Baseball for the Thinking Fan

Login | Register | Feedback

btf_logo
You are here > Home > Baseball Newsstand > Baseball Primer Newsblog > Discussion
Baseball Primer Newsblog
— The Best News Links from the Baseball Newsstand

Tuesday, February 19, 2013

Musmeci: Melky Cabrera Doesn’t Deserve a World Series Ring

No Melky ring today, my love has gone away!

I am a fan of the team and will cheer for anyone on the roster.  For the past three seasons, management has put on the field a team that brought the first two World Series Championships in the San Francisco Giants era.

But as of today, I am mad at the San Francisco Giants.

...I’m mad at the Giants for not taking a stand against giving Cabrera a ring.  If he did not get a ring, what’s Melky going to do?  Complain?  If he complains, the fresh-start he’s been given by the Toronto Blue Jays would start off in a negative fashion – not exactly the quiet start he wants.  Are the Giants afraid of the MLB Players Association filing a grievance?  I think there’s more than enough evidence to support the team’s desire not to give him a ring.

When there is a reunion of the 2012 World Series Champions in the year 2022, will Cabrera be invited?  I can go on record and say absolutely NOT.  So if he’s not even welcome at an reunion game, he shouldn’t bear the ring of a miracle season that he was only a minor part of … not to mention it was all illegal in baseball terms.

In a bit of good news, NO MORE “MELK-MAN” OUTFITS.

That alone may deserving of a ring.

Repoz Posted: February 19, 2013 at 07:55 PM | 19 comment(s) Login to Bookmark
  Tags: giants

Reader Comments and Retorts

Go to end of page

Statements posted here are those of our readers and do not represent the BaseballThinkFactory. Names are provided by the poster and are not verified. We ask that posters follow our submission policy. Please report any inappropriate comments.

   1. GuyMcGuffin Posted: February 19, 2013 at 08:13 PM (#4372274)
Does José Guillen have to give back his 2010 World Series ring too? Or does that not register high enough on the grandstanding scale to merit a mention?
   2. GregD Posted: February 19, 2013 at 08:43 PM (#4372287)
Who cares?
   3. Dock Ellis Posted: February 19, 2013 at 08:44 PM (#4372289)
When there is a reunion of the 2002 National League Champions in the year 2022, will Barry Bonds be invited?
   4. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: February 19, 2013 at 09:47 PM (#4372319)
A few of those ol' championship reunions are going to be depopulated wastelands.
   5. Moeball Posted: February 19, 2013 at 09:52 PM (#4372321)
When there is a reunion of the 2002 National League Champions in the year 2022, will Barry Bonds be invited?


Or, for that matter, the 2002 Angels and Troy Glaus?

As much of a blowhard as Curt Schilling is, he may be right about one thing - I don't believe there has been a single WS champion in the last 20 years that wasn't heavily "tainted"...
   6. Blastin Posted: February 19, 2013 at 10:35 PM (#4372336)
Melky already has a ring, ya know...
   7. Calvin T. Posted: February 19, 2013 at 10:38 PM (#4372338)
Do have to agree with the general point of the author.

I'm not one that is passionate about the steroid issue. But you just can't have an organization be so inconsistent. Either you give Cabrera a ring AND you extend an invite to the reunion ceremony or you do not do either. This is just another example of a team trying to have it both ways.

I'm really not sure how you rally fans around this issue but the Giants really do need to be taught a lesson on this for their inconsistency.
   8. Random Transaction Generator Posted: February 19, 2013 at 11:01 PM (#4372346)
Either you give Cabrera a ring AND you extend an invite to the reunion ceremony or you do not do either. This is just another example of a team trying to have it both ways.

Domingo Martinez has TWO World Series rings (1992/93 Toronto Blue Jays) but I don't think he gets invited to the reunion ceremonies.
What about players that are traded away mid-season and get a ring? I'm pretty sure they don't get invited to the reunion ceremonies.
   9. Pasta-diving Jeter (jmac66) Posted: February 19, 2013 at 11:06 PM (#4372350)
As much of a blowhard as Curt Schilling is, he may be right about one thing - I don't believe there has been a single WS champion in the last 20 years that wasn't heavily "tainted"...

which means, by definition, that no one is
   10. The Yankee Clapper Posted: February 19, 2013 at 11:17 PM (#4372357)
Isn't who gets a ring covered in the CBA? Think there is a minimum based on service time, which Melky meets. Teams can give out more, but not less, IIRC. "Deserve" doesn't have much to do with it.
   11. flournoy Posted: February 19, 2013 at 11:29 PM (#4372365)
I'm really not sure how you rally fans around this issue but the Giants really do need to be taught a lesson on this for their inconsistency.


What lesson do the Giants need to be taught? They haven't held any reunion ceremonies yet, so they haven't had a chance to invite or not invite Melky Cabrera to them. Where is the inconsistency? Did you time travel twenty years into the future?
   12. morineko Posted: February 19, 2013 at 11:41 PM (#4372369)
I think the Giants sent Todd Wellemeyer's ring for 2010 to the Cubs' extended spring training facility. Hopefully he got it before he reported to Iowa (for the 3 days he was actually there.)
   13. SoSH U at work Posted: February 20, 2013 at 12:12 AM (#4372373)

Isn't who gets a ring covered in the CBA? Think there is a minimum based on service time, which Melky meets. Teams can give out more, but not less, IIRC. "Deserve" doesn't have much to do with it.


