Baseball Primer Newsblog— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand
Wednesday, May 30, 2012
As noted poet K. Lastima once noted…“Randomness can be at times random”.
But what’s really been killing the Cubs is how they hit in the clutch. In high-leverage situations—close games in late innings with runners on—the Cubs are hitting .195, tied for second-worst in the majors, with 36 RBI (also second-worst) and 67 strikeouts in 195 high-leverage at bats (far and away the worst). In high-pressure situations, they’re striking out one-third of the time. To put that in context, Bryan LaHair has the seventh-highest strikeout rate in baseball; the Cubs, as a team in their most important at bats, strike out just a bit more often than LaHair. The good news? No team has hit under .200 in high-leverage situations in the past decade, and only one team has hit under .210, the historically awful 119-loss Tigers of 2003. So that number will almost inevitably come up, and with it the Cubs’ record.
On the flip side of the inning, the team is just as bad on the mound in the clutch. In high-leverage situations, the Cubs have a 12.54 ERA, second-worst in baseball behind the Braves and over a full run behind the Cardinals. Their opponents in high-leverage situations have a .389 OBP, the highest in baseball, to go along with a .250 batting average and a .457 slugging percentage. By comparison, Alex Rodriguez is hitting .277/.361/.424 this year—basically, every batter they face when it really matters has been A-Rod.
|
Bookmarks
You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.
Hot Topics
Newsblog: Draft signings (117 - 5:48am, Jun 19)Last:  Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: Steinberg: St. Louis baseball writer makes hilarious jokes about the Nats (83 - 5:43am, Jun 19)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: [OTP-June] Economic Times: Hope politics, sports don’t get mixed up: Manmohan Singh (2117 - 4:52am, Jun 19)Last:  Greg (U)KNewsblog: Stan "The Fan" Charles: After Biogenesis, Should MLB Players Still Have The Right To Arbitration? (26 - 4:40am, Jun 19)Last: Gonfalon BubbleNewsblog: OT: The Soccer Thread June, 2013 (596 - 4:40am, Jun 19)Last:  Swedish ChefNewsblog: LATimes: Microsoft unveils new Xbox One console (211 - 4:22am, Jun 19)Last:  vivaelpujolsNewsblog: Schoenfield: Scherzer has turned into another Detroit ace (20 - 4:13am, Jun 19)Last: vivaelpujolsNewsblog: Murphy: Ruben Amaro Jr. doesn't "do" five-year plans, but the Phillies need a good one (24 - 4:12am, Jun 19)Last: Jack Carter, calling Beleaguered CastleNewsblog: ‘Old man’ Arroyo pitching better than ever (3 - 4:07am, Jun 19)Last: vivaelpujolsNewsblog: Quiz: Do you know MLB rules? - SportsNation - ESPN (24 - 3:33am, Jun 19)Last: Rob_WoodNewsblog: OMNICHATTER for June 18, 2013 (193 - 2:48am, Jun 19)Last:  Sleepy supports unauthorized ramblingNewsblog: OT: NBA Finals and June thread (912 - 2:39am, Jun 19)Last:  robinredNewsblog: WaPo - Sheinin | For Angels' Mike Trout, no ceiling applies (53 - 1:43am, Jun 19)Last: Walt DavisNewsblog: Kevin Youkilis needs back surgery, out 10-12 weeks (28 - 1:22am, Jun 19)Last: Infinite Joost (Voxter)Newsblog: Brian Cashman Calls Hitting Coach Kevin Long’s Stance On Teixeira ‘Alarming’ (48 - 12:11am, Jun 19)Last: RB in NYC (Now Semi-Retired from BBTF)
|
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. Gern Blanston Posted: May 30, 2012 at 09:05 AM (#4142836)Too wordy. C+.
But on the bright side, that's steep decline-phase A-Rod, not good A-Rod!
Who needs 'bad' when legendarily bad seems achievable?
I would have felt the same last year or maybe even 2010. An historically bad team is probably the last thing you want in the new regime's first year, unless, of course, we're pondering future draft pick slots.
I don't know - if you're ever going to have a historically bad year, it would seem like a new regime's first year is the time to do it... a new regime is the only sort of regime that can really survive a historically bad year.
Castro is slugging .443, after 433 last year -- Dunston didn't do that till he was in his 30s (and did so just as offense was beginning to take off).
I don't want to make excuses for that putrid BB/K ratio - but Castro isn't Dunston at the plate by any stretch. Castro has a much quicker bat and I've seen far fewer - if any - "Dunston classics", as we used to call those PA's where Dunston would sprint up to the plate, take Ruthian hacks at three straight sliders two feet off the plate, then bust his tail down to fist on the dropped 3rd strike.
Of course, Castro could use a little Dunston in the field... it might backfire into a colossally bad IF if you got both Castro's lackadaisical errors AND Dunston's hair on fire errors, but if they could cancel each other out...
Well, they've got a decent shot at breaking the team record for losses (103). Depends on what means by "historically bad" or "legendarily bad," I guess.
OK, Darwin Barney might be our best player. :-)
Too wordy. C+.
Agreed. Cubs Suck (in the Clutch too) is more direct.
Also what might the Angels or Phillies give us for Dempster right now?
Is there anything on the Phillies you'd particularly want? Most of the shiny objects I'd have wanted from Philly went to Houston in the Pence deal (Singleton, Santana, Cozart). Who's left in that system? Biddle maybe? Valle seems to have gone Goldbach.
LAA might be more fertile... a couple of interesting arms, but assuming both Bourjos and Trout are off limits/laughable for Dempster (or Garza) - I'd have a difficult time figuring out what I'd want. The bloom is way off Conger and Segura.
I'd say that Castro isn't really as good as BRef's WAR says he is nor do I think Barney is as good as they say he is.
Can the Cubs play the Padres all of the time?
Am not clear what you mean. Do you mean DRS recognizes that he's started "out of position" and only rates him for plays relative to starting position? Or do you mean DRS ignores starting position and is giving him credit for lots of OOZ plays? Or are you saying that UZR discards data for plays where a shift was on? (that would be a very bad idea I'd think) I didn't realize any of the systems were adjusting for shifts.
Is there anything on the Phillies you'd particularly want?
Not a clue which is why I asked. Those are just the two teams that have lost big name pitchers recently (Weaver and Halladay) and the Angels have the extra annoyance that the Rangers added Oswalt. So if anybody was looking to upgrade right now (instead of in 6 weeks) it would be those two. But I'd happily trade him to Toronto or the Orioles or, hell, the Cardinals if we can get good stuff back from one of them.
They've got to be feeling a little queasy about the contract they dished out to Derek Holland this winter.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main