Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, April 12, 2001

Maddux flirts with perfection

I’ve read some theories that Maddux would not be as effective with the new strike zone. That Maddux was only as good as he was because he got the extra 5 inches off the outside corner. I guess that theory is wrong.

The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 01:44 PM | 6 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags:

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 04:51 PM (#66663)
I didn't see the game either, but I saw the highlights on ESPN. From what they showed, his ball had incredible movement. Of course, they only showed a few pitches. I have been surprised all spring at the number of remarks implying that Maddux has been successful because he gets a wider plate. He takes what the umps give him. If the new strike zone is adhered to, Maddux will adjust and still hit his spots and change speeds. Give him his due.
   2. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 04:51 PM (#67120)
I didn't see the game either, but I saw the highlights on ESPN. From what they showed, his ball had incredible movement. Of course, they only showed a few pitches. I have been surprised all spring at the number of remarks implying that Maddux has been successful because he gets a wider plate. He takes what the umps give him. If the new strike zone is adhered to, Maddux will adjust and still hit his spots and change speeds. Give him his due.
   3. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 04:51 PM (#67906)
I didn't see the game either, but I saw the highlights on ESPN. From what they showed, his ball had incredible movement. Of course, they only showed a few pitches. I have been surprised all spring at the number of remarks implying that Maddux has been successful because he gets a wider plate. He takes what the umps give him. If the new strike zone is adhered to, Maddux will adjust and still hit his spots and change speeds. Give him his due.
   4. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:04 PM (#66665)
Nightengale's article in Baseball Weekly this week talks about how Randy Johnson is being hurt by not getting the outside strike. It makes sense when you think about it, as his pitches tend to start outside and come in on a righty, which is what makes him practically unhittable if you are a lefty hitter, because a pitch that looks it coming right at you ends up over the plate for a strike. His getting lit on Sunday (worst start since 1994 if I remember correctly) is decent evidence that they are not giving that pitch anymore. He did pitch well against LA in the opener though.

From what I've read (I know it's only a week and a half in), the impression I get is that they aren't giving the outside pitch too much anymore.
   5. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:04 PM (#67122)
Nightengale's article in Baseball Weekly this week talks about how Randy Johnson is being hurt by not getting the outside strike. It makes sense when you think about it, as his pitches tend to start outside and come in on a righty, which is what makes him practically unhittable if you are a lefty hitter, because a pitch that looks it coming right at you ends up over the plate for a strike. His getting lit on Sunday (worst start since 1994 if I remember correctly) is decent evidence that they are not giving that pitch anymore. He did pitch well against LA in the opener though.

From what I've read (I know it's only a week and a half in), the impression I get is that they aren't giving the outside pitch too much anymore.
   6. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:04 PM (#67908)
Nightengale's article in Baseball Weekly this week talks about how Randy Johnson is being hurt by not getting the outside strike. It makes sense when you think about it, as his pitches tend to start outside and come in on a righty, which is what makes him practically unhittable if you are a lefty hitter, because a pitch that looks it coming right at you ends up over the plate for a strike. His getting lit on Sunday (worst start since 1994 if I remember correctly) is decent evidence that they are not giving that pitch anymore. He did pitch well against LA in the opener though.

From what I've read (I know it's only a week and a half in), the impression I get is that they aren't giving the outside pitch too much anymore.
   7. Darren Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:09 PM (#66667)
David--

My thoughts exactly.

Further, I don't think anyone is questioning whether or not Maddux would be able to adjust. But how effective would he be after making those adjustments. If his high 80s, low 90s fastball has to move too close to the middle of the plate, he could be in trouble.
   8. Darren Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:09 PM (#67124)
David--

My thoughts exactly.

Further, I don't think anyone is questioning whether or not Maddux would be able to adjust. But how effective would he be after making those adjustments. If his high 80s, low 90s fastball has to move too close to the middle of the plate, he could be in trouble.
   9. Darren Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:09 PM (#67910)
David--

My thoughts exactly.

