Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Thursday, January 03, 2013



One and done.

I placed an X next to Jack Morris on my Hall of Fame ballot, and I was finished voting. If Morris is elected, I will most likely be finished voting period. If Morris is not elected this time, I will vote for him next year in his final year of eligibility and then be done.

Barring a change in my thinking, which I don’t expect, I believe the time has come to relinquish my right as a 10-year (actually 50-year) member of the Baseball Writers Association of America to vote in the Hall of Fame election.

I offer two reasons for my decision.

  1- Though I don’t believe there is a more qualified set of electors, certainly not the new-age stats guys who are envious of the writers and believe they should determine Hall of Famers, I don’t think reporters and columnists who cover and comment on baseball news should be making baseball news.
  2- The steroids issue has made it impossible to conduct a rational vote and cast a reasonable ballot. No matter how a writer votes or on what he bases his decision whom to vote for or not to vote for, his reasoning has to be flawed and open to challenge.

I have read and heard all sorts of explanations for voting or not voting for players listed on the ballot, the focus falling on players known to have used performance-enhancing substances (i.e. those who tested positive) or those who were suspected or having used them (especially those cases where circumstantial evidence e of use was strong).

...Now, you might ask and reasonably so, if I plan to stop voting, why did I vote this year? I voted in the hope that my vote would contribute to Morris’ election. I didn’t vote for anyone else because anyone I might have considered was a known or suspected cheater, and I didn’t want to aid and abet a cheater.

I think I am safe in concluding that Morris did not cheat. I know the stats zealots don’t think Morris is a Hall of Famer because his rankings in their new-fangled ratings fall below their standards. But they don‘t have a formula for intestinal fortitude or determination.

Repoz Posted: January 03, 2013 at 12:33 PM | 103 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: hof

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2
   101. Andere Richtingen Posted: January 04, 2013 at 11:29 PM (#4339456)
It's good to see the Hall of Fame enshrinement thing imploding on the force of its own stupidity. And it was stupid before this steroid business came along.

The Hall of Fame is great as a museum. It is not a church, and there should be no sainthood.
   102. J.R. Wolf Posted: January 04, 2013 at 11:55 PM (#4339467)
"Don't worry about him, he's just a hateful crank that should have died in 1980."

Wow, and I thought that I had a bad opinion of the old crank.
   103. Sheer Tim Foli Posted: January 05, 2013 at 12:50 AM (#4339493)
Did he throw in "new fangled" as a bit of a grist for the younger folks' mill? A little poke? Or does he really talk that way and that was completely free of irony?
Page 2 of 2 pages  < 1 2

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.



<< Back to main

BBTF Partner

Support BBTF


Thanks to
Andere Richtingen
for his generous support.


You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogOTP 2016 Oct 17: Politics, Sports, and the 'League of Legends' World Championship
(2085 - 3:31am, Oct 24)
Last: David Nieporent (now, with children)

NewsblogWhy Steve Bartman should throw the first pitch at Game 3 of the World Series
(68 - 1:16am, Oct 24)
Last: Slivers of Maranville descends into chaos (SdeB)

Newsblogred sox - Inside story of David Ortiz's injury: 'He was essentially playing on stumps' - WEEI | Rob Bradford
(34 - 12:55am, Oct 24)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogESPN: Stark: Why super teams don't win the World Series
(18 - 11:22pm, Oct 23)
Last: ERROR---Jolly Old St. Nick

NewsblogOT: NBA 2016-17 Preseason Thread
(234 - 11:06pm, Oct 23)
Last: knowledge is STIGGLES, france is bacon

NewsblogWelcome back, Kyle Schwarber! | 2080 Baseball
(17 - 9:25pm, Oct 23)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogOT: October-November 2016 Soccer Thread
(73 - 9:16pm, Oct 23)
Last: jmurph

Gonfalon CubsNL pennant thread
(35 - 9:13pm, Oct 23)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogNLCS Game 6 Chatter
(675 - 8:55pm, Oct 23)
Last: Howie Menckel

Newsblog2016 Season Prediction OMNICHATTER
(80 - 5:13pm, Oct 23)
Last: Kiko Sakata

NewsblogEpstein on Cubs clinching NLCS |
(6 - 5:04pm, Oct 23)
Last: Kiko Sakata

NewsblogSunday Notes: DH Dilemma, Indians, Gallardo, Glasnow, HoF Managers, more | FanGraphs Baseball
(3 - 5:02pm, Oct 23)
Last: escabeche

NewsblogVerlander deal? Astros all-in? Why MLB hot stove could be trade-heavy | New York Post
(3 - 4:55pm, Oct 23)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogProspect Retrospective: Ricky Vaughn, RHP, Cleveland Indians - Minor League Ball
(13 - 2:07pm, Oct 23)
Last: Man o' Schwar

Hall of MeritMost Meritorious Player: 2016 Discussion
(6 - 7:17am, Oct 23)
Last: bjhanke

Page rendered in 0.1418 seconds
49 querie(s) executed