some aspects of the ranking make sense, and others are not as obvious. For instance, if a game is played one on one, such as tennis, and the match is sufficiently long, you can be pretty sure that the better player will win. As you add players, the role of luck generally rises because the number of interactions rises sharply.

Jim Furtado Posted: November 20, 2012 at 06:47 AM | 5 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: sabermetrics

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. depletion Posted: November 20, 2012 at 08:37 AM (#4306599)
The same happens with negative feedback. Should your daughter come home with a poor grade reflecting bad luck, you might chide her and punish her by limiting her time on the computer. Her next test will likely produce a better grade, irrespective of your sermon and punishment.

Of course it's impossible to know if the grade is because of luck so obviously you try to determine why she got the grade: didn't do the homework, test was poorly worded, bad noise/odor in the test room, never really grapsed the material, etc. It's pretty mindless to write off results to "luck" without first seeing if they're "trend".
   2. Rally Posted: November 20, 2012 at 09:53 AM (#4306640)
Depends on the way the test is set up. If it's all multiple choice, with many difficult questions that lead to guessing, then luck is a big factor.

Back in my day, after those of us lucky enough to avoid sabre-tooth tigers made it to school, most of the tests were pretty easy if you read what you were supposed to read and moderately tough if you didn't.
   3. valuearbitrageur Posted: November 20, 2012 at 12:49 PM (#4306814)
In Poker the results = skill + luck works out slightly differently,

because mother ####### donkeys always get way more luck.
   4. Walt Davis Posted: November 20, 2012 at 01:08 PM (#4306836)
Not that it matters much but team outcomes (or batter outcomes) do not strictly meet the assumptions of the binomial distribution. The binomial is (almost certainly) a reasonable approximation. The independence of tests is probably the most "controversial" of the binomial assumptions for baseball (hot and cold streaks).

Also one doesn't normally think of discrete variables in a classical test theory (or "true score theory") way. It doesn't matter much once you're talking outcomes of 162 games or 600 PA but O = T + E is more conformable with continuous variables. For a discrete variable, P(O) = T (not usually expressed as a "true" score but go with it) or in the case of the binomial, E(O) = NT where N is the number of trials, T the true p of success and O the number of successes. As N gets large, the binomial approximates a normal distribution for most baseball-y values of T.
   5. dr. scott Posted: November 20, 2012 at 02:47 PM (#4306912)
Daniel Kahneman descirbes this quite well in thinking fast and Slow when an Israeli general tells him that positive feedback never works and negative feedback always works. when he praised cadets for a clean execution of some maneuver, the next time they try they usually dont do nearly as good, and whever he yelled at someone for screwing up, they always did better.

Kahneman was quite excited by this as he saw this as a perfect example of regression to the mean, but realized that regression ot the mean is one of the main reasons why people think megative feedback is so effective. This of course is most true in cases where you only praise or reprimand serious outliers. Yhere will always be a distribution of talent of course.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Guts
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogThe story of Alex Anthopoulos: From tragedy to prodigy to Braves GM
(1 - 8:30am, Nov 18)
Last: bfan

NewsblogStanton, Altuve capture first MVP Awards | MVP
(45 - 8:23am, Nov 18)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogOTP 13 November 2017: Politics, race now touching every sport
(1946 - 8:13am, Nov 18)
Last: Greg K

NewsblogFangraphs: Let's Make One Thing Absolutely Clear About Aaron Judge
(17 - 8:04am, Nov 18)
Last: I Am Not a Number

NewsblogOT: Winter Soccer Thread
(187 - 7:36am, Nov 18)
Last: Nose army. Beef diaper? (CoB)

NewsblogThe Eric Hosmer Dilemma | FanGraphs Baseball
(20 - 7:27am, Nov 18)
Last: Shock

NewsblogOT - November* 2017 College Football thread
(158 - 3:06am, Nov 18)
Last: cmd600

NewsblogBraves will lose prospects, and possibly a lot more, for violating international market rules
(48 - 1:30am, Nov 18)
Last: Armored Trooper VOTTO

NewsblogJim Palmer on Mark Belanger and Omar Vizquel: The Hardball Times
(86 - 11:40pm, Nov 17)
Last: QLE

Hall of Merit2018 Hall of Merit Ballot Discussion
(239 - 11:33pm, Nov 17)
Last: Rob_Wood

NewsblogOT - NBA 2017-2018 Tip-off Thread
(1391 - 10:34pm, Nov 17)
Last: SPICEY WITH A SIDE OF BEER ON A BABYYYYYYY

NewsblogJudge, Bellinger named BBWAA Rookies of Year | MLB.com
(86 - 9:25pm, Nov 17)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogDerek Jeter addresses Giancarlo Stanton rumors | MLB.com
(24 - 7:38pm, Nov 17)
Last: Khrushin it bro

NewsblogYu Darvish is out to silence his doubters after World Series flop | SI.com
(9 - 7:15pm, Nov 17)
Last: Misirlou doesn't live in the restaurant

Hall of MeritMock 2018 Modern Baseball Committee Hall of Fame Ballot
(72 - 6:47pm, Nov 17)
Last: Jarrod HypnerotomachiaPoliphili (TeddyF.Ballgame)

Page rendered in 0.2930 seconds
47 querie(s) executed