|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, July 01, 2009
Lou Gehrig: All the arguing in the world can’t change the decision of the umpire…yeah, but now that the umps have Instant Replay!
July 4th will mark the 70th anniversary of perhaps baseball’s most famous moment. (And maybe the most famous speech in sports history—is “Win one for the Gipper” close?) Lou Gehrig’s “Luckiest Man” farewell to roughly 60,000 at Yankee Stadium took place on July 4, 1939. Can any athlete ever again be as beloved as The Iron Horse was during his 277-word farewell? Is it possible? If Gehrig had to deal with the 2009 world back in 1939, would he have been looked at the same way when he stepped up to the microphone at Yankee Stadium?
How could he? Can you imagine one of the three or four best hitters of all time going through what Gehrig went through, but having it happen today? It would be disgusting, 50 times worse than Jade Goody. You’d have TMZ parked in the Mayo Clinic. Some guy who was teammates for an hour and a half with Gehrig 15 years ago would come out with a scandal-filled book (yup, my money would be on Wally Pipp, too). And yes, you’d hear the whispers. “Well, his power numbers really spiked in 1927. How does someone go from 16 homers to 47?” It would never end. Probably some girl he dated as a freshman at Columbia would wind up as “The Bachelorette.” And all because a guy could hit a baseball.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (87 - 3:55am, May 26)Last: Athletic Supporter leads the nation in driftersNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (57 - 3:16am, May 26)Last: bjhankeNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012 (1834 - 3:06am, May 26)Last:  SpiveyNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (8 - 2:43am, May 26)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (119 - 1:28am, May 26)Last:  Swedish ChefNewsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (8 - 12:40am, May 26)Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamuraiNewsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (12 - 12:25am, May 26)Last: TriponHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (15 - 12:13am, May 26)Last: DanGNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (4 - 11:26pm, May 25)Last: cardsfanboyNewsblog: CSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day (18 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielderHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot (28 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: lieiamSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (20 - 11:24pm, May 25)Last: DanNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (27 - 11:16pm, May 25)Last: baudibNewsblog: TBO: Nerdy Rays head north (17 - 10:07pm, May 25)Last: PreservedFishNewsblog: Dodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic (22 - 9:38pm, May 25)Last: Cris E
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Bitter Calculus Instructor Posted: July 01, 2009 at 05:38 AM (#3238779)Gehrig clearly took steroids.
I invite everyone else to NOT RTFA.
and a sportwriter once saw this vial in his locker
Lost his college eligibility to play baseball as he played in a professional summer league.
Didn't take himself out of the lineup when he was hurting the team till very late
Yeah, some hero.
I don't read Posnanski that much, but I do read THT and a few other sites that I have on my reader, plus the occasional wire service or Yahoo Sports article. I'd rather read the comments here.
Given our culture's propensity today to (a) take the other side of any position, article, or stance (so if Gehrig was a good guy, there would be tons out there trying to rip him up and pull him back to the level of ordinary); and (b) love the "Oprah model guest" (someone who commits a bad act but then redeems himself by confessing his failings and his love for all that is politically correct), my guess is "no", Lou Gehrig would be just another guy the popular press ripped to shreds with innuendo, selective reporting and sourcing jealous rivals.
I don't see why this is a necessity. Jeter is pretty universally admired and he's a tax evading womanizer. Peyton Manning. LeBron James. Who is tearing these guys down? Ken Griffey at the height of his popularity wasn't torn down. I think people worry too much.
Of course not.
When Gehrig retired, the Yankees were only suspected of being the root of all evil in the world. With the benefit of 70 years additional history, we now have proof that they are the root of all evil in the world.
IIRC, he mentions it as a possibility but stops short of endorsing it as the truth.
I don't see why this is a necessity. Jeter is pretty universally admired and he's a tax evading womanizer. Peyton Manning. LeBron James. Who is tearing these guys down? Ken Griffey at the height of his popularity wasn't torn down. I think people worry too much.
And of course the obvious comparison to Gehrig would be Ripken, who gets sniped at by about .00001% of the baseball world for "selfishly" playing through slumps and for assorted other bits of trivia, but who otherwise has been treated like----well, like Lou Gehrig.
