Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, April 12, 2001

Maddux flirts with perfection

I’ve read some theories that Maddux would not be as effective with the new strike zone. That Maddux was only as good as he was because he got the extra 5 inches off the outside corner. I guess that theory is wrong.

The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 01:44 PM | 6 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags:

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 04:51 PM (#66663)
I didn't see the game either, but I saw the highlights on ESPN. From what they showed, his ball had incredible movement. Of course, they only showed a few pitches. I have been surprised all spring at the number of remarks implying that Maddux has been successful because he gets a wider plate. He takes what the umps give him. If the new strike zone is adhered to, Maddux will adjust and still hit his spots and change speeds. Give him his due.
   2. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 04:51 PM (#67120)
I didn't see the game either, but I saw the highlights on ESPN. From what they showed, his ball had incredible movement. Of course, they only showed a few pitches. I have been surprised all spring at the number of remarks implying that Maddux has been successful because he gets a wider plate. He takes what the umps give him. If the new strike zone is adhered to, Maddux will adjust and still hit his spots and change speeds. Give him his due.
   3. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 04:51 PM (#67906)
I didn't see the game either, but I saw the highlights on ESPN. From what they showed, his ball had incredible movement. Of course, they only showed a few pitches. I have been surprised all spring at the number of remarks implying that Maddux has been successful because he gets a wider plate. He takes what the umps give him. If the new strike zone is adhered to, Maddux will adjust and still hit his spots and change speeds. Give him his due.
   4. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:04 PM (#66665)
Nightengale's article in Baseball Weekly this week talks about how Randy Johnson is being hurt by not getting the outside strike. It makes sense when you think about it, as his pitches tend to start outside and come in on a righty, which is what makes him practically unhittable if you are a lefty hitter, because a pitch that looks it coming right at you ends up over the plate for a strike. His getting lit on Sunday (worst start since 1994 if I remember correctly) is decent evidence that they are not giving that pitch anymore. He did pitch well against LA in the opener though.

From what I've read (I know it's only a week and a half in), the impression I get is that they aren't giving the outside pitch too much anymore.
   5. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:04 PM (#67122)
Nightengale's article in Baseball Weekly this week talks about how Randy Johnson is being hurt by not getting the outside strike. It makes sense when you think about it, as his pitches tend to start outside and come in on a righty, which is what makes him practically unhittable if you are a lefty hitter, because a pitch that looks it coming right at you ends up over the plate for a strike. His getting lit on Sunday (worst start since 1994 if I remember correctly) is decent evidence that they are not giving that pitch anymore. He did pitch well against LA in the opener though.

From what I've read (I know it's only a week and a half in), the impression I get is that they aren't giving the outside pitch too much anymore.
   6. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:04 PM (#67908)
Nightengale's article in Baseball Weekly this week talks about how Randy Johnson is being hurt by not getting the outside strike. It makes sense when you think about it, as his pitches tend to start outside and come in on a righty, which is what makes him practically unhittable if you are a lefty hitter, because a pitch that looks it coming right at you ends up over the plate for a strike. His getting lit on Sunday (worst start since 1994 if I remember correctly) is decent evidence that they are not giving that pitch anymore. He did pitch well against LA in the opener though.

From what I've read (I know it's only a week and a half in), the impression I get is that they aren't giving the outside pitch too much anymore.
   7. Darren Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:09 PM (#66667)
David--

My thoughts exactly.

Further, I don't think anyone is questioning whether or not Maddux would be able to adjust. But how effective would he be after making those adjustments. If his high 80s, low 90s fastball has to move too close to the middle of the plate, he could be in trouble.
   8. Darren Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:09 PM (#67124)
David--

My thoughts exactly.

Further, I don't think anyone is questioning whether or not Maddux would be able to adjust. But how effective would he be after making those adjustments. If his high 80s, low 90s fastball has to move too close to the middle of the plate, he could be in trouble.
   9. Darren Posted: April 12, 2001 at 05:09 PM (#67910)
David--

My thoughts exactly.