I'm not sure the CBA covers rings (at least to the same degree it covers playoff shares). I think there would be no choice in the matter regarding Melky getting a full share, but I don't know if he automatically receives a ring.
   14. Gonfalon Bubble Posted: February 20, 2013 at 12:24 AM (#4372376)
As much of a blowhard as Curt Schilling is, he may be right about one thing - I don't believe there has been a single WS champion in the last 20 years that wasn't heavily "tainted"

The best part about Schilling's views on the subject-- and in this case, the plural "views" more than applies-- is that he's gone from publicly calling for steroid-aided statistics and titles to be offically invalidated, to publicly saying that the suggestion that the Red Sox' championships were in any way tainted due to steroids was nothing but haters hatin', to publicly saying pffft, all the teams were equally implicated so what can ya do? Whatever side of the fence you're on, Curt Schilling agrees with you.
   15. Walt Davis Posted: February 20, 2013 at 01:31 AM (#4372384)
Two words: Guillermo Mota
   16. Tom (and his broom) Posted: February 20, 2013 at 01:59 AM (#4372395)
The CBA doesn't mention rings per se...but what it does say is that teams cannot impose additional punishments after the league suspends a player.

Unless you can find a precedent (and you won't) of a player with similar playing time for WS champion not getting a ring then you have to give him one.

The Giants management have emphatically said they will give him a ring, I think the exact words were along the lines of "We never even discussed it, of course he gets one, he deserves one."
   17. Shock Posted: February 20, 2013 at 02:16 AM (#4372397)
Until the Giants are ready to concede all the wins they had with Melky on the team and concede winning the world series, it is absurd to not give Melky a ring.
   18. RMc's Yelling Mob of Hackmen Posted: February 20, 2013 at 08:16 AM (#4372438)
None of the Giants would have @#$! ring if the Tigers had bothered to show up for the #$@% Series...

\yes, still bitter
   19. Voros McCracken of Pinkus Posted: February 20, 2013 at 10:36 AM (#4372561)
Maybe they should send him a watch instead.

You must be Registered and Logged In to post comments.

 

 

<< Back to main

News

All News | Prime News

Old-School Newsstand


BBTF Partner

Support BBTF

donate

Thanks to
JPWF13
for his generous support.

Bookmarks

You must be logged in to view your Bookmarks.

Hot Topics

NewsblogThe Baseballist: Three Reasons Why Adding DH Makes Sense For NL | BaseballAmerica.com
(62 - 11:24pm, Apr 23)
Last: Rennie's Tenet

NewsblogJason Heyward swinging hot bat early for Cubs | MLB.com
(14 - 11:19pm, Apr 23)
Last: shoewizard

NewsblogSmokeless Tobacco is Gone From the Ballpark, if Not the Clubhouse
(15 - 11:15pm, Apr 23)
Last: vortex of dissipation

NewsblogOTP 17 April 2017: Baseball, giant American flags, and patriotism
(1385 - 11:12pm, Apr 23)
Last: Random Transaction Generator

NewsblogOT - March 2017 NBA thread
(2290 - 11:08pm, Apr 23)
Last: LA Podcasting Hombre of Anaheim

NewsblogLettuce, tomato, and OMNICHATTER sandwich, April 23, 2017
(94 - 11:01pm, Apr 23)
Last: What did Billy Ripken have against ElRoy Face?

Hall of MeritBaseball Prospectus: Japanese Baseball: How Good Is It?
(28 - 10:52pm, Apr 23)
Last: Bleed the Freak

Hall of MeritThe Baseball Hall of Merit: Important Links
(25 - 10:48pm, Apr 23)
Last: Bleed the Freak

NewsblogWatch Matt Barnes Get Ejected For Throwing At Manny Machado Despite Foul Ball
(28 - 10:41pm, Apr 23)
Last: Jose is El Absurd Pollo

NewsblogTake the pledge: Let's banish pitcher wins, losses from baseball conversations
(68 - 9:41pm, Apr 23)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogOT: March-April 2017 Soccer Thread
(309 - 8:55pm, Apr 23)
Last: AuntBea calls himself Sky Panther

Gonfalon CubsAssorted Week 1 Thoughts
(39 - 8:19pm, Apr 23)
Last: Walt Davis

NewsblogRangers' Joey Gallo hits hardest homer of 2017 | MLB.com
(13 - 6:08pm, Apr 23)
Last: ReggieThomasLives

NewsblogRed Sox coaches still don't want hitters thinking about hitting for power - providencejournal.com
(20 - 5:58pm, Apr 23)
Last: cardsfanboy

NewsblogEarly AL Rookie of Year debate shows Yankees’ plan at work | New York Post
(3 - 4:59pm, Apr 23)
Last: Walt Davis

Page rendered in 0.3919 seconds
47 querie(s) executed