Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Sunday, October 14, 2012

MGL: How much does losing Jeter hurt the Yankees “on paper?”

~ BREAKING ~ Planet Waldling has just exploded! ~ BREAKING ~

With Jeter the Yankees score .03 more runs per game but allow .07 more runs per game, for a net loss.

The Yankees win .6% more often without Jeter than with him.

That is with Nix replacing him.

... So there you have it folks. Jeter is not worth any more to the Yankees than Jayson Nix.

Let the flames begin!

Repoz Posted: October 14, 2012 at 03:17 PM | 28 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: sabermetrics, yankees

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. jmp Posted: October 14, 2012 at 04:06 PM (#4269574)
mgl
Yes, I don’t have nix projected all that badly. Around 15 runs worse than Jeter I think. Maybe less. I’m not sure off the top if my head. And of course my projection for Jeter is far worse than his 2012 season.


At some point, when the season is over, don't the actual results matter more than the projection?
   2. Bowling Baseball Fan Posted: October 14, 2012 at 04:21 PM (#4269599)
A couple years ago this was something I would post all over the place. I'm not touching this at all.
   3. Shock Posted: October 14, 2012 at 04:25 PM (#4269611)

At some point, when the season is over, don't the actual results matter more than the projection?


No. What happened in the past doesn't matter; what matters is what we expect him to do in the future. To expect him to simply play the same as his 2012 season is as foolish as expecting him to play the same as his 2011 season, or his 2012 August or whatever. It's as foolish as assuming Cano would be the same in the O's series as he was in his 13 games prior where he hit .500 (or whatever.) None of it matters, it all matters.

Again, this mostly comes down to defense anyway. Nix's defense at SS is largely unknown.
   4. Walt Davis Posted: October 14, 2012 at 04:27 PM (#4269616)
Not reading the article but it depends on what he means by his projection. If he means a pre-season 2012 projection then, yes, he needs to incorporate actual 2012 performance. But if he means a projection of Jeter's current talent level which includes his 2012, then he's already done that. ZiPS provides a "rest-of-season" projection, no reason MGL can't do the same. A simple 3-year Marcel puts him at a 105 OPS+. Ding him for being a year older and that's probably 100. Using bWAR, Marcel would put him about 15 runs below average on defense or at about 1.6 WAR overall, both before applying the age penalty. An up-to-the-minute assessment of Jeter's true talent might well put him well below average because, even this year, he's barely above it.

But that's using bWAR. Using fWAR, in part thanks to their much lower replacement level, Jeter's compiled 8.3 WAR over the last 3 years compared to just 4.6 under bWAR. Since MGL is a fangraphs boy, it's hard to see an argument for a team being better without their above-average SS.
   5. JJ1986 Posted: October 14, 2012 at 04:34 PM (#4269637)
In his career, Nix went from being a 2B to being a 3B. Why would we expect him to be even adequate at SS?
   6. Voros McCracken of Pinkus Posted: October 14, 2012 at 04:38 PM (#4269642)
Well in terms of actual player evaluation, projections (small 'p') are technically all that ever matters. The past is always the past. Obviously any projection of playing ability for right now should include 2012 and include it to a considerable extent.

That said I can't imagine that Nix is a better player at short than Jeter. Sure Jeter as a shortstop defensively has all sorts of problems, and even offensively Jeter's big year with the bat is tempered by what looks to be the disappearance of his once large baserunning value. But there's no real evidence Nix is much of a shortstop either (and some that suggests he's a bad one), and while Nix is likely a little better on the bases with at least as much power, his on-base skills are pretty terrible.

I'd agree that on paper the dropoff between Jeter and Nix over a seven game series (or even two of them) has a negligible difference on the Yankees' chances, but I would say the loss of Jeter and the resulting sudden increase in the spotlight for Nix could have some more serious negative consequences as well.
   7. Voros McCracken of Pinkus Posted: October 14, 2012 at 04:39 PM (#4269644)
#5,

His first year out of high school in rookie ball he played short, so you'd assume he played there in high school. He played it so well he was a second baseman from then until now, with only occasional stops at short (with varying levels of success).
   8. The Ghost screws up everything with hubris Posted: October 14, 2012 at 05:11 PM (#4269702)
In his career, Nix went from being a 2B to being a 3B. Why would we expect him to be even adequate at SS?

