We get that Andy Pettitte is a God-fearing man, and originally that’s why he said he had to tell the truth about his dear friend Roger Clemens and the same performance-enhancing drugs that Pettitte says he used twice and only twice in his own career, because doing it more than that, like the rest of the dirty cheaters, would have been wrong, wrong, wrong.
Pettitte can’t have it both ways. Can’t have it both ways even as a beloved Yankee who won all those games for them, even as much as he wants people to like him. Again: He was either telling the truth four years ago in a deposition for Congress, or he was telling the truth the other day in Washington when his lawyer, Jay Reisinger, nearly walked him all the way to the witness chair like a parent walking a child to his first day of school.
It was a nuanced performance, you bet. Pettitte put himself in no legal peril, because this is the end of it for the government and steroids. After Bonds and Clemens, the government will close the books on ballplayers using steroids and other performance-enhancing drugs once and for all. And if you are one who never thought the government should have been involved in the first place, you will cheer like you do at the ballpark when somebody on your team has a big home run, or get the kind of big outs Clemens and Pettitte always got for the Yankees.
But if you give Pettitte every possible benefit of the doubt, he comes up looking like a huge phony here.
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. marko Posted: May 06, 2012 at 09:58 AM (#4124562)But Lupica can.
Excellent.
Brilliant.
You might note that the current asking price for that book in both hardback and paperback is one whole penny.
Another reason to keep the penny - otherwise someone may have to buy five copies of Lupica's work.
I love that film.
...unfortunately, I couldn't think of making any of the characters of the Clemens affair match The Man Who Shot Liberty Valance.
And he's wrong. Pettitte's trial testimony was identical to his deposition testimony. Just as Ray accurately predicted it would be in an earlier thread.
EDIT: Eh, maybe I should have read #11 first.
The motto of the NYDN I-team
haven't kept up - what's the main BBTF vibe on Pettitte re HGH?
good guy? bad guy?
This is just me:
The same as everyone else, but somehow the BBWA decided he was completely not to blame, which annoys me. I blame him for that annoyance. Also, he's a big liar.
It didn't help that he was eager embrace that special treatment.
I don't know, Andy Devine did a great Bud Selig.
HA! Far better the best I could muster (I stopped trying after my initial Pompey/McNamee broke down quickly. Very quickly.)
At least until this latest round of testimony, it seemed to be:
a) Pettitte made a mistake. It's like he smoked pot once or twice. Would you really hold that against him? (They bought his story, basically.)
b) Count da ringzzz (Bonds + Clemens' postseason achievements occurred while juiced.)
c) Clutch playoff work + Counting Pettitte's postseason stats on top of his regular season.
d) Most wins in a decade. (Beat that Rocket!)
It's just hilarious. Pettitte's undoing was not (a) using HGH, was not (b) lying about it over and over again. It was... (c) finally telling a consistent story.
Of course, his new critics are so obtuse that they don't realize his "new" story is exactly the same as his previous one... and so his battleship gets sunk.
This is the nonsensical logic being applied by the torch bearers of the newfound Character Clause. Though it's hardly surprising; excusing amps users while excoriating steroids users was always bizarrely irrational at best, dishonest at worst.
EDIT: cross posted.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main