|
|
|
|
Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Monday, December 05, 2011
There aren’t many third basemen in the Hall of Fame; fewer still played during years easily comparable to those Santo played in. Via Fangraphs, here’s a look at cumulative WAR (Wins over Replacement Player, a stat designed to measure how much better a player is than a MLB-ready minor leaguer or easily signable free agent) among the HoF third basemen who played during or after Santo’s time…
In short, Santo was arguably better over time than his peers, even the great Brooks Robinson. By Baseball Prospectus’s numbers, Santo had two MVP-caliber years and finished just shy twice, despite never winning the award (a longtime knock on Santo’s candidacy). Only Mike Schmidt passed Santo before Santo’s health issues ended his career several years before a player of his caliber and position would usually retire. Which brings up the point that diabetes, at the time, was not well understood or treated; the usual comparison between yesterday’s players and today’s in the context of superior conditioning and training—pitchers pre- and post-Tommy John surgery, for instance—is only more dramatic in Santo’s case. Santo self-medicated with candy bars between innings, gauging his need based on his mood, a far cry from the technology available to today’s players.
It’s not just that Santo was underappreciated as a player, it’s that a player of Santo’s type was underappreciated until recently. He was a brilliant defensive third baseman, and for all his obvious skills as a hitter, his real offensive value was hidden in stats that baseball teams and nerds have only started to emphasize in recent years.
Thanks to Benny.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: T.R. Sullivan: Of Frank Robinson, Milt Pappas and Jim Palmer (9 - 5:29am, May 26)Last: bjhankeNewsblog: HP: Baseball is leaving the human factor behind (59 - 5:24am, May 26)Last: bjhankeNewsblog: Bud Selig -- No need for more MLB replay for now - ESPN (87 - 3:55am, May 26)Last: Athletic Supporter leads the nation in driftersNewsblog: OT: NBA Monthly Thread, May 2012 (1834 - 3:06am, May 26)Last:  SpiveyNewsblog: Himrich’s Top Ten Target Field Foods (8 - 2:43am, May 26)Last: Long John McCaine Mutiny on the Bounty (scott)Newsblog: Boston.com: Curt Schilling’s 38 Studios lays off all staff (119 - 1:28am, May 26)Last:  Swedish ChefNewsblog: Wilmoth: Nate McLouth Designated For Assignment (12 - 12:25am, May 26)Last: TriponHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1973 Discussion (15 - 12:13am, May 26)Last: DanGNewsblog: The Hall of Very Good: Former Cards Slugger Critical of "LaRussa's Regime" (4 - 11:26pm, May 25)Last: cardsfanboyNewsblog: CSN to host ‘Phillies at the Beach’ on Memorial Day (18 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: Fielder's the first baseman, Felder is the fielderHall of Merit: Most Meritorious Player: 1972 Ballot (28 - 11:25pm, May 25)Last: lieiamSox Therapy: A Winning Ballclub? (20 - 11:24pm, May 25)Last: DanNewsblog: Matschulat: Did I Miss The "Paul Konerko Is So Overrated OMG" Bandwagon? (27 - 11:16pm, May 25)Last: baudibNewsblog: TBO: Nerdy Rays head north (17 - 10:07pm, May 25)Last: PreservedFishNewsblog: Dodgers want to host NHL's Winter Classic (22 - 9:38pm, May 25)Last: Cris E
|
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. frannyzoo Posted: December 06, 2011 at 12:02 AM (#4007630)Yeah. The long-overdue inductions of both Santo and Bert Blyleven have to be seen as achievements of the steadily-growing influence of sabermetrics in the non-basement world.
Well, happy day all the same. Kind of a ###### shame that it happened almost a year to the day after he died.
Non-basement world? I guess we're no longer the underground.
We're through the looking glass now, people!
Jimmy Collins was brilliant. Cletis Boyer was brilliant. Santo was merely good.
Nevertheless, it's about time he got in. Shame on the BBWA for allowing him to die before he got in.
Well, when you read this quote today on FB from Danny Peary (noted film critic and co-author of Roger Maris: Baseball's Reluctant Hero..."When did people start thinking Ron Santo was a better player than Gil Hodges? A travesty."...you might think differently.
Congrats to Santo's family and friends. It was long overdue.
Bobby Grich!
That' what I was thinking. Is this golden era group going to meet every three years and discuss the same guys? Cause that's a recipe for getting more of them elected. No one wants to meet every 3 years and elect nobody.
They should disband the older committees soon, but you still need 1970-present.
Grich (as noted), Trammell, Whitaker, Stieb, etc. Plenty of deserving candidates.
Nah, but there is probably a screed from Murray Chass on how he and Miller are convinced it was that anti-union bastard Al Kaline who kept ol' Marv out of Cooperstown (his ineligibility for this particular group be damned).
Something nobody has mentioned today: Jim Kaat almost got elected today. He received 10 votes, falling just two short of induction. Hodges and Minoso got 9 votes, and Oliva got 8. Nobody else got 3.
That sounds about right to me - from this era, we're pretty much out of guys for whom you could make a compelling case they belong. I'm not sure why Kaat did so well...I predict there will be a lot of pressure for the committee to select Minoso when they next convene...
This is my reasoning for suggesting (the horror) that Blyleven would have been a Hall of Famer without Rich Lederer's campaign.
Grich (as noted), Trammell, Whitaker, Stieb, etc. Plenty of deserving candidates.
The problem is, they're going to elect guys like Mattingly, Dale Murphy, Ron Guidry...
Exactly. For every worthy player you mentioned, they're going to elect a few Jack Morris's and Steve Garvey's. Is it really worth it? I say no.
Really? There's knowledge and there's convincing those not privy to that knowledge, and not disposed to believing it, of it. PR, salesmanship--call it what you will, it was vital. He had to overcome an entrenched bias. That's hard--as everyone who has ever discussed anything with you (or I, or anyone who really believes in a thing) will attest. It's simple logic.
A year or so after his death, just like Santo.
@21: Ouch! We have a winner.
Steve
Thanks. If "off-the-field impact may have put him over the top with a few voters" then I wonder if other guys that think they are or will be close will start getting involved in charitible causes more than the otherwise might have. Will more guys try to polish their image?
Cyril
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main