Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, December 21, 2004

MLB: Padres acquire outfielder Dave Roberts for Payton, Vazquez, minor leaguer and cash

GM Kevin Towers…..We are very pleased to bring not only a native San Diegan, but a key piece to Boston’s World Championship team in 2004. Roberts brings us a well needed table setter at the top of our lineup, along with tremendous range in the outfield to cover the spacious gaps at PETCO Park.


Thanks to Darren

Repoz Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:27 AM | 49 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags:

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 
   1. cal Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:21 AM (#1032755)
looks like they did ok getting rid of a guy they really weren't gonna use that much.
   2. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:30 AM (#1032773)
I don't think Vazquez is worth anything. Average middle infielder bat and not much of a glove. Better than Crespo, I guess.

Payton is just about exactly as good as Roberts offensively and defensively, but he's a righty, so he'll fit the team better.

Pauley seems to have a C+ prospect reputation, which is nice as a throw in.

The Padres threw in some cash too. If the Sox aren't taking on any money it's a nice little deal.
   3. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:34 AM (#1032784)
So much for Freddy Guzman getting the starting job in SD next year. This is a good trade for BOS, a great one actually (unless they sent $50M along). Gives them a great defensive OF who can play LF and CF and who packs a lot more power than Roberts. And a decent infielder too...
   4. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:34 AM (#1032785)
Cabrera got 4/32 from Anaheim. We get the #23 pick in the draft and another sandwich pick.
   5. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:36 AM (#1032788)
Vazquez is at ~ an average+ hitter for a SS/2B starter. He is in his prime and he murdered AAA last year. He will make an excellent utility guy, assuming he can play d. They could also stash him in AAA and try to get the non-tendered Eckstein for that job.
   6. Hendry's Wad of Cash (UCCF) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:36 AM (#1032790)
Not to point this out, but three players plus cash seems like a lot to give up for Dave Roberts.

Not that Jay Payton et al are much to write home about, but still.
   7. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:37 AM (#1032791)
Do we, JBH? Was Cabrera ahead of Finley in the FA list?
   8. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:37 AM (#1032794)
Great. As if BOS needs more draft picks...
   9. rLr Is King Of The Romans And Above Grammar Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:39 AM (#1032798)
This is a joke article, right? Dave Roberts was most recently acquired for a Rule 5 draftee (drafted off the Padres roster, no less) and spent the majority of his time in Boston pinch running. No need to send multiple players and cash for him.
   10. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:39 AM (#1032800)
ARE YOU KIDDING? Towers got raped here. ####. Payton is a defensive superstar. Vazquez is one of the best utility infielders out there (I bet he puts up an OBP within 10 points of Renteria). And then a minor leaguer and Towers is paying them. FOR DAVE ROBERTS?!?!?! ####. Thank you Kevin. You ######.
   11. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:45 AM (#1032807)
It does seem like a lot for just Roberts. But Roberts is a plus defender, a good hitter for a CF, and a plus baserunner. He's better than Payton. The other 2 make up the difference I suppose (Vazquez is supposedly lousy defensively).
   12. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:47 AM (#1032812)
Now, this is a F-CKING A trade for Theo.
   13. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:48 AM (#1032815)
He will make an excellent utility guy, assuming he can play d.
Well yeah, it doesn't look like he can play D though. Entering this year his 2B UZR was -18 in 73 games, and his SS UZR was -16 in 135 games.

Do we, JBH? Was Cabrera ahead of Finley in the FA list?

Finley wasn't offered arb
   14. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:48 AM (#1032816)
How is it so great? The Sox got a worse CF (though better for their needs), a utility IF, and a C+/B- TNSTAAPP. They also probably took on a little cash. It looks pretty even to me.
   15. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:49 AM (#1032820)
Those are scary-bad UZRs.
   16. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:49 AM (#1032821)
Vazquez' UZRs suggest he'll never be a major league regular at any position. He would be an ok backup IF, but he's nothing special.

Jay Payton, as noted, is the King of UZR. Righty, some pop, great glove, absolutely perfect 4th OF for Boston. It's a small move, but I like it a lot.

Roberts' speed, defense, and just enough OBP shoulfd be a great match for the big ballpark in San Diego. I'll be rooting for him.
   17. Repoz Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:50 AM (#1032823)
Roberts...At this point in my career, I need to continue to play and develop as a baseball player

hehe
   18. Srul Itza Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:50 AM (#1032826)
Roberts is a bona fidee post season hero.