Further, I don't think anyone is questioning whether or not Maddux would be able to adjust. But how effective would he be after making those adjustments. If his high 80s, low 90s fastball has to move too close to the middle of the plate, he could be in trouble.
   10. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 06:33 PM (#66668)
If Maddux could consistently hit the spot 5 inches off the plate, I see no reason why he won't be able to hit the corner now. The guy has impeccable control and it does not matter if he only throws in the high 80's; it's the movement he gets on his pitch that makes him so tough to hit, along with keeping hitters off balance.
   11. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 06:33 PM (#67125)
If Maddux could consistently hit the spot 5 inches off the plate, I see no reason why he won't be able to hit the corner now. The guy has impeccable control and it does not matter if he only throws in the high 80's; it's the movement he gets on his pitch that makes him so tough to hit, along with keeping hitters off balance.
   12. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 06:33 PM (#67911)
If Maddux could consistently hit the spot 5 inches off the plate, I see no reason why he won't be able to hit the corner now. The guy has impeccable control and it does not matter if he only throws in the high 80's; it's the movement he gets on his pitch that makes him so tough to hit, along with keeping hitters off balance.
   13. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 09:18 PM (#66669)
I don't think Maddux hitting the corner now would be the problem either. But now that he might have to hit a corner that's a few inches closer to the plate and the hitter, his pitches might be easier to hit, which is the bigger issue. When he was off by two inches in the past, he'd still be three inches off the plate. Assuming he's trying to hit a spot on the edge of the the plate, when he's off by two inches now, it's right over the plate, which could be a problem.
   14. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 09:18 PM (#67126)
I don't think Maddux hitting the corner now would be the problem either. But now that he might have to hit a corner that's a few inches closer to the plate and the hitter, his pitches might be easier to hit, which is the bigger issue. When he was off by two inches in the past, he'd still be three inches off the plate. Assuming he's trying to hit a spot on the edge of the the plate, when he's off by two inches now, it's right over the plate, which could be a problem.
   15. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 09:18 PM (#67912)
I don't think Maddux hitting the corner now would be the problem either. But now that he might have to hit a corner that's a few inches closer to the plate and the hitter, his pitches might be easier to hit, which is the bigger issue. When he was off by two inches in the past, he'd still be three inches off the plate. Assuming he's trying to hit a spot on the edge of the the plate, when he's off by two inches now, it's right over the plate, which could be a problem.
   16. Robert Dudek Posted: April 12, 2001 at 10:16 PM (#66670)
Greg Maddux is a great pitcher for the following 3 reasons:

1) He has pinpoint control - not only in terms of not walking guys but also not grooving pitches.

2) His pitches all have incredible movement. I've never seem him through a "straight" pitch.

3) He knows how to keep the hitters off balance.

If it is true that the strike-zone has changed shape and become taller and thinner, I think Maddux is the type of pitcher (along with the high 95 MPH fastball types) who can adjust fairly easily. He has such great control that instead of working the corners he'll start to go up and down more. I have a pet theory that it's harder for a hitter to cover the strike-zone vertically than horizontally. We'll see how the new strike zone affects offensive levels, but the early returns suggest that walks are going to be dramatically down. Maddux might end up walking less than a man per 9 innings.

Of course he is getting older, so a loss of even 1 or 2 MPH off his pitches will make it much more difficult for him to be dominant. However, barring injury, I think Maddux has at least 4 more excellent seasons in him.
   17. Robert Dudek Posted: April 12, 2001 at 10:16 PM (#67127)
Greg Maddux is a great pitcher for the following 3 reasons:

1) He has pinpoint control - not only in terms of not walking guys but also not grooving pitches.

2) His pitches all have incredible movement. I've never seem him through a "straight" pitch.

3) He knows how to keep the hitters off balance.

If it is true that the strike-zone has changed shape and become taller and thinner, I think Maddux is the type of pitcher (along with the high 95 MPH fastball types) who can adjust fairly easily. He has such great control that instead of working the corners he'll start to go up and down more. I have a pet theory that it's harder for a hitter to cover the strike-zone vertically than horizontally. We'll see how the new strike zone affects offensive levels, but the early returns suggest that walks are going to be dramatically down. Maddux might end up walking less than a man per 9 innings.

