Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Friday, August 17, 2012

Megdal: How will the Mets’ owners fare without help from the league?

Megdal adds this do wah diddy…“Manfred alert!‏”

But if Fred Wilpon and his partners are to survive another winter in charge of the Mets, it appears they’ll have to do it without M.L.B.‘s help this time.

“I can’t imagine that we would be providing such assistance,” M.L.B. executive vice president of economics and league affairs Rob Manfred said in an email Friday, when asked if M.L.B. would be a source of any financial assistance for the Mets over the remainder of 2012.

Manfred also confirmed that the Mets haven’t received any financial assistance from Major League Baseball since March 2012, when the loan was repaid.

In other circumstances, this would be good news: Teams that don’t need financial help, after all, wouldn’t have received any from Major League Baseball.

But the Mets are going to need additional money from somewhere. The $240 million they received from selling off minority stakes in the team back in March is already accounted for: at least $110 million to pay off a portion of what was a $430 million debt against the team due in 2014, $25 million back to M.L.B., $40 million to pay off a bridge loan from Bank of America that allowed the team to pay operating expenses last winter, at least $43.7 million in bond payments on Citi Field due in June and December, a revenue-sharing bill due to M.L.B. that totaled $20 million in 2011, $20 million in interest on a $450 million debt against S.N.Y. due in 2015, and at least $20 million in interest on the remaining $320 million or so in debt against the team.

Repoz Posted: August 17, 2012 at 02:24 PM | 11 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: business, mets

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. bfan Posted: August 17, 2012 at 03:04 PM (#4210709)
I guess someone needs to decide whether MLB franchises are increasing in value (it sure seems that way), but rolling some of that interest into the loan doesn't seem that imprudent a thing to do by lenders. And what exactly is this "a revenue-sharing bill due to M.L.B. that totaled $20 million in 2011"; revenue is income; bill is expense-I cannot figure out what that is. if it is a bill for going over some salary cap, that would be non-recurring for 2012, correct?
   2. Swedish Chef Posted: August 17, 2012 at 03:08 PM (#4210714)
And what exactly is this "a revenue-sharing bill due to M.L.B. that totaled $20 million in 2011"; revenue is income; bill is expense-I cannot figure out what that is. if it is a bill for going over some salary cap, that would be non-recurring for 2012, correct?

I think The Yankee Clapper can explain what it is, at length. He may be somewhat biased though.
   3. Randy Jones Posted: August 17, 2012 at 03:10 PM (#4210718)
[1] You really have no idea what "revenue sharing" is in terms of MLB teams? You have to be kidding.
   4. Mayor Blomberg Posted: August 17, 2012 at 03:19 PM (#4210727)
Chef, I think you mean Yankee Redneck, not the Clapper.
   5. Swedish Chef Posted: August 17, 2012 at 03:31 PM (#4210753)
Oh no, my apologies, nobody deserves to be wrongly accused of being obsessed with revenue sharing.
   6. charityslave is thinking about baseball Posted: August 17, 2012 at 07:37 PM (#4211073)
Oh, and don't forget the billion or so they still owe to Bobby Bonilla!
   7. Walt Davis Posted: August 19, 2012 at 05:45 AM (#4211748)
bfan, you've probably put it together by now but in case not ...

That means the Mets are a team that has to pay into the revenue sharing pool. So they have a "bill" for $20 M. Appoximately $1 M of that $20 M will be used to pay the power bill on that Marlins HR thingy.
   8. bfan Posted: August 19, 2012 at 07:29 AM (#4211753)
That means the Mets are a team that has to pay into the revenue sharing poo


That is what I thought. That means that is the mets have lowered salary in 2012 (no Reyes), then that is a non-recurring expense. The article says they are going to need money, and cite that number as paid for out of the 240 million they got in March. They do not have to pay that $20 million again; that is my point.
   9. Swedish Chef Posted: August 19, 2012 at 07:50 AM (#4211758)
The article says they are going to need money, and cite that number as paid for out of the 240 million they got in March. They do not have to pay that $20 million again; that is my point.

You're thinking luxury tax, the Mets don't have the payroll to be subject to that.

But they get to pay revenue sharing because they have above-average revenue from playing in New York, you can think of it as a tax on big-market teams. The only way for them to avoid paying revenue sharing is if their revenues tank, say if the gate shrank dramatically, and that would be worse. In the new CBA there are provisions for returning revenue sharing money to the club if it would have gone to a top-15 team. So maybe their bill will be lower next year anyway.
   10. bfan Posted: August 19, 2012 at 09:07 AM (#4211795)
Thank-you; I did not understand that element of the financial structure.
   11. Lassus Posted: August 19, 2012 at 11:02 AM (#4211848)
Someone check on Yankee Redneck. The fact that he hasn't shown up in this thread has me worried he got hit by a car.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Backlasher
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogThe Jeff Jacobs HOF Ballot: Keep The Voting Serious And Fair
(31 - 11:39am, Dec 21)
Last: Cargo Cultist

NewsblogDetermining Hall vote is no easy task | New York Post
(2 - 11:27am, Dec 21)
Last: bobm

NewsblogMarty Noble's HOF Ballot
(13 - 11:26am, Dec 21)
Last: Non-Youkilidian Geometry

NewsblogOT: Politics - December 2014: Baseball & Politics Collide in New Thriller
(5159 - 11:19am, Dec 21)
Last: Mefisto

NewsblogOT: Soccer December 2014
(321 - 11:13am, Dec 21)
Last: Swedish Chef

NewsblogOT: Monthly NBA Thread - December 2014
(763 - 11:07am, Dec 21)
Last: Norcan

NewsblogThe 2015 HOF Ballot Collecting Gizmo!
(162 - 10:55am, Dec 21)
Last: Random Transaction Generator

NewsblogGetting ready to gamble on Jung-Ho Kang | FOX Sports
(2 - 10:41am, Dec 21)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogThe Yankees’ plan in case A-Rod can’t play at all
(14 - 10:23am, Dec 21)
Last: BDC

NewsblogRuben Amaro Jr. says it would be best if Phillies move on from Ryan Howard
(37 - 10:07am, Dec 21)
Last: BDC

NewsblogDodgers biggest spenders in payroll
(8 - 9:16am, Dec 21)
Last: cercopithecus aethiops

NewsblogOT: NFL/NHL thread
(9190 - 8:37am, Dec 21)
Last: PASTE Thinks This Trout Kid Might Be OK (Zeth)

NewsblogGiants acquire McGehee to fill third-base spot
(5 - 8:33am, Dec 21)
Last: Greg K

NewsblogAP sources: Umpires, MLB reach 5-year agreement
(3 - 5:48am, Dec 21)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogAngels, Red Sox discontinue pension plans for non-uniformed personnel - LA Times
(23 - 4:00am, Dec 21)
Last: The TVerik of Lordly Might

Page rendered in 0.1946 seconds
48 querie(s) executed