Fay Vincent, the former commissioner, was skeptical of the denials.
“Who’s going to believe the players after Rose and Armstrong?” he asked, referring to Pete Rose, in whose banishment from baseball he was involved, and Lance Armstrong. “Some of them are telling the truth, but it’s difficult to believe them after everything.”
Vincent favors a drug-testing rule similar to baseball’s rule prohibiting betting on baseball. Violate the rule once, and you’re out.
“The rule has worked,” he said in a telephone interview. “That deterrent really works. I think we’re going to come to it in baseball. Three bites at the steroids apple doesn’t work.”
M.L.B. and the union have made testing increasingly harder for players to evade positive tests. The two sides have agreed to blood testing for the first time, and players, Manfred said, will find it more difficult to use the kind of drug regimen alleged Biogenesis players might have used.
Vincent, though, raised another deterrent, the one that is used in Saudi Arabia to stop people from committing any kind of theft. Thieves, he pointed out, have their hands cut off.
“Petty theft doesn’t exist with the Saudis,” he said.
Repoz
Posted: February 02, 2013 at 10:14 AM |
22 comment(s)
Login to Bookmark
Tags:
steroids,
yankees
Reader Comments and Retorts
Go to end of page
Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.
1. John Northey Posted: February 02, 2013 at 11:07 AM (#4360610)I guess the one function Vincent can serve in life is to make us feel better about Bud Selig. Imagine if they actually let this guy be the commissioner?
Betting is betting; there are no shades of gray, no changing the definition.
But PEDs? Andro wasn't considered a PED when McGwire had it in his locker; there's still debate about whether hGh really does anything worthwhile. Heck, even in the Olympics (model of virtue and "clean sport" that it is) didn't test for anything until a cylcist died in the 60's Olympics (ironically, his doping appears to have nothing to do with his death).
If Vicnent believes that bans for misconduct should be permanent, why did he allow George Steinbrenner allowed back into baseball?
One rule for owners, one rule for players.
But two bites* would? The difference doesn't seem big enough to get that worked up over, or to put that much faith in.
*"Violate the rule once, and you’re out." only pertains to gambling on games where one had a duty to perform. Rule 21 specifies different penalties for different infractions.
I realize there's no reason for millionaires to give a shit about anyone else, but highly visible ballplayers agreeing to blood testing is going to make it easier elsewhere.
Don't you mean harder? They gave up their personal privacy rights, what kind of example is that?
What's with the banning crap?
Willie Mays and Mickey Mantle were given lifetime bans, and reinstated.
George Steinbrenner was banned, and reinstated.
Judge Landis banned players who held out, including a player who had a paycuts forced on him and refused to play asking for his release. He banned a player for playing in an exhibition game simply because some banned players were in the game. He banned a player for sending a drunken letter to a friend on another team saying he hated his manager so much he was willing to quit during the pennant chase.
Is part of the many problems with Chass that he really doesn't understand that those people lying doesn't mean these people are lying? Is Chass married? When he reads that Ashton Kutcher cheated, does he start looking at his wife funny?
Is he capable of understanding that with a large group of people, some number of those people are going to be liars, or cheats, or whatever category you want to think of, and that's no reflection on everyone else; it is simply, all but inevitable?
Chass would have to show a pattern peculiar to ballplayers, and he'd be best off in this... campaign... to show that pattern is more extensive among them than it is for a general population. Thing is, I don't think his mind works that way.
I think some of what we take for willful neanderthal-like behavior is only the bafflement and anger from people who cannot understand how basic reasoning and induction works; they think that people who do are getting away with something, or being 'clever'. I don't think Chass understands how to look at a population wrt certain behaviors.
Would this work for bad writing, too?
Easier for authorities elsewhere to get blood testing done on folks.
Nope, not that either.
MLB Network interviewed Ken Davidoff the other evening right after the Bosch "news" broke. Davidoff very frankly stated that you could provide for the death penalty for the first failed PED test and some guys would STILL use. The incentives and egos are just too great at the Major League level.
You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.
<< Back to main