Of course he is getting older, so a loss of even 1 or 2 MPH off his pitches will make it much more difficult for him to be dominant. However, barring injury, I think Maddux has at least 4 more excellent seasons in him.
   18. Robert Dudek Posted: April 12, 2001 at 10:16 PM (#67913)
Greg Maddux is a great pitcher for the following 3 reasons:

1) He has pinpoint control - not only in terms of not walking guys but also not grooving pitches.

2) His pitches all have incredible movement. I've never seem him through a "straight" pitch.

3) He knows how to keep the hitters off balance.

If it is true that the strike-zone has changed shape and become taller and thinner, I think Maddux is the type of pitcher (along with the high 95 MPH fastball types) who can adjust fairly easily. He has such great control that instead of working the corners he'll start to go up and down more. I have a pet theory that it's harder for a hitter to cover the strike-zone vertically than horizontally. We'll see how the new strike zone affects offensive levels, but the early returns suggest that walks are going to be dramatically down. Maddux might end up walking less than a man per 9 innings.

Of course he is getting older, so a loss of even 1 or 2 MPH off his pitches will make it much more difficult for him to be dominant. However, barring injury, I think Maddux has at least 4 more excellent seasons in him.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Rough Carrigan
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP: 5 December 2016: Baseball's New Collective Bargaining Agreement
(1787 - 8:51am, Dec 11)
Last: Jay Z

NewsblogWEEI: SOURCES: FORMER RED SOX MANAGER BOBBY VALENTINE BEING CONSIDERED FOR UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR TO JAPAN
(72 - 8:28am, Dec 11)
Last: Eddie Hart

NewsblogOT: NBA 2016-17 Preseason Thread
(1320 - 8:00am, Dec 11)
Last: Bitter Mouse, Space Tyrant

NewsblogOT - College Football Bowl Spectacular (December 2016 - January 2017)
(77 - 7:56am, Dec 11)
Last: AuntBea

NewsblogSarris -- Going off the record at baseball's winter meetings - Insider ($)
(14 - 7:49am, Dec 11)
Last: djordan

NewsblogLeyland Wants Change In U.S. Mentality In Next Year's WBC
(17 - 5:55am, Dec 11)
Last: Bote Man

NewsblogWinning in MLB is harder when everyone is smarter - SweetSpot- ESPN
(7 - 1:08am, Dec 11)
Last: Commissioner Bud Black Beltre Hillman

NewsblogRyan Thibs has his 2017 HOF Tracker Up and Running
(116 - 12:23am, Dec 11)
Last: Jose Remains The Most Absurd Thing on the Site

NewsblogHow Did Rick Porcello Go From Afterthought to Ace?
(17 - 6:14pm, Dec 10)
Last: Jose Remains The Most Absurd Thing on the Site

Gonfalon CubsCubs roster update - post Winter Meetings
(29 - 5:46pm, Dec 10)
Last: Andere Richtingen

NewsblogWhy the Adam Eaton trade wasn’t a panic move for the Washington Nationals - The Washington Post
(15 - 5:12pm, Dec 10)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogPitch boss on Fox baseball drama's struggle and future | EW
(11 - 4:42pm, Dec 10)
Last: RoyalsRetro (AG#1F)

NewsblogDexter Fowler's $82.5M deal with the Cardinals shows free agency is alive and well
(2 - 3:39pm, Dec 10)
Last: Barry`s_Lazy_Boy

NewsblogOT: October-November 2016 Soccer Thread
(380 - 1:01pm, Dec 10)
Last: I am going to be Frank

NewsblogJAYSON STARK ON THE WINTER MEETINGS: “I’M ONLY GOING TO REPORT INFORMATION THAT I AM CONFIDENT ABOUT”
(21 - 11:49am, Dec 10)
Last: McCoy

Page rendered in 0.2058 seconds
46 querie(s) executed