No price is too high for the intangibles he brings.
   19. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:51 AM (#1032829)
Finley wasn't offered arb

Cool! Now we just Philly to sign Lowe, which would bump the Yanks #17 for Lieber back to the 2nd round, and give us the first rounder. BTW, this system for compesation is stupid.
   20. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:51 AM (#1032831)
Darren, I only said that because the Yankee fans on this thread appear truly pissed off. In all honesty, I'd rather have Payton over Roberts. But the Padres panicked when Payton went MIA in that huge park in SD and Freddy Guzman showed everyone he wasn't the second coming of Juan Pierre.
   21. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:52 AM (#1032833)
"But Roberts is a plus defender, a good hitter for a CF, and a plus baserunner."

Roberts seems to me like a player who gets overwhelmed when he plays full time. He thrived last year as a 4th outfielder and I think if he's removed from that role, he won't hit nearly as well. He also might not hit a single HR in Petco all year. Payton also has a higher career EQA (and had a good year in 03 (.275 EQA)) and is a better defender. I think Payton for Roberts would have been a fair trade, with the Red Sox getting the better end. This is awful.
   22. Repoz Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:52 AM (#1032834)
Michael Kay..."If Dave Roberts hadn't stolen that base..."

He wouldn't be involved in a 3 for 1 deal.
   23. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:53 AM (#1032836)
Maybe Philly will sign Tek instead?
   24. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:54 AM (#1032839)
I agree with J#1F here. (See, we can agree on stuff.)
   25. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:54 AM (#1032840)
But Payton makes tiwce what Roberts makes and Roberts has been a better hitter in recent years (I think). Plus the baserunning. I don't have UZR handy, so there may be a significant defensive difference that I'm missing.
   26. Urban Faber Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:56 AM (#1032847)
I guess Kenny Williams (Carlos Lee) drove up the price on speed.
   27. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:56 AM (#1032849)
Well, if he has to go somewhere, I guess that would work.
   28. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:58 AM (#1032856)
Darren, the Padres are sending cash to BOS so the salaries are probably a wash. And I'd think that Payton is as good, if not better, as measured by UZR. I think Theo got a major steal here.
   29. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:59 AM (#1032858)
Gee, I hope so.

Am I the only one rooting for someone to give Varitek an insane contract the Sox can't match, even if it means that the Sox have to sign AJ Pierioaerazki (who's clearly a worse player) with nowhere left to spend the extra cash?
   30. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:01 AM (#1032865)
"I agree with J#1F here. (See, we can agree on stuff.)"

Absolutely, outside of our opinions on a particurlar player of course.

"But Payton makes tiwce what Roberts makes and Roberts has been a better hitter in recent years "

Well, recent year. Remember, Roberts blew in 03. Blew hard. Plus, the Sox are actually getting cash, from the Padres. That just seems silly to me.
   31. Srul Itza Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:03 AM (#1032869)
Given that Cabrera just got 4 years, $32 Million from the Los Anaheim Angels, it is clear that Post Season Intangible Mojo is indeed a very valuable commodity.
   32. Mark Shirk (jsch) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:04 AM (#1032870)
Yeah, I don't understand why the PAdres gave up so much to get Roberts. At the same time, watching Jay Payton, I can't believe that he would be a defensive superstar. I usually trust UZR but damn.
   33. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:04 AM (#1032871)
From SOSH, via NYYFans:

Steve Hensen, ESPN 710am radio reporting on Randy Johnson trade - "what may be cause the problem in the trade is -- the Boston Red Sox. According to Hensen, one of the "simultaneous" signings/trades that has to happen for LA to do the RJ trade is to sign JD Drew. Well evidently per Hensen, Boston just bid more for Drew than LA may be willing to pay for. "

I would be crazy happy if we somehow got Drew. If you ignore the injuries he's not really any worse than Beltran. Who knows how he'd fit in though.
   34. The Kids Are Enright (1k5v3L) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:08 AM (#1032876)
Absolutely, outside of our opinions on a particurlar player of course.

OK, I'll stop bad-mouthing John Rocker.
   35. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:08 AM (#1032877)
Also, we nontendered Traber, DiNardo and Sandy Martinez.

Rotoworld seems to think they're just clearing 40 man space with Traber, and they'll resign him on a minor league deal.

Rotoworld says DiNardo would have had to open next season in the majors if he wasn't nontendered. I didn't know that. They better get him back though.
   36. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:09 AM (#1032879)
I'm guessing the Sox are getting enough cash to make the two sides even, meaning their payroll is going up slightly.