Because he only has to be as good as Jeter?
   9. cardsfanboy Posted: October 14, 2012 at 05:33 PM (#4269758)
At some point, when the season is over, don't the actual results matter more than the projection?


Not for the likes of MGL, Cameron and Ray among others.
   10. Shock Posted: October 14, 2012 at 05:42 PM (#4269783)
If we're talking about evaluating the 2012 season, of course it's the results that "matter." If we're talking about how a player is going to perform over the next X games, they only "matter" in so much as they are important inputs for our estimation...
   11. JJ1986 Posted: October 14, 2012 at 05:49 PM (#4269803)
Because he only has to be as good as Jeter?


I think the ratio of the numbers (.03/.07) makes it look weird. MGL first posted that Jeter was 15 runs better with the bat; that ratio would make Nix 35 runs better with the glove. The actual numbers are about 5 and 11 which is more reasonable on defense, but doesn't look right on offense.
   12. Shock Posted: October 14, 2012 at 06:16 PM (#4269866)
MGL clarified that:

First of all, I said that the 15 runs was a guess off the top of my head. I was not in front of my computer.

Secondly, the .03 runs came from the sim. I said, one the lineup in the sim is completely different - I didn’t just replace Jeter in the 2 hole with Nix in the two hole. The sim also is a sim which means that it interacts all the players and includes base running, base stealing, etc. And finally, because the sim is a sim, the number of runs scored has sample error. The .03 could be .08 or .01 or just about anything.


In other words, he wasn't comparing Jeter to Nix -- he was comparing the Yankees lineup with Jeter vs. the Yankees lineup with Nix. A slightly different (but more important) measurement.
   13. JJ1986 Posted: October 14, 2012 at 06:25 PM (#4269884)
That makes sense. Cano, Tex, A-Rod, Swisher and Granderson all probably project better than Jeter and they all move up in the lineup now. Plus, you get some benefit in not having your best hitter 3rd.

It does (implicitly) underrate Jeter because they'd probably gain from just dropping him (or Ichiro) to 8th in the lineup.
   14. jmp Posted: October 14, 2012 at 06:55 PM (#4269979)
If we're talking about evaluating the 2012 season, of course it's the results that "matter." If we're talking about how a player is going to perform over the next X games, they only "matter" in so much as they are important inputs for our estimation..


The important thing there is how good mgl's estimation is. I think there's too much credit given to the projections when we get to outliers like 38 year old shortstops. I would be curious to see how many times mgl has actually done a good job projecting Jeter. My memory is that he hasn't done well at all.
   15. Voros McCracken of Pinkus Posted: October 14, 2012 at 08:25 PM (#4270125)
I think there's too much credit given to the projections when we get to outliers like 38 year old shortstops.

The problem is that ultimately you have to produce some sort of projection. Projections aren't just something math geeks like me do, everybody who does player evaluation has to do it, it's just the geeks do it mathematically. So does a mathematical projection do better or worse in such situations than other methods? Don't know without knowing the other methods and a way to compare the two.
   16. charityslave is thinking about baseball Posted: October 14, 2012 at 08:53 PM (#4270192)
Don't forget, the 2013 projection is for a 38 year old ss coming off a significant ankle injury. Of course, since its Jeter, he'll probably have a 5 war season and make all the doubters look foolish once again.
   17. PreservedFish Posted: October 14, 2012 at 09:06 PM (#4270221)
I would rather have Jeter.
   18. DKDC Posted: October 14, 2012 at 09:44 PM (#4270332)
   19. cardsfanboy Posted: October 14, 2012 at 09:48 PM (#4270344)
MGL Out


It's like for a robot he actually has emotions.
   20. SoSH U at work Posted: October 14, 2012 at 09:51 PM (#4270359)
MGL Out


Did something prompt that?

   21. PreservedFish Posted: October 14, 2012 at 10:11 PM (#4270409)
MGL Out


That is one of the all-time great blog posts.
   22. Voros McCracken of Pinkus Posted: October 14, 2012 at 11:30 PM (#4270609)
Did something prompt that?