Further, I don't think anyone is questioning whether or not Maddux would be able to adjust. But how effective would he be after making those adjustments. If his high 80s, low 90s fastball has to move too close to the middle of the plate, he could be in trouble.
   10. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 06:33 PM (#66668)
If Maddux could consistently hit the spot 5 inches off the plate, I see no reason why he won't be able to hit the corner now. The guy has impeccable control and it does not matter if he only throws in the high 80's; it's the movement he gets on his pitch that makes him so tough to hit, along with keeping hitters off balance.
   11. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 06:33 PM (#67125)
If Maddux could consistently hit the spot 5 inches off the plate, I see no reason why he won't be able to hit the corner now. The guy has impeccable control and it does not matter if he only throws in the high 80's; it's the movement he gets on his pitch that makes him so tough to hit, along with keeping hitters off balance.
   12. The Original Gary Posted: April 12, 2001 at 06:33 PM (#67911)
If Maddux could consistently hit the spot 5 inches off the plate, I see no reason why he won't be able to hit the corner now. The guy has impeccable control and it does not matter if he only throws in the high 80's; it's the movement he gets on his pitch that makes him so tough to hit, along with keeping hitters off balance.
   13. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 09:18 PM (#66669)
I don't think Maddux hitting the corner now would be the problem either. But now that he might have to hit a corner that's a few inches closer to the plate and the hitter, his pitches might be easier to hit, which is the bigger issue. When he was off by two inches in the past, he'd still be three inches off the plate. Assuming he's trying to hit a spot on the edge of the the plate, when he's off by two inches now, it's right over the plate, which could be a problem.
   14. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 09:18 PM (#67126)
I don't think Maddux hitting the corner now would be the problem either. But now that he might have to hit a corner that's a few inches closer to the plate and the hitter, his pitches might be easier to hit, which is the bigger issue. When he was off by two inches in the past, he'd still be three inches off the plate. Assuming he's trying to hit a spot on the edge of the the plate, when he's off by two inches now, it's right over the plate, which could be a problem.
   15. scruff Posted: April 12, 2001 at 09:18 PM (#67912)
I don't think Maddux hitting the corner now would be the problem either. But now that he might have to hit a corner that's a few inches closer to the plate and the hitter, his pitches might be easier to hit, which is the bigger issue. When he was off by two inches in the past, he'd still be three inches off the plate. Assuming he's trying to hit a spot on the edge of the the plate, when he's off by two inches now, it's right over the plate, which could be a problem.
   16. Robert Dudek Posted: April 12, 2001 at 10:16 PM (#66670)
Greg Maddux is a great pitcher for the following 3 reasons:

1) He has pinpoint control - not only in terms of not walking guys but also not grooving pitches.

2) His pitches all have incredible movement. I've never seem him through a "straight" pitch.

3) He knows how to keep the hitters off balance.

If it is true that the strike-zone has changed shape and become taller and thinner, I think Maddux is the type of pitcher (along with the high 95 MPH fastball types) who can adjust fairly easily. He has such great control that instead of working the corners he'll start to go up and down more. I have a pet theory that it's harder for a hitter to cover the strike-zone vertically than horizontally. We'll see how the new strike zone affects offensive levels, but the early returns suggest that walks are going to be dramatically down. Maddux might end up walking less than a man per 9 innings.

Of course he is getting older, so a loss of even 1 or 2 MPH off his pitches will make it much more difficult for him to be dominant. However, barring injury, I think Maddux has at least 4 more excellent seasons in him.
   17. Robert Dudek Posted: April 12, 2001 at 10:16 PM (#67127)
Greg Maddux is a great pitcher for the following 3 reasons:

1) He has pinpoint control - not only in terms of not walking guys but also not grooving pitches.

2) His pitches all have incredible movement. I've never seem him through a "straight" pitch.

3) He knows how to keep the hitters off balance.