EQAs by year:

Player 02 03 04
Roberts 276 246 273
Payton 280 275 251

It looks too close to call there. I'm a little suspicous because a lot of Payton's goodness has come in Coors.
   37. Der Komminsk-sar Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:09 AM (#1032880)
"Vazquez is one of the best utility infielders out there (I bet he puts up an OBP within 10 points of Renteria)"
Whaaa? IIRC, he was outrighted to the minors last year - any team in baseball could have had him. I've got a soft spot for him, he's a smooth fielder, tries to get on base, and is a lefty stick in the middle infield - but he's not rangy, lacks power, and might not make the R-Sox bench.
   38. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:11 AM (#1032886)
Um.

Ugh.
   39. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:12 AM (#1032890)
"OK, I'll stop bad-mouthing John Rocker."

HAHAHA, that was pretty funny.

"Whaaa? IIRC, he was outrighted to the minors last year - any team in baseball could have had him."

I was basing that more on his consecutive .340 OBP seasons then last year. I didn't realize he fell off the planet. Still I think the 850 abs in 02 and 03 is more indicative of his talent then his 100+ last year. I bet he rebounds nicely.
   40. Mark Shirk (jsch) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:14 AM (#1032896)
That may sound like good news, JB H, but how much did they bid for Drew? He does haev some SERIOUS durability issues. And where would they play him? Is Nixon now a bench guy? Would Manny be leaving town? Damon?
   41. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:15 AM (#1032898)
Vazquez has been crappy just about everywhere he's played, defensively. The sample is small enough that it's certainly possible that he's a competent middle infielder. But given his continued minor league exile in the face of good hitting, I would assume UZR has Vazquez correctly as lacking the glove to really play those positions.

Payton's UZR projects him as a +15-20 CF, so he's a very nice addition. Although he's never really hit outside of Coors, he should be a big upgrade on Kapler.

So, on draft picks, the Sox get a 1st rounder from the Angels and a 2nd rounder from the Mets, plus two comp picks. They lose their 1st-3rd round picks from the FA signings. It'd be nice if someone in the second half of the first round takes Lowe. Draft day's gonna be fun.
   42. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:16 AM (#1032905)
Why the hell do we need to clear 40 man space? Don't we have about 5 open spots? And where did you get that info?

If the Sox are in on Drew, Manny is on the way out I'd guess.
   43. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:17 AM (#1032906)
I would be crazy happy if we somehow got Drew. If you ignore the injuries he's not really any worse than Beltran. Who knows how he'd fit in though.

That's the thing. What in the hell is going on if the Sox are bidding on Drew?

Theo does try to do interesting things. He's been pretty boring this offseason, so far.
   44. Larry Bowa Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:19 AM (#1032910)
Fellas,

Intangibles are worth 1.75-5.25 million/year, depending on the time and circumstances of the intagibleness. In this case, I would rate Roberts' intangible goodness at approximately 3.5 million/year given the magnitude of his intangible achievement in 2004. I see he has an IZR (Intangible Zone Rating) of 25.2, which is, of course, off the charts, which means King Theo got rooked by Big Daddy Towers.

If there was one base that needed to be stolen, and the weight of a franchise lay in the balance, I'd want Dave Roberts every time. That is an intangible worth having, because you just never know when that situation will pop up... but when it does, see, now you have your bases covered.

Brilliant... dare I say brilliantly sublime move here by Kevin Towers.

For those who are about to be intangible, I salute thee!

Your pal,
Larry
   45. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:20 AM (#1032912)
And where would they play him? Is Nixon now a bench guy? Would Manny be leaving town? Damon?

Maybe Ortiz. Would it be completely unrealistic for them to sign Drew, move Manny to DH and trade Ortiz for AJ Burnett?
   46. I Love LA (OFF) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:21 AM (#1032913)
Sweet. Come on, Omar, go get back Traber and DiNardo.
   47. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:24 AM (#1032921)
If there was one base that needed to be stolen, and the weight of a franchise lay in the balance, I'd want Dave Roberts every time.

I just watched the NESN DVD this evening.

That stolen base was totally awesome. If it were decreed that I should be forced to perform deviant sexual acts on a stolen base, I would choose that stolen base.
   48. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:26 AM (#1032924)
If they do, JBH, I expect some credit. I'd hate to see Ortiz go, but as I've illustrated before, Manny to DH and guy with bat AND glove to LF represents a sizeable improvement.

And of, if you think Traber or Dinardo is on Omar's radar, you may soon be getting a visit from Sonny the bird.
   49. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:29 AM (#1032930)
It is so decreed!
   50. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:29 AM (#1032931)
If they do, JBH, I expect some credit. I'd hate to see Ortiz go, but as I've illustrated before, Manny to DH and guy with bat AND glove to LF represents a sizeable improvement.

