User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets. |
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
Page rendered in 0.2399 seconds
56 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Never Give an Inge (Dave) Posted: September 20, 2011 at 06:33 PM (#3931016)Edit: Coke to Dave.
Yeah, I think this is an instance where you have to consider limiting the "bonus" granted for a bad defense (as it were). In other words, if he's got a lower-than-typical BABIP, then that's fewer chances for the bad defense to screw up, right? Or am I missing something?
Where's the next knuckler? Dickey, even though he's only had 2 good years, is only 8 years younger than Wake.
Charlie Haeger is currently 27 and has pitched a bit in the majors (but not in 2011), although with pretty bad results (career major-league ERA+ of 67, ERA in AA/AAA this year of 5.44). But, of course, aging curves are pretty weird for knucklers, so maybe he can still fashion together a career.
Probably playing outfield for a A/AA team, even though he's 3 years older than everyone else on his team.
He doesn't know he's a knuckleball pitcher yet, but at the end of this season a manager is going to tell him that he doesn't have a future with this team at his current position, and he's probably going to be cut after the World Series. The player will sulk for about a week or so, and then will catch a highlight of Wakefield or Dickey pitching. He'll grab a baseball from his equipment bag, do some Googling for "knuckleball grip" and start playing around in his backyard/schoolyard.
Or he'll follow a path like Dickey's. He'll be a conventional pitcher who approaches 30 and becomes aware that he's not going to make it as a MLB regular with his current arsenal. He'll pick up the knuckler somewhere and then work on it for a year in the minors. Then he'll get drafted in the Rule 5 and soak up garbage innings at the back end of a bad team's roster for a season. After that it's just hard work, a little luck, and a non-guaranteed spring training invite or two.
EDIT: This suggestion comes up every once in a while -- every time a team has a guy who's smart and hard working and with a good arm but who doesn't pan out for some reason, the team should have someone teach him a knuckleball, then send him to the Arizona fall league or somewhere to see if it sticks at all. It would be a minimal investment that would be covered if you pull just one R.A. Dickey out of your slush pile.
It's a zero downside, possibly high upside policy. Far too rational, apparently, to be applied by actual human beings.
It's a zero downside, possibly high upside policy. Far too rational, apparently, to be applied by actual human beings.
I'd employ it as often as I'd send my bats without a position to the AFL in catching gear.
To the points raised- the article was less about Dickey being better than Lincecum and Cain, and more about performing at roughly their level for a bargain price. However, the Met defense has been just awful this year. Really, not a plus defensive performer anywhere on the diamond. I wouldn't be shocked if that defensive allowance were accurate.
If he has played baseball long enough, and proficiently enough, to pitch professionally, the chances are that he already is familiar some variation of a knuckleball grip. I would be willing to bet that almost everyone who has played baseball at the Little League level or above has experimented with trying to throw a knuckleball at least once or twice. I could throw one in high school; of course only about 1 of every 25 would actually "knuckle". The rest would just sort of spin like a half-speed fastball, becoming an open invitation to an extra base hit (which is why I never threw one in a real game).
Good god yes, everybody fools around with a knuckler when playing catch, whether they're a pitcher or not. And a curve. I even used to fart around with a screwball, but that kind of hurt.
My knuckler would knuckle fairly reliably -- but it was essentially a formless lob, and I had no idea where it was going. If I exerted enough arm action/velocity to be able to actually control it, then it would lazily spin, and be the world's juiciest gopher ball.
Still, I can see why it would be something worth trying if a guy's basically going to wash out otherwise.
Plus, Dickey is not a conventional knuckleballer in that he throws pretty hard, as hard as he did as a conventional pitcher. His primary knuckler is relatively hard (70's-ish I think), but he throws a traditional flutter as well.
I think that a knuckleballer will be given less leeway than a regular pitcher, but I don't think he wouldn't be given a chance. Looking back at the three recent marginal knuckleballers to pitch in the majors (Haeger, Charlie Zink, and Jared Fernandez -- who am I missing?), it seems that only Fernandez should have gotten more of a chance than he did. Maybe the Sox should have called up Zink earlier in 2008 or given him another start, but his record of success in the minors was pretty short, and his one start was memorably bad. I think that the big problem is that none of the recent knuckleballers to make it to the high minors have been anything like as good as Dickey or Wakefield.
To be clear, I agree with you on this (and tried to acknowledged this point in #1 before diverting the conversation).
That's mitigated by his being a knuckleballer - you'd expect him to have a low BABIP (on average).
That's interesting. His BABIP was only .289 vs .280 last year, so I found it hard to justify a 15-run swing in defensive support (actually a bit higher if you prorate 2010 to a full season). I mean, .289 vs .280 is only about 5 hits a season. But if BABIP is down across the league, then that could mean a bigger change in defensive support for Dickey.
Anyway, I'm not going to dismiss the number out-of-hand, but I'd want to look into the components more.
Dickey has the added "weird path" bonus of being born without an elbow ligament. I hope this isn't knowledge so common that it is boring for me to repeat but Dickey, as a conventional pitcher, was a first round pick out of the University of Tennessee. As such, Baseball America put him (and some other guys) on the magazine's cover in posed picture. A Rangers' team doctor saw the picture and saw that, in the picture, Dickey was holding his arm in a way that a normal fellow shouldn't be able to. He then ordered tests and it turns out that Dickey was born without an important elbow ligament.
Long story short... I'm glad Dickey is having a good late career reinvention. If anyone deserves the baseball gods to smile on 'em, it's him. He has been dealt some weird cards but it is tremendously impressive how he has not only stayed in the game, but become a difference maker.
Not just any ligament, but the UCL, the same ligament that is typically stressed by the pitching motion and that Tommy John surgery replaces.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main