If it is true that the strike-zone has changed shape and become taller and thinner, I think Maddux is the type of pitcher (along with the high 95 MPH fastball types) who can adjust fairly easily. He has such great control that instead of working the corners he'll start to go up and down more. I have a pet theory that it's harder for a hitter to cover the strike-zone vertically than horizontally. We'll see how the new strike zone affects offensive levels, but the early returns suggest that walks are going to be dramatically down. Maddux might end up walking less than a man per 9 innings.

Of course he is getting older, so a loss of even 1 or 2 MPH off his pitches will make it much more difficult for him to be dominant. However, barring injury, I think Maddux has at least 4 more excellent seasons in him.
   18. Robert Dudek Posted: April 12, 2001 at 10:16 PM (#67913)
Greg Maddux is a great pitcher for the following 3 reasons:

1) He has pinpoint control - not only in terms of not walking guys but also not grooving pitches.

2) His pitches all have incredible movement. I've never seem him through a "straight" pitch.

3) He knows how to keep the hitters off balance.

If it is true that the strike-zone has changed shape and become taller and thinner, I think Maddux is the type of pitcher (along with the high 95 MPH fastball types) who can adjust fairly easily. He has such great control that instead of working the corners he'll start to go up and down more. I have a pet theory that it's harder for a hitter to cover the strike-zone vertically than horizontally. We'll see how the new strike zone affects offensive levels, but the early returns suggest that walks are going to be dramatically down. Maddux might end up walking less than a man per 9 innings.

Of course he is getting older, so a loss of even 1 or 2 MPH off his pitches will make it much more difficult for him to be dominant. However, barring injury, I think Maddux has at least 4 more excellent seasons in him.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Brian
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogAlex Anthopoulos accuses infielder Steve Tolleson of quitting on team
(19 - 5:48pm, Aug 31)
Last: bbmck

Newsblog8-31-2015 OMNICHATTER
(9 - 5:48pm, Aug 31)
Last: stanmvp48

NewsblogFan dies in fall from upper deck at Turner Field | www.ajc.com
(122 - 5:42pm, Aug 31)
Last: Barry`s_Lazy_Boy

NewsblogProposing a Callup Rule Change
(52 - 5:37pm, Aug 31)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogOTP - August 2015: Meet the … Baseball Owner Funding the 2016 Campaign ...
(4790 - 5:32pm, Aug 31)
Last: David Nieporent (now, with children)

NewsblogTim Lincecum's hip recovery stalls, and he might have thrown his last pitch as a Giant: "The bad days are outshining the good ones" - Giants Extra
(7 - 5:20pm, Aug 31)
Last: deputydrew

NewsblogJake Arrieta throws no-hitter against Dodgers | MLB.com
(43 - 5:16pm, Aug 31)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogWhat’s wrong with the Nationals? It’s the starting pitching, stupid. - The Washington Post
(18 - 5:16pm, Aug 31)
Last: A big pile of nonsense (gef the talking mongoose)

NewsblogPrimer Dugout (and link of the day) 8-31-2015
(16 - 4:59pm, Aug 31)
Last: Perry

NewsblogBlue Jays to name Mark Shapiro club president, replacing Beeston - CBSSports.com
(18 - 4:54pm, Aug 31)
Last: A big pile of nonsense (gef the talking mongoose)

NewsblogSB Nation: Pirates outfielder may have made the most chill out in MLB history
(59 - 4:52pm, Aug 31)
Last: A big pile of nonsense (gef the talking mongoose)

NewsblogThe Indians want a new minority owner — but the price isn’t right | New York Post
(19 - 4:36pm, Aug 31)
Last: cmd600

NewsblogOT: Monthly NBA Thread - August 2015
(154 - 2:43pm, Aug 31)
Last: Moses Taylor world tour 2015: Tel Aviv

NewsblogBraves’ record, attendance both in decline since 42-42 | www.ajc.com
(1 - 2:39pm, Aug 31)
Last: bfan

NewsblogSunday Notes: Heaney, Givens, Dombrowski, Lefties-vs-Lefties, more | FanGraphs Baseball
(2 - 2:05pm, Aug 31)
Last: cardsfanboy

Page rendered in 0.2491 seconds
43 querie(s) executed