At some point last offseason I think I argued that trading Randy Winn for Ortiz would be a wash :P

"Trading" Ortiz for Drew is probably about a 3 win improvement. Then you'd get a freeroll on whatever value Ortiz gives you in trade.
   51. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:31 AM (#1032934)
The Sox have only one open space on the 40-man according to the roster at redsox.com, and that will be filled by a catcher.

The Sox wouldn't need to dump those guys, though, unless they have some more acquisitions to come.

I guess Theo might think this is the perfect time to slip those two past the rest of baseball. Plus, neither's all that good and Traber's probably not ready for ST.
   52. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:32 AM (#1032937)
Hmm, Randy Winn actually had a good year. I had thought he had been horrible for some reason. It probably still is pretty close to a wash. My attempt at self deprication has failed.
   53. Harold Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:36 AM (#1032943)
It's not really fair to say the Padres are sending cash as part of this deal; it's to offset Payton's $4M salary.

That said, I don't think that Roberts is better than Payton, but apparently Bochy and Towers do.

Vazquez is a terrific utility infielder. His raw number look OK, but look at his platoon splits: he's a 280/370/370 type against RHP. I think he slept with Bochy's wife, though, because Bochy does not trust him one bit and wanted him gone.
   54. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:36 AM (#1032944)
Why are they not that good? And would they have to have Traber on the roster on opening day?
   55. Larry Bowa Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:40 AM (#1032952)
Vinay,

I can't speak for Vazquez, but I can tell you I wouldn't sleep with Bochy's wife, and I sure as hell hope Vasquez has the ****ing sense to not do it, either.

Another intangible worth having: knowing which teammates' wife to sleep with.

Your pal,
Larry
   56. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:42 AM (#1032956)
"Trading" Ortiz for Drew is probably about a 3 win improvement.

But the upgrade involved there entirely separate from Ortiz. It's all replacing Manny's glove with Drew's.

I'd say there are three basic options for getting the Manny->Drew upgrade.

1) Trade Manny. Simple. Just, um, who'll take him? This is the best option only if the Sox have some bizarre need to cut payroll or if Beltran is a guaranteed sign if they can get the money.

2) Trade Ortiz. This is a somewhat larger upgrade than trading Manny, but it costs $15-20M more. That's a lot of extra cash. The return for Ortiz might be big, but there are so few big names on the market and even fewer open positions on the Sox roster for next year. I don't see it, honestly.

3) Trade Millar and Minky, move Ortiz to 1st. He doesn't look too awful there. Good arm, right? This would be the largest upgrade in wins of the three, I believe, and the second cheapest - only cost an extra $2-4M.

Possibly, the rumors about Theo's interest in Delgado could be a backup plan if the Drew acquisition doesn't come together, but he does trade Millar and Mientkiewicz. Though that is all, um, a little speculative.
   57. Earvin 'Gold Stars' Johnson Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:43 AM (#1032960)
Player 02 03 04
Roberts 276 246 273
Payton 280 275 251 
   58. Earvin 'Gold Stars' Johnson Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:45 AM (#1032965)
Just wanted to see what would do.
Consider my curiousity sated.
   59. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:47 AM (#1032968)
My had nice pretty spacing though.
   60. 6 - 4 - 3 Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:55 AM (#1032980)
Let's see...

Dave Roberts for Ramon Vazquez might make sense for the Padres.

Dave Roberts for Jay Payton with no cash transfers involved could make sense for the Padres.

Dave Roberts for some random pitching prospect would definitely make sense for the Padres.

Dave Roberts for all three plus cash to pay for Payton's bloated contract makes absolutely no sense for the Padres.

Kevin Towers is usually smarter than this, but I don't understand how this trade improves the Padres, talent-wise or financially. If he felt that he needed to get Payton's salary off the books, then maybe Vazquez and the prospect were necessary to grease the wheels. But sending the cash needed to equalize the deal is just plain nutty.
   61. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:58 AM (#1032986)
But the upgrade involved there entirely separate from Ortiz. It's all replacing Manny's glove with Drew's.

In a way, but DH would be improved with Manny there.

2) Trade Ortiz. This is a somewhat larger upgrade than trading Manny, but it costs $15-20M more.

Probably what you'd pay to unload Manny anyways.

3) Trade Millar and Minky, move Ortiz to 1st. He doesn't look too awful there.

My memory is that he does look awful there. Can't seem to bend over to field grounders and not much of a scooper. Plus there's the back issues.