An argument with David Cameron followed by a post by Cameron here:

http://www.insidethebook.com/ee/index.php/site/comments/so_how_many_times_does_leyland_have_to_get_burned/#comments

That is no longer there because it got binned.
   23. greenback changed his travels Posted: October 15, 2012 at 12:09 AM (#4270658)
Geez, if there's one saber-guy that could benefit from seroquel, it's gotta be MGL.
   24. Voros McCracken of Pinkus Posted: October 15, 2012 at 12:23 AM (#4270663)
{deleted} :D
   25. Don Malcolm Posted: October 15, 2012 at 12:30 AM (#4270667)
Yeah, yeah--and Rany's going to disengage from the Royals. Promises, promises. :-)
   26. Graham & the 15-win "ARod Vortex of suck" Posted: October 15, 2012 at 12:53 AM (#4270675)
I missed Cameron's comment in the Leyland thread. What did Cameron say?
   27. Walt Davis Posted: October 15, 2012 at 01:07 AM (#4270682)
I was not in front of my computer.

Secondly, the .03 runs came from the sim.


Now wait a second ...

MGL will no longer be contributing to the book blog? It's his own blog (shared with Tango). It's pretty bad when you get run off your own blog. Just kill the comments section or require that commenters make a $10,000 bet first or something.

   28. Renegade (((JE))) Posted: October 15, 2012 at 11:44 PM (#4272160)
MGL will no longer be contributing to the book blog? It's his own blog (shared with Tango). It's pretty bad when you get run off your own blog. Just kill the comments section or require that commenters make a $10,000 bet first or something.

Tres bizarre! Hey, does anyone have an idea how to push Chass over the edge?

EDIT: Stranger still is that MGL disabled the comments section for his good-bye post.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
Infinite Yost (Voxter)
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogMargaret Whitton Dies at 67
(4 - 12:44am, Dec 06)
Last: Gold Star - just Gold Star

NewsblogDodgers sign free-agent pitcher Rich Hill | MLB.com
(50 - 12:36am, Dec 06)
Last: Cargo Cultist

NewsblogNationals Taken Aback by Bryce Harper Contract Demands
(19 - 12:35am, Dec 06)
Last: Cargo Cultist

NewsblogOT: NBA 2016-17 Preseason Thread
(1177 - 12:24am, Dec 06)
Last: Dandy Little Glove Man

NewsblogOTP: 5 December 2016: Baseball's New Collective Bargaining Agreement
(146 - 12:06am, Dec 06)
Last: Chicago Joe

Sox TherapyWintry Mixing
(18 - 12:05am, Dec 06)
Last: the Hugh Jorgan returns

NewsblogDiamondbacks bring framing into focus with catching switch - SweetSpot- ESPN
(8 - 11:52pm, Dec 05)
Last: Howie Menckel

NewsblogSeamheads.com Launches Redesigned and Updated Negro Leagues Database
(2 - 10:55pm, Dec 05)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

NewsblogFive reasons Texas Rangers could say no to Edwin Encarnacion | The Star-Telegram
(8 - 10:45pm, Dec 05)
Last: Crispix reaches boiling point with lackluster play

NewsblogThe Royals are in a bind and will have to do something about it soon | FOX Sports
(18 - 10:40pm, Dec 05)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT - College Football Bowl Spectacular (December 2016 - January 2017)
(61 - 10:38pm, Dec 05)
Last: cmd600

NewsblogGiants sign free agent closer Mark Melancon | MLB.com
(22 - 10:17pm, Dec 05)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogHeyman - Braves Join Sale Derby White Sox Seem Serious This Time
(18 - 10:15pm, Dec 05)
Last: Bote Man

Hall of Merit2017 Hall of Merit Ballot
(3 - 9:22pm, Dec 05)
Last: Dr. Chaleeko

Sox TherapyThe Post Mortem Concludes - Not Players
(6 - 9:17pm, Dec 05)
Last: Jose Remains The Most Absurd Thing on the Site

Page rendered in 0.3414 seconds
47 querie(s) executed