I agree with Shooty. It's perfectly possible even today to keep yourself out of the tabloids, and Gehrig, though he was a big celebrity, was pretty shy of personal invasions. (And it's not like the press in the 20s and 30s were a bunch of shrinking violets, even if there were some things no family newspaper would print.) In addition to Jeter and Griffey, think of Albert Pujols, who is pretty comparable to Gehrig as a player. Aside from pointless innuendo over whether he's the age that his baseball cards say he is, who has a bad word to say about Albert?
Edit: And it seems I agree with Andy too. Small cans of Coke all round :)
Cubs fans.
Brewers fans.
And I'll throw in another recommendation for Eig's biography: superb!
Today, Babe Ruth would be Barry Bonds to the power of John Rocker.
Hawking's kind of an outlier - the life expectancy is still damn short.
Next thing we'll find out is that Hawking's wheelchair is configured to slow down his personal time/space and Hawking is really only 28 years old.
Not if Babe out-performed the rest of MLB to the same extent he did during his career. It'd be "Babe being Babe", and allowances would be made. Babe would also have greater financial incentives (what would Babe get today, $40M/year?) to be somewhat discreet.
Bonds sure didn't get the Barry being Barry treatment. (Barry didn't have the charm of Babe, though. Babe was pure Id and people love that.)
Today, Babe Ruth would be Barry Bonds to the power of John Rocker.
Bingo. The press at the time downplayed/overlooked most of Ruth's indiscretions, and instead went full-bore for the characterization of him as the blithe, boisterous man-child, promising little Jimmy in the hospital bed that he'd knock a homer and then doing it, yadda yadda. Nowdays the emphasis would be completely in the other direction; he'd be scandal-sheet gold.
Today, Babe Ruth would be Barry Bonds to the power of John Rocker.
It's true that the question far more suits Ruth, but unless he started picking fights with the media, I'm not sure how much that the stuff you mention would stick.
Well, OK, maybe using Miller Huggins as a signal flag to attract the attention of a comely hoboess standing by the railroad tracks might have brought about a bit of chastisement. But he only did that once. (smile)
But I still think that Ruth would be seen much more (at worst) as a variant on Ozzie Guillen than as anything remotely like Barry Bonds. He always was good for a quote, his basic nature seemed relatively guileless, and even when it wasn't, the guile was so transparent that it had a certain amount of Homer Simpsonish charm to it. Unlike Bonds, he didn't always seem to be at war with the world at large, and unlike most of today's players, his personality wasn't pre-packaged and kept stuffed in a bottle. I'm pretty sure that the average fan today could still pretty easily relate to him in spite of all the scandals. Whether or not he'd escape the wrath of the generic BTF snarkmonger and "hypocrisy" seeker is another story.
Good idea for a handle, actually.
I'm with Dan. How much fun would it be to have Babe Ruth storming around the league these days? It'd be like Pacman Jones times Barry Bonds plus Latrell Sprewell all shaken up and fired out of a cannon called Espn_e! created just to cover him 25 x 8.
(As I started writing this I thought the notion might be fun, but the more I think about it the more I fear it would drive me from baseball.)
Right now that's the frontrunner for the understatement of the 21st century.
Good idea for a handle, actually.
Go for it, Bob. It's out there and available.
I'll take it!
Or Deadspin gold; at the very least.
I think there's a crucial difference. There was nothing malicious or mean about Babe.
He was remarkably good natured, did tons of charity stuff with kids, and had a killer personality.
I don't see why his womanizing would get any more negative press than Jeter's does.
He'd certainly be a tabloid favorite, but he wouldn't be villified.
Sounds like he'd be Shaquille O'Neal times Brett Favre minus John Daly.
As I understand it, Hawking is *the* outlier--there's no other documented case of anyone surviving as long with ALS as he has.
I had a friend who had the disease. It was terrible. At the end, you have to make a choice, go on a ventilator and "live", while becoming an incredible burden to all that love you, or dying. And dying not so well, basically suffocating. He went on the vent mostly for his kids, but 3 years later, during the evening, he accidentally became disconnnected from the breathing tube and died.
Unfortunately, I have a work colleague that this is now happening to, but he is not going to do the vent.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main