Possibly, the rumors about Theo's interest in Delgado could be a backup plan if the Drew acquisition doesn't come together, but he does trade Millar and Mientkiewicz. Though that is all, um, a little speculative.

Where's that rumor from?
   62. 6 - 4 - 3 Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:58 AM (#1032987)
BTW, forgot to mention the obvious: great trade by Theo Epstein. He gets an outfielder who better suits his team's needs and a decent backup infielder, all without increasing his payroll. That perhaps doesn't mean as much for Boston as it does for other teams, but it's still pretty impressive.
   63. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:02 AM (#1032991)
It is so decreed!

Damn!

This is going to be really, really complicated - to execute and then to explain.
   64. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:05 AM (#1032998)
Er, for some reason it didn't even occur to me that Ortiz could play 1B.

I'm not sure if that's the best deal though.

Let's say Drew and Ortiz are a wash offensively, Drew is 35 runs better than Manny in the field, Ortiz is 5 runs worse than Millar in the field and Minky's getting traded no matter what happens.

Trading Ortiz gets you 35 runs + his trade value + the $2 you save by keeping Ortiz instead of Millar
Keeping Ortiz gets you 30 runs + Drew's offense over Millar (WAG - 20 runs?).
   65. Larry Bowa Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:06 AM (#1033003)
It is so decreed!

Damn!

This is going to be really, really complicated - to execute and then to explain.


Intangibles always are. That's why you can't just look at WARP, ERA, TINSTAPP, JUGSTAPP, POP, or RBI. You need to look into a man's soul and see the depth of his intangibleness. Only then will true intangibility light your path to victory!
   66. Bobby Bonilla's Annuity (Matt) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:11 AM (#1033008)
Payton is a defensive superstar.

Payton is not a superstar.
   67. Cowboy Popup Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:13 AM (#1033013)
UZR says Payton is one of the best defensive players in the leage, thats all I meant by calling him a defensive superstar. I didn't mean to imply that his overall game was at superstar status, just his level of defensive play.
   68. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:13 AM (#1033014)
What are you trading Ortiz for, though? The Sox only have two roster areas open right now, C and SP. Which catcher or pitcher do you propose the Sox try to acquire?

Burnett would probably be a 10-20 run upgrade next year to the pitching staff, but then he'd be gone. And that's if the Marlins want a guy who's been playing DH.

If Ortiz can play first at all, I think it makes a lot more sense to keep him - in the scenario where the Sox take a run at JD Drew.
   69. JB H Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:21 AM (#1033025)
What are you trading Ortiz for, though?

If the Sox can still spend the 2 million they save efficiently (giving newly acquired Ramon Vazquez's job to newly unemployed David Eckstein would work), they can just trade Ortiz for prospects. They'd lose in the range of 5 runs this year and get a good deal of future value. Although I'd fear for Theo's safety if he did that.
   70. The Artist Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:21 AM (#1033028)
Someday, the person behind Larry should unmask themselves- he is pure gold.
   71. Phil Coorey. Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:26 AM (#1033033)
That stolen base was totally awesome. If it were decreed that I should be forced to perform deviant sexual acts on a stolen base, I would choose that stolen base.


I watch it at least twice a week on my computer. The goods
   72. Miko Supports Shane's Spam Habit Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:40 AM (#1033052)
What are you trading Ortiz for, though?

Doesn't he have a home in Wisconsin (he married a woman he met while playing A ball there)? They could include him in a trade to...for...
   73. greenback Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:44 AM (#1033061)
Another intangible worth having: knowing which teammates' wife to sleep with.

Where's John Brattain with an Anna Benson joke?

This thread's better than that other stupid Payton-Roberts thread.
   74. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:51 AM (#1033074)
FWIW, somebody on SoSH posted a BA scouting report on Pauley, from last offseason.

Apparently, Pauley's curve projects to be a plus pitch, and he has an actual fastball, too. Pauley's 2004 wasn't great, but it's nice to hear he has some upside.

Moving further off-topic, that Portland team is gonna be a hell of a lot of fun. The rotation should be Papelbon, Lester, Delcarmen, Pauley, Vaquedano/Cedeno - no filler. That's pretty cool.
   75. 6 - 4 - 3 Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:56 AM (#1033083)
UZR says Payton is one of the best defensive players in the leage, thats all I meant by calling him a defensive superstar. I didn't mean to imply that his overall game was at superstar status, just his level of defensive play.

Payton's among the top quartile of defensive centerfielders according to 2000-03 UZR, but I think calling him a "defensive superstar" is a bit of stretch. Very good defensive player is more apt, IMHO.
   76. Mikαεl Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:56 AM (#1033086)
Link to SoSH posting of scouting report.

