User Comments, Suggestions, or Complaints | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Advertising
|
Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats
|
AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets. |
For wholesale prices on baseball gifts and equipment, check these stores out! |
Page rendered in 0.1561 seconds
53 querie(s) executed

Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. TerpNats Posted: September 22, 2012 at 07:07 PM (#4243254)Shhh, we're supposed to be pretending that the Nationals sprang up out of the ground with no prior history!
Wow, that really surprises me. I guess strikeouts were low back when IP were high, but still. I didn't think 200 K was THAT hard to do historically.
Well, to be fair, Grimsley pitched for the Orioles for 4 seasons after the Senators moved to Texas, so the O's were the only game in town.
Oh c'mon now. You've got to be at least 50 to even remember when DC had baseball before the Nats. There can't be more than 20 people who actually care about this "it's been so long since DC had a winning team" silliness.
back when IP were REALLY high, 200k pitcher seasons were common. after 1892 and the 10 foot jump in distance between rubber and plate, 200k seasons immediately floundered.
after that.. times were different, the season shorter than today. Looked at from another angle, the first year where TWO major league batters struck 100 times was 1914 (thank you, Federal League). Next time that happened was 1937. In 2012, season nearly over but still room for more whiffers, there are today 91 major league batters with 100k+.
Expansion alone does not account for that. There were a myriad of other conditions lending themselves to the thin flock of post-1892 200k pitcher seasons, well documented elsewhere: strategy, emphasis on putting the ball in play and play for one run at a time, management demanding a batter skill set that emphasized making contact, weaker lineups 1 through 9 that afforded pitchers lesser challenges later in the order, pitchers easing up on those weaker batters to conserve resources and allow them to complete game (anything less than a complete game was basically NOT a Quality Start), and so on.
Fun game, congrats to Gio. Now maybe he can get a date.
6. Jose Can Youk Seabiscuit Posted: September 22, 2012 at 07:46 PM (#4243279)
I was really really really wrong about Gio a the start of the year.
That's what she said.
Mark me down as surprised that Johnson didn't K more than 200 in a season after 1916.
There are plenty of baseball fans in their fifties and over in the D.C. area. Just piss off.
Would have the best K rate in the modern era if not for Hal Newhouser in the same year.
Still a lot more people than the number of joint Nationals / Expos fans.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main