Pauley’s best offering is a curveball that can become a plus pitch. His fastball has solid-average velocity, sitting at 88-91 mph and reaching 94, and has good life. Though he’s not big, he has a quick arm and throws hard without effort. His changeup is progressing nicely.
   77. Urban Faber Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:57 AM (#1033088)
Most importantly, it means that three of the four guys in MLB history named Dave Roberts will have played for the Padres. The other one played in the sixties before the Padres existed but I have no doubt he would have as well.
   78. Miko Supports Shane's Spam Habit Posted: December 21, 2004 at 07:56 AM (#1033195)
Whoa, Pauley's from Longmont, CO. That's just down the road from me. I hope he's better than Shawn Chacon (another guy with a big hook from this neck of the woods).
   79. yb125 Posted: December 21, 2004 at 09:43 AM (#1033276)
This is a bad but noe unsurprising deal for the padres. KT once again got lost trying to fill what he thought was a hole (lead off hitter/defensive CF) and overpaid for a guy who'll likely disappoint. Roberts had a decent year with LA and that likely played into this. Anyways this doesn't hurt the padres too much but unless Roberts has a his carear year it won't help them.
   80. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 21, 2004 at 10:01 AM (#1033281)
I just want to keep it simple. Sign Drew, stick him LF (or put him in RF and stick Nixon in LF), he may be a few runs less than Manny offensively, but he'll be a 26 run improvement if Drew is at 0 UZR.

Manny made 20 million last year, Drew will probably make 12 or so. I would be willing to pay 5 mil of Manny's salary if it meant that we'll be getting real assets back such as prospects. There would be also a saving of 3 million to go towards a bullpen arm.

Btw, I think Boston fans had to choose between Manny and Ortiz, they'd all choose Ortiz because Ortiz is cheaper, not to mention the fact that Manny was placed on waivers last seasno, and nobody cared then.
   81. IronChef Chris Wok Posted: December 21, 2004 at 10:08 AM (#1033283)
Btw, with my option, you'd keep Millar and Mientkiewcz all around. You'd keep Millar as the "swingman" since we all know Drew can get injured easily. In my drug induced reality I'd like to see Millar NEVER EVER step on the field with a glove ever again, but his righty bat will let him keep a MLB job. Doug plays as 1B, Ortiz fulltime DH.

Millar would act as the "swingman", his primary role would be a 4th OF, but he could soemtimes DH if Ortiz needs a break, sometimes play LF if Nixon/Drew needs a break, sometimes start at 1B (When facing a lefty pitcher), be the first pinch-hitter up during interleague play, etc. I think 350 PA's for Millar would not be out of the question. 350 PA's at .825 OPS is worth keeping him around.

I justify Douggie's existence on the Red Sox with his glove and glove alone. He's probably among the top 3 in terms of defensive 1B's and can step in 2B at a pinch, so he does have value, even as a defensive sub. I know his contract is a bit big, but realistically you can't get jack back in a trade anyway. You might as well keep him and use him to your advantage.
   82. Edmundo Posted: December 21, 2004 at 02:28 PM (#1033326)
San Diego has to steal Philly Weatherman Dave Howard then. The added bonus is that he's the father of David Borneaieauneaiouz (The "Angel" Dude).
   83. RP Posted: December 21, 2004 at 02:44 PM (#1033332)
Is Payton the 4th OF, or did something happen to J. Damon that I'm not aware of?

Damn...I was really hoping the Orioles would go after Payton (esp. given how little the Red Sox paid for him).
   84. Josh Posted: December 21, 2004 at 03:49 PM (#1033417)
If there is a taker for Nixon's contract, it makes the most sense to trade him. The injury risk is the same (if not worse for Nixon), Drew is significantly at everything, and the increase in price is basically either of the 1B.

And, Nixon -- if sold as healthy -- is not a negative value, like Manny.
   85. Josh Posted: December 21, 2004 at 03:50 PM (#1033419)
significantly better, that is.

This would also keep the team from being too lefty.
   86. villageidiom Posted: December 21, 2004 at 03:54 PM (#1033428)
Slow it down, folks.

First, if we pursue the interesting mental exercise of figuring out what to do if they get Drew, let's start with discussions of trading Damon, not "Manny Ortiz". Ortiz is productive and underpaid; he's not going anywhere. Manny is productive and overpaid, but unless someone else wants to take on that cost he's staying. I don't expect this to happen, nor do I expect the Sox to get into the business of paying people not to play for them.

Damon is the most likely to go. The odds of him repeating last year's performance are low; he'd have to repeat last year's performance for his contract to be worthwhile; and there are likely some teams out there that are willing to take that chance.

Second, if the impact of getting Drew is that the Yankees don't get Johnson, even if Drew sits on the bench 9/162 it's about a 2- or 3-win improvement in the standings over the alternative.
   87. Dr Love Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:01 PM (#1033435)
Maybe Philly will sign Tek instead?

They'd have to find a taker for Lieberthal's $7.5 million (a year) contract, and he's got 2 or 3 years on it.
   88. Kevin Sweet Child Romine (aco) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:01 PM (#1033437)
So, based on today's 40-man roster, I came up with this 25-man:

CMirabelli
1BMillar
2BBellhorn
3BMueller
SSRenteria
LFRamirez
CFDamon
RFNixon
CShoppach
IFVazquez
IFMientkiewicz
IFYoukilis
OFPayton
OFHyzdu
SPSchilling
SPClement
SPWells
SPArroyo
SPWakefield
CLFoulke
RPEmbree
RPTimlin
RPMantei
RPHalama
RPKim?

Not too shabby. Catcher is the biggest need, obviously. With Embree and Timlin a year older, I'd say a really effective set-up man would be most welcome.

Best case scenario as I see it: Drew is signed to play LF, Ortiz stays, someone takes Manny. Who, though? Mets? Dodgers, maybe? Since it's an idee fixe a for me, may I propose Manny + $ to Colorado for Helton?
   89. Kevin Sweet Child Romine (aco) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:05 PM (#1033439)
They'd have to find a taker for Lieberthal's $7.5 million (a year) contract, and he's got 2 or 3 years on it.

How's his defense?
   90. DCA Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:23 PM (#1033461)
KCSR --

You forgot Ortiz. I think one of Millar/Minky has to be dropped to make room for him, since the Sox can't go with fewer than 11 pitchers. Either that or Hyzdu or Youk goes to Pawtucket.
   91. Bob Loblaw Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:26 PM (#1033464)
aco, that's not a bad guess at what things will look like if the Red Sox don't do anything else, but I think there are two very possible changes.

First is that they'll go with 12 pitchers instead of five outfielders, especially since Millar can sort of play in the outfield.

Second is that the fifth outfield spot will go to Rule V pick Adam Stern instead of Hyzdu.

I'd still like Varitek to replace Shoppach on that list (unlike most of you, I don't care if they overpay him) and I'd like Millar to disappear from that list, but you're right, it looks pretty good already.
   92. Nate Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:27 PM (#1033467)
Calling all Mets fans...

One of the NY Papers is reporting that the Mets and Sox are talking Mientkiewictz, but that Theo wants too much. With Orber Moreno getting non-tendered (a guy I really want to sign now), I'm not sure what he could be asking for. He can't be asking for Milledge or Petit, can he?

What the hell could he be asking for? Aaron Heilman is asking for too much? Heath Bell? Did he ask for Zambrano to complete the horrible trades full circle? Does Victor Diaz help Boston at all -- now with Payton and Vazquez? Maybe that's it, Theo trying to stockpile cheap talent, but Mets like Diaz too much? The lack of anything resembling plate discipline would lead me to believe the Sox wouldn't be interested in him though.
   93. Dr Love Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:30 PM (#1033472)
How's his defense?

Well he won a Gold Glove in 99. I don't know his UZR or anything, but I can't see it as being bad. He had an absolutely terrible year at the plate in 04, if he went to bat 4 times in a game, he was swinging at the first pitch in 3 of those at bats. Except for last year though, he's been excellent at the plate for a catcher. However he was pointed to as being the leader of the muntiny to get Bowa out of town, and got KILLED in the media for it. And Lieberthal didn't do anything to stop that perception. He's also an injury liability.
   94. Kevin Sweet Child Romine (aco) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:38 PM (#1033483)
You forgot Ortiz.

Rrriiight. I thought it was odd that both Hyzdu and Kim were on the roster. Forgot the all-important DH position. So, I'll drop Youkilis [ducks]:

C Mirabelli
1B Millar
2B Bellhorn
3B Mueller
SS Renteria
LF Ramirez
CF Damon
RF Nixon
DH Ortiz
C ?
IF Vazquez
IF Mientkiewicz
OF Payton
OF Hyzdu
SP Schilling
SP Clement
SP Wells
SP Arroyo
SP Wakefield
CL Foulke
RP Embree
RP Timlin
RP Mantei
RP Halama
RP Kim
   95. Kevin Sweet Child Romine (aco) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:48 PM (#1033500)
Does Victor Diaz help Boston at all -- now with Payton and Vazquez?

I take it Victor Diaz's days at 2B are just a memory at this point? Not that the Sox need a 2B, really.

[Lieberthal] had an absolutely terrible year at the plate in 04, if he went to bat 4 times in a game, he was swinging at the first pitch in 3 of those at bats.

Sounds like something fixable. He still managed to put up a 100 OPS+ last year. Is he an injury risk beacuse he's a catcher in his 30's, or is there something else?
   96. Dr Love Posted: December 21, 2004 at 04:59 PM (#1033514)
Is he an injury risk beacuse he's a catcher in his 30's, or is there something else?

Well, that certainly doesn't help, but he's been hurt in the past... hmm... now that I look at it, he hasn't been hurt since 2001... I thought he was hurt in 02 or 03, but I was wrong. I stand (well actually I'm sitting) corrected, he's no more of an injury risk than any other catcher his age.
   97. Kevin Sweet Child Romine (aco) Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:09 PM (#1033530)
I'd still like Varitek to replace Shoppach on that list (unlike most of you, I don't care if they overpay him) and I'd like Millar to disappear from that list

I agree on both of these points, provided they don't guarantee Tek a 4th year. Millar has value, but he's too much of a liability anywhere in the field. Plus, he's a grating dufus.
   98. Darren Posted: December 21, 2004 at 05:42 PM (#1033580)
I'd be surprised if he wasn't asking for Petit or Milledge. As you note, there's not much else there that helps the Red Sox. And it can't hurt to ask for those guys and see if he'll go for it. Maybe those guys don't have the tools Omar likes.
   99. Nate Posted: December 21, 2004 at 06:32 PM (#1033661)
I'm like to think that Kevin, but I get this nagging feeling that as the negotations drag on and other FAs sign elsewhere, another team could get involved. Like maybe the White Sox, who made noise about acquiring a big player, then didn't but instead shed salary by moving Carlos Lee. Or perhaps the Rangers, who haven't signed anyone yet and there's always the Boras/Hicks connection (as tired as it is to bring up).

Maybe the Cardinals, although this seems unlikely unless they go really cheap at 2B/SS. Maybe some other team that I can't forsee. I just get the feeling the Sox won't be alone for long.
   100. The Polish Sausage Racer Posted: December 21, 2004 at 07:27 PM (#1033796)
Wouldn't it be worth paying too much for the admittedly fragile JD Drew just to hose the Yankees yet again on the Randy Johnson trade? I can smell the glee from here.
Page 1 of 2 pages  1 2 > 

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
danielj
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogHP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind
(58 - 4:30am, May 26)
Last: baudib

NewsblogBud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN
(87 - 3:55am, May 26)
Last: Athletic Supporter leads the nation in drifters

NewsblogOT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012
(1834 - 3:06am, May 26)
Last: Spivey

NewsblogHimrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods
(8 - 2:43am, May 26)
Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)

NewsblogBoston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff
(119 - 1:28am, May 26)
Last: Swedish Chef

NewsblogT.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer
(8 - 12:40am, May 26)
Last: The Gurus DO NOT BourbonSamurai

NewsblogWilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment
(12 - 12:25am, May 26)
Last: Tripon

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion
(15 - 12:13am, May 26)
Last: DanG

NewsblogThe Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime"
(4 - 11:26pm, May 25)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogCSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day
(18 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielder

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot
(28 - 11:25pm, May 25)
Last: lieiam

Sox TherapyA Winning Ballclub?
(20 - 11:24pm, May 25)
Last: Dan

NewsblogMatschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon?
(27 - 11:16pm, May 25)
Last: baudib

NewsblogTBO: Nerdy Rays head north
(17 - 10:07pm, May 25)
Last: PreservedFish

NewsblogDodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic
(22 - 9:38pm, May 25)
Last: Cris E

Buy MLB playoff tickets, plus 2011 World Series, 2011 ALCS tickets and NLCS game tickets. We also have Texas Rangers playoff schedule, tickets to Red Sox games and Yankees game tickets. Plus, buy Phillies baseball tickets, Tigers playoff tickets and the biggies like ALDS baseball tickets and 2011 NLDS tickets.

Demarini, Easton and TPX Baseball Bats

 

 

 

AllianceTickets.com has cheap MLB Tickets. Get all your Colorado Rockies Tickets, Seattle Mariners Tickets, San Francisco Giants Tickets and all your favorite baseball tickets here. We also carry cheap Denver Broncos Tickets, Seattle Seahawks Tickets and Denver Nuggets Tickets.

Page rendered in 0.6120 seconds
54 